To the Editor:
Histiocytic neoplasms are rare clonal hematopoietic disorders occupying a wide clinical spectrum amongst adults and children. Identification of recurrent somatic mutations in the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway has reframed our understanding of these diseases from autoimmune conditions to clonal myeloid neoplasms. Equally important knowledge of mutational drivers of histiocytoses has overhauled the clinical management of these disorders. Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a multisystem histiocytic neoplasm affecting adults characterized by osseous infiltration in the distal legs and variable involvement of retroperitoneal, cardiovascular, cutaneous, neurological, and other structures [1]. More than 50% of ECD lesions harbor BRAFV600E mutations, and in 2018 vemurafenib was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for BRAFV600E-mutated ECD [2]. The MEK1/2 inhibitor, cobimetinib, was recently broadly approved for the treatment of histiocytic neoplasms based on a phase 2 trial in which 20/24 patients with diverse histiocytic neoplasms including mutations in BRAF, N/KRAS, and MEK1/2 demonstrated a complete or partial response by [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET).
Recent studies have identified a subset of histiocytic neoplasm patients with activating mutations upstream of RAS-RAF-MEK1/2 including in the receptor tyrosine kinase CSF1R [3]. Importantly, one patient with an activating CSF1R mutation has been treated successfully with the CSF1R inhibitor, pexidartinib [4]. Given the requirement of CSF1R signaling for development and maintenance of the monocyte/macrophage lineage and the observation that CSF1R is required for differentiation of lesional cells within LCH [5], it has been hypothesized that CSF1R inhibition may be efficacious in broader genetic subtypes of histiocytosis patients. To date, however, evaluation of CSF1R inhibition in histiocytic neoplasms outside of one patient with CSF1R-mutated disease has not been explored. We present here a case of ECD with progression despite MEK inhibition with a dramatic and lasting response to CSF1R inhibition.
A 58-year-old woman with a past medical history of hypertension and chronic gastritis presented with 3 years of progressive fatigue, diffuse edema, and bone pain in the legs. Physical examination demonstrated pitting edema in the legs, diffuse rash consisting of partially blanching large red patches on the chest and back, and periorbital xanthelasmas (Fig. 1). Laboratory studies demonstrated normocytic anemia (Hb 9.4 g/dL), lymphopenia (absolute lymphocyte count 0.8 K/µL), and otherwise normal blood counts, hypoalbuminemia (2.1 g/dL), and elevated C-reactive protein (7.0 mg/dL). Computed tomography (CT) and full-body FDG-PET/CT demonstrated widespread FDG-avid infiltrates in the bones of the arms and legs, the retroperitoneum, mediastinum, para-aortic regions, pericardium, and pleura. Biopsy of retroperitoneal infiltrates, chest rash, and xanthelasma demonstrated a xanthomatous histiocytic lesion immunoreactive for CD68, CSF1-R (CD115), overexpressing phospho-ERK1/2, and without positivity for CD1a, S100, or CD207 (Langerin), confirming a non-Langerhans cell neoplasm (non-LCH) (Fig. 2A). The constellation of non-LCH with involvement of the distal extremities, retroperitoneum, and para-aortic structures established a diagnosis of ECD. A large next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel of all protein-coding exons and selected introns of 576 genes known to undergo somatic genomic alterations in hematological neoplasms was performed on three separate biopsies from 2018 and did not demonstrate mutations in BRAF or other MAPK pathway genes. Rather, these biopsies demonstrated an in-frame deletion in exon 8 encoding the RING finger domain of CBL (CBL c.1203_1211delCACATCCTG; p.T402_C404del) (Fig. 2A).
The patient was treated briefly with intravenous immune globulin, as well as interferon-alpha, both without clinical benefit. She was treated next with the MEK inhibitor trametinib at 1 mg orally daily with regression of infiltrates by FDG-PET/CT and resolution of rash (Fig. 1). However, after 18 months of treatment, the erythematous rash re-emerged in the same distribution, and FDG-PET/CT demonstrated metabolic recurrence of multifocal infiltrative lesions. Physical examination demonstrated yellow plaques on the episclera, indicating progression of ocular disease (Fig. 1). Skin biopsy in 2020 again demonstrated non-LCH with greater overexpression of phospho-ERK1/2 than in the 2018 lesional biopsy, and repeated NGS demonstrated the previously identified CBL in-frame deletion as well as a new, sub-clonal nonsense mutation in exon 7 involving the linker domain of CBL (CBL c.1087delG; p.V363*) (Fig. 2A).
Treatment was initiated with pexidartinib 200 mg orally twice daily through commercial drug access. Dramatic regression in rash, resolution of episcleral disease and xanthelasmas, as well as resolution of FDG-avid disease by PET/CT, was observed after 4 months of treatment (Fig. 1). The patient has completed 24 months of treatment with a sustained complete response. No hepatotoxicity or other adverse events have been observed. As the optimal duration of treatment in ECD with targeted therapies remains unknown, the patient currently faces indefinite treatment.
