Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Pediatrics

Variance in respiratory quotient among daily activities and its association with obesity status

Abstract

Background/objectives

The ability to adapt the level of daily fuel utilization to substrate availability is given by the respiratory quotient (RQ), which its variance is an indicator of metabolic flexibility. Metabolic inflexibility is associated with many pathologies including obesity, but evidence relies on bed-rest studies and exercise-based interventions. Our goal was to examine the associations for RQ variance in response to daily living activities with obesity, in healthy adults.

Subjects/methods

Participants (N = 50; 25 women), 20–64 years were lying for 60 min and randomly performed three conditions for 10 min each (sitting, standing, 1 sit/stand/sit transition min−1). RQ was measured by indirect calorimetry and fat mass (FM), trunk FM (TFM), and fat-free mass (FFM) by DXA.

Results

RQ variance among the three conditions was inversely associated with BMI (ß = 0.005; p < 0.001), FM (ß = 0.007; p = 0.024), and TFM (ß = 0.008; p = 0.026). A positive association was found between RQ variance and FFM (ß = −0.007; p = 0.024). No interactions for sex were found (p ≥ 0.05).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that a higher RQ variance in response to daily living metabolic challenges such as transitioning between sitting and standing is associated with lower overall and central obesity, as well as with a higher FFM, in healthy adults. Thus, RQ variance may work as an indication of metabolic flexibility, but these findings were obtained in a young and non-obese adult population without considering their fitness levels. Thus, further research in this field is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Regression curve estimation for the associations for RQ variance with FFM and the several obesity outcomes, namely BMI, FM, and TFM.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Kelley DE, Mandarino LJ. Fuel selection in human skeletal muscle in insulin resistance: a reexamination. Diabetes. 2000;49:677–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Muoio DM. Metabolic inflexibility: when mitochondrial indecision leads to metabolic gridlock. Cell. 2014;159:1253–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergouignan A, Antoun E, Momken I, Schoeller DA, Gauquelin-Koch G, Simon C, et al. Effect of contrasted levels of habitual physical activity on metabolic flexibility. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013;114:371–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heilbronn LK, Gregersen S, Shirkhedkar D, Hu D, Campbell LV. Impaired fat oxidation after a single high-fat meal in insulin-sensitive nondiabetic individuals with a family history of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2007;56:2046–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rynders CA, Blanc S, DeJong N, Bessesen DH, Bergouignan A. Sedentary behaviour is a key determinant of metabolic inflexibility. J. Physiol. 2018;596:1319–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mujika I, Padilla S. Detraining: loss of training-induced physiological and performance adaptations. Part I: short term insufficient training stimulus. Sports Med. 2000;30:79–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mujika I, Padilla S. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic characteristics of detraining in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:413–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Blanc S, Normand S, Pachiaudi C, Fortrat JO, Laville M, Gharib C. Fuel homeostasis during physical inactivity induced by bed rest. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:2223–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergouignan A, Rudwill F, Simon C, Blanc S. Physical inactivity as the culprit of metabolic inflexibility: evidence from bed-rest studies. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011;111:1201–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Craft LL, Zderic TW, Gapstur SM, Vaniterson EH, Thomas DM, Siddique J, et al. Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: an observational inclinometry study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reiff C, Marlatt K, Dengel DR. Difference in caloric expenditure in sitting versus standing desks. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9:1009–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith L, Hamer M, Ucci M, Marmot A, Gardner B, Sawyer A. et al. Weekday and weekend patterns of objectively measured sitting, standing, and stepping in a sample of office-based workers: the active buildings study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:9.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-014-1338-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Judice PB, Hamilton MT, Sardinha LB, Zderic TW, Silva AM. What is the metabolic and energy cost of sitting, standing and sit/stand transitions? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116:263–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Galgani JE, Moro C, Ravussin E. Metabolic flexibility and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;295:E1009–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goodpaster BH, Sparks LM. Metabolic flexibility in health and disease. Cell metabolism. 2017;25:1027–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Freese J, Klement RJ, Ruiz-Núñez B, Schwarz S, Lötzerich H. The sedentary (r)evolution: have we lost our metabolic flexibility? F1000Research. 2017;6:1787.https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12724.2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Corpeleijn E, Saris WH, Blaak EE. Metabolic flexibility in the development of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes: effects of lifestyle. Obes Rev. 2009;10:178–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Baig S, Parvaresh Rizi E, Shabeer M, Chhay V, Mok SF, Loh TP, et al. Metabolic gene expression profile in circulating mononuclear cells reflects obesity-associated metabolic inflexibility. Nutr Metab. 2016;13:74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tareen SHK, Kutmon M, Adriaens ME, Mariman ECM, de Kok TM, Arts ICW, et al. Exploring the cellular network of metabolic flexibility in the adipose tissue. Genes Nutr. 2018;13:17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith RL, Soeters MR, Wust RCI, Houtkooper RH. Metabolic flexibility as an adaptation to energy resources and requirements in health and disease. Endocr Rev. 2018;39.

