Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Pre-hypertension and subclinical carotid damage: a meta-analysis

Abstract

The association between pre-hypertension (pre-HTN) and subclinical carotid damage is poorly defined. We performed a meta-analysis of ultrasonographic studies assessing carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in untreated pre-HTN subjects. The OVID-MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched for English-language articles without time restriction up to February 2018 through focused, high sensitive search strategies. Studies were identified by crossing the following search terms: “pre-hypertension”, “high normal blood pressure”, “carotid intima-media thickness”, “carotid atherosclerosis”, “ultrasonography”. Overall, 7645 subjects (3374 normotensive, 1936 untreated pre-HTN, and 2335 HTN individuals) of both genders were included in seven studies. In the pooled study population, common carotid IMT showed a progressive increase from normotensive (723 ± 39 µm) to pre-HTN (779 ± 45 µm) (standardized mean difference, SMD 0.36 ± 0.08, CI 0.34–0.46, p < 0.0001) and to HTN subjects (858 ± 82 µm) (SMD 0.39 ± 0.07, CI 0.26–0.54, p = 0.002 vs. pre-HT). The statistical difference did not change after correction for publication bias and was not affected by a single study effect. Our meta-analysis shows that carotid IMT in pre-HTN subjects is intermediate between normotensive and HTN individuals. These findings support the view that pre-HTN is an unfavourable condition that should be properly managed in order to prevent vascular damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Bohm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2013;31:1281–357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pierdomenico SD, Cuccurullo F. Risk reduction after regression of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens. 2010;23:876–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bang CN, Devereux RB, Okin PM. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy or strain is associated with lower incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients independent of blood pressure reduction - A LIFE review. J Electrocardiol. 2014;47:630–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cuspidi C, Meani S, Valerio C, Esposito A, Sala C, Maisaidi M, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure, target organ damage and aortic root size in never-treated essential hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21:531–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chrysohoou C, Pitsavos C, Panagiotakos DB, Skoumas J, Stefanadis C. Association between prehypertension status and inflammatory markers related to atherosclerotic disease. The ATTICA Study. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17:568–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Garofalo C, Borrelli S, Pacilio M, Minutolo R, Chiodini P, De Nicola L, et al. Hypertension and prehypertension and prediction of development of decreased estimated GFR in the general population: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67:89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soliman EZ, Ambrosius WT, Cushman WC, Zhang ZM, Bates JT, Neyra JA, et al. SPRINT Research Study Group. Effect of intensive blood pressure lowering on left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension: SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). Circulation. 2017;136:440–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tadic M, Majstorovic A, Pencic B, Ivanovic B, Neskovic A, Badano L, et al. The impact of high-normal blood pressure on left ventricular mechanics: a three-dimensional and speckle tracking echocardiography study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30:699–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jang SY, Kim S, Lee CK, Cho EJ, Cho SJ, Lee SC. Pre-hypertension and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in middle-aged Koreans. Korean Circ J. 2016;46:536–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Santos ABS, Gupta DK, Bello NA, Gori M, Claggett B, Fuchs FD, et al. Pre-hypertension is associated with abnormalities of cardiac structure and function in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Hypertens. 2016;29:568–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hald EM, Lijfering WM, Mathiesen EB, Johnsen SH, Løchen ML, Njølstad I, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis predicts future myocardial infarction but not venous thromboembolism: the Tromso Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:226–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baldassarre D, Veglia F, Hamsten A, Humphries SE, Rauramaa R, de Faire U, et al. IMPROVE Study Group. Progression of carotid intima-media thickness as predictor of vascular events: results from the IMPROVE study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:2273–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman, DG PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (Clinical Research ed). 2009; 339, b2535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Manios E, Tsivgoulis G, Koroboki E, Stamatelopoulos K, Papamichael C, Toumanidis S, et al. Impact of prehypertension on common carotid artery intima-media thickness and left ventricular mass. Stroke. 2009;40:1515–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Toprak A, Wang H, Chen W, Paul T, Ruan L, Srinivasan S, et al. Pre-hypertension and black–white contrasts in cardiovascular risk in young adults: Bogalusa Heart Study. J Hypertens. 2009;27:243–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan JR, Chen YH, Bi YF, Xu M, Huang Y, Dai M, et al. Prehypertension is associated with atherosclerosis in Type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes. 2010;2:56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim SH, Cho GY, Baik I, Lim SY, Choi CU, Lim HE, et al. Early abnormalities of cardiovascular structure and function in middle-aged Korean adults with pre-hypertension: The Korean Genome Epidemiology Study. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24:218–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Urbina EM, Khoury PR, McCoy C, Daniels SR, Kimball TR, Dolan LM. Cardiac and vascular consequences of pre-hypertension in youth. J Clin Hypertens. 2011;13:332–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong H, Wang H, Liao H. Prehypertension is associated with increased carotid atherosclerotic plaque in the community population of Southern China. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013;13:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sung SH, Cheng HM, Wang KL, Yu WC, Chuang SY, Ting CT, et al. White coat hypertension is more risky than pre hypertension: important role of arterial wave reflections. Hypertension. 2013;61:1346–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pignoli P, Tremoli E, Poli A, Oreste P, Paoletti R. Intimal plus medial thickness of arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation. 1986;74:1399–408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Salonen R, Haapanen A, Salonen JM. Measurement of intima-media thickness of common carotid arteries with high resolution B-mode ultrasonography: inter- and intra-observer variability. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1991;17:225–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Y, Wang QJ. The prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension among US adults according to the new Joint National Committee guidelines: new challenges of the old problem. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2126–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai PS, Ke TL, Huang CJ, Tsai JC, Chen PL, Wang SY, et al. Prevalence and determinants of pre-hypertension status in the Taiwanese general population. J Hypertens. 2005;23:1355–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Grotto I, Grossman E, Huerta M, Sharabi Y. Prevalence of pre-hypertension and associated cardiovascular risk profiles among young Israeli adults. Hypertension. 2006;48:254–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2017;2017:13. Nov

    Google Scholar 

  29. Natali A, Muscelli E, Casolaro A, Nilsson P, Melander O, Lalic N, et al. Metabolic characteristics of prehypertension: role of classification criteria and gender. J Hypertens. 2009;27:2394–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zavodni AE, Wasserman BA, McClelland RL, Gomes AS, Folsom AR, Polak JF, et al. Carotid plaque morphology and composition in relation to incident cardiovascular events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Radiology. 2014;271:381–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Den Ruijter HM, Peters SA, Anderson TJ, Britton AR, Dekker JM, Eijkemans MJ, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness measurements in cardiovascular risk prediction: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;308:796–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesare Cuspidi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cuspidi, C., Sala, C., Tadic, M. et al. Pre-hypertension and subclinical carotid damage: a meta-analysis. J Hum Hypertens 33, 34–40 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-018-0114-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-018-0114-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links