Introduction

In recent years, the importance of renewable resource-based products for industrial applications has become extremely clear with the increasing emphasis on environmental issues, waste disposal and depletion of fossil resources. Bio-based polymers can provide an alternative to petroleum-based polymers by using innovative ideas in designing novel bio-based polymers and composites; these novel polymers and composites can compete with existing petroleum-based materials with the advantage of eco-friendliness.1, 2, 3

Plant oils, such as linseed, sunflower, soybean and palm oils, are some of the most abundant renewable resources, and hence, they are considered an ideal alternative chemical feedstock.4 Inexpensive triglyceride natural oils have been extensively utilized for coatings, inks, plasticizers, lubricants, resins and agrochemicals in addition to their applications in the food industry.5, 6, 7 However, the low functionality and flexible aliphatic nature of plant oils result in several limitations for thermosets, such as films with low mechanical properties.8

Epoxidized soybean oil (ESO) is manufactured through the epoxidation of the double bonds of soybean oil, which is one of the most inexpensive vegetable oils in the world and is industrially available in large volumes at a reasonable cost.9 ESO is primarily used as a plasticizer for poly(vinyl chloride), chlorinated rubber and poly(vinyl alcohol) emulsions to improve stability and flexibility.10 Moreover, various cationic polymerizations of epoxidized plant oils can be achieved through the use of photoinitiators, latent catalysts or acid catalysts. These epoxy compounds from renewable resources possess a high potential as starting materials for bio-based thermosetting plastics.11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Epoxidized plant oils have been cured in the presence of inorganic chemicals to produce organic–inorganic hybrid materials.17, 18, 19, 20, 21 Furthermore, several researchers have investigated plant oil-based green composites using kenaf, