Abstract
Background/Aims
Coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality are higher in people of South Asian origin than in those of African origin. We investigated whether as young adults without diabetes, people in Mauritius of South Asian descent (Indians) would show a more adverse cardiovascular risk profile that those of predominantly African descent (Creoles), and whether this could be explained by ethnic differences in visceral adiposity or other fat distribution patterns.
Methods
The study was conducted in 189 young non-physically active adults, with the following measurements conducted after an overnight fast: anthropometry (weight, height, waist circumference), whole-body and regional body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, blood pressure, and blood assays for glycemic (glucose and HbA1c) and lipid profile (triglycerides and cholesterols).
Results
The results indicate higher serum triglycerides and lower HDL cholesterol in men than in women, and in Indians than in Creoles (pā<ā0.001). No significant differences due to sex or ethnicity are observed in body mass index and waist circumference, but indices of visceral adiposity (visceral/android, visceral/subcutaneous) and visceral-to-peripheral adiposity ratio (visceral/gynoid, visceral/limb) were significantly higher in men than in women, and in Indians than in Creoles. The significant effects of sex and ethnicity on blood lipid profile were either completely abolished or reduced to a greater extent after adjusting for the ratio of visceral-to-peripheral adiposity than for visceral adiposity per se.
Conclusions
In young adults in Mauritius, Indians show a more adverse pattern of body fat distribution and blood lipid risk profile than Creoles. Differences in their fat distribution patterns, however, only partially explain their differential atherogenic lipid risk profile, amid a greater impact of visceral-to-peripheral adiposity ratio than that of visceral adiposity per se on sex and ethnic differences in cardiovascular risks; the former possibly reflecting the ratio of hazardous (visceral) adiposity and protective (peripheral) superficial subcutaneous adiposity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
It is now recognized that people of certain race-ethnic groups experience a disproportionately greater burden of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, with the most compelling evidence deriving from studies conducted on first-generation migrants or their descendants living in Europe, North America, and in other diaspora countries. In particular, people with origins from countries of South Asia (Indian subcontinent) have a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular mortality than Caucasians of European ancestry [1,2,3,4,5,6]. African-Americans show higher rates of diabetes, coronary heart disease, and stroke than white Americans of European descent [4, 7], while black people of African-Caribbean origins living in the UK have higher rates of diabetes and stroke than white British Europeans [5, 6]. Furthermore, while people with origins from South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa share higher risks for type 2 diabetes than people of European Caucasian origin [5,6,7], those of South Asian origins have higher risks for coronary heart disease than people of African-Caribbean origins [5, 8].
In Mauritius, an island nation whose multi-ethnic population comprises primarily those of South Asian (Indian) ancestry and of predominantly African ancestry (Creoles), national health surveys conducted since the mid-1980ās have also documented a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in both these ethnicities [9,10,11,12]. Notably, while the prevalence of type 2 diabetes was reported to be equally high both in Mauritian Indians and Creoles [9, 10] and to increase to similar extent in both ethnicities over the past decades [11], the Indians seem more prone to coronary heart disease and stroke than the Creoles [13, 14]. Among the major factors that could be involved in the greater predisposition of Mauritian Indians than Creoles to cardiovascular diseases, a less favorable cardiovascular risk profile (higher triglycerides and lower HDL cholesterol), has been reported among Indians [15,16,17], although this was not explained by ethnic differences in abdominal adiposity [15]. The latter, however, was assessed anthropometrically as waist-to-hip ratio, and hence may not accurately reflect central adiposity. Given evidence that proneness to store fat in visceral adipose tissue is an independent predictor for the development of atherogenic dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease risks [18,19,20,21,22], the aims of the study reported here were to investigate:
-
(i)
whether as young adults without diabetes, Mauritian Indians would show a less favorable cardiovascular risk profile and a more adverse body fat distribution pattern characterized by higher visceral adiposity compared to Creoles, and
-
(ii)
the extent to which potential differences in visceral fat or other fat distribution patterns could explain differences due to sex and ethnicity in the cardiovascular risk profile of these young adults.
Subjects and methods
Participants and study design
Healthy young adult participants (nā=ā189) were recruited from the two main ethnic groups: those of South Asian (Indian) ancestry and those of predominantly African/Malagasy ancestry (Creoles); these two ethnicities constituting two-thirds and a-quarter of the islandās population, respectively [23]. They were eligible if they were men or women of 18ā40 years of age, with relatively stable body weight (defined as <3% variation during the past 3 months), and non-physically active as defined by the Sedentary Behaviour Research Network [24]. Smokers, people who regularly consume alcoholic drinks, and women with menstrual irregularities, pregnant or breastfeeding women were excluded. The study was conducted in accordance to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health and Wellness, Republic of Mauritius (ethical approval reference code: MHC/CT/NETH/RAME); written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Anthropometry
Body weight was measured on an electronic weighing scale (Tanita Corporation, Tokyo), height was measured using a portable stadiometer (Tanita Leicester Height Measure, Leicester, UK), and waist circumference (WC) was measured at navel level using a non-stretchable tape, and according to the Standardization Reference Manual of Lohman et al. [25].
