To the Editor
Gunnarsson et al. [1] examined fusions in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML), ascertained their association with COSMIC single-base substitution signatures (SBS), and identified one enrichment: SBS18 in RUNX1::RUNX1T1-fusion-positive cases. Having demonstrated that SBS18 is a substantial source of mutations in RUNX1::RUNX1T1-fusion-positive AML cases, the authors suggested that DNA damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS)—the proposed etiology of SBS18—“may be of particular importance in RUNX1::RUNX1T1-fusion-positive AML” [1]. Indeed, the RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion disrupts hematopoietic differentiation [2], a process which also takes regulatory input from ROS [3]. However, the proportion of mutational burden attributable to a given mutational process does not necessarily indicate the degree to which the process drives oncogenesis [4, 5]. To assess the contribution of SBS18-associated ROS to these AML cases, one must first quantify the extent to which SBS18-attributable mutations drive oncogenesis; this quantification can be performed with metrics such as cancer effect size [4].
To attribute SNVs reported by Gunnarsson et al. [1] to the subset of COSMIC v3.2 mutational signatures that have been deemed relevant to AML [6] and that are not associated with prior treatment (as all samples collected were pediatric and diagnostic), we executed MutationalPatterns [7] signature extraction 100 times on resampled trinucleotide mutation profiles and reported mean values. We found SBS1 (an aging signature), SBS5 (a clock-like signature also associated with age), and SBS18 (usually attributed to ROS) to be the most substantial contributors to somatic mutational burden, largely in agreement with Gunnarsson et al. [1] (Gunnarsson et al. [1] didn’t identify a contribution from SBS5, perhaps due to signature bleeding [8]). RUNX1::RUNX1T1-fusion-positive samples exhibited an elevated SBS18 signature that was stable across bootstraps (Fig 1A): a significantly higher proportion of mutations in these samples was attributable to SBS18 than in samples with other fusions or no fusions (P < 0.01 for both comparisons, Mann–Whitney U test; Fig. 1B).
To assess the contributions of SBS18 and other signatures not only to mutational burden but also to oncogenesis in each Gunnarsson sample, we first estimated the cancer effect sizes of AML somatic variants using a combined dataset of the 20 whole-genome Gunnarsson samples plus an additional 197 whole-exome samples from TCGA [9]. The cancer effect size is a measure that quantifies the evolutionary advantage—namely, increased survival or proliferation—that is conferred by single-nucleotide variants. The observation of a somatic variant in tumor sequence data depends jointly on the baseline rate at which mutations arise in viable cancer cells and on the magnitude of benefit those mutations confer to cancer cell proliferation and survival. The baseline mutation rates were determined per-sample using the regression framework from dNdScv [10] that estimates gene mutation rates at the cohort level. Specific rates for each variant were rescaled based on the sample-specific trinucleotide mutation profile.
We used the cancereffectsizeR package to perform mutation rate estimation and to calculate the maximum-likelihood cancer effect sizes of all single-nucleotide variants under its default model of selection [4]. We then attributed proportions of the effect size of each variant to mutational signatures based on how likely each corresponding mutagenic process was to have caused that variant in a viable cancer cell (i.e., in accordance with the trinucleotide contexts of the variants, the trinucleotide profiles defining each signature, and the relative presence of each signature in samples carrying the variants). Computing these attributions for each signature across all variants, we obtained estimates of the proportion of total cancer effect attributable to each signature (cancer effect weight) [11].
On a case-by-case basis across the Gunnarsson cohort, mutations attributed to SBS18 consistently contributed to cancer effect as well as mutational burden (Fig. 2A). Other signatures varied in this respect: mutations attributed to aging-related cytidine deamination (SBS1) contributed substantially less to cancer effect than they did to mutational burden, and mutations attributed to another age-related process (SBS5) contributed substantially more (P < 0.001, two-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test; Fig. 2B). To an extent that verged on significance, SBS18 contributed more to oncogenesis than to mutational burden (P = 0.06, two-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Per tumor, substantially higher proportions of both mutational signature weights and cancer effect weights were attributed to SBS18 in RUNX1::RUNX1T1-fusion-positive cases than other cases (Fig. 2A–B).