  21. van Uffelen JG, Wong J, Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Riphagen I, Gilson ND, et al. Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review. Am J Prevent Med. 2010;39:379–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. WMJ. 2008;54:122–25.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chobot A, G¢rowska-Kowolik K. Obesity and diabetes-Not only a simple link between two epidemics. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2018;34:e3042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. p. xvii–280.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Church TS, Thomas DM, Tudor-Locke C, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, Rodarte RQ. et al. Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Buckley JP, Hedge A, Yates T, Copeland RJ, Loosemore M, Hamer M. The sedentary office: an expert statement on the growing case for change towards better health and productivity. 2015.

  27. Dempsey PC, Owen N, Yates TE, Kingwell BA, Dunstan DW. Sitting Less and Moving More: Improved Glycaemic Control for Type 2 Diabetes Prevention and Management. Current diabetes reports. 2016;16:114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dunstan DW, Kingwell BA, Larsen R, Healy GN, Cerin E, Hamilton MT, et al. Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:976–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Duvivier BM, Schaper NC, Hesselink MK, van Kan L, Stienen N, Winkens B, et al. Breaking sitting with light activities vs structured exercise: a randomised crossover study demonstrating benefits for glycaemic control and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2017;60:490–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Miles-Chan JL, Sarafian D, Montani JP, Schutz Y, Dulloo A. Heterogeneity in the energy cost of posture maintenance during standing relative to sitting: phenotyping according to magnitude and time-course. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e65827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sparti A, DeLany JP, de la Bretonne JA, Sander GE, Bray GA. Relationship between resting metabolic rate and the composition of the fat-free mass. Metab Clin Exp. 1997;46:1225–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gallagher D, Belmonte D, Deurenberg P, Wang Z, Krasnow N, Pi-Sunyer FX, et al. Organ-tissue mass measurement allows modeling of REE and metabolically active tissue mass. Am J Physiol. 1998;275(2 Pt 1):E249–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Illner K, Brinkmann G, Heller M, Bosy-Westphal A, Muller MJ. Metabolically active components of fat free mass and resting energy expenditure in nonobese adults. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2000;278:E308–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Stephens BR, Granados K, Zderic TW, Hamilton MT, Braun B. Effects of 1 day of inactivity on insulin action in healthy men and women: interaction with energy intake. Metab Clin Exp. 2011;60:941–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Thorp AA, Kingwell BA, Sethi P, Hammond L, Owen N, Dunstan DW. Alternating bouts of sitting and standing attenuate postprandial glucose responses. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46:2053–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Duvivier BM, Schaper NC, Bremers MA, van Crombrugge G, Menheere PP, Kars M, et al. Minimal intensity physical activity (standing and walking) of longer duration improves insulin action and plasma lipids more than shorter periods of moderate to vigorous exercise (cycling) in sedentary subjects when energy expenditure is comparable. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e55542.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. McMurray RG, Soares J, Caspersen CJ, McCurdy T. Examining variations of resting metabolic rate of adults: a public health perspective. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46:1352–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cooper JA, Watras AC, O’Brien MJ, Luke A, Dobratz JR, Earthman CP, et al. Assessing validity and reliability of resting metabolic rate in six gas analysis systems. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:128–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Morris C, Grada CO, Ryan M, Roche HM, De Vito G, Gibney MJ, et al. The relationship between aerobic fitness level and metabolic profiles in healthy adults. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013;57:1246–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kriketos AD, Sharp TA, Seagle HM, Peters JC, Hill JO. Effects of aerobic fitness on fat oxidation and body fatness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:805–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Compher C, Frankenfield D, Keim N, Roth-Yousey L. Best practice methods to apply to measurement of resting metabolic rate in adults: a systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:881–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the participants for their time and effort. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. This investigation was conducted at Interdisciplinary Center of the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), I&D 472 (UID/DTP/00447/2020). PBJ is supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (SFRH/BPD/115977/2016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro B. Júdice.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Faculty Ethics Council (approval number: 14/2013) and conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards [22].

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Júdice, P.B., Sardinha, L.B. & Silva, A.M. Variance in respiratory quotient among daily activities and its association with obesity status. Int J Obes 45, 217–224 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-0591-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-0591-x

Search

Quick links