Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ultrafast imaging of terahertz electric waveforms using quantum dots

Abstract

Microscopic electric fields govern the majority of elementary excitations in condensed matter and drive electronics at frequencies approaching the Terahertz (THz) regime. However, only few imaging schemes are able to resolve sub-wavelength fields in the THz range, such as scanning-probe techniques, electro-optic sampling, and ultrafast electron microscopy. Still, intrinsic constraints on sample geometry, acquisition speed and field strength limit their applicability. Here, we harness the quantum-confined Stark-effect to encode ultrafast electric near-fields into colloidal quantum dot luminescence. Our approach, termed Quantum-probe Field Microscopy (QFIM), combines far-field imaging of visible photons with phase-resolved sampling of electric waveforms. By capturing ultrafast movies, we spatio-temporally resolve a Terahertz resonance inside a bowtie antenna and unveil the propagation of a Terahertz waveguide excitation deeply in the sub-wavelength regime. The demonstrated QFIM approach is compatible with strong-field excitation and sub-micrometer resolution—introducing a direct route towards ultrafast field imaging of complex nanodevices in-operando.

Introduction

The detection of radiation—including human vision—is typically sensitive to the energy carried by an electromagnetic wave rather than its fields. Heinrich Hertz succeeded to prove the existence of electromagnetic fields by conversion into incoherent visible fluorescence1. Today, electric waveforms can coherently be sampled with ultrashort laser pulses2,3,4 to directly access the temporal signatures of charge motion and quasi-particle excitations in condensed matter systems up to the visible spectrum5. Yet, relevant field distributions are often confined to microscopic scales significantly below the diffraction limit—arising from inhomogeneity of materials, microstructures or intrinsic confinement of light-matter excitations6,7,8. Only a few approaches spatially resolve local electric near-field waveforms up to multi-Terahertz frequencies, including raster-scanned photoconductive switches and electro-optic microscopy9,10,11,12,13. Enhanced resolution is provided by scattering near-field optical microscopy14,15,16,17, THz-driven scanning tunneling microscopy18,19 and recently emerging ultrafast electron microscopy20,21,22. THz-induced visible luminescence has been employed for imaging spatial field distributions via temporally cumulated effects of strong local fields23,24,25,26. Sampling THz electric waveforms in the time-domain using visible fluorescence appears highly desirable as it bears numerous prospects including the access to nanoscopic scales, 3D geometries, high-speed acquisition, and compatibility with strong local fields inside active and nonlinear-driven devices7,27,28,29,30.

Here, we demonstrate ultrafast far-field imaging of THz electric near-fields using fluorescence microscopy. We capture visible photons from local quantum dot probes and acquire stroboscopic movies of electric near-field evolutions. The scheme employs the quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE)31,32,33, encoding electric near-fields into far-field luminescence modulations via variations of photo-absorption, illustrated in Fig. 1. THz-induced quasi-instantaneous interactions were previously reported for diverse 0D-quantum systems26,34,35. Harnessing this mechanism, we perform spatially resolved time-domain spectroscopy, and demonstrate the imaging capabilities by resolving the ultrafast electric waveforms of (a) the localized THz resonance of a bowtie antenna and (b) the propagating THz gap excitation inside a micro-slit waveguide. Akin to plasmonics in the visible and near-infrared spectrum, these highly localized excitations arise from collective oscillations of the electron plasma constrained by sub-wavelength geometries.

Fig. 1: Quantum-Probe Field Microscopy (QFIM).
figure 1

a Imaging of THz electric near-fields in a fluorescence microscope using quantum dot (QD) luminescence. The absorption of ultrashort visible sampling pulses (green) is modulated via the quantum-confined Stark effect in a layer of nanocrystals (red). b The THz-induced change in the QD band structure can increase the absorption and translates to enhanced luminescence emission, accessible by optical microscopy. The modulated fluorescence yield SQFIM=STHz−S0 encodes the instantaneous local electric field and snapshot images resolve the spatio-temporally evolution of the near-field waveform

Results

Our experiments are based on two-color excitation using single-cycle Terahertz pulses to drive phase-stable near-fields and visible fs-pulses to excite the quantum dot probes, see Fig. 1a. The incident THz pulses at electric field strengths up to 400 kV/cm are enhanced in lithographically patterned gold structures. Colloidal CdSe-CdS core-shell nanocrystals, similarly used in voltage sensing applications36,37, are deposited as a homogeneous layer of quantum-probes via drop-casting. Luminescence is excited via wide-field illumination in the image plane of a fluorescence microscope with ~150 fs pulses at wavelengths around 500 nm. We acquire differential images of the emission yield with a CCD camera in the presence and absence of THz excitation. The difference signal, which we refer to as the QFIM signal SQFIM in the following, represents the crucial observable for instant local fields.