The U.S. FDA approval of cobimetinib for adults with histiocytic neoplasms has provided an important advancement for patients with these disorders. At the same time, histiocytosis patients with acquired resistance to MEK inhibitors or intolerant to these agents are beginning to be observed. Here we identify acquired mutations in the E3 ubiquitin ligase CBL as associated with resistance to MEK inhibition and progression of disease in a histiocytosis patient. Given the knowledge that CBL stimulates CSF1R multi-ubiquitination and endocytosis to limit macrophage proliferation [6] (Fig. 2B), we hypothesize that the loss of the normal CBL proteins within the neoplastic histiocytes resulted in the absence of cellular recycling of CSF1R through its physiological ubiquitination and that this resulted in persistent or sustained activation of the receptor to a degree that was no longer inhibited by the MAPK pathway inhibition achieved with trametinib. This finding of resistance to MEK inhibition with CBL loss is consistent with CBL’s role as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor in myeloid neoplasms in which transformation to leukemia is most frequently seen upon loss-of-heterozygosity of a single initiating CBL mutation [7, 8]. Lack of response to trametinib following acquisition of both the somatic CBL mutations in a subset of neoplastic histiocytes was demonstrated with greater overexpression of phospho-ERK1/2 in the 2020 biopsy at disease progression than the initial 2018 biopsy prior to the initiation of targeted therapy. Potentially consistent with this hypothesis, CSF1R inhibition resulted in clinical benefit in this patient following failure of trametinib therapy. Overall, these data suggest a broader potential role for CSF1R inhibition in histiocytosis patients beyond patients with CSF1R activating mutations.
References
Goyal G, Heaney ML, Collin M, Cohen-Aubart F, Vaglio A, Durham BH, et al. Erdheim-Chester disease: consensus recommendations for evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment in the molecular era. Blood 2020;135:1929–45.
Diamond EL, Subbiah V, Lockhart AC. Vemurafenib for BRAF V600-mutant Erdheim-Chester disease and Langerhans cell histiocytosis: analysis of data from the histology-independent (vol 4, pg 384, 2018). JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:122.
Durham BH, Lopez Rodrigo E, Picarsic J, Abramson D, Rotemberg V, De Munck S, et al. Activating mutations in CSF1R and additional receptor tyrosine kinases in histiocytic neoplasms. Nat Med. 2019;25:1839–42.
Abeykoon JP, Lasho TL, Dasari S, Rech KL, Ranatunga WK, Manske MK, et al. Sustained, complete response to pexidartinib in a patient with CSF1R-mutated Erdheim-Chester disease. Am J Hematol. 2022;97:293–302.
Lonardi S, Scutera S, Licini S, Lorenzi L, Cesinaro AM, Gatta LB, et al. CSF1R Is Required for Differentiation and Migration of Langerhans Cells and Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis. Cancer Immunol Res. 2020;8:829–41.
Lee PS, Wang Y, Dominguez MG, Yeung YG, Murphy MA, Bowtell DD, et al. The Cbl protooncoprotein stimulates CSF-1 receptor multiubiquitination and endocytosis, and attenuates macrophage proliferation. EMBO J. 1999;18:3616–28.
Niemeyer CM, Kang MW, Shin DH, Furlan I, Erlacher M, Bunin NJ, et al. Germline CBL mutations cause developmental abnormalities and predispose to juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2010;42:794–800.
Loh ML, Sakai DS, Flotho C, Kang M, Fliegauf M, Archambeault S, et al. Mutations in CBL occur frequently in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 2009;114:1859–63.
Acknowledgements
BHD was supported by the Fellow Scholar Award in Basic/Translational Research from the American Society of Hematology (ASH), a grant from the Erdheim-Chester Disease Global Alliance Foundation, and K08 CA218901 from the NCI/NIH during the data collection for this study. VR is supported in part by NIH/NCATS 2KL2-TR-2385, the Melanoma Research Alliance, the Prevent Cancer Foundation, and NIH/NCI U24 CA264369-01A1. OA-W is supported in part by the Edward P. Evans Foundation, NIH/NCI (R01 CA251138 and R01 CA242020), NIH/NHLBI (R01 HL128239), NIH/NCI P50 CA254838-01, and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. We acknowledge the use of the Integrated Genomics Operation Core, funded by the NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG, P30 CA08748), Cycle for Survival, and the Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (P30 CA008748), as well as the National Cancer Institute (R37CA259260; ELD). This was supported by the Frame Family Fund (ELD), the Joy Family West Foundation (ELD), and the Applebaum Foundation (ELD).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ELD, OA-W, and BHD designed the study. ELD, JHF, MEL, VR, MY, KP-D, GAU, RR performed clinical studies and assessment. ELD, JHF, MEL, VR, MY, KP-D, GAU, RR, OA-W, and BHD performed studies and analyses on patient specimens. ELD, JHF, MEL, VR, MY, KP-D, GAU, RR, OA-W, and BHD wrote and revised the paper with approval from all co-authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
OA-W has served as a consultant for H3B Biomedicine, Foundation Medicine Inc, Merck, and Janssen, Loxo Oncology/Lilly and is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Envisagenics Inc and Harmonic Discovery Inc.; OA-W has received prior research funding from H3B Biomedicine, Loxo Oncology/Lilly, Minovia, and Nurix Therapeutics unrelated to the current manuscript. ELD discloses unpaid editorial support from Pfizer Inc and serves on an advisory board for Day One Biotherapeutics, Springworks Therapeutics, and Opna Bio, all outside the submitted work. MEL has a consultant role with Johnson and Johnson, Novocure, Janssen, Novartis, Deciphera, Kintara, RBC/La Roche Posay, Trifecta, Genentech, Loxo, Seattle Genetics, Lutris, OnQuality, Roche, Oncoderm, Apricity and research funding from Lutris, Paxman, Novocure, OQL, Novartis and AZ, all outside the submitte work. MY serves as a consultant for Janssen Research and Development outside the submitted work. VR serves as a medical consultant for Inhabit Brands, Inc outside the submitted work. GAU discloses research grant and paid consultancy and speaker bureau with GE Healthcare and Lantheus, research grant and paid consultancy from Nuclidium, research grants from RazeBio and Curium, and paid consultancy with POINT Biopharma, all outside the submitted work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Diamond, E.L., Francis, J.H., Lacouture, M.E. et al. CSF1R inhibition for histiocytic neoplasm with CBL mutations refractory to MEK1/2 inhibition. Leukemia 37, 1737–1740 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-023-01947-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-023-01947-4