Body composition and fat distribution
Whole-body composition was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using a HologicTM HorizonĀ® QDRĀ® WI System (Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA, USA), and according to guidelines for DXA procedures [26]. Scans were also analyzed to estimate the regional fat mass using the standardized regions specified by the manufacture for trunk, android, gynoid, and appendicular (limb) fat, as well as visceral adipose tissue mass (also referred to as visceral fat) using the Hologic Visceral Fat software. Abdominal subcutaneous fat (i.e., subcutaneous fat in the android region) was calculated as the difference between android fat and visceral fat. Peripheral adiposity refers to gynoid fat or appendicular (limb) fat, the latter being the sum of fat mass of the arms and legs.
Blood assays and blood pressure
Resting blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) was measured by oscillometry using an OMRONĀ® M2 automatic blood pressure monitor (OMRON Healthcare Ltd., Milton Keynes, UK), after which a blood sample was collected. HbA1c was measured on the same day on whole blood by HPLC (TosohG8, Tosoh Bioscience Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The other blood parameters were measured from plasma or serum (obtained by centrifugation and stored at ā20āĀ°C until later assays) using automated clinical analyzers (Abbott Architect c8000, Illinois, USA), namely plasma glucose and serum concentrations of triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (Total-C) and HDL cholesterol (HDL-C). The serum value for LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) was calculated using the Friedewald formula [27].
Data analysis and statistics
Data analyses were performed using statistical software (STATISTIX version 8.0; Analytical Software, St Paul, Minnesota, USA), the figures were made using Graphpad Prism Software (version 9.3.1 for Windows, San Diego, CA, USA). The tabulated data are presented as MeanāĀ±āstandard deviation (SD), and the data analyzed by two-factor analysis of variance and covariance to test for significance the effect of sex, ethnicity, and sex-ethnicity interaction. Because of its skewed distribution, the values of TG were logarithmically (log10) transformed to normalize the distribution prior to the application of statistical analyses. Linear model procedures were also applied for statistical comparisons of the two regression lines for equality of variance, slopes, and elevations (that is, y-intercepts). The analytical software for comparison of regression lines utilizes the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). For all tests, significance was set at pā<ā0.05.
Results
Physical characteristics
The participants (nā=ā189) were young adults (mean/median age of ~26 years) with a large range of BMI varying between 14 and 37ākg/m2 (mean/median of 24.5 and 24ākg/m2, respectively). At the time of recruitment, all subjects were apparently healthy on the basis of questionnaire and interview. Nevertheless, upon performing their blood assays and taking their blood pressure, fasting blood glucose and HbA1c were found to be above limits of normality for 12 and 44% of the subjects, respectively, while about a-third of the subjects had high diastolic blood pressure (Supplementary Table S1). Among them, a few were diagnosed with overt diabetes (nā=ā2) or hypertension (nā=ā4). Their data are nonetheless included in the analysis as presented in the Tables and Figures here, as sensitivity analysis indicates that their omission had no impact on result outcomes and interpretations.
Their physical characteristics, according to sex and ethnicity, are presented in Table 1. No significant differences across groups/subgroups are observed for age, BMI, and WC. While men show higher stature than women by about 14ācm on average (1.74 vs 1.60ām, pā<ā0.001), analysis by ethnicity indicates that Indians were on average shorter than Creoles, with the difference in height reaching statistical significance in men (1.73 vs 1.78ām, pā<ā0.05) though not in women (1.60 vs 1.62ām). Analysis of body composition as fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass index (FFMI), and appendicular soft lean mass index (ALMI) ā the latter a proxy for skeletal muscle mass - indicate significant effects of sex and ethnicity for FFMI and ALMI, with values for Indians being lower than for Creoles. By contrast, FMI is observed to be higher in Indians than in Creoles in men, but not in women, with ANOVA indicating a significant effect of sex (pā<ā0.001), and not of ethnicity.
Body composition and fat distribution patterns
Application of linear regression analysis, however, indicates both sex and ethnic differences in the BMI-FMI relationship, as well as in the WC-trunk fat% relationship, as judged by statistically significant y-intercepts (elevations) when comparing sex and ethnicity within each sex (Fig. 1, AāF). For the same BMI (or for same WC), women show higher total FMI (and higher trunk fat%) than men (A, D), and within each sex, Indians show greater total FMI (and greater trunk fat%) than Creoles (BāF). Furthermore, sex and ethnic differences are also observed for regression plots of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) as a function of total body fat or trunk fat, as indicated by significant differences in the y-intercept for VAT vs total body fat (Fig. 2, AāC), and VAT vs trunk fat (DāF). These results indicate that for the same amount of total body fat or trunk fat, men show higher VAT than women (A, D), while Indians show higher values for VAT than Creoles, independently of sex (B, C, E, F).
