Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The impact of a vegan diet on pregnancy outcomes

Journal of Perinatology volume 41, pages 1129–1133 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective

To determine the effect of a maternal vegan diet on pregnancy outcome.

Study design

This is a prospective observational study. Women with a singleton pregnancy who maintained the same diet prior to, and throughout current pregnancy were enrolled. Stratification was performed according to diet type: vegans, lacto–ovo–vegetarians, fish-eaters, and omnivores.

Results

Overall, 273 women were enrolled, of them, 112 omnivores, 37 fish-eaters, 64 lacto–ovo–vegetarians, and 60 vegans. The vegan diet was significantly associated with an increased risk of small-for-gestational-age newborns compared only to an omnivore diet (RR = 5.9, 95% CI, 1.2–21.8). The incidence of preterm birth was similar in all groups. Vegans had lower birthweight compared to lacto–ovo–vegetarians (3015 ± 420 g vs. 3285 ± 482 g, P = 0.004), and to omnivores (3328 ± 495 g, P < 0.001), but not to fish-eaters. Vegans also had a lower mean gestational weight gain compared only to omnivores (11.6 ± 4.2 kg vs. 14.3 ± 4.6 kg, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

The vegan diet is associated with an increased risk for small-for-gestational-age newborns and lower birthweight.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Key TJ, Appleby PN, Rosell MS. Health effects of vegetarian and vegan diets. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006;65:35–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilsing AMJ, Crowe FL, Lloyd-Wright Z, Sanders TAB, Appleby PN, Allen NE, et al. Serum concentrations of vitamin B12 and folate in British male omnivores, vegetarians and vegans: results from a cross-sectional analysis of the EPIC-Oxford cohort study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64:933–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Majchrzak D, Singer I, Männer M, Rust P, Genser D, Wagner KH, et al. B-vitamin status and concentrations of homocysteine in Austrian omnivores, vegetarians and vegans. Ann Nutr Metab. 2007;50:485–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elorinne AL, Alfthan G, Erlund I, Kivimäki H, Paju A, Salminen I, et al. Food and nutrient intake and nutritional status of Finnish vegans and non-vegetarians. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Winston CJ. Health effeets of vegan diets 1-3. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1627–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leung AM, LaMar A, He X, Braverman LE, Pearce EN. Iodine status and thyroid function of Boston-area vegetarians and vegans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:1303–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sebastiani G, Barbero AH, Borrás-Novel C, Casanova MA, Aldecoa-Bilbao V, Andreu-Fernández V, et al. The effects of vegetarian and vegan diet during pregnancy on the health of mothers and offspring. Nutrients. 2019;11:1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pawlak R. To vegan or not to vegan when pregnant, lactating or feeding young children. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017;71:1259–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganpule A, Yajnik CS, Fall CHD, Rao S, Fisher DJ, Kanade A, et al. Bone mass in Indian children—relationships to maternal nutritional status and diet during pregnancy: the Pune maternal nutrition study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:2994–3001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Adaikalakoteswari A, Vatish M, Lawson A, Wood C, Sivakumar K, McTernan PG, et al. Low maternal vitamin B12 status is associated with lower cord blood HDL cholesterol in white caucasians living in the UK. Nutrients. 2015;7:2401–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Piccoli GB, Clari R, Vigotti FN, Leone F, Attini R, Cabiddu G, et al. Vegan-vegetarian diets in pregnancy: danger or panacea? A systematic narrative review. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122:623–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pistollato F, Sumalla Cano S, Elio I, Masias Vergara M, Giampieri F, Battino M. Plant-based and plant-rich diet patterns during gestation: beneficial effects and possible shortcomings. Adv Nutr. 2015;6:581–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrara P, Sandullo F, Di Ruscio F, Franceschini G, Peronti B, Blasi V, et al. The impact of lacto-ovo-/lacto-vegetarian and vegan diets during pregnancy on the birth anthropometric parameters of the newborn. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2019;0:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zulyniak MA, De Souza RJ, Shaikh M, Desai D, Lefebvre DL, Gupta M, et al. Does the impact of a plant-based diet during pregnancy on birth weight differ by ethnicity? A dietary pattern analysis from a prospective Canadian birth cohort alliance. BMJ Open. 2017;7:1–9.

  15. Tan C, Zhao Y, Wang S. Is a vegetarian diet safe to follow during pregnancy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59:2586–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Avnon T, Anbar R, Lavie I, Ben-Mayor Bashi T, Paz Dubinsky E, Shaham S, et al. Does vegan diet influence umbilical cord vitamin B12, folate, and ferritin levels? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301:1417–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131;e49–64.

  18. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e1–25.

  19. Dollberg S, Haklai Z, Mimouni FB, Gorfein I, Gordon E-S. Birth weight standards in the live-born population in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7:311–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. J Am Med Assoc. 1998;280:1690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosell M, Appleby P, Spencer E, Key T. Weight gain over 5 years in 21 966 meat-eating, fish-eating, vegetarian, and vegan men and women in EPIC-Oxford. Int J Obes. 2006;30:1389–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldstein RF, Abell SK, Ranasinha S, Misso M, Boyle JA, Black MH, et al. Association of gestational weight gain with maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2017;317:2207–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Viswanathan M, Siega-Riz AM, Moos MK, Deierlein A, Mumford S, Knaack J, et al. Outcomes of maternal weight gain. Evid Rep. Technol Assess. 2008;168:1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carter JP, Furman T, Hutcheson HR. Preeclampsia and reproductive performance in a community of vegans. South Med J. 1987;80:692–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gabbe SG, Graves CR. Management of diabetes mellitus complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:857–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jali MV, Desai BR, Gowda S, Kambar S, Jali SM. A hospital based study of prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in an urban population of India. Eur Rev Med Pharm Sci. 2011;15:1306–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Lis Maternity & Women’s Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Tomer Avnon, Tali Ben-Mayor Bashi & Yariv Yogev

  2. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Tomer Avnon, Inbar Lavie & Yariv Yogev

  3. Nutrition and Dietetic Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Efrat Paz Dubinsky & Ronit Anbar

  4. School of Nutritional Sciences, The Robert H Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

    Ronit Anbar

Authors
  1. Tomer Avnon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Efrat Paz Dubinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Inbar Lavie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tali Ben-Mayor Bashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ronit Anbar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yariv Yogev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Tomer Avnon—conception, methodology, investigation supervision, data curation, formal analysis, and drafting the initial paper. Efrat Paz Dubinsky—investigation and data curation. Inbar Lavie—formal analysis. Tali Ben-Mayor Bashi—investigation and data curation. Ronit Anbar—methodology and investigation. Yariv Yogev—methodology, investigation supervision, and resources. All authors revised the paper, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomer Avnon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avnon, T., Paz Dubinsky, E., Lavie, I. et al. The impact of a vegan diet on pregnancy outcomes. J Perinatol 41, 1129–1133 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00804-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00804-x

Search

Advanced search

Quick links