Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Review of biosensing with whispering-gallery mode lasers


Lasers are the pillars of modern optics and sensing. Microlasers based on whispering-gallery modes (WGMs) are miniature in size and have excellent lasing characteristics suitable for biosensing. WGM lasers have been used for label-free detection of single virus particles, detection of molecular electrostatic changes at biointerfaces, and barcode-type live-cell tagging and tracking. The most recent advances in biosensing with WGM microlasers are described in this review. We cover the basic concepts of WGM resonators, the integration of gain media into various active WGM sensors and devices, and the cutting-edge advances in photonic devices for micro- and nanoprobing of biological samples that can be integrated with WGM lasers.


Lasers have played a crucial role in optics since Theodore Maiman first reported on Stimulated Optical Radiation in Ruby 60 years ago1. Experiments with lasers have enabled the development of quantum optics theory2, as well as many different applications, for example, in manufacturing, imaging, spectroscopy, metrology and sensing3. During the last few years, the application of microlasers, especially whispering-gallery mode (WGM) microlasers, in chemical and biological sensing has increased due to advances made in reducing the gap between laboratory experiments and their real-world application. A number of exciting applications of WGM lasers in biosensing have been reported, such as lasing within living cells4, monitoring contractility in cardiac tissue5, detection of molecular electrostatic changes at biointerfaces6, label-free detection of single virus particles7 and advancement of in vivo sensing4,8,9. WGM microlasers with a liquid-core optical ring resonator (LCORR) can probe the properties of a gain medium introduced as a fluid into the core of a thin-walled glass capillary, thereby providing good sensitivity for the detection of health biomarkers such as DNA and protein molecules10,11.

Many optical platforms are potentially useful for label-free sensing in biology and chemistry. Examples include optical sensors that make use of plasmonic nanostructures and nanoparticles, photonic crystals, tapered optical fibres, zero-mode waveguides and passive WGM resonators12,13,14,15,16,17,18. These micro- and nanoscale optical platforms have already been used for some of the most demanding biosensing tasks such as detection of single molecules17,19 and detection of single influenza A virus particles and other nanoparticles20,21. The use of WGM microlasers for chemical and biological sensing can offer sensing modalities that are often not easily accessed on other optical sensor platforms. For example, in vivo sensing with WGM microlasers is facilitated by detection of the emission of relatively bright laser light at frequencies that are spectrally well separated from the frequency of the free-space excitation beam. Furthermore, WGM microlasers may offer a potentially very high detection sensitivity for molecules due to the narrow linewidth of the laser lines, which could enable detection of the frequency shifts induced by single molecules. Herein, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the emerging field of biological and biochemical sensing with WGM microlasers. Our review is structured as follows. In the first section, we review the building blocks of WGM microlaser devices, their biosensing applications and their sensing mechanisms. In the second and third sections, we focus on the use of WGM microdroplet resonators in biosensing and the most recent advances made in the integration of WGM microdroplet resonators with gain media. In the fourth section, we review state-of-the-art techniques for micro- and nanoprobing of biological samples that can be combined with WGM microlasers. We close with a discussion of the prospects of using emerging WGM microlasers in biological and chemical sensing applications and as an emerging research tool for single-molecule biosensing.

WGM microlasers in biosensing

Building blocks

Similar to conventional lasers, WGM microlasers consist of three principal building blocks: the gain medium, the pump source, and the optical resonator—here the WGM resonator. The gain medium defines most of the spectral, temporal and power characteristics of the laser light emission. Usually, an optical pump source supplies the energy needed to maintain population inversion of the active particles in the gain medium, i.e., fluorophore molecules, for light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation. The various gain media that have already found use in WGM microlaser-based sensors are reviewed in sections ‘Microdroplet resonators as active cavities in biosensing’ and ‘Review of gain media in WGM microlasers for sensing’.

The performance of a WGM microlaser can be further characterised by the quality factor (Q-factor) of the optical resonator, which is a measure of the damping of the resonator modes. The Q-factor is defined as the ratio of the stored energy to the energy dissipated per radian of the oscillation. Various important laser parameters depend on the Q-factor of the cavity such as (i) the laser linewidth, a measure of the spectral coherence of the laser emission and its monochromaticity; (ii) the photon lifetime, the time it takes for the energy in the resonator cavity to decay to 1/e of the original value; and (iii) the lasing threshold, the lowest optical pump power at which stimulated emission is observed. Several optical waves (modes) can typically be excited in a WGM resonator; the separation between two neighbouring modes is called the free spectral range. Another important parameter for resonators is the finesse22, which is the free spectral range of the cavity modes divided by the linewidth (FWHM) of the resonances. The finesse corresponds to the number of roundtrips the light takes inside a WGM microcavity before the stored energy decays to 1/e of the original value.

The term whispering-gallery wave was first used by Lord Rayleigh to describe the propagation of sound waves in the dome of St Paul’s Cathedral23; whispering-gallery wave or mode is now used to describe the effect of any wave travelling around a concave surface. Comparable to this effect, light in a WGM microlaser is confined through near-total internal reflection and circumnavigates a typically spherical cavity, such as a glass microbead24; the interference of the light results in WGM optical resonances. WGMs may be confined in cavity geometries such as disks25, toroids26, or deformed hexagonal resonators27. The unique characteristics of WGM microcavities, such as the long lifetime of the intracavity photons and the small volume of the modes, make them excellent candidates for constructing WGM microlasers with low lasing thresholds that exhibit narrow spectral linewidths. To the best of our knowledge, the first WGM laser was made from a highly polished crystalline calcium fluoride (CaF2) sphere of 1–2 mm diameter. The rare-earth ion samarium (Sm2+) was used as the optical gain dopant28. Since then, lasing has been demonstrated in many different spherical WGM cavity geometries8,28,29 and others, such as triangular nanoplatelets30 and ZnO hexagonal and dodecagonal microrods and nanonails31. Achieving a low lasing threshold is especially important in biosensing applications where the photodamage of biological samples must be avoided. The light intensities of WGMs range from MWcm−2 to GWcm−2 and are comparable to those in microscopy32. For example22, for a WGM resonator of 40 µm diameter and finesse 3 × 105, when the input power is 16 µW, the built‐up circulating optical power is as high as 800 mW, and the circulating optical intensity is 20 MWcm−2. WGM lasing thresholds at µW pump power levels and below have been demonstrated33,34,35. Lasing thresholds of nJ have been shown for spatially and temporally incoherent optical pumping36. WGM thresholds of µJ cm−2 have been demonstrated for pumping with a pulsed laser37. Apart from optical pumping with a pulsed laser, the ability to realize free-space continuous-wave optical pumping38 is advantageous because it allows for a wider selection of wavelengths, a smaller laser linewidth and thus a potentially higher sensitivity in biosensing applications.

Sensing mechanisms

In Table 1, we list WGM microlasers that have been used in some of the most exciting and most recent sensing and biosensing applications. In this section, we review some of the basic sensing mechanisms and how they have been used in the respective applications.

According to the Shawlow-Townes formula, the linewidth of WGM microlasers with cold-cavity Q-factors of 108 pumped at 1550 nm using erbium as a gain medium can reach a few hertz, thus rendering WGM lasers potentially useful in biosensing applications that require a high detection sensitivity39,40,41. For example, microsphere or microring resonators doped with a gain material can provide a 104-fold narrower resonance linewidth than a passive microcavity42. Changes in the refractive index in the surrounding medium cause spectral shifts of the WGMs, which can be used for detecting biomolecules. A spectral shift of the lasing line on the order of ∆ω = 210.8 kHz corresponds to refractive index changes on the order of 10−9. The detection of a very low concentration of biomolecules becomes possible if these spectral WGM shifts are resolved42. Another interesting WGM sensing modality uses the changes in the effective linewidth, where resonance broadening is attributed to the stress-induced mode shift of different polar modes in the emission spectrum of fluorescent dye-doped 6–10 µm diameter polystyrene microspheres. These changes have been used to monitor the forces that deform these microspheres when they are engulfed by a cell during the biological process endocytosis43.

The interaction of a nanoparticle with the evanescent field of a WGM can lift the degeneracy of the clockwise and counterclockwise propagating modes, resulting in mode splitting44. Monitoring the frequency shifts of the laser lines from WGM splitting is a mechanism that has been used for highly sensitive detection of nanoparticles, down to nanoparticles ~15 nm in radius45,46. The WGM frequency shifts due to mode splitting are typically too small to be resolved directly on a spectrometer. Instead, the frequency splitting is measured by recording the beat note that is produced when an ultranarrow emission line of a WGM microlaser is split into two modes by a nanoparticle scatterer. The mode-splitting sensing mechanism with WGM microlasers has been applied in biosensing for detection of ~120 nm influenza A virus particles deposited on the WGM sensor from air using an erbium-doped silica microtoroid cavity7.

