Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Factors associated with follow-up of infants with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy in a high-risk infant clinic in California

Abstract

Objective

To determine the rates of high-risk infant follow-up (HRIF) attendance and the characteristics associated with follow-up among infants with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in California.

Study design

Using population-based datasets, 1314 infants with HIE born in 2010–2016 were evaluated. The characteristics associated with follow-up were identified through multivariable logistic regression.

Results

73.9% of infants attended HRIF by age 1. Follow-up rates increased and variation in follow-up by clinic decreased over time. Female infants; those born to African-American, single, less than college-educated, or publicly insured caregivers; and those referred to high-volume or regional programs had lower follow-up rates. In multivariable analysis, Asian and Pacific Islander race/ethnicity had lower odds of follow-up; infants with college- or graduate school-educated caregivers or referred to mid-volume HRIF programs had greater odds.

Conclusion

Sociodemographic and program-level characteristics were associated with lack of follow-up among HIE infants. Understanding these characteristics may improve the post-discharge care of HIE infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs SE, Berg M, Hunt R, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Inder TE, Davis PG. Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013:CD003311. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003311.pub3.

  2. Kurinczuk JJ, White-Koning M, Badawi N. Epidemiology of neonatal encephalopathy and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86:329–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Perez A, Ritter S, Brotschi B, Werner H, Caflisch J, Martin E, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. J Pediatr. 2013;163:454–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pappas A, Shankaran S, McDonald SA, Vohr BR, Hintz SR, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Cognitive outcomes after neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatrics. 2015;135:e624–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vannucci RC. Current and potentially new management strategies for perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics. 1990;85:961–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Azzopardi DV, Strohm B, Edwards AD, Dyet L, Halliday HL, Juszczak E, et al. Moderate hypothermia to treat perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1349–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Newborn AAoPCoFa. Hospital discharge of the high-risk neonate. Pediatrics. 2008;122:1119–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vohr B, Wright LL, Hack M, Aylward G. Follow-up care of high-risk infants. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1377–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ballantyne M, Stevens B, Guttmann A, Willan AR, Rosenbaum P. Maternal and infant predictors of attendance at Neonatal Follow-Up programmes. Child Care Health Dev. 2014;40:250–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harmon SL, Conaway M, Sinkin RA, Blackman JA. Factors associated with neonatal intensive care follow-up appointment compliance. Clin Pediatr (Philos). 2013;52:389–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perenyi A, Katz J, Flom P, Regensberg S, Sklar T. Analysis of compliance, morbidities and outcome in neurodevelopmental follow-up visits in urban African-American infants at environmental risk. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2010;1:396–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolke D, Söhne B, Ohrt B, Riegel K. Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropouts. Lancet. 1995;345:447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brady JM, Pouppirt N, Bernbaum J, D’Agostino JA, Gerdes M, Hoffman C, et al. Why do children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia not attend neonatal follow-up care? Parental views of barriers. Acta Paediatr. 2018;107:996–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ballantyne M, Benzies K, Rosenbaum P, Lodha A. Mothers’ and health care providers’ perspectives of the barriers and facilitators to attendance at Canadian neonatal follow-up programs. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41:722–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hintz SR, Gould JB, Bennett MV, Lu T, Gray EE, Jocson MAL, et al. Factors associated with successful first high-risk infant clinic visit for very low birth weight infants in California. J Pediatr. 2019;210:91–8.e91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tin W, Fritz S, Wariyar U, Hey E. Outcome of very preterm birth: children reviewed with ease at 2 years differ from those followed up with difficulty. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998;79:F83–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Callanan C, Doyle L, Rickards A, Kelly E, Ford G, Davis N. Children followed with difficulty: how do they differ? J Paediatr Child Health. 2001;37:152–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazaubrun C DU, Garel M, Ancel PY, Supernant K, Blondel B, Paris-Petite-Couronne GE. Difficulties with the follow-up of a cohort of very preterm infants: the EPIPAGE Paris-Petite-Couronne population. Arch Pediatr. 2006;13:1202–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gluckman PD, Wyatt JS, Azzopardi D, Ballard R, Edwards AD, Ferriero DM, et al. Selective head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia after neonatal encephalopathy: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2005;365:663–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Ehrenkranz RA, Tyson JE, McDonald SA, Donovan EF, et al. Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1574–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou WH, Cheng GQ, Shao XM, Liu XZ, Shan RB, Zhuang DY, et al. Selective head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia after neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in China. J Pediatr. 2010;157:367–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jacobs SE, Morley CJ, Inder TE, Stewart MJ, Smith KR, McNamara PJ, et al. Whole-body hypothermia for term and near-term newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165:692–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Simbruner G, Mittal RA, Rohlmann F, Muche R, Participants nnnT. Systemic hypothermia after neonatal encephalopathy: outcomes of neo.nEURO.network RCT. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e771–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Papile LA, Baley JE, Benitz W, Cummings J, Carlo WA, Eichenwald E, et al. Hypothermia and neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatrics. 2014;133:1146–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Akula VP, Gould JB, Kan P, Bollman L, Profit J, Lee HC. Characteristics of neonatal transports in California. J Perinatol. 2016;36:1122–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pai VV, Kan P, Bennett M, Carmichael SL, Lee HC, Hintz SR. Improved referral of very low birthweight infants to high-risk infant follow-up in California. J Pediatr. 2019;216:101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang BG, Lee HC, Gray EE, Gould JB, Hintz SR. Programmatic and administrative barriers to high-risk infant follow-up care. Am J Perinatol. 2018;35:940–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Meurs KP, Yan ES, Randall KS, Chock VY, Davis AS, Glennon CS, et al. Development of a NeuroNICU with a broader focus on all newborns at risk of brain injury: the first 2 years. Am J Perinatol. 2018;35:1197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nehra V, Pici M, Visintainer P, Kase JS. Indicators of compliance for developmental follow-up of infants discharged from a regional NICU. J Perinat Med. 2009;37:677–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by grant number F32 HD096778-01 from the National Institutes of Health, awarded to VVP. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VVP contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study, interpreted the data, and drafted and reviewed the manuscript. PK and TL contributed to the design of the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and reviewed the manuscript. EEG and MB contributed to the design of the study and reviewed the manuscript. MALJ contributed to the conceptualization of the study and reviewed the manuscript. HCL, SLC, and SRH contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study, analyzed the data, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vidya V. Pai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pai, V.V., Kan, P., Lu, T. et al. Factors associated with follow-up of infants with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy in a high-risk infant clinic in California. J Perinatol 41, 1347–1354 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00898-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00898-3

Search

Quick links