The results of these regression analyses suggesting disproportionately higher visceral fat in men than in women, and in Indians than in Creoles, are also observed in some central adiposity indices, specifically in the ratios of visceral/android fat and visceral/subcutaneous fat in the abdominal region (Table 2), as well as in the indices of visceral-to-peripheral adiposity, namely in the ratios of visceral/gynoid fat and visceral/limb fat. These significant effects in adiposity indices contrast with a lack of statistical significance for the effects of sex and ethnicity on absolute values (kg) of central adiposity (android fat, visceral fat, abdominal subcutaneous fat), as well as after adjusting these measures of central adiposity for height (or height2) as covariate. Indeed, no significant correlations are observed between these measures of central adiposity and height (or height2) whether analyzed for the whole population sample or separately for men and women. Furthermore, while a significant sex effect (menā>āwomen), is also observed in the ratio of android/gynoid fat, no significant effect of ethnicity is observed for this adiposity index.
Cardiometabolic health
The results on cardiometabolic health markers are presented in Table 3. No significant effect of sex or ethnicity is observed for fasting blood glucose and HbA1c. By contrast, highly significant effects due to sex and ethnicity are observed for TG (menā>āwomen; Indiansā>āCreoles) and HDL-C (menā<āwomen; Indiansā<āCreoles). A significant effect of ethnicity (pā<ā0.05), but not of sex, is also observed for Total-C and LDL-C (Indiansā>āCreoles). Furthermore, a highly significant effect of sex (pā<ā0.001) is observed for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (menā>āwomen by about 14 and 6āmm Hg, respectively), but there is no significant effect due to ethnicity.
The results of covariance analysis in examining the extent to which any significant effect of sex or ethnicity for a given cardiometabolic health marker (i.e. unadjusted) is altered after controlling for various adiposity indices (as covariants) are presented in Table 4. The significant effects of sex on TG and HDL-C (unadjusted pā<ā0.001 and pā<ā0.01, respectively) are not altered after adjusting for any of parameters of central adiposity (visceral, abdominal subcutaneous, visceral/android; visceral/subcutaneous), or for peripheral adiposity (limb fat or gynoid fat). By contrast, they are completely abolished (ns) after adjusting for indices of visceral-to-peripheral adiposity (visceral/gynoid, visceral/limb), while only marginally reduced after adjusting for abdominal subcutaneous-to-peripheral adiposity. Furthermore, in relation to blood pressure (BP), the highly significant effect of sex on systolic BP is not altered after adjusting for any of these adiposity indices. By contrast, the strong significant effect sex on diastolic BP is completely abolished after adjusting for the ratio of visceral-to-peripheral adiposity, but only marginally reduced after adjusting for abdominal subcutaneous-to-peripheral adiposity ratio. Table 4 (panel A) also shows that the significant effects of sex on TG, HDL-C, and diastolic BP, which are abolished by the ratio of visceral-to-peripheral adiposity, are also abolished by indices of lean mass (FFMI or ALMI). However, the application of a stepwise regression analysis, which allows the testing of the contribution of subsets of the independent variables to the overall model (supplementary Table S2) indicates that while visceral-to-peripheral adiposity ratio and lean mass together contribute to 31%, 15 and 28% of variability in TG, HDL-C, and diastolic BP, respectively, the contribution of lean mass per se is small (about 3ā5%), and that visceral-to-peripheral adiposity ratio is a more important contributor of variability in TG, HDL-C, and diastolic BP.
The results presented in Table 4 (B) indicate that the significant effects of ethnicity on blood lipid risk markers (TG, HDL-C, LDL-C) are mostly unaltered after adjusting for the parameters of central adiposity (visceral, abdominal subcutaneous, visceral/android, visceral/subcutaneous), or for peripheral adiposity (limb fat or gynoid fat). By contrast, these effects due to ethnicity are reduced or abolished after adjusting for indices of visceral-to-peripheral adiposity (visceral/gynoid, visceral/limb), but not after adjusting for abdominal subcutaneous-to-peripheral adiposity (subcutaneous/gynoid; subcutaneous/limb). The significant effects of ethnicity on TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C are also not altered after adjustments for the indices of lean mass (FFMI or ALMI).
The significant effects of sex and ethnicity on cardiometabolic health markers are also not altered after adjusting for FMI.
Discussion
The study presented here in young adult Mauritians demonstrates a less favorable cardiometabolic risk profile in men than in women, and in Indians than in Creoles, which is explained at least in part by a higher visceral adiposity characterized as the ratio of visceral-to-peripheral adiposity rather than by a disproportionate visceral adiposity per se. Furthermore, although lean mass also differed by sex and ethnicity, the results of our analysis indicates that lean mass, in its own rights, has a relatively small impact or no significant impact on the differences due to sex and ethnicity, respectively, on cardiometabolic health markers in this cohort.