Another interesting sensing mechanism for WGM microsphere lasers makes use of the concepts of Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and coherent radiative energy transfer (CRET)47. Following these mechanisms, the WGM microlaser doped with donor molecules can exhibit changes in its emission intensity and wavelength upon surface binding of acceptor molecules. WGM cavities composed of liquid crystal (LC) droplets and doped with donor/acceptor molecules were used to detect the FRET signals in the emission spectrum of the droplets. WGM microlaser LC droplets were used to detect FRET signals of fluorophores such as rhodamine B isothiocyanate and rhodamine-phycoerythrin as they attached to the LC droplet surface47.

WGM sensing platforms

The most versatile WGM microlasers provide true platforms for the development of various applications in chemical and biological sensing. One of these platforms is the so-called optofluidic ring resonator-based dye laser48. This microfluidic dye laser is based on a liquid-core optical ring resonator. The LCORR is made of a fused silica capillary with a wall thickness of a few microns. The circular cross-section of the capillary forms a ring resonator that supports WGMs and provides optical feedback for lasing, for example, by injecting a dye solution. Due to the high Q-factor of the WGM, a low lasing threshold can be achieved for pulsed laser excitations of ~1 μJ mm−2. A large fraction of the mode intensity extends into the capillary, where a gain medium such as rhodamine B can be introduced. LCORR lasers have been employed in a range of biosensing applications. In one example, the indocyanine green (ICG) fluorophore was dissolved in blood plasma and then injected into the LCORR capillary to demonstrate sensing in blood. When injected into blood, ICG binds primarily to plasma proteins and lipoproteins, resulting in enhanced fluorescence and lasing10. In a similar optofluidic ring resonator approach, a single layer of DNA molecules was used to provide laser gain in DNA detection49. Intercalating DNA dyes were employed so that there was no lasing from nontarget DNA on this digital DNA detection platform49. Gong et al.50 recently introduced the concept of a distributed fibre optofluidic laser. Due to precise fibre geometry control via fibre drawing, a series of identical optical microcavities uniformly distributed along a hollow optical fibre (HOF) was achieved to obtain a one-dimensional distributed fibre optofluidic laser. An enzymatic reaction catalysed by horseradish peroxidase was monitored in the HOF over time, and changes in the product concentration were measured by laser-based arrayed colourimetric detection. The fabricated five-channel detection scheme is shown in Table 1. In general, optofluidic resonator platforms combine the merits of a low-threshold lasing with ultranarrow WGM lasing spectra and microfluidic integration. Furthermore, they are suitable for switching between single- and multimode lasing regimes, and they provide optofluidic tuneability of the lasing wavelength51.

Another interesting sensing platform that solves the problem of fabricating WGM microlasers with different sensing specificities was demonstrated by coating passive ‘microgoblet’ WGM cavities with multifunctional molecular inks52. The one-step modification process uses dip-pen lithography to coat the passive ‘goblet’ cavity with phospholipid inks to introduce optical gain and provide molecular binding selectivity at the same time. The ink was applied such that it solely coated the light-guiding circumference of a prefabricated polymer ‘goblet’ microresonator. The authors showed that the highly localised deposition of the ink suffices for low-threshold lasing in air and water. In air, the observed lasing threshold was 10 nJ per pulse, which is only approximately three times that demonstrated in similar goblet microlasers where the entire volume was dye-doped. The authors demonstrated biosensing applications, for example, detecting streptavidin binding to biotin that was contained in the ink and provided molecular binding selectivity. Streptavidin binding to the microcavity was detected from a redshift in the WGM laser mode52.

Another WGM microlaser platform that is versatile and may find more widespread use comprises the demonstration of ultrasound modulation of the laser output intensity of WGM microdroplets; this platform may enable the development of laser emission-based microscopy for deep tissue imaging53.

A liquid crystal biosensor platform based on WGM lasing has been reported for real-time and high-sensitivity detection of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and its inhibitors54. The spectral responses provide direct information about molecular adsorption/desorption at the liquid crystal/aqueous solution interface and can be used as an indicator of enzymatic reactions. The limit of detection achieved was as low as 0.1 pg mL−1 for fenobucarb and 1 pg mL−1 for dimethoate, which is considerably lower than the standard levels of the pesticides specified for water quality standards. The results indicated that this versatile platform has potential for application in real-time and highly sensitive monitoring of biochemical reactions.

Ouyang et al.55 presented an optofluidic chip platform that was integrated with directly printed, high-Q polymer WGM microlaser sensors for ultrasensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). It was demonstrated that such an optofluidic biochip can measure horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–streptavidin, which is a widely used catalytic molecule in ELISA, via chromogenic reaction at a concentration of 0.3 ng mL−1. Moreover, it enables on-chip optofluidic ELISA of the disease biomarker vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) at the extremely low concentration of 17.8 fg mL−1, which is over 2 orders of magnitude better than the ability of current commercial ELISA kits.

Table 1 WGM laser-based biosensors and their physical sensing mechanisms

Microdroplet resonators as active cavities in biosensing

To achieve high Q-factors, which are important for sensing and lasing applications, WGM resonators require smooth, near-spherical surfaces that limit scattering losses. Recently, water-walled cavities have been explored to provide an ultrasmooth cavity surface and more than 106 recirculation cycles of light60. This work points to an important class of devices that can be easily and inexpensively made with microdroplets. In the following section, we review the application of WGM microdroplet resonators in biosensing.

WGM microdroplets for lasing

Droplet resonators in liquid–air or liquid–liquid configurations achieve high quality factors and finesse because they can trap light via near-total internal reflection using the ultrasmooth liquid interface. Liquids with a higher refractive index, such as oils or aqueous glycerol solutions, are desirable for the miniaturisation of devices and for minimising radiation losses. For example, recent sensing approaches use high-refractive-index oil to make droplet resonators with a high Q-factor up to 1.6 × 10761,62.

Air–liquid microdroplets suitable for WGMs are easy to create by using water or other liquids. A high surface tension naturally forms water droplets in air. The surface tension of water in droplet form is 8000 times stronger than gravity. In the case of liquid–liquid droplets, immiscibility of the two components is often required and is an advantage in sensing. The liquids are self-contained, with minimum cross-contamination, which provides good biocompatibility and often longevity for the sensing device8,63. The most common method to make droplets is to use a dispenser with a sharp tip such as a syringe and slowly push the liquid out into another liquid or on top of a solid surface. The surface tension of the drop will help it maintain its position, and the amount of liquid pushed out will determine the droplet diameter8,54,64. Some reports have also used the natural drying of liquids until tiny droplets are formed because of the surface tension65,66. Finally, the cavity resonances of the WGMs can be manipulated by controlling the surface tension around the droplets, either by streaming the background fluid or by stretching the droplet using a dual-beam trap64,67.

The requirements for the occurrence of stimulated emission with a certain frequency in WGM lasers entail excitation of a gain medium by a pump source, confinement of the resultant light and feedback from the microcavity. The droplet cavity medium can be easily mixed with molecules and submicron particles, such as fluorescent particles, biomolecules or specific binding chemical molecules. These will act as a gain medium and can later be used for light emission from the droplets and for various sensing mechanisms based on WGM droplet lasing8,64,66,68,69.

Droplet-based WGM microlasers can be advantageous in sensing and biosensing; compared to other WGM resonator structures, they offer very high Q-factors that can exceed 109 under ideal conditions because of their naturally smooth surfaces as a result of surface tension70. Such high-Q resonant modes allow lasing at very low threshold pump powers. In addition, the position of the droplets inside a given medium can be controlled using optical trapping, magnetic fields, electrodynamic ion traps (Paul traps) and ultrasonic waves69,71,72,73,74,75. Droplet-based resonators with liquid crystals as an integral component within the droplet offer an opportunity for tuning and tailoring droplet properties, such as the orientation of the LCs using electric fields6,54. Tuning of the droplet-based sensor can improve its sensitivity limits and makes it capable of sensing biomolecules with negative charges6. However, fabrication and tuning of LC droplets is complicated; therefore, their use for in vivo applications has not yet been demonstrated.

