Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

MULTIPLE MYELOMA, GAMMOPATHIES

Plasma cells expression from smouldering myeloma to myeloma reveals the importance of the PRC2 complex, cell cycle progression, and the divergent evolutionary pathways within the different molecular subgroups

Abstract

Sequencing studies have shed some light on the pathogenesis of progression from smouldering multiple myeloma (SMM) and symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). Given the scarcity of smouldering samples, little data are available to determine which translational programmes are dysregulated and whether the mechanisms of progression are uniform across the main molecular subgroups. In this work, we investigated 223 SMM and 1348 MM samples from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) for which we had gene expression profiling (GEP). Patients were analysed by TC-7 subgroup for gene expression changes between SMM and MM. Among the commonly dysregulated genes in each subgroup, PHF19 and EZH2 highlight the importance of the PRC2.1 complex. We show that subgroup specific differences exist even at the SMM stage of disease with different biological features driving progression within each TC molecular subgroup. These data suggest that MMSET SMM has already transformed, but that the other precursor diseases are distinct clinical entities from their symptomatic counterpart.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Distribution of TC subgroups, impact on outcome, and patterns of expression changes between SMM and MM.
Fig. 2: Patterns of expression changes differ among cytogenetic subgroups.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Misund K, Keane N, Stein CK, Asmann YW, Day G, Welsh S, et al. MYC dysregulation in the progression of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2020;34:322–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bustoros M, Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, Park J, Redd R, Zhitomirsky B, Dunford AJ, et al. Genomic profiling of smoldering multiple myeloma identifies patients at a high risk of disease progression. JCO. 2020;38:2380–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyle EM, Deshpande S, Tytarenko R, Ashby C, Wang Y, Bauer MA, et al. The molecular make up of smoldering myeloma highlights the evolutionary pathways leading to multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2021;12:293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weinhold N, Heuck C, Rosenthal A, Thanendrarajan S, Stein C, Van Rhee F, et al. The clinical value of molecular subtyping multiple myeloma using gene expression profiling. Leukemia. 2016;30:423–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Khan R, Dhodapkar M, Rosenthal A, Heuck C, Papanikolaou X, Qu P, et al. Four genes predict high risk of progression from smoldering to symptomatic multiple myeloma (SWOG S0120). Haematologica. 2015;100:1214–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dhodapkar MV, Sexton R, Waheed S, Usmani S, Papanikolaou X, Nair B, et al. Clinical, genomic, and imaging predictors of myeloma progression from asymptomatic monoclonal gammopathies (SWOG S0120). Blood. 2014;123:78–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stein CK, Pawlyn C, Chavan S, Rasche L, Weinhold N, Corken A, et al. The varied distribution and impact of RAS codon and other key DNA alterations across the translocation cyclin D subgroups in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:27854–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blighe K, Rana S, Lewis M. Enhanced Volcano: Publication-ready volcano plots with enhanced colouring and labeling. R package version; 1.8.0. https://github.com/kevinblighe/EnhancedVolcano.

  9. Mason MJ, Schinke C, Eng CLP, Towfic F, Gruber F, Dervan A, et al. Multiple Myeloma DREAM challenge reveals epigenetic regulator PHF19 as marker of aggressive disease. Leukemia. 2020;34:1866–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alaterre E, Raimbault S, Goldschmidt H, Bouhya S, Requirand G, Robert N, et al. CD24, CD27, CD36 and CD302 gene expression for outcome prediction in patients with multiple myeloma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:98931–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Franqui-Machin R, Hao M, Bai H, Gu Z, Zhan X, Habelhah H, et al. Destabilizing NEK2 overcomes resistance to proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:2877–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mikulasova A, Ashby C, Tytarenko RG, Qu P, Rosenthal A, Dent JA, et al. Microhomology-mediated end joining drives complex rearrangements and overexpression of MYC and PVT1 in multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2020;105:1055–66. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.217927.

  13. Wang Y, Ren F, Chen P, Liu S, Song Z, Ma X. Identification of a six-gene signature with prognostic value for patients with endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2018;7:5632–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Y, Manjunath M, Yan J, Baur BA, Zhang S, Roy S, et al. The cancer-associated genetic variant Rs3903072 modulates immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Front Genet. 2019;10:754.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho SH, Goenka S, Henttinen T, Gudapati P, Reinikainen A, Eischen CM, et al. PARP-14, a member of the B aggressive lymphoma family, transduces survival signals in primary B cells. Blood. 2009;113:2416–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients and their families for their contributions to this study. BAW and GJM received grant support through a Translational Research Programme award from the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (6602-20 and 6600-20).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Designed the study: EMB, BAW, GJM, FVR. Analysed the data: EMB, AR, AH. Interpreted the data: EMB, BAW, FED, HG, YuW, GJM. Acquired the data: PF, MR, CA, MB, SKJ, CPW, YanW, CDS, ST, MZ, BB, MVD, FVR, GLM, FED. Wrote the manuscript: EMB, FED, BW. Reviewed the manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian A. Walker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boyle, E.M., Rosenthal, A., Ghamlouch, H. et al. Plasma cells expression from smouldering myeloma to myeloma reveals the importance of the PRC2 complex, cell cycle progression, and the divergent evolutionary pathways within the different molecular subgroups. Leukemia 36, 591–595 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01379-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01379-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links