To further validate the increased oncogenic effect of SBS18 mutations in RUNX1::RUNX1T1-fusion-positive cases in the Gunnarsson cohort, we separately analyzed the cancer effect weights of mutational sources in the TCGA cohort [9]. Because AMLs have low mutational burdens and whole-exome sequencing reveals few mutations per case, we performed signature analysis on a cohort-wide set of mutations derived from all of the RUNX1::RUNX1T1-fusion-positive cases, all of the cases with other fusions, and all of the cases with no fusions. Concordant with a parallel analysis of the Gunnarsson samples (Fig. 2C), the TCGA RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion samples demonstrated higher signature weights and cancer effect weights as a consequence of SBS18 than did cases with other fusions or cases with no fusions (Fig. 2D). This result validates our demonstration that in RUNX1::RUNX1T1-fusion-positive AML cases, ROS-associated processes contribute not only mutations but also oncogenic effects, supporting further investigation into the prevention of these processes.
Data availability
Somatic variant calls from whole-genome-sequenced pediatric AML cases were acquired from the Gunnarsson group and can be requested from the group via https://figshare.com/s/5a1ca3f39611c39bfaae. Additional somatic variant data were acquired from cBioPortal and are publicly available under the identifier aml_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018. All other data and code used in the analyses are available at https://github.com/Townsend-Lab-Yale/sbs18_aml/.
References
Gunnarsson R, Yang M, Olsson-Arvidsson L, Biloglav A, Behrendtz M, Castor A, et al. Single base substitution mutational signatures in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia based on whole genome sequencing. Leukemia. 2021;35:1485–9.
Al-Harbi S, Aljurf M, Mohty M, Almohareb F, Ahmed SOA. An update on the molecular pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targeting of AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1);RUNX1-RUNX1T1. Blood Adv. 2020;4:229–38.
Sillar JR, Germon ZP, DeIuliis GN, Dun MD. The role of reactive oxygen species in acute myeloid leukaemia. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20236003.
Cannataro VL, Gaffney SG, Townsend JP. Effect Sizes of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:1171–7.
Cannataro VL, Gaffney SG, Sasaki T, Issaeva N, Grewal NKS, Grandis JR, et al. APOBEC-induced mutations and their cancer effect size in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 2019;38:3475–87.
Alexandrov LB, Kim J, Haradhvala NJ, Huang MN, Tian Ng AW, Wu Y, et al. The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer. Nature. 2020;578:94–101.
Blokzijl F, Janssen R, van Boxtel R, Cuppen E. MutationalPatterns: comprehensive genome-wide analysis of mutational processes. Genome Med. 2018;10:33.
Maura F, Degasperi A, Nadeu F, Leongamornlert D, Davies H, Moore L, et al. A practical guide for mutational signature analysis in hematological malignancies. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2969.
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2059–74.
Martincorena I, Raine KM, Gerstung M, Dawson KJ, Haase K, Van Loo P, et al. Universal patterns of selection in cancer and somatic tissues. Cell. 2017;171:1029–41.e21.
Cannataro VL, Mandell JD, Townsend JP. Attribution of cancer origins to endogenous, exogenous, and preventable mutational processes. Mol Biol Evol. 2022;39, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msac084.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JM—Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing, Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision; JNF—Validation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Review & Editing, Visualization; EC—Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing, Visualization; MX—Review & Editing; VC—Methodology, Software, Review & Editing; JT—Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing, Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
JPT has consulted for Black Diamond Therapeutics, Agios Pharmaceuticals, and Servier Pharmaceuticals. VLC has consulted for Black Diamond Therapeutics. MLX has consulted for Blueprint Medicines and Pure Marrow and has served on the advisory board for Seattle Genetics. Other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mandell, J.D., Fisk, J.N., Cyrenne, E. et al. Not only mutations but also tumorigenesis can be substantially attributed to DNA damage from reactive oxygen species in RUNX1::RUNX1T1-fusion-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 36, 2931–2933 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01752-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01752-5