WGM droplet microlasers in sensing and biosensing

Yang et al. demonstrated reconfigurable liquid droplets by dispensing a solution of dichloromethane and epoxy resin using a computer-controlled microplotter64. Due to adhesion, a tiny drop of the liquid was left hanging on the outside wall of the dispenser after the dispenser was immersed in the solution. The dispenser was then touched to the soap water surface, which pulled the drop of solution down to the soap water surface, and the drop self-assembled into a circular floating microdroplet due to the surface tension of water and the high viscosity and immiscibility of the epoxy. The size of the droplet was controlled by the dispenser size and the immersion depth when the dispenser touched the epoxy solution. The formation of self-assembled droplets was demonstrated by Duong Ta et al.65 They prepared a polymer solution composed of polystyrene, dichloromethane and epoxy resin and dipped a metal rod with a sharp tip inside it. The tip was then immersed into a PDMS solution and moved parallel at a constant speed until the solution completely left the tip. This created a fibre shape of the solution on the PDMS with decreasing diameter from the point where the metal rod touched the PDMS to where it left. Because of the high surface tension of the epoxy resin, the fibre spontaneously broke into numerous small pieces, forming well-aligned spherically shaped droplets. These liquid droplet microlasers are particularly exciting for biosensing applications because they have demonstrated excellent biocompatibility and miniature sizes8,63,68,76,77.

Although droplet-based WGM microlasers may offer many advantages over other microcavities, they also face some challenges, such as deformation and evaporation because of their volatile nature, mechanical instabilities because of weak binding forces, low WGM coupling efficiencies and problems related to their positioning. To overcome the problem of toxicity, naturally occurring materials, such as lipids and starch granules, have been explored for producing WGM droplets and microlasers for biosensing8,63,78,79.

Review of gain media in WGM microlasers for sensing

Fluorescent dyes

Fluorescent dyes are common gain materials in WGM microlasers for sensing and biosensing. Fluorophores can usually provide better biocompatibility than quantum dots (QDs), which, depending on their composition, are often toxic80. Some dye molecules, such as indocyanine green (ICG) and fluorescein, are of special interest in this regard because they have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for human use81. Other dyes, such as cypate, rhodamine 110, Oregon green and Tokyo green, are also claimed to be noncytotoxic with a wide range of experimental data in support of this70.

Various dye-doped droplets have been used to demonstrate lasing from WGM-based microlasers. They have found some important applications in the imaging, labelling and tracking of cells because of the ease of implanting them within cells and because of their biocompatible nature4,8. WGM microlasers doped with rhodamine, coumarin 6, coumarin 102, ICG, or Nile red have been used to detect temperature, stress, water vapour and various biological molecules, such as bovine serum albumin (BSA) and acetylcholinesterase4,8,54,63,64,66,76,82. Most organic fluorescent dyes suffer from photobleaching, which restricts repetitive measurements and the use of high pump powers to enhance the signal unless the fluorescent material is regenerated83. One of the possible ways to address this problem is the replacement of dyes with polymers84. For example, an optofluidic microlaser with an ultralow threshold down to 7.8 µJ cm−2 in an ultrahigh‐Q WGM microcavity filled with a biocompatible conjugated polymer has been demonstrated85. This conjugated polymer exhibits a significant enhancement in lasing stability compared with Nile red. Polymer microspheres can be used as biomarkers or assay substrates in chemical diagnostics, flow cytometry and biological imaging.

Fluorescent biomaterials

Fluorescent biomaterials naturally occurring in living organisms, such as flavin mononucleotide86, Gaussia luciferase63, green fluorescent protein63,87, Venus yellow fluorescent protein68, firefly luciferin88 and chlorophyll89, have been merged into droplets and other resonator structures as the gain media for WGM microlasers. Researchers58 demonstrated that natural egg white is an excellent biomaterial for a WGM laser cavity. Using a simple dehydration method, dye-doped goose egg white microspheres were obtained with various sizes from 20 to 160 µm in diameter. These microspheres can act as laser sources under optical excitation with a lasing threshold of ~26 µJ mm−2 and a Q-factor up to 3 × 103. Another example of the use of natural materials for lasing is chicken albumen59. These microsphere biolasers can operate in aqueous and biological environments such as water and human blood serum, which makes them promising candidates for laser-based biosensing and biological applications.

Higher excitation powers are usually required for these biomaterials to initiate lasing compared to organic dyes because of their low quantum yields86. Most importantly, due to their nonsynthetic origin, fluorescent biomaterials show promise for in vivo sensing applications (see the section ‘WGM microlaser-based sensors in living systems: extra- and intracellular sensing’).

Rare-earth elements

Rare-earth elements have been used in many examples as the gain medium in WGM microlasers. Stimulated emission has been demonstrated with WGM cavities with samarium28, as well as neodymium, erbium, thulium, and holmium90. Erbium is an interesting gain dopant that can be applied in a sol–gel process to fabricate WGM microlasers. Yang et al.91 reported on erbium-doped and Raman microlasers on a silicon chip fabricated by the sol–gel process, where Q-factors as high as 2.5 × 107 at 1561 nm were obtained. Ions of Er3+ can be used to achieve lasing in different spectral bands. Er-doped TiO2 thin films grown by the sol–gel technique can demonstrate sharp emission peaks at 525 nm, 565 nm, 667 nm, and 1.54 µm92.

Er:Yb-doped glass WGM microlasers have been demonstrated by using a CO2 laser to melt Er:Yb glass onto silica microcapillaries or fibres93. This proposed WGM structure facilitates thermo-optical tuning of the microlaser modes by passing gas through the capillary and can be used for sensing, such as anemometry. The same group reported anomalous pump-induced lasing suppression in Yb:Er-doped microlasers94. Usually, a pump source achieves lasing in a system, and in most cases, a stronger pump leads to higher laser power at the output. However, in this case, the authors observed that this behaviour may be suppressed if two pump beams are used.

WGM sensing mechanisms are based on tracking the resonance shift or Q-factor spoiling, monitoring WGM intensity changes95, and using photon upconversion96. WGM-modulated green and red upconversion with a Q-factor up to 45,000 was achieved in a 9 μm Er:Yb codoped tellurite sphere located in methanol97. The authors assessed its application in refractometric sensing and its advantages for the detection of nanoparticles with a diameter of <50 nm. Refractometric sensing with a detection sensitivity of 7.7 nm/RIU was demonstrated.

Although several sensing applications of active WGM cavities doped with rare-earth ions have been demonstrated, their use in biosensing is limited because a high pump power is often required for lasing, especially for upconversion lasing98.

Quantum dots

Quantum dots are a common gain material in WGM microlasers for sensing66,99. Quantum dots are colloidal or epitaxial semiconductor nanocrystals in which the electron–hole pair is confined in all three spatial dimensions. They are characterised by tuneable emission wavelengths, high quantum yields, and resistance to photobleaching99. Laser emission into modes of a dielectric microsphere has been observed using different QDs, such as optically pumped HgTe QDs on the surface of a fused silica microsphere100 or semiconductor ZnO hexagonal nanodisks101.

The temperature dependence of the resonant wavelengths of a WGM microbottle doped with CdSe QDs has been studied102. These WGM resonators exhibit a blueshift with increasing temperature. It has been observed that these shifts are linear with temperature over an ~10 nm wavelength range. This system has been found to be highly photostable for temperature sensing applications.

Another example of QDs in WGM lasers is core-shell CdSe/ZnS QDs, which can be embedded in polystyrene microspheres99. Their potential for targeted biosensing was explored through the addition of a protein that adsorbs to the microsphere surface, thrombin, and one that does not, bovine serum albumin. Such sensors demonstrate an approximately 100 nm/RIU sensitivity and have interesting advantages such as remote excitation and remote sensing103. WGM resonators doped with CdSe/ZnS QDs have also been used to demonstrate the concept of automatic label-free WGM sensing of alcohol in water and of bacterial spores in water104.

An interesting example is silicon QDs, which are especially attractive for fluorescent refractometric sensors because of their low toxicity and ease of handling105. The authors105 showed that silica microspheres with a thin layer of Si QDs immersed in a cuvette with methanol demonstrate WGM resonance shifts as a function of the refractive index of the analyte solution, giving sensitivities ranging from ~30 to 100 nm/RIU and a detection limit of 10−4 RIU. Capillaries with a high-index fluorescent silicon QD coating have also been developed for protein biosensing using biotin–neutravidin as a specific interaction model106.

Quantum dots are more photostable than their organic dye counterparts; they reach a high quantum yield of fluorescence and can emit light over a wide spectral range. However, they are not widely used for biosensing because of their weak solubility in water and toxic materials in their composition80. The latter problem can be solved by using a relatively new type of QD made of carbon, which opens the opportunity to explore so-called ‘green photonics’. Carbon QD WGM lasers have been recently demonstrated107.