First, we follow the ultrafast near-field evolution inside a THz antenna structure, shown in Fig. 2a, with sub-cycle temporal resolution by acquiring a sequence of snapshot images at increasing delays between THz and visible pulses. Figure 2b shows nine exemplary frames out of a series with temporal separation of Δτ = 30 fs (full movie in Media 1). We observe a strong enhancement in the antenna gap and close to the terminal bars (THz polarization ~0° to the antenna axis). The signal is maximized at the edge of each antenna leg and decays symmetrically towards the center of the bowtie as apparent in the snapshot at Δτ = 0 fs in Fig. 2c, demonstrating a spatial resolution of ~2 µm (see Supplementary Information). This pattern visually matches finite-element simulations of the THz electric near-field, shown in Fig. 2d, and strongly depends on the incident polarization (data for THz polarization ~90° to the antenna axis in Supplementary Information). Based on the simulated field enhancement and the incident peak field of ~400 kV/cm, we estimate a maximum near-field strength of ~10 MV/cm.

Fig. 2: Evolution of THz near-fields in a resonant bowtie antenna.
figure 2

a Optical micrograph of the THz bowtie resonator. b A series of subsequent microscopic snapshots at selected delays tracks the THz near-field with sub-cycle temporal resolution (incident THz polarization as indicated). c QFIM snapshot at the peak local field at Δτ= 0 fs. d The simulated spatial near-field distribution at resonance in the gap region closely resembles the QFIM signal in (c). e A snapshot acquired in transient transmission contrast (Δτ = 0 fs) corroborates the field-driven absorption modulation as the origin of the QFIM signal

Analyzing the QFIM signal inside the gap, we demonstrate the extraction of local electric waveforms and characterize the temporal response of the bowtie antenna. As a prerequisite, we study the relation between the maximum field strength F and the peak signal of SQFIM. Measurements with varying incident field strengths yield the dependence SQFIM F1.9 for the quantum dots used in the experiment, as evident in the double-logarithmic representation in Fig. 3b. Thus, the peak signal scales nonlinearly with the maximum incoming field34. Employing the rectifying relation and the incident far-field waveform—obtained from calibrated conventional electro-optic sampling (EOS)—, we simulate the local near-field and the resulting QFIM signal using a finite-element time-domain simulation of the structure and find close agreement with the experimental QFIM trace, see Fig. 3a. The comparison of the incident THz waveform and the simulated near-field evolution is shown in Fig. 3c with corresponding spectra in Fig. 3d. Alternatively, a reconstruction of the near-field in a resonator can be obtained by adapting a single resonance model to the QFIM data, as shown in the Supplementary Information. Depending on the signal quality, direct extraction of near-field waveforms appears feasible via recovery of the polarity and reversal of the nonlinear QFIM signal.

Fig. 3: QFIM signal and near-field waveform inside a bowtie antenna.
figure 3

a Local QFIM signal in the gap of the bowtie (blue circles) and the modeled temporal luminescence evolution (gray) based on the incident waveform. b Scaling of the peak QFIM signal (circles) as a function of the maximum incident field strength. c Comparison of the driving far-field waveform (green) and the simulated local near-field inside the bowtie gap (red). d Corresponding spectra of both waveforms shown in (c)

The underlying mechanism enabling the QFIM scheme relies on THz-driven modulations of the electronic band structure in low-dimensional quantum systems31,32, i.e., the QCSE in semiconductor nanocrystals33. The altered electron and hole wavefunctions induce a quasi-instantaneous change of the optical transition dipole moment. As a result, the photoabsorption may be reduced or enhanced depending on the visible excitation frequency and the accessed electronic states, as previously resolved via transient absorption spectroscopy35. We spatially map these changes via luminescence emission microscopy. Specifically, we note that irrespective of much longer luminescence lifetimes (~10 ns), the temporal sampling resolution is exclusively governed by the ultrafast absorption process. This quasi-instantaneous absorption can alternatively be accessed via transient absorption imaging of the antenna, as shown, e.g., for Δτ = 0 fs in Fig. 2e, yielding a pattern complementary to the QFIM signal.

