Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Call to action: prioritizing delivery room care for neonates with critical congenital heart disease

Managing high-risk newborns with critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) in the delivery room is a unique challenge, characterized by complex physiology, heightened urgency, the coordinated efforts of multiple medical teams, and depending on the facility, the infrequent occurrence of such cases. Currently, there is a lack of unified guidance for resuscitation of these newborns in the delivery room. In this commentary, we advocate for an integrated approach involving maternal-fetal medicine specialists, fetal cardiologists, neonatologists, and cardiac intensivists. The proposed approach emphasizes collaborative pre-delivery planning, focusing on anticipated risk factors, postnatal physiology, and clinical management plans. We stress the importance of simulation-based education specifically addressing CCHD scenarios and advocate for research collaborations to establish evidence-based guidelines and track outcomes. Ultimately, a comprehensive, collaborative, and standardized approach, involving prenatal coordination, communication, and education, is essential for optimizing the delivery room management of neonates with CCHD.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Stages of multidisciplinary collaboration for neonates with critical congenital heart disease.

References

  1. Levy PT, Thomas AR, Wethall A, Perez D, Steurer M, Ball MK. Rethinking Congenital Heart Disease in Preterm Neonates. Neoreviews. 2022;23:e373–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marzec L, Zettler ET, Cua CL, Rivera BK, Pasquali S, Katheria A, et al. Timing of umbilical cord clamping among infants with congenital heart disease. Progr.Pediat. Cardiol. 2020;59:101318.

  3. Thomas AR, Ma AL, Weinberg DD, Huber M, Ades A, Rychik J, et al. Delivery room oxygen physiology and respiratory interventions for newborns with cyanotic congenital heart disease. J Perinatol. 2021;41:2309–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sethi N, Klugman D, Said M, Hom L, Bowers S, Berger JT, et al. Standardized delivery room management for neonates with a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: A model for improving interdisciplinary delivery room care. J Neonatal-Perinatal Med. 2021;14:317–29.

  5. Haxel CS, Johnson JN, Hintz S, Renno MS, Ruano R, Zyblewski SC, et al. Care of the Fetus With Congenital Cardiovascular Disease: From Diagnosis to Delivery. Pediatrics. 2022;150:e2022056415C.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Levy P, Thomas AR, Law BHY, Joynt C, Gupta R, Elshenawy S, et al. Multicentre study protocol comparing standard NRP to deveLoped Educational Modules for Resuscitation of Neonates in the Delivery Room with Congenital Heart Disease (LEARN-CHD). BMJ Open. 2023;13:e067391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wetzel EA, Lang TR, Pendergrass TL, Taylor RG, Geis GL. Identification of Latent Safety Threats Using High-Fidelity Simulation-Based Training with Multidisciplinary Neonatology Teams. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39:268–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Auguste TC, Boswick JA, Loyd MK, Battista A. The simulation of an ex utero intrapartum procedure to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:395–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Donofrio MT, Levy RJ, Schuette JJ, Skurow-Todd K, Sten MB, Stallings C, et al. Specialized delivery room planning for fetuses with critical congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:737–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Backes CH, Huang H, Cua CL, Garg V, Smith CV, Yin H, et al. Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in infants with congenital heart disease: A pilot, randomized, controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2015;35:826–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kai-ou Tang, M.A., Boston Children’s Hospital, for her illustration of Figure 1.

Funding

Sources of Financial Assistance: This work was supported by T32 HD 098061 and by the Canadian NRP research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AT and NA conceptualized the manuscript. AT, NA, PL, BL, CJ, RG, SE, DR, LP, JS, SG, BAJ, MB, MD, EA, EV, SG all contributed to the first draft, performed literature review, and revised subsequent drafts. All authors have approved the submitted manuscript and have agreed to be accountable for the contents.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alyssa R. Thomas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, A.R., Levy, P.T., Donofrio, M.T. et al. Call to action: prioritizing delivery room care for neonates with critical congenital heart disease. J Perinatol 44, 321–324 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01828-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01828-9

Search

Quick links