Inorganic perovskites

Semiconductor perovskites, or ABX3 materials, basically consist of a cubic unit cell with a large monovalent cation (A) in the centre, a divalent cation (B) on the corners, and smaller X- on the faces of the cube. The energy bandgap is directly related to the chemical structure of the perovskite, and its manipulation allows the full visible range to be covered in WGM microlasers. WGM lasing has been demonstrated in a number of perovskite structures with different shapes such as formamidinium lead bromide perovskite microdisks108, CsPbBr3 microrods109, and patterned lead halide perovskite microplatelets110. WGM lasers can also be fabricated using perovskites as quantum dots34. Similar to QDs, perovskites allow gradual tuning of the emission wavelength111.

Controllable fabrication of perovskite microlasers is challenging because it requires template-assisted growth or nanolithography. Zhizhchenko et al.112 implemented an approach for fabrication of microlasers by direct laser ablation of a thin film on glass with donut-shaped femtosecond laser beams. This method allows fabrication of single-mode perovskite microlasers operating at room temperature in a broad spectral range (550–800 nm) with Q-factors up to 5500.

Perovskite materials have a wide number of potential applications, including gas sensors113. Currently, the main problems with perovskites in WGM microlasers and sensors are their degradation in aqueous media and low photostability108. Some attempts to alleviate the water instability of perovskites, which mainly affects the structural and emission performance, include encapsulation in a SiO2 shell, with the resulting composite assembled into a tubular whispering-gallery microcavity114.

Other prospective materials for WGM lasers

New materials for WGM microlasers and biosensors for which sensing has not yet been demonstrated have a bright future. Of special interest are 2D materials for WGM microlasers such as graphene, transition metal dichalcogenides (WS2, MoS2) and tungsten disulphide sandwiched between hexagonal boron nitride115,116. WGM single-mode lasing resonance was realised in submicron-sized ZnO rod-based WGM cavities with graphene117. Carbon-based materials are prospective materials for WGM lasers and biosensors due to their biocompatibility. In addition to WGM resonators doped with carbon quantum dots and graphene, a diamond WGM ‘cold’ resonator with a Q-factor of 2.4 × 107 has been demonstrated118. Nanodiamonds including nitrogen vacancy centres coupled to disk resonators can be used for single-photon generation119, with prospects for quantum sensors.

The niche of new materials for biosensors is gradually being expanded. Another example is MXenes, which were recently found to have strong sensitivity enhancement for biosensing, gas sensing and humidity sensing due to their metallic conductivity, hydrophilic surface, large specific surface, and wide-band optical absorption. The experimental evidence supports the mechanism by which the characteristics of 2D MXene Ti3C2Tx can enhance the sensitivities of fibre optic biosensors and can be applied to the detection of most trace biochemical molecules120,121,122.

Sensing with WGM microlasers in living cells and organisms

The application of WGM microlasers for in vivo sensing in cells and organisms is often limited to the use of biocompatible materials, geometries and dimensions that do not significantly affect the integrity of the target system. Ideally, the microsensor should not cause cellular stress. In this section, we review various micro- and nanoprobing approaches that are suitable for in vivo sensing. First, we discuss some of the most promising photonic techniques for biological micro- and nanoprobing, with a view to their use in WGM sensing. Then, we review the use of active WGM resonators for intracellular lasing and in vivo sensing applications.

Single-cell micro- and nanoprobing

Tagging and in vivo real-time sensing of physicochemical properties within single living cells is one of the main goals in biosensing. Despite the many challenges posed by the biocompatibility requirement on the microsensors used, several photonic micro- and nanoprobing techniques have already been successfully used for such applications123. An example of a successful approach relies on the modification of optical fibres with different sensing nanostructures, which ideally do not compromise cellular viability. Specifically, the insertion of a SnO2 nanowire waveguide tagged with fluorescent CdSe@ZnS streptavidin-tailored QDs (maximum emission at 655 nm) into the cell cytoplasm has been shown to enable in vivo endoscopy and controlled cargo delivery (Fig. 1)124. Optical pumping through a tapered fibre creates an evanescent field located in the region near the tip, where the nanowire is physically cleaved, which is thus suitable for local endoscopy and spectrometry.

Fig. 1: Example of nanoprobing using optical fibres combined with waveguiding materials tagged with fluorescent QDs.

a Diagram of a nanowire-based cell endoscope; b diagram of a blue laser waveguided through a SnO2 nanowire attached to the tip of an optical fibre; c, d dark-field images of the nanowire-based cell endoscope before (c) and during (d) deformation by a tungsten needle to demonstrate its flexibility and robustness. The yellow arrows in bd indicate the position of the nanowire tip where light emission into free space occurs. eg Intensity emission profiles for an endoscope immersed in a cell culture medium, in which fluorescent proteins are illuminated with blue light from the nanowire tip; e diagram, f top-view dark-field image, and g top-view fluorescence image (a 442 nm longpass filter was applied). Scale bars 50 μm. Reproduced from ref. 124

Another interesting example of a design that enables single-cell probing consists of the use of an active ‘nanobeam’ photonic crystal nanocavity constituted by a GaAs semiconductor doped with InAs QDs. These nanocavities have been shown to fulfil the biocompatibility requirement through experiments of internalisation using PC3 cancer cells in culture, in which normal cellular functions, such as migration and division, were maintained. Moreover, upon laser pumping, nanocavity spectra of the internalised probes were obtained, thus constituting the first reported example of active optical resonators in a biological environment, to the best of our knowledge. Shambat et al.125 showed the feasibility of remote optical readout sensing by performing in vitro protein sensing experiments for streptavidin (SA)-biotin binding, which opens the way for in vivo sensing using the described approach (Fig. 2)125. An appealing alternative would be the use of WGM ring resonators as active cavities instead of the crystal cavity geometry.

Fig. 2: Schematic drawing of the optical setup used for remote readout with active GaAs semiconductor photonic crystal nanocavities doped with InAs QDs.

The box depicts some of the potential sensing modes, e.g., label-free protein detection (left panels). False-colour SEM micrographs of an actual photonic crystal used for streptavidin (SA)-biotin-binding experiments (right panels i and ii)125

On the same note, focusing on enhancing the biocompatibility, the use of so-called ‘living nanoprobes’ has recently been proposed126. This interesting example made use of in situ optical trapping at the tip of a tapered optical fibre, while the tapered fibre was inserted in a medium containing yeast, L. acidophilus and leukaemia cells (Fig. 3). Yeast cells were trapped on the tip upon external laser pumping, and self-assembly continued with the integration of L. acidophilus cells along the optical axis. Light was guided into the target (leukaemia cells), where localised fluorescence and optical signals were detected. These bionanospear probes demonstrate the value of biomimetic approaches towards single-cell sensing, with devices capable of concentrated illumination of subwavelength spatial regions. It is possible that the nanospear approach could be combined with WGM sensing by trapping a WGM microlaser at the tip of the fibre.

Fig. 3: Microscopy images illustrating the construction of a living nanoprobe from yeast and bacteria single units, together with a sequence of actual use for probing a single leukaemia cell.

a Bionanospear assembled on an optical fibre using single yeast and five L. acidophilus cells. bd Dark-field images showing b 532 nm (green) light, c 644 nm (red) light and d 473 nm (blue) light propagating through the bionanospear and focused into subwavelength dimension spots (insets show line intensity profiles for the lateral direction in the spots). fi Local fluorescence excitation/detection from a single leukaemia cell in human blood using the bionanospear. f Dark-field optical image of the bionanospear and leukaemia cell separated by a 3-μm gap. jn Flexibility testing by pushing the bionanospear against the cell membrane of a leukaemia cell. Reproduced from ref. 126

WGM microlaser-based sensors in living systems: extra- and intracellular sensing

Photonic nanoprobes are limited to acting as waveguiding media, and the inclusion of active elements (preferably with high biocompatibility) is needed to meet the requirements of single-cell probing. The next logical and necessary step would be to generate stimulated emission in or by biological systems, rather than delivering laser radiation externally. In this regard, WGM microlasers can be used for tagging purposes and may provide valuable information on the functionality of a biological system by monitoring changes in resonator properties upon the application of a given stimulus.