Now, we demonstrate the field-resolved tracking of propagating ultrafast THz excitations using the QFIM scheme. Specifically, we spatio-temporally resolve a THz wavepacket traveling along the subwavelength slit of a gold waveguide, as depicted in Fig. 4a. We map the temporal evolution of the QFIM signal along the gap in a 2D representation (x, Δτ) in Fig. 4b, resolving two distinct features: First, the horizontal lines arise from the direct field enhancement inside the gap extending over the THz focus. Subsequently, the tilted feature reveals the propagation of a THz gap excitation with a velocity cprop below c0 emerging from the left edge of the structure. Such propagating plasmonic excitations are confined inside a subwavelength slit and provide the basis for ultrafast circuits—enabling the routing, nanofocusing, and enhancement of infrared radiation12,38,39,40,41,42. We corroborate our finding with a time-domain electromagnetic simulation of the ultrafast interaction (see “Materials and methods”), yielding the launching of a THz wavepacket from the edge with a propagation velocity cprop (white solid line in Fig. 4b) in agreement with the experimental QFIM dataset. This gap excitation manifests as a spatially oscillating electric field distribution along the slit—in contrast to the unidirectional field of the direct enhancement, illustrated by the simulated fields at two exemplary temporal delays (Δτ1 = 0 ps, Δτ2 = 1 ps) in Fig. 4d. In correspondence to Fig. 4b, c, we present the simulated electric near-fields as a spatio-temporal map in Fig. 4e. The simulation yields a phase velocity of the waveguide excitation between the vacuum and the substrate of cprop ~ c0/2. Moreover, we also reproduce the experimentally observed interference of the direct and the propagating pulses. We attribute the different propagation lengths of experiment and simulation to the idealized homogeneous microstructure assumed in the model43. Furthermore, the simulation yields a second gap excitation at the opposite side of the THz waveguide. We experimentally resolve this feature in a QFIM measurement acquired at the right side of the waveguide in Fig. 4c.

Fig. 4: Temporal imaging of a propagating THz gap excitation.
figure 4

a Launching of a THz waveguide excitation in a micro-slit driven at normal incidence (2 µm gap). b 2D representation (x, Δτ) of the normalized QFIM waveforms along the slit temporally disentangles the spatially homogeneous direct response of the slit (direct field enhancement) and a THz gap excitation propagating along the waveguide. The peak electric field inside the waveguide propagates with a velocity below c0 (dashed line) as quantitatively predicted by time-domain electromagnetic simulation (cprop, solid line). c The reversed propagation direction is observed via QFIM for excitation at the opposite side of the waveguide. d Simulated electric field distributions for two temporal delays illustrate the homogeneous direct enhancement (Δτ1 = 0 ps) and the propagating THz excitation (Δτ2 = 1 ps). e 2D representation (x, Δτ) of the simulated electric field evolution along the gap in correspondence to (b, c)

Discussion

We introduce Quantum-probe Field Microscopy to image ultrafast electric near-field waveforms in the time-domain. Our approach utilizes the encoding of momentary THz-fields onto the visible emission of nanocrystals and far-field fluorescence imaging. The underlying THz field-driven and quasi-instantaneous QCSE provides a direct link between the luminescence observable and the local electric fields. On this basis, we demonstrate the time-resolved microscopy of near-field waveforms inside a single bowtie antenna—a building block of ultrahigh-frequency devices, metamaterials, and strong-field light-matter interaction experiments27,28. Moreover, we observe THz propagation inside a gap deeply in the sub-wavelength regime and, thus, introduce the ultrafast sampling of propagating electric fields inside confined structures in the time domain. These results motivate the application of QFIM for imaging electric waveforms of surface excitations, including THz phonon and plasmon polaritons on bulk surfaces and 2D heterostructures44,45. In contrast to near-field scattering microscopy based on nanotips, our scheme is compatible with strong driving fields and we envision unprecedented insights to THz-driven nonlinear dynamics, such as interactions between polaritonic wavepackets7,29. Finally, we highlight the prospect of QFIM for imaging THz fields at the nanoscale using optical super-resolution microscopy46, paving a promising way towards ultrafast nanoscopy of strong electric fields inside nonlinearly driven nanosystems.

Materials and methods

Ultrafast QFIM microscope

We generate high-field single-cycle THz pulses by the tilted pulse front method47 in a MgO:LiNbO3 crystal using pulses from an amplified 10 kHz Yb-laser system (central wavelength 1030 nm, pulse energy 1 mJ), see Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Information. For the quantum dot excitation, we employ laser pulses from an optical parametric amplifier (OPA) at 530 nm or 480 nm wavelength, optimized for QFIM signal strength. The vertically polarized THz beam is focused on the sample with a 90°-off-axis parabolic gold mirror. We obtain a maximum field strength of 400 kV/cm in the sample plane and a peak frequency of ~0.9 THz via calibrated EO sampling using a 100 µm thick <110> GaP crystal. In addition, the THz field strength can be varied by polarization rotation of the pump pulses used for THz generation. The OPA beam provides wide-field excitation in the sample plane. Luminescence is collected by a microscope objective. We acquire luminescence images with a cooled CCD camera. The pump pulses used for THz generation are chopped at a few Hz, and we capture synchronized luminescence images with and without THz pumping. The consecutive image sequences are digitally subtracted to obtain the THz-induced difference signal. Ultrafast temporal resolution in this pump-probe scheme is obtained via scanning the temporal delay Δτ between THz pump pulses and visible excitation pulses via a mechanical delay stage.