Although recruited as apparently healthy subjects, the high prevalence of elevated fasting plasma glucose and high blood pressure (BP) in this population sample (Supplementary Table S1) reflect the outcome of national surveys of the past decades in their characterization of Mauritians as a population with a high predisposition to type 2 diabetes and hypertension [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. In this cohort here of young adults, however, only a few subjects were diagnosed with overt type 2 diabetes and/or hypertension, and sensitivity analysis indicated that their inclusion or exclusion in data analysis has no impact on our findings elaborated and discussed below. In this context, this research outcome can be viewed as one based on an essentially disease-free young adult Mauritian cohort.
Regional body composition
The results presented here on DXA-derived body composition reinforce previous findings, from studies that assessed body composition in adults and children by isotopic deuterium dilution and bioimpedance analysis, that for the same age, sex, and BMI, Mauritian Indians have more body fat and less lean mass than Creoles [28, 29], and that in young adults of the same sex and WC, Indians have more abdominal fat than Creoles [28]. Using DXA-derived regional body composition analysis, the current study also reveals a more adverse regional pattern of fat distribution characterized by disproportionately higher visceral adiposity in men than in women, and in Indians than in Creoles.
Our results are in line with the well-documented differences due to sex in regional fat distribution in other populations, with women being generally characterized by a preferential accumulation of adiposity in the gluteo-femoral region, whereas men are more prone to abdominal fat deposition [30]. Indeed, subgroup comparisons here also indicate that Mauritian men show higher values than women for the various indices of central-to-peripheral adiposity (android/gynoid, android/limb). Furthermore, the findings here that Indians have disproportionately more visceral adiposity than Creoles are in agreement with some studies conducted in Canada, USA, and UK indicating that migrant populations of South Asian descent have more visceral fat for the same BMI or WC than those of European descents whereas those African descents have less [31,32,33].
There are, however several studies that have failed to find a higher visceral adiposity in people of South Asian origins, and a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of new and published data has indicated that most studies reported similar levels of visceral fat in South Asians compared with those of white European descent [34]. In addition to low power of single studies and the use of different techniques and approaches to determine visceral adipose tissue, these discrepancies across studies may also be contributed by the way visceral fat is expressed or adjusted. In fact, in our study, ethnic differences in the absolute level of visceral fat (kg), although numerically higher in Indians than in Creoles, did not reach statistical significance. A disproportionately higher visceral adiposity in Indians than in Creoles (as well as due to sex) only became evident when visceral fat was linearly regressed against total fat or trunk fat, or when it is expressed as a fraction of android fat (and hence relative to subcutaneous fat in that abdominal region) or expressed relative to peripheral fat (in the gynoid region or in limbs). These latter analytical approaches may thus be more appropriate in revealing differences in body fat distribution patterns across ethnically diverse populations. Our findings of a disproportionate higher visceral fat in Indians than in Creoles across the entire body fat range studied, including in those with low body fat, as well as in an essentially young and disease-free cohort, would therefore support the contention of Wells [35] that South Asians inherently allocate fat disproportionately to the visceral depot.
Cardiovascular health markers: sex differences
Sex differences in cardiometabolic risks are generally attributed to a combination of biological and behavioral factors which can be modified by age, ethnic background, and geography [36, 37]. Compared to premenopausal women, men tend to have a less favorable cardiometabolic risk profile in terms of higher fasting blood glucose, TG, LDL-C, and BP. These sex differences have often been shown to be independent of BMI and WC and to persist after adjustments for various lifestyle behaviors (physical activity, smoking). In the present study in young Mauritian adults who were non-smokers and non-regular alcohol consumers, these less favorable cardiometabolic risk factors in men than in women were observed in their serum TG and HDL-C and in BP. The higher TG and low HDL-C in men than in women, could in part be associated with a greater visceral-to-peripheral adiposity ratio in men than in women.
As for the higher BP (and higher incidence of hypertension) in young and middle-aged men than in premenopausal women [36, 37], the explanations generally center upon the protective role of female sex hormones and their receptors, and the role for androgen, possibly through mechanisms that blunt the pressure-natriuresis relation [38]. In our study here in young adults, although both systolic and diastolic BP were higher in men than in women (by about 14 and 7āmm Hg, respectively), only the sex difference in diastolic BP could be related to body fat distribution in that it was abolished after adjusting for visceral-to-peripheral adiposity.
To try to understand why the differences in diastolic BP are more affected after adjustment for the ratio of visceral-to-peripheral adiposity than it is the case for systolic BP, one should first consider that systolic and diastolic BP represent the extremes values of the BP oscillations within each cardiac cycle. However, from a hemodynamic point of view, what is determinant to achieve sodium balance through the pressure-natriuresis mechanism is the mean BP [39, 40], which is the variable used to compute total peripheral resistance. Yet, various factors can affect mean BP, notably renal compression by visceral, retroperitoneal, and renal sinus fat [41, 42]. As diastolic BP is closer to mean BP and thus more closely related to total peripheral resistance (which reflects the state of constriction of small arteries and arterioles), whereas systolic BP is more closely related to the elasticity of the central arteries, one could thus speculate that adjustment for the ratio of visceral-to-peripheral adiposity is more likely to affect diastolic BP than it does on systolic BP.