Microlasers based on biomaterials can be further classified depending on whether the resonator configuration implies extra- or intracellular positioning. A remarkable example of an extracellular microlaser that uses Fabry–Pérot microcavities was presented by Gather and Yun in 2011127. In their work, the authors proposed a design based on living cells as a gain medium using E. coli cells that were previously modified so that they express green fluorescent protein (GFP)128,129. They used this device to demonstrate that the lasing properties from bacteria can be inherited by transmitting the capability to synthesise GFP upon cell division; this constitutes a crucial step towards large-scale self-sustained biological lasers. In another example, lasing amplification from live Venus protein-expressing E. coli bacterial cells was demonstrated to be feasible using WGM microdroplets68. Aside from using fluorescence proteins in extracellular microlasers, several approaches taking advantage of other biological structures were also recently reported, namely, assembly of feedback lasers using B2 vitamin-doped gelatine as a waveguide core130, use of nanostructured DNA films doped with fluorescent dyes131, fabrication of lasers based on chlorophyll-doped high Q-factor optofluidic ring resonators89, or even use of modified virus particles for lasing and biosensing132.

Intracellular microlasers can open an entirely new avenue towards single-cell sensing, generating stimulated emission via biocompatible WGM cavities from within cells. One of the earliest examples in this regard was the use of polystyrene WGM microresonators (microspheres of 8–10 μm diameter) that allowed real-time sensing of biomechanical forces of endothelial living cells upon endocytosis43. Subsequently, using silica-coated microdisks as multiplexed microimaging probes, it was demonstrated that intracellular narrowband laser emission is feasible and enables tagging by spectral barcoding133,134. Furthermore, each studied cell type was able to internalise multiple microdisks, thus opening the possibility of multiplexed tagging of a large number of cells, allowing 3D tracking of individual cancer cells in a tumour spheroid and even motility measurements via long-term tracking over several days in mitotic 3T3 fibroblasts, as shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4: Illustration of the use of microdisk resonators (so-called laser particles or LPs) for cell tracking in a tumour spheroid upon internalisation.

a Optical microscopy images of a tumour taken at different evolution times (12, 60 and 108 h). b Colour-coded tagged image (each colour corresponding to a given wavelength) of the spatial distribution within the tumour. c Mapped trajectories of selected microdisks, with a sampling rate of 1 h. d Trajectories corresponding to single parental cells (P) separating (marked by arrows) into two descendant cells (F′ and F′′). e Representative paths of cells classified according to measured average motility: high motility (top 25%) and low motility (bottom 25%). Initial positions are marked with a colour-coded circle depending on the wavelength; the path colour denotes the elapsed time over 128 h. Grey dots denote the positions of all microdisks at 12 h. Reproduced from ref. 134

An example of the internalisation of size-dispersed core-shell organic@silica microspheres, which can act as NIR WGM microresonators, was recently presented by Lv et al.135. The authors were able to distinguish and perform real-time tracking of 106 individual macrophage cells, even during the foaming process, which provided further insight into the dynamics of atherosclerosis, a major cause of cardiovascular diseases. NIR WGM microresonators are a promising example considering in vivo applications because they use nano/microjoule optical pumping and output light in the near-infrared wavelength range, thus considerably reducing the impact on cell physiology.

Humar et al. have shown a simple and elegant way of generating nontoxic polyphenyl ether (PPE) oil droplets inside cells (Fig. 5)63. They used a microinjector connected to a glass micropipette with a 1 μm outer diameter and injected the oil into cells, which formed tiny droplets because of the immiscibility of the oil in the cell cytoplasm. The size of the injected droplets was controlled by the injection time, while the injection pressure was kept constant. Once the droplets were injected into the cells, a free-space coupling method, including an oil immersion objective, was employed for excitation of WGMs and collection of fluorescence63.

Fig. 5: Illustration and microscopic images of the procedure followed to obtain oil microdroplets within single cells.

a Schematic diagram of the injection of a PPE droplet into the cytoplasm of a cell. b Confocal fluorescence image of a cell containing a PPE droplet doped with Nile red dye (red). The nucleus of the cell can be seen in blue. c Bright-field (left) and laser output (right) images of a cell containing a PPE droplet. d Typical output spectrum of the lasing modes. e Time-lapse variation in the output spectrum for a live cell (left) and a dead cell fixed with formaldehyde (right). Adapted from ref. 8

In a very recent example dealing with intracellular WGM microlasers, it was demonstrated that spectral shifts of the WGMs caused by refractive index changes can be correlated with the contractility of an individual cardiac cell in living organisms5. Specifically, WGM microbeads were internalised and then acted as intracellular microlasers; their resonant emission wavelengths showed a redshift associated with cardiomyocyte contraction. By tracking the spectral position of the brightest lasing wavelength, a linearly approximated external refractive index (ηext) could be calculated, and the average ηext changes showed a characteristic increase during cell contractions (Fig. 6a). Three-dimensional images of the studied cells demonstrate that microbeads are in direct contact with a dense network of myofibrils and thus so is the evanescent field of the laser mode (Fig. 6b). Since such proteins are involved in the contractile process, the origin of refractive index variations can be traced back to the fact that cell contractions significantly increase the protein density of the myofibrils. WGM microbead lasers can be readily internalised by different types of cardiac cells and even by zebrafish, for which cardiac contractility measurements were also performed. Moreover, these quantitative transient signals can be used to assess the effect of a calcium channel blocker drug (nifedipine), providing new insights into the mechanobiology of cardiac cells in general (Fig. 6g).

Fig. 6: Real-time tracking of individual cell contractility through changes in the refractive index with both internalised WGM microbeads and extracellular microbeads in contact with the cell membrane for nonphagocytic adult cardiomyocytes.

a Continuous single-cell monitoring with an intracellular microbead over 10 min (top) at 2 nJ/pulse, and magnification of the 20 s window indicated by the red rectangle (bottom). b 3D arrangement of myofibrils around microbeads in neonatal cardiomyocytes (CMs). Cell nucleus (magenta) and microlaser (green). c WGM spectrum of a microlaser showing multimode lasing (left). Illustration of the redshift in the lasing wavelength upon CM contraction (right). d Microlaser attached to the atrium of a zebrafish heart (3 days post-fertilisation); scale bar 200 µm. e Average refractive index change (Δηext) between the resting phase (diastole) and peak contraction (systole) for 12 individual cells. f Extracellular microlaser (white arrow) on top of an adult CM. Scale bar 30 µm. g ηext trace of a spontaneously beating neonatal CM during administration of 500 nM nifedipine (black arrow). Reproduced from ref. 5

In general, approaches for conferring biocompatibility to microresonators make use of surface chemistry manipulation. For example, lipofectamine treatment applied to soft polystyrene active microresonators has been shown to facilitate endocytosis in four different types of cells. The feasibility of this approach has been demonstrated with the use of WGM microlaser-based cell tracking, which revealed broad compatibility with nervous system cells during division (N7 and SH-SY5Y cells), although such cells are generally believed to be nonphagocytic (Fig. 7)136.

Fig. 7: Long-term tracking of 3T3 fibroblast cells over several cell generations using internalised lipofectamine-treated polystyrene active microresonators. Mother cells are denoted A (red), and subsequent daughter generations are labelled B (blue), C (violet) and D (orange).

a Left: differential interference contrast (DIC) images of a WGM laser within a migrating cell before, during, and after three cycles of cellular division. The time stamps indicated in the images are in hours:minutes and represent the period elapsed after the first lasing spectrum. Right: lasing spectra of the WGM resonator recorded during the migratory period, i.e., between cell division events. Arrows mark the free spectral range (FSR) between two neighbouring TE modes. b Left: tagging of both daughter cells (B1 and B2) from a mother cell carrying two intracellular lasers (R1 and R2). Right: lasing spectra of resonators inside the mother cell (centre, recorded separately for each resonator but plotted together) and after cell division (top/bottom). All DIC images show an area of 100 × 100 μm2. Reproduced from ref. 136

Several biomaterials have been explored for fabrication of WGM intracellular lasers, such as dye-doped aptamer-modified silica microresonators134, microresonators doped with fluorescent dyes such as rhodamine B (RhB)78 or fluorescein43 fabricated from bovine serum albumin (BSA), and biopolysaccharides, among others. Highly biocompatible microcavities built from adipocytes from animal subcutaneous tissue have been demonstrated to enable laser emission under low-power pumping pulsed excitation. This is very suitable for the measurement of (in vivo) variations in the salt concentration in HeLa cells (Fig. 8)8. In addition, the conversion between B- and A-type starch structures has been monitored in soft starch granules doped with an organic dye for lasing emission79, which shows the potential of these devices for high-sensitivity sensing.