Electromagnetic simulations

We employ a finite element solver (COMSOL Multiphysics) to calculate the electric near-fields of the structures. The model for the bowtie resonator consists of the gold antenna on a soda lime glass substrate48,49. For the propagating THz waveguide excitation, we employ a model consisting of two conducting metal bars (periodicity 50 µm, length 700 µm, gap 2 µm) on a soda lime glass substrate. We excite the structures using a plane wave single-cycle THz pulse (polarization perpendicular to the gap, center frequency 0.9 THz).

Details on the fabrication of gold microstructures, the synthesis of CdSe-CdS quantum dots and the polarization dependence of the bowtie antenna are presented in the Supplementary Information.

References

  1. Hertz, H. Ueber electrodynamische Wellen im Luftraume und deren Reflexion. Ann. Phys. 270, 609–623 (1888).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wu, Q. & Zhang, X. ‐C. Free‐space electro‐optic sampling of terahertz beams. Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 3523–3525 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Leitenstorfer, A., Hunsche, S., Shah, J., Nuss, M. C. & Knox, W. H. Detectors and sources for ultrabroadband electro-optic sampling: experiment and theory. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1516–1518 (1999).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Keiber, S. et al. Electro-optic sampling of near-infrared waveforms. Nat. Photonics 10, 159–162 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goulielmakis, E. et al. Direct measurement of light waves. Science 305, 1267–1269 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Huber, A. J., Keilmann, F., Wittborn, J., Aizpurua, J. & Hillenbrand, R. Terahertz near-field nanoscopy of mobile carriers in single semiconductor nanodevices. Nano Lett. 8, 3766–3770 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Basov, D. N., Fogler, M. M. & Abajo, F. J. Polaritons in van der Waals materials. Science 354, aag1992 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lundeberg, M. B. et al. Tuning quantum nonlocal effects in graphene plasmonics. Science 357, 187–191 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jepsen, P. U., Jacobsen, R. H. & Keiding, S. R. Generation and detection of terahertz pulses from biased semiconductor antennas. JOSA B 13, 2424–2436 (1996).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunsche, S., Koch, M., Brener, I. & Nuss, M. C. THz near-field imaging. Opt. Commun. 150, 22–26 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Feurer, T., Vaughan, J. C. & Nelson, K. A. Spatiotemporal coherent control of lattice vibrational waves. Science 299, 374–377 (2003).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wächter, M., Nagel, M. & Kurz, H. Metallic slit waveguide for dispersion-free low-loss terahertz signal transmission. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 061111 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Blanchard, F. et al. Real-time terahertz near-field microscope. Opt. Express 19, 8277 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Knoll, B. & Keilmann, F. Near-field probing of vibrational absorption for chemical microscopy. Nature 399, 134–137 (1999).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, H.-T., Kersting, R. & Cho, G. C. Terahertz imaging with nanometer resolution. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3009–3011 (2003).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ribbeck, H.-Gvon et al. Spectroscopic THz near-field microscope. Opt. Express 16, 3430–3438 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Eisele, M. et al. Ultrafast multi-terahertz nano-spectroscopy with sub-cycle temporal resolution. Nat. Photonics 8, 841–845 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cocker, T. L. et al. An ultrafast terahertz scanning tunnelling microscope. Nat. Photonics 7, 620–625 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peller, D. et al. Quantitative sampling of atomic-scale electromagnetic waveforms. Nat. Photonics 15, 143–147 (2021).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zewail, A. H. Four-dimensional electron microscopy. Science 328, 187–193 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryabov, A. & Baum, P. Electron microscopy of electromagnetic waveforms. Science 353, 374–377 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Feist, A. et al. Ultrafast transmission electron microscopy using a laser-driven field emitter: femtosecond resolution with a high coherence electron beam. Ultramicroscopy 176, 63–73 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hirori, H. et al. Extraordinary carrier multiplication gated by a picosecond electric field pulse. Nat. Commun. 2, 594 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lange, C. et al. Extremely nonperturbative nonlinearities in GaAs driven by atomically strong terahertz fields in gold metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 227401 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Iwaszczuk, K., Zalkovskij, M., Strikwerda, A. C. & Jepsen, P. U. Nitrogen plasma formation through terahertz-induced ultrafast electron field emission. Optica 2, 116 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pein, B. C. et al. Terahertz-driven luminescence and colossal stark effect in CdSe–CdS colloidal quantum dots. Nano Lett. 17, 5375–5380 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, H.-T. et al. Active terahertz metamaterial devices. Nature 444, 597–600 (2006).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin, Y.-M. et al. 100-GHz transistors from wafer-scale epitaxial graphene. Science 327, 662–662 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kauranen, M. & Zayats, A. V. Nonlinear plasmonics. Nat. Photonics 6, 737–748 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hentschel, M., Schäferling, M., Duan, X., Giessen, H. & Liu, N. Chiral plasmonics. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602735 (2017).