Cardiovascular health markers: ethnic differences
While BP tended to be higher in Creoles than in Indians, this ethnic difference in systolic or diastolic BP was, however, marginal and not statistically significant. These results here would seem to be in conflict with the results of national surveys which have consistently reported significantly higher BP in adult Creoles than in Indians, albeit for a population sample that also included middle-aged and older adults [43, 44]. However, our study here in young adult Mauritians that BP is not significantly higher in Creoles than in Indians is consistent with findings from the UK that higher values for BP in people of African ancestry are seen in older, but not in younger age groups [45,46,47].
Our data indicating a less favorable blood lipid profile (higher TG and lower HDL-C) in Indians than in Creoles in this young adult cohort is also consistent with previous findings from national surveys based on pooled data of Mauritians aged 20ā70 years [15,16,17]. Furthermore, in line with a previous study indicating that this ethnic difference in blood lipid profile could not be explained by abdominal adiposity assessed as waist-to-hip ratio, our study here also indicates that the more adverse lipid profile in Indians than in Creoles is not explained by the ratio of android/gynoid fat (for which waist-to-hip ratio is a proxy), nor by visceral fat or central adiposity indices per se. By contrast, only the ratio of visceral-to-peripheral adiposity could explain, albeit partly, the more adverse lipid profile in Indians than in Creoles. The specificity of visceral fat rather than subcutaneous fat in the abdominal android region in this explanation is underscored by the lack of impact of adjusting for abdominal subcutaneous-to-peripheral adiposity in this ethnic difference in lipid profile.
Visceral-to-peripheral adiposity ratio vs visceral adiposity per se
While genetics and lifestyle factors could also contribute to the more adverse lipid profile in Indians than in Creoles, the question arises as why it is the visceral-to-peripheral adiposity ratio, rather than visceral fat or visceral/android fat, that explain at least partly the ethnic (as well as sex) differences in cardiometabolic risks. In addressing this question, it is important to consider that the primary adipose tissue compartment which is present throughout the body, i.e. the superficial subcutaneous adipose tissue, constitutes the vast majority of the adipose tissue in the lower body and limbs. Rather than being relatively metabolically inert or benign, these fat depots, which differ from intra-abdominal and visceral adipose tissue by their developmental and functional characteristics, may actively protect against risks for cardiovascular diseases [48,49,50], namely (i) by acting as a āprotective metabolic sinkā capable of metabolizing and storing (and hence buffer against) excess circulating free fatty acids, and (ii) by releasing predominantly anti-inflammatory cytokines. In fact, lower body adiposity, which comprises mostly superficial subcutaneous adipose tissue in the gluteal, femoral, and thigh regions, has been shown to be independently associated with a healthier cardiovascular risk profile in several ethnic groups [51,52,53,54,55,56], including in Asian Indians [56]. The protective effects of peripheral (superficial) adipose tissue therefore contrast sharply with the hazardous effects of visceral adipose tissue and deep abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue through the release FFAs and pro-inflammatory cytokines that impair hepatic (and lipid) metabolism [19]. Consequently, a ratio of visceral-to-peripheral adiposity, by reflecting the opposing effects of hazardous fat (visceral) versus protective fat (superficial subcutaneous) best defines the net susceptibility to atherogenic disease risk. This would imply that two individuals, one with low visceral and peripheral fat, and the other with high visceral and peripheral fat, would have the same risk for high TG or low HDL levels.
Study limitations and strengths
This is the first experimental study that has applied DXA technology to investigate body composition in Mauritians, and specifically here into the effects of sex and ethnicity on the relationship between body composition and cardiometabolic risks in this population with a high propensity for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. A main limitation of this study is that the population sample is relatively small, particularly among men of Creole ethnicity. However, this is to some extent compensated by the selection of subjects as young adults, essentially without diabetes and disease-free, all non-smokers, non-regular alcohol consumers, and non-physically active; thereby obviating the need to adjust for these well-known confounding clinical and lifestyle factors for cardiovascular risks, and hence the need for much large sample size. Furthermore, the large range of BMI and WC (and hence body composition parameters) in all subgroups satisfied conditions for appropriate analytical procedure centered on regression models. Another limitation is the validity of assessing visceral fat by DXA, which was not measured but estimated according to an algorithm which was developed on US population. However, validation of DXA-derived estimation of visceral fat against gold-standard MRI, have indicated that DXA, a relatively convenient, inexpensive, and safe method with minimum radiation dosage, can be a reliable technique for assessment of visceral fat in several other populations, including in Asian populations [57,58,59,60].