Fig. 8: Intracellular microcavities used for tagging and intracellular sensing of relevant parameters in HeLa cells.

a Bright-field image of a HeLa cell after internalisation of a polystyrene fluorescent bead. b Processed image of the cell in (a), where the false-colour intensity corresponds to the oscillating WGMs. c Calculated single-bead diameter map from confocal hyperspectral images corresponding to WGM output. d, e Images of bead-containing HeLa cells (d), and corresponding bead diameter map (e). f Time evolution of the resonant peak position for a bead inside a HeLa cell upon the addition of sodium chloride at t = 0; such exposure to a hypertonic solution produces cell volume shrinkage, which in turn causes the concentrations in the cytoplasm to vary, affecting the refractive index, which produces a shift in the peak wavelength. Scale bars 10 μm. Reproduced from ref. 8

Concluding remarks

The progress in biosensing with WGM microlasers is impressive. The many different ways that WGM microresonator materials and their multiple possible geometries can be combined and integrated with gain media result in a myriad of possible WGM microlaser devices that, as we have seen from this review, can have very exciting applications in biosensing. WGM microlaser sensors can be further optimised for the specific biosensing tasks at hand. For example, by functionalisation of the sensor with receptor molecules, one can achieve molecule-specific biodetection, and by integrating the sensors with microfluidics, one can achieve more controlled sample delivery and more reproducible data capture. The microgoblet WGM microlaser platform is an excellent example of this. It demonstrates reproducible and multiplexed detection of several different biomarkers via a single device integrated with microfluidics, where each WGM goblet sensor is functionalised with receptor-containing molecular inks. The WGM LCORR platform and WGM microdroplets and beads are other examples of versatile sensor platforms that can be tailored to meet a variety of different sensing needs, including detection of DNA, sensing of health-related protein markers and intracellular single-cell sensing of pH and forces.

This review shows that ongoing innovations in the fabrication and integration of microlasers with gain materials and lab-on-chip devices and the exploration of gain materials that provide more robust sensor operations or new functionalities (such as those based on polymers and MXenes, respectively) spur growing research activities on WGM microlaser sensors for real-world sensing applications. Developing these applications will require not only WGM devices with a robust and reproducible sensor response but also WGM sensors that operate in a highly multiplexed fashion, on chip or in solution, and that can be fabricated at low cost and for single use at the point of need.

There are a number of important challenges that need to be addressed before robust and clinically relevant in vitro and in vivo sensing applications of WGM microlaser sensors can become a reality. These challenges are mainly related to the lack of chemical stability of some of the cavity materials in water, the need for miniaturisation of the cavity so as not to perturb the biological cell or organism, the difficulty of biomolecular sensing in complex media where one encounters a host of unwanted background signals, and the difficulty of optical detection in highly scattering and absorbing biological media such as human tissue where WGM lasing at near-infrared wavelengths would be most desired. Methods are needed to discern the specific response of the WGM microlaser sensor to the binding of molecules from a background of resonance shifts due to temperature and bulk refractive index fluctuations. Referencing the measurements by comparing the frequency shifts of WGMs excited in the same microbead cavity may provide a way forward for achieving WGM microlaser sensing over prolonged time periods and under variable experimental conditions. For example, measuring relative frequency shifts in split-mode optoplasmonic WGM sensors has already been used as a sensing concept for highly sensitive detection of single molecules, and these measurements were mostly unaffected by changes in temperature and the host refractive index137.

Another of the outstanding challenges in WGM microlaser sensing is achieving high detection sensitivity at the level of single molecules. Passive WGM sensors have already demonstrated this ability; this has established them as an important platform to investigate the fundamentals of light-matter interactions, biomolecular structures and dynamics138,139. The WGM microlaser sensors can, in principle, become even more sensitive than their passive WGM counterparts. The difficulty lies in resolving the very small spectral shifts of the WGM laser lines on the order of ~10 MHz in single-molecule detection. A way forward may be the use of two laser lines for self-reference measurements within the same resonator and to reduce common mode noise, a concept that has, in part, been demonstrated for detection of very small ~15 nm nanoparticles7. Split-mode frequency shift detection with passive optoplasmonic WGM sensors that use plasmonic nanoparticles attached to WGM resonators has already enabled single-molecule detection. The passive ‘optoplasmonic’ WGM counterparts have demonstrated extremely high detection sensitivities12. The optoplasmonic WGM sensing concept has been used to detect even very small molecules, such as cysteamine (~77 Da), at attomolar concentrations, as well as single ions, such as single mercury and zinc ions, in aqueous solutions140,141,142. The application of the optoplasmonic split-mode single-molecule sensing concept137 to WGM microlasers should be explored to achieve single-molecule sensitivity. This approach may not only open up single-molecule sensing with WGM microlasers but also establish active WGM resonators as another important research platform to explore biomolecular interactions, their dynamics and the fundamentals of light-matter interactions in active optoplasmonic microcavities. The detection of single molecules inside a single cell using a WGM microlaser would be an exciting goal to pursue. Other important in vivo and in vitro diagnostic applications for ultrasensitive WGM microlasers to aim for include implantable sensors that detect health biomarkers and lab-on-chip devices that analyse biological samples, molecule-by-molecule, in ultrasmall (attolitre) detection volumes.

To conclude, WGM microlaser sensing is blossoming. This rapidly growing research area has the potential to address many of the most pressing biosensing challenges we are facing today. The coming decade will be the proving ground for biosensors such as WGM microlasers to deal with a myriad of global health and environmental concerns, including the emergence of new viruses and the detection of toxins in our water supplies. We need versatile sensors such as WGM microlasers to be best equipped to tackle these daunting challenges, i.e., by quickly and accurately detecting virus particles, health-related biomarkers and novel and harmful toxins in our drinking water.


  1. 1.

    Maiman, T. H. Stimulated optical radiation in ruby. Nature 187, 493–494 (1960).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Glauber, R. J. The quantum theory of optical coherence. Phys. Rev. 130, 2529–2539 (1963).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ready, J. F. Industrial Applications of Lasers. 2nd edn (Academic Press, London, 1997).

  4. 4.

    Schubert, M. et al. Lasing within live cells containing intracellular optical microresonators for barcode-type cell tagging and tracking. Nano Lett. 15, 5647–5652 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Schubert, M. et al. Monitoring contractility in cardiac tissue with cellular resolution using biointegrated microlasers. Nat. Photonics 14, 452–458 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang, Z. H. et al. Bio-electrostatic sensitive droplet lasers for molecular detection. Nanoscale Adv. 2, 2713–2719 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    He, L. N. et al. Detecting single viruses and nanoparticles using whispering gallery microlasers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 428–432 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Humar, M. & Hyun Yun, S. Intracellular microlasers. Nat. Photonics 9, 572–576 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wu, X. Q. et al. Nanowire lasers as intracellular probes. Nanoscale 10, 9729–9735 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chen, Y. C., Chen, Q. S. & Fan, X. D. Lasing in blood. Optica 3, 809–815 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sun, Y. Z. et al. Bioinspired optofluidic FRET lasers via DNA scaffolds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16039–16042 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Xavier, J. et al. Advances in optoplasmonic sensors—combining optical nano/microcavities and photonic crystals with plasmonic nanostructures and nanoparticles. Nanophotonics 7, 1–38 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Taylor, A. B. & Zijlstra, P. Single-molecule plasmon sensing: current status and future prospects. ACS Sens. 2, 1103–1122 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liang, F. et al. Photonic-plasmonic hybrid single-molecule nanosensor measures the effect of fluorescent labels on DNA-protein dynamics. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602991 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Levene, M. J. et al. Zero-mode waveguides for single-molecule analysis at high concentrations. Science 299, 682–686 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yu, W. Y. et al. Cavity optomechanical spring sensing of single molecules. Nat. Commun. 7, 12311 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mauranyapin, N. P. et al. Evanescent single-molecule biosensing with quantum-limited precision. Nat. Photonics 11, 477–481 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Duff, D. G., Baiker, A. & Edwards, P. P. A new hydrosol of gold clusters. 1. Formation and particle size variation. Langmuir 9, 2301–2309 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Vincent, S., Subramanian, S. & Vollmer, F. Optoplasmonic characterisation of reversible disulfide interactions at single thiol sites in the attomolar regime. Nat. Commun. 11, 2043 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Vollmer, F., Arnold, S. & Keng, D. Single virus detection from the reactive shift of a whispering-gallery mode. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20701–20704 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Trichet, A. A. P. et al. Nanoparticle trapping and characterization using open microcavities. Nano Lett. 16, 6172–6177 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Venkatakrishnarao, D. et al. Advanced organic and polymer whispering-gallery-mode microresonators for enhanced nonlinear optical light. Adv. Optical Mater. 6, 1800343 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rayleigh, L. C. X. I. I. The problem of the whispering gallery. Lond., Edinb., Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 20, 1001–1004 (1910).