  31. Mendez, E. E. et al. Effect of an electric field on the luminescence of GaAs quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 26, 7101–7104 (1982).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller, D. A. B. et al. Band-edge electroabsorption in quantum well structures: the quantum-confined Stark effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2173–2176 (1984).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Empedocles, S. A. & Bawendi, M. G. Quantum-confined Stark effect in single CdSe nanocrystallite quantum dots. Science 278, 2114–2117 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoffmann, M. C., Monozon, B. S., Livshits, D., Rafailov, E. U. & Turchinovich, D. Terahertz electro-absorption effect enabling femtosecond all-optical switching in semiconductor quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 231108 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pein, B. C. et al. Terahertz-driven stark spectroscopy of CdSe and CdSe–CdS core–shell quantum dots. Nano Lett. 19, 8125–8131 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Park, K., Deutsch, Z., Li, J. J., Oron, D. & Weiss, S. Single molecule quantum-confined Stark effect measurements of semiconductor nanoparticles at room temperature. ACS Nano 6, 10013–10023 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kuo, Y. et al. Characterizing the quantum-confined Stark effect in semiconductor quantum dots and nanorods for single-molecule electrophysiology. ACS Photonics 5, 4788–4800 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Grischkowsky, D. R. Optoelectronic characterization of transmission lines and waveguides by terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6, 1122–1135 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bozhevolnyi, S. I., Volkov, V. S., Devaux, E., Laluet, J.-Y. & Ebbesen, T. W. Channel plasmon subwavelength waveguide components including interferometers and ring resonators. Nature 440, 508–511 (2006).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Schnell, M. et al. Nanofocusing of mid-infrared energy with tapered transmission lines. Nat. Photonics 5, 283–287 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen, Y. et al. Efficient interfacing photonic and long-range dielectric-loaded plasmonic waveguides. Opt. Express 23, 9100 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Prämassing, M., Liebtrau, M., Schill, H. J., Irsen, S. & Linden, S. Interferometric near-field characterization of plasmonic slot waveguides in single- and poly-crystalline gold films. Opt. Express 28, 12998 (2020).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kuttge, M. et al. Loss mechanisms of surface plasmon polaritons on gold probed by cathodoluminescence imaging spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 113110 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Alonso-González, P. et al. Controlling graphene plasmons with resonant metal antennas and spatial conductivity patterns. Science 344, 1369–1373 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Seren, H. R. et al. Nonlinear terahertz devices utilizing semiconducting plasmonic metamaterials. Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16078–e16078 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hanne, J. et al. STED nanoscopy with fluorescent quantum dots. Nat. Commun. 6, 7127 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hebling, J., Almasi, G., Kozma, I. & Kuhl, J. Velocity matching by pulse front tilting for large area THz-pulse generation. Opt. Express 10, 1161 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Johnson, P. B. & Christy, R. W. Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Rubin, M. Optical properties of soda lime silica glasses. Sol. Energy Mater. 12, 275–288 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Koehler and M. Lippitz for experimental equipment and valuable discussions.

Funding

This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) via project 403711541. T.L. acknowledges funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research program (grant agreement no. 714968). N.K. and P.M. thank the ARC for support through grant CE170100026. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.B.H. and G.H. conceived the experiment. N.K. synthesized and characterized the quantum dots. T.L. fabricated the microstructures. J.A.L. and M.B.H. performed numerical near-field simulations. M.B.H. recorded the QFIM data. M.B.H. and G.H. analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and the writing of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Herink.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heindl, M.B., Kirkwood, N., Lauster, T. et al. Ultrafast imaging of terahertz electric waveforms using quantum dots. Light Sci Appl 11, 5 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00693-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00693-5

Search

Quick links