Conclusions
This study in young (disease-free) adult Mauritians demonstrates a disproportionately higher visceral
compared to peripheral adiposity in Indians than in Creoles across a wide range of body fat, and is hence in support of the contention that South Asians allocate fat disproportionately to the visceral depot. It also suggests that differential effects of sex and ethnicity on cardiovascular risk profile are better explained by differences in the visceral-to-peripheral adiposity ratio than by a disproportionate visceral adiposity per se; the former possibly reflecting the ratio of hazardous (visceral) adiposity and protective (peripheral) superficial subcutaneous adiposity. Further studies are warranted to validate the visceral-to-peripheral adiposity ratio as a critical body fat distribution pattern in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases in ethnically diverse populations.
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Anand SS, Yusuf S, Vuksan V, Devanesen S, Teo KK, Montague PA, et al. Differences in risk factors, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease between ethnic groups in Canada: the Study of Health Assessment and Risk in Ethnic groups (SHARE). Lancet. 2000;356:279ā84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02502-2
Karter AJ, Schillinger D, Adams AS, Moffet HH, Liu J, Adler NE, et al. Elevated rates of diabetes in Pacific Islanders and Asian subgroups: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE). Diabetes Care. 2013;36:574ā9. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0722
Volgman AS, Palaniappan LS, Aggarwal NT, Gupta M, Khandelwal A, Krishnan AV, et al. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in South Asians in the United States: epidemiology, risk factors, and treatments: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;138:e1āe34. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000580
Brown AF, Liang LJ, Vassar SD, Escarce JJ, Merkin SS, Cheng E, et al. Trends in racial/ethnic and nativity disparities in cardiovascular health among adults without prevalent cardiovascular disease in the United States, 1988 to 2014. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168:541ā9. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-0996
Tillin T, Hughes AD, Mayet J, Whincup P, Sattar N, Forouhi NG, et al. The relationship between metabolic risk factors and incident cardiovascular disease in Europeans, South Asians, and African Caribbeans: SABRE (Southall and Brent Revisited) - a prospective population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1777ā86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.046
Farmaki AE, Garfield V, Eastwood SV, Farmer RE, Mathur R, Giannakopoulou O, et al. Type 2 diabetes risks and determinants in second-generation migrants and mixed ethnicity people of South Asian and African Caribbean descent in the UK. Diabetologia. 2022;65:113ā27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05580-7
Brancati FL, Kao WH, Folsom AR, Watson RL, Szklo M. Incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in African American and white adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. JAMA. 2000;283:2253ā9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.17.2253
Wild SH, Fischbacher C, Brock A, Griffiths C, Bhopal R. Mortality from all causes and circulatory disease by country of birth in England and Wales 2001-2003. J Public Health. 2007;29:191ā8. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdm010
Dowse GK, Gareeboo H, Zimmet PZ, Alberti KG, Tuomilehto J, Fareed D, et al. High prevalence of NIDDM and impaired glucose tolerance in Indian, Creole, and Chinese Mauritians. Diabetes. 1990;39:390ā6. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.39.3.390
Tuomilehto J, Li N, Dowse G, Gareeboo H, Chitson P, Fareed D, et al. The prevalence of coronary heart disease in the multi-ethnic and high diabetes prevalence population of Mauritius. J Intern Med. 1993;233:187ā94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.1993.tb00672.x
Sƶderberg S, Zimmet P, Tuomilehto J, de Courten M, Dowse GK, Chitson P, et al. Increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in all ethnic groups in Mauritius. Diabet Med. 2005;22:61ā8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01366.x
Mauritius Non-Communicable Disease Survey 2021. The trends in diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk in Mauritius. Available from: https://files.aho.afro.who.int/afahobckpcontainer/production/files/Mauritius-Non-Communicable-Diseases-Survey-2021.pdf (Accessed December 01. 2023)
Vos T, Gareeboo H, Roussety F. Ethnic differences in ischaemic heart disease and stroke mortality in Mauritius between 1989 and 1994. Ethn Health. 1998;3:45ā54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.1998.9961847
Magliano DJ, Sƶderberg S, Zimmet PZ, Cartensen B, Balkau B, Pauvaday V, et al. Mortality, all-cause and cardiovascular disease, over 15 years in multiethnic Mauritius: impact of diabetes and intermediate forms of glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1983ā9. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-0312
Hodge AM, Dowse GK, Collins VR, Alberti KG, Gareeboo H, Tuomilehto J, et al. Abdominal fat distribution and insulin levels only partially explain adverse cardiovascular risk profile in Asian Indians. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1996;3:263ā70.