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Foreman, M. R., Swaim, J. D. & Vollmer, F. Whispering gallery mode sensors. Adv. Opt. Photonics 7, 168–240 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tavernier, H. et al. Magnesium fluoride whispering gallery mode disk-resonators for microwave photonics applications. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 22, 1629–1631 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Jiang, X. F. & Yang, L. Optothermal dynamics in whispering-gallery microresonators. Light. Sci. Appl. 9, 24 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Grundmann, M. & Dietrich, C. P. Whispering gallery modes in deformed hexagonal resonators. Phys. Status Solidi (B) 249, 871–879 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Garrett, C. G. B., Kaiser, W. & Bond, W. L. Stimulated emission into optical whispering modes of spheres. Phys. Rev. 124, 1807–1809 (1961).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Benner, R. E. et al. Observation of structure resonances in the fluorescence spectra from microspheres. Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 475–478 (1980).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Li, G. H. et al. Record-low-threshold lasers based on atomically smooth triangular nanoplatelet perovskite. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1805553 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wang, D. et al. Lasing in whispering gallery mode in ZnO nanonails. J. Appl. Phys. 99, 093112 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    König, K. Multiphoton microscopy in life sciences. J. Microsc. 200, 83–104 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sandoghdar, V. et al. Very low threshold whispering-gallery-mode microsphere laser. Phys. Rev. A 54, R1777–R1780 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Yan, D. D. et al. Stable and low-threshold whispering-gallery-mode lasing from modified CsPbBr3 perovskite quantum dots@SiO2 sphere. Chem. Eng. J. 401, 126066 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wu, Y. Q., Ward, J. M. & Nic Chormaic, S. Ultralow threshold green lasing and optical bistability in ZBNA (ZrF4–BaF2–NaF–AlF3) microspheres. J. Appl. Phys. 107, 033103 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Herr, S. J., Buse, K. & Breunig, I. LED-pumped whispering-gallery laser. Photonics Res. 5, B34–B38 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ilchenko, V. S. & Matsko, A. B. Optical resonators with whispering-gallery modes-part II: applications. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 12, 15–32 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zhang, S. X. et al. Free-space coupling efficiency in a high-Q deformed optical microcavity. Opt. Lett. 41, 4437–4440 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kuehne, A. J. C. & Gather, M. C. Organic lasers: recent developments on materials, device geometries, and fabrication techniques. Chem. Rev. 116, 12823–12864 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    He, L. N., Özdemir, S. K. & Yang, L. Whispering gallery microcavity lasers. Laser Photonics Rev. 7, 60–82 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lu, T. et al. A narrow-linewidth on-chip toroid raman laser. IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 47, 320–326 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jun, Y. & Guo, L. J. Optical sensors based on active microcavities. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 12, 143–147 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Himmelhaus, M. & Francois, A. In-vitro sensing of biomechanical forces in live cells by a whispering gallery mode biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 25, 418–427 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Weiss, D. S. et al. Splitting of high-Q Mie modes induced by light backscattering in silica microspheres. Opt. Lett. 20, 1835–1837 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Chen, W. J. et al. Parity-time-symmetric whispering-gallery mode nanoparticle sensor [Invited]. Photonics Res. 6, A23–A30 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Özdemir, S. K. et al. Highly sensitive detection of nanoparticles with a self-referenced and self-heterodyned whispering-gallery Raman microlaser. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E3836–E3844 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Yuan, Z. Y. et al. Lasing-encoded microsensor driven by interfacial cavity resonance energy transfer. Adv. Optical Mater. 8, 1901596 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Shopova, S. I. et al. Optofluidic ring resonator based dye laser. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 221101 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lee, W. et al. Digital DNA detection based on a compact optofluidic laser with ultra-low sample consumption. Lab Chip 16, 4770–4776 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gong, C. Y. et al. Distributed fibre optofluidic laser for chip-scale arrayed biochemical sensing. Lab Chip 18, 2741–2748 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Feng, Z. Q. & Bai, L. Advances of optofluidic microcavities for microlasers and biosensors. Micromachines 9, 122 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bog, U. et al. On-chip microlasers for biomolecular detection via highly localized deposition of a multifunctional phospholipid ink. Lab Chip 13, 2701–2707 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Li, X. Z. et al. Ultrasound modulated droplet lasers. ACS Photonics 6, 531–537 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Duan, R. et al. Detection of acetylcholinesterase and its inhibitors by liquid crystal biosensor based on whispering gallery mode. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 308, 127672 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ouyang, X. et al. Ultrasensitive optofluidic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by on-chip integrated polymer whispering-gallery-mode microlaser sensors. Lab Chip 20, 2438–2446 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Chen, Y. C. & Fan, X. D. Biological lasers for biomedical applications. Adv. Optical Mater. 7, 1900377 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Tan, X. T. et al. Fast and reproducible ELISA laser platform for ultrasensitive protein quantification. ACS Sens. 5, 110–117 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    van Nguyen, T. et al. Egg white based biological microlasers. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53, 445104 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Mai, H. H. et al. Chicken albumen-based whispering gallery mode microlasers. Soft Matter 16, 9069–9073 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Maayani, S., Martin, L. L. & Carmon, T. Water-walled microfluidics for high-optical finesse cavities. Nat. Commun. 7, 10435 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Avino, S. et al. Direct sensing in liquids using whispering-gallery-mode droplet resonators. Adv. Optical Mater. 2, 1155–1159 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Giorgini, A. et al. Liquid droplet microresonators. Sensors 19, 473 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Humar, M. & Yun, S. H. Whispering-gallery-mode emission from biological luminescent protein microcavity assemblies. Optica 4, 222–228 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Yang, S. C. et al. Reconfigurable liquid whispering gallery mode microlasers. Sci. Rep. 6, 27200 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Ta, V. D., Chen, R. & Sun, H. D. Tuning whispering gallery mode lasing from self-assembled polymer droplets. Sci. Rep. 3, 1362 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Wang, Y. et al. Robust whispering-gallery-mode microbubble lasers from colloidal quantum dots. Nano Lett. 17, 2640–2646 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Aas, M. et al. Spectral tuning of lasing emission from optofluidic droplet microlasers using optical stretching. Opt. Express 21, 21380–21394 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Jonáš, A. et al. In vitro and in vivo biolasing of fluorescent proteins suspended in liquid microdroplet cavities. Lab Chip 14, 3093–3100 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Aas, M., Jonáš, A. & Kiraz, A. Lasing in optically manipulated, dye-doped emulsion microdroplets. Opt. Commun. 290, 183–187 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Alford, R. et al. Toxicity of organic fluorophores used in molecular imaging: literature review. Mol. Imaging 8, 341–354 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Chen, L. J. et al. Microfluidic fabrication of cholesteric liquid crystal core–shell structures toward magnetically transportable microlasers. Lab Chip 16, 1206–1213 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Anand, S. et al. Observation of whispering gallery modes in elastic light scattering from microdroplets optically trapped in a microfluidic channel. J. Optical Soc. Am. B 33, 1349–1354 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Karadag, Y. et al. Dye lasing in optically manipulated liquid aerosols. Proceedings of the SPIE 8810, Optical Trapping and Optical Micromanipulation X (SPIE, San Diego, 2013).

  74. 74.

    Azzouz, H. et al. Levitated droplet dye laser. Opt. Express 14, 4374–4379 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Tona, M. & Kimura, M. Novel lasing modes observed in a levitated single dye-doped microdroplet. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 3533–3535 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Humar, M. et al. Biomaterial microlasers implantable in the cornea, skin, and blood. Optica 4, 1080–1085 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Wei, C. et al. Organic Janus microspheres: a general approach to all-color dual-wavelength microlasers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 5116–5120 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    van Nguyen, T. et al. Protein-based microsphere biolasers fabricated by dehydration. Soft Matter 15, 9721–9726 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Wei, Y. H. et al. Starch-based biological microlasers. ACS Nano 11, 597–602 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Resch-Genger, U. et al. Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels. Nat. Methods 5, 763–775 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Mérian, J. et al. Fluorescent nanoprobes dedicated to in vivo imaging: from preclinical validations to clinical translation. Molecules 17, 5564–5591 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Zheng, L. et al. Embedding liquid lasers within or around aqueous microfluidic droplets. Lab Chip 18, 197–205 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Kiraz, A., Chen, Q. S. & Fan, X. D. Optofluidic lasers with aqueous quantum dots. ACS Photonics 2, 707–713 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Gardner, K. et al. Ultrabright fluorescent and lasing microspheres from a conjugated polymer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1802759 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Tang, S. J. et al. A tunable optofluidic microlaser in a photostable conjugated polymer. Adv. Mater. 30, 1804556 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Nizamoglu, S., Gather, M. C. & Yun, S. H. All-biomaterial laser using vitamin and biopolymers. Adv. Mater. 25, 5943–5947 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Chen, Q. et al. Optofluidic lasers with a single molecular layer of gain. Lab Chip 14, 4590–4595 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Wu, X. et al. Bio-inspired optofluidic lasers with luciferin. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 203706 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Chen, Y. C., Chen, Q. S. & Fan, X. D. Optofluidic chlorophyll lasers. Lab Chip 16, 2228–2235 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Anashkina, E. A. Laser sources based on rare-earth ion doped tellurite glass fibers and microspheres. Fibers 8, 30 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Yang, L. et al. Erbium-doped and Raman microlasers on a silicon chip fabricated by the sol–gel process. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 091114 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Mondal, S. et al. Investigation of optical and electrical properties of erbium-doped TiO2 thin films for photodetector applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 29, 19588–19600 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Ward, J. M., Yang, Y. & Nic Chormaic, S. Glass-on-glass fabrication of bottle-shaped tunable microlasers and their applications. Sci. Rep. 6, 25152 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Lei, F. C. et al. Pump induced lasing suppression in Yb:Er-doped microlasers. Opt. Express 25, 24679–24689 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Reynolds, T. et al. Fluorescent and lasing whispering gallery mode microresonators for sensing applications. Laser Photonics Rev. 11, 1600265 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Fernandez-Bravo, A. et al. Continuous-wave upconverting nanoparticle microlasers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 572–577 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Ruan, Y. L. et al. Tellurite microspheres for nanoparticle sensing and novel light sources. Opt. Express 22, 11995–12006 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Chen, X., Sun, T. Y. & Wang, F. Lanthanide-based luminescent materials for waveguide and lasing. Chem. – Asian J. 15, 21–33 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Beier, H. T., Coté, G. L. & Meissner, K. E. Whispering gallery mode biosensors consisting of quantum dot-embedded microspheres. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 37, 1974–1983 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Shopova, S. I. et al. Microsphere whispering-gallery-mode laser using HgTe quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 6101–6103 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Gargas, D. J. et al. Whispering gallery mode lasing from zinc oxide hexagonal nanodisks. ACS Nano 4, 3270–3276 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Bhattacharya, S. et al. Temperature dependence of whispering gallery modes of quantum dot-doped microbottle resonators. J. Lumin. 221, 117050 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Pang, S., Beckham, R. E. & Meissner, K. E. Quantum dot-embedded microspheres for remote refractive index sensing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 221108 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Charlebois, M. et al. Toward automatic label-free whispering gallery modes biodetection with a quantum dot-coated microsphere population. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 5, 524–532 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Zhi, Y. et al. Refractometric sensing with silicon quantum dots coupled to a microsphere. Plasmonics 8, 71–78 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Lane, S. et al. Protein biosensing with fluorescent microcapillaries. Opt. Express 23, 2577–2590 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Liu, H. Z. et al. Whispering gallery mode laser from carbon dot–nacl hybrid crystals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 18248–18253 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Li, X. J. et al. Stable whispering gallery mode lasing from solution-processed formamidinium lead bromide perovskite microdisks. Adv. Optical Mater. 8, 2000030 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Wang, S. et al. Solution-phase synthesis of cesium lead halide perovskite microrods for high-quality microlasers and photodetectors. Adv. Optical Mater. 5, 1700023 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Liu, X. F. et al. Periodic organic–inorganic halide perovskite microplatelet arrays on silicon substrates for room-temperature lasing. Adv. Sci. 3, 1600137 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    An, Y. H. et al. Color-tunable photoluminescence and whispering gallery mode lasing of alloyed CsPbCl3(1–x)Br3x microstructures. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 7, 1902126 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Zhizhchenko, A. et al. Single-mode lasing from imprinted halide-perovskite microdisks. ACS Nano 13, 4140–4147 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Das, S., Gholipour, S. & Saliba, M. Perovskites for laser and detector applications. Energy Environ. Mater. 2, 146–153 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Li, S. Q. et al. Water-resistant perovskite nanodots enable robust two-photon lasing in aqueous environment. Nat. Commun. 11, 1192 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Wang, L. et al. 2D-material-integrated whispering-gallery-mode microcavity. Photonics Res. 7, 905–916 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Ren, T. H. et al. Whisper gallery modes in monolayer tungsten disulfide-hexagonal boron nitride optical cavity. ACS Photonics 5, 353–358 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Li, J. T. et al. Single mode ZnO whispering-gallery submicron cavity and graphene improved lasing performance. ACS Nano 9, 6794–6800 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Ilchenko, V. S. et al. Whispering gallery mode diamond resonator. Opt. Lett. 38, 4320–4323 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Schell, A. W. et al. Three-dimensional quantum photonic elements based on single nitrogen vacancy-centres in laser-written microstructures. Sci. Rep. 3, 1577 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Chen, Y. Z. et al. Refractive index sensors based on Ti3C2Tx MXene fibers. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3, 303–311 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Klusmann, C. et al. Hybridizing whispering gallery modes and plasmonic resonances in a photonic metadevice for biosensing applications. J. Optical Soc. Am. B 34, D46–D55 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Park, J. et al. Titanium dioxide whispering gallery microcavities. Adv. Optical Mater. 2, 711–717 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Gramotnev, D. K. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Nanofocusing of electromagnetic radiation. Nat. Photonics 8, 13–22 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Yan, R. X. et al. Nanowire-based single-cell endoscopy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 191–196 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Shambat, G. et al. Single-cell photonic nanocavity probes. Nano Lett. 13, 4999–5005 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Li, Y. C. et al. Living nanospear for near-field optical probing. ACS Nano 12, 10703–10711 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Gather, M. C. & Yun, S. H. Single-cell biological lasers. Nat. Photonics 5, 406–410 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Gather, M. C. & Yun, S. H. Lasing from Escherichia coli bacteria genetically programmed to express green fluorescent protein. Opt. Lett. 36, 3299–3301 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Karl, M. et al. Single cell induced optical confinement in biological lasers. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50, 084005 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Vannahme, C. et al. Single-mode biological distributed feedback laser. Lab Chip 13, 2675–2678 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Camposeo, A. et al. Physically transient photonics: random versus distributed feedback lasing based on nanoimprinted DNA. ACS Nano 8, 10893–10898 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Hales, J. E. et al. Virus lasers for biological detection. Nat. Commun. 10, 3594 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Kwok, S. J. J. et al. Multiplexed laser particles for spatially resolved single-cell analysis. Light. Sci. Appl. 8, 74 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Martino, N. et al. Wavelength-encoded laser particles for massively multiplexed cell tagging. Nat. Photonics 13, 720–727 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Lv, Z. et al. Intracellular near-infrared microlaser probes based on organic microsphere–SiO2 core–shell structures for cell tagging and tracking. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 32981–32987 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Schubert, M. et al. Lasing in live mitotic and non-phagocytic cells by efficient delivery of microresonators. Sci. Rep. 7, 40877 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Subramanian, S., Vincent, S. & Vollmer, F. Effective linewidth shifts in single-molecule detection using optical whispering gallery modes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 151106 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Frustaci, S. & Vollmer, F. Whispering-gallery mode (WGM) sensors: review of established and WGM-based techniques to study protein conformational dynamics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 51, 66–73 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Vollmer, F. & Yu, D. S. Optical Whispering Gallery Modes for Biosensing (Springer, Cham, 2020).

  140. 140.

    Baaske, M. D. & Vollmer, F. Optical observation of single atomic ions interacting with plasmonic nanorods in aqueous solution. Nat. Photonics 10, 733–739 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Kim, E., Baaske, M. D. & Vollmer, F. In situ observation of single-molecule surface reactions from low to high affinities. Adv. Mater. 28, 9941–9948 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Kim, E., Baaske, M. D. & Vollmer, F. Towards next-generation label-free biosensors: recent advances in whispering gallery mode sensors. Lab Chip 17, 1190–1205 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors acknowledge the following funding sources: EPSRC EP/T002875/1, EP/R031428/1 and BBSRC BB/R022178/1. The authors thank Gillian Fearnyough, Eleanor Osborne and Oliver Kimmer for proofreading the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nikita Toropov or Frank Vollmer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All figures were reproduced with corresponding permissions provided by publishers.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toropov, N., Cabello, G., Serrano, M.P. et al. Review of biosensing with whispering-gallery mode lasers. Light Sci Appl 10, 42 (2021).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links