Snijder MB, Zimmet PZ, Visser M, Dekker JM, Seidell JC, Shaw JE. Independent association of hip circumference with metabolic profile in different ethnic groups. Obes Res. 2004;12:1370ā4. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2004.173
Nyamdorj R, Qiao Q, Sƶderberg S, PitkƤniemi JM, Zimmet PZ, Shaw JE, et al. BMI compared with central obesity indicators as a predictor of diabetes incidence in Mauritius. Obesity. 2009;17:342ā8. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.503
DesprĆ©s JP. Intra-abdominal obesity: an untreated risk factor for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. J Endocrinol Invest. 2006;29:77ā82. 3 Suppl
Dulloo AG, Jacquet J, Solinas G, Montani JP, Schutz Y. Body composition phenotypes in pathways to obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Int J Obes. 2010;34 Suppl 2:S4ā17. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.234
Nazare JA, Smith JD, Borel AL, Haffner SM, Balkau B, Ross R, et al. Ethnic influences on the relations between abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adiposity, liver fat, and cardiometabolic risk profile: the International Study of Prediction of Intra-Abdominal Adiposity and Its Relationship With Cardiometabolic Risk/Intra-Abdominal Adiposity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96:714ā26. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.035758
Hwang YC, Fujimoto WY, Hayashi T, Kahn SE, Leonetti DL, Boyko EJ. Increased visceral adipose tissue is an independent predictor for future development of atherogenic dyslipidemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:678ā85. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-3246
Raheem J, Sliz E, Shin J, Holmes MV, Pike GB, Richer L, et al. Visceral adiposity is associated with metabolic profiles predictive of type 2 diabetes and myocardial infarction. Commun Med. 2022;2:81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-022-00140-5
Demographics of Mauritius. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Mauritius (Accessed 01 December 2023).
Sedentary Behaviour Research Network. Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms āsedentaryā and āsedentary behaviours. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37:540ā2. https://doi.org/10.1139/h2012-024
Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign Illinois: Human Kinetics Book; 1988.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for bone mineral density and body composition assessment. IAEA Human Health Series No.15, 2010. Available from: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1479_web.pdf. (Accessed 01. December 2023)
Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499ā502.
Hunma S, Ramuth H, Miles-Chan JL, Schutz Y, Montani JP, Joonas N, et al. Body composition-derived BMI cut-offs for overweight and obesity in Indians and Creoles of Mauritius: comparison with Caucasians. Int J Obes. 2016;40:1906ā14. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.176
Ramuth H, Hunma S, Ramessur V, Ramuth M, Monnard C, Montani JP, et al. Body composition-derived BMI cut-offs for overweight and obesity in ethnic Indian and Creole urban children of Mauritius. Br J Nutr. 2020;124:481ā92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114519003404
DesprĆ©s JP, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2006;444:881ā7.
DesprĆ©s JP, Couillard C, Gagnon J, Bergeron J, Leon AS, Rao DC, et al. Race, visceral adipose tissue, plasma lipids, and lipoprotein lipase activity in men and women: the Health, Risk Factors, Exercise Training, and Genetics (HERITAGE) family study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1932ā8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.20.8.1932
Carroll JF, Chiapa AL, Rodriquez M, Phelps DR, Cardarelli KM, Vishwanatha JK, et al. Visceral fat, waist circumference, and BMI: impact of race/ethnicity. Obesity. 2008;16:600ā7. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2007.92
Eastwood SV, Tillin T, Dehbi HM, Wright A, Forouhi NG, Godsland I, et al. Ethnic differences in associations between fat deposition and incident diabetes and underlying mechanisms: the SABRE study. Obesity. 2015;23:699ā706. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20997
Iliodromiti S, McLaren J, Ghouri N, Miller MR, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, Linge J, et al. Liver, visceral and subcutaneous fat in men and women of South Asian and white European descent: a systematic review and meta-analysis of new and published data. Diabetologia. 2023;66:44ā56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05803-5
Wells JC. Commentary: why are South Asians susceptible to central obesity?-the El NiƱo hypothesis. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:226ā7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl287
Pilote L, Dasgupta K, Guru V, Humphries KH, McGrath J, Norris C, et al. A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease. CMAJ. 2007;176:S1ā44. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051455
Lew J, Sanghavi M, Ayers CR, McGuire DK, Omland T, Atzler D, et al. Sex-based differences in cardiometabolic biomarkers. Circulation. 2017;135:544ā55. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023005
Reckelhoff JF. Gender differences in the regulation of blood pressure. Hypertension. 2001;37:1199ā208.
Hall JE, Granger JP, Hester RL, Montani JP. Mechanisms of sodium balance in hypertension: role of pressure natriuresis. J Hypertens Suppl. 1986;4:S57ā65.
Montani JP, Van Vliet BN. Understanding the contribution of Guytonās large circulatory model to long-term control of arterial pressure. Exp Physiol. 2009;94:382ā8. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2008.043299
Hall JE, do Carmo JM, da Silva AA, Wang Z, Hall ME. Obesity-induced hypertension: interaction of neurohumoral and renal mechanisms. Circ Res. 2015;116:991ā1006. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305697
Montani JP, Carroll JF, Dwyer TM, Antic V, Yang Z, Dulloo AG. Ectopic fat storage in heart, blood vessels and kidneys in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:S58ā65. Suppl 4
Nan L, Tuomilehto J, Dowse G, Zimmet P, Gareeboo H, Chitson P, et al. Prevalence and medical care of hypertension in four ethnic groups in the newly-industrialized nation of Mauritius. J Hypertens. 1991;9:859ā66. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199109000-00014
Nyamdorj R, Qiao Q, Sƶderberg S, PitkƤniemi J, Zimmet P, Shaw J, et al. Comparison of body mass index with waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-stature ratio as a predictor of hypertension incidence in Mauritius. Hypertens. 2008;26:866ā70.
Agyemang C, Bhopal R. Is the blood pressure of people from African origin adults in the UK higher or lower than that in European origin white people? A review of cross-sectional data. J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17:523ā34. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001586
Harding S, Maynard M, Cruickshank JK, Gray L. Anthropometry and blood pressure differences in black Caribbean, African, South Asian and white adolescents: the MRC DASH study. J Hypertens. 2006;24:1507ā14. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000239285.20315.4d
Agyemang C, Humphry RW, Bhopal R. Divergence with age in blood pressure in African-Caribbean and white populations in England: implications for screening for hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2012;25:89ā96.
Jensen MD. Role of body fat distribution and the metabolic complications of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:S57ā63. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-1585. 11 Suppl 1
Manolopoulos KN, Karpe F, Frayn KN. Gluteofemoral body fat as a determinant of metabolic health. Int J Obes. 2010;34:949ā59. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.286
Karpe F, Pinnick KE. Biology of upper-body and lower-body adipose tissue-link to whole-body phenotypes. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11:90ā100. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2014.185
Wiklund P, Toss F, Weinehall L, Hallmans G, Franks PW, Nordstrom A, et al. Abdominal and gynoid fat mass are associated with cardiovascular risk factors in men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4360ā6.
Snijder MB, Zimmet PZ, Visser M, Dekker JM, Seidell JC, Shaw JE. Independent and opposite associations of waist and hip circumferences with diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia: the AusDiab Study. Int J Obes. 2004;28:402ā9.
Snijder MB, Visser M, Dekker JM, Goodpaster BH, Harris TB, Kritchevsky SB, et al. Low subcutaneous thigh fat is a risk factor for unfavourable glucose and lipid levels, independently of high abdominal fat. the Health ABC Study. Diabetologia. 2005;48:301ā8.
Fu X, Song A, Zhou Y, Ma X, Jiao J, Yang M, et al. Association of regional body fat with metabolic risks in Chinese women. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17:2316ā24.
Vasan SK, Osmond C, Canoy D, Christodoulides C, Neville MJ, Di Gravio C, et al. Comparison of regional fat measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional anthropometry and their association with markers of diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk. Int J Obes. 2018;42:850ā7.
Gowri S M, Antonisamy B, Geethanjali FS, Thomas N, Jebasingh F, Paul TV, et al. Distinct opposing associations of upper and lower body fat depots with metabolic and cardiovascular disease risk markers. Int J Obes. 2021;45:2490ā8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00923-1
Kaul S, Rothney MP, Peters DM, Wacker WK, Davis CE, Shapiro MD, et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for quantification of visceral fat. Obesity. 2012;20:1313ā8. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.393
Choi YJ, Seo YK, Lee EJ, Chung YS. Quantification of visceral fat using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and its reliability according to the amount of visceral fat in Korean adults. J Clin Densitom. 2015;18:192ā7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2015.02.001
Bea JW, Chen Z, Blew RM, Nicholas JS, Follis S, Bland VL, et al. MRI based validation of abdominal adipose tissue measurements from DXA in postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom. 2022;25:189ā97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2021.07.010
Chan B, Yu Y, Huang F, Vardhanabhuti V. Towards visceral fat estimation at population scale: correlation of visceral adipose tissue assessment using three-dimensional cross-sectional imaging with BIA, DXA, and single-slice CT. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1211696. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1211696
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the staff of the Nuclear Medicine Department of the Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital for accommodating our subjects for the DXA scans.
Funding
This research study was funded by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (project MAR 6012), the Mauritian Ministry of Health & Wellness, and the Faculty of Science & Medicine, University of Fribourg, Switzerland. Open access funding provided by University of Fribourg.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.J., V.R., and A.G.D. were involved in the study planning and design; V.R., B.N.R., N.J., and S.H. contributed to data collection and sample analysis, A.G.D., V.R., J.-P.M., and Y.S. contributed to data analysis and interpretation. A.G.D. and V.R. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript, and J-P.M, Y.S., N.J., and S.H. contributed towards its final version. All authors read and approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisherās note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articleās Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the articleās Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ramessur, V., Hunma, S., Joonas, N. et al. Visceral-to-peripheral adiposity ratio: a critical determinant of sex and ethnic differences in cardiovascular risks among Asian Indians and African Creoles in Mauritius. Int J Obes (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-024-01517-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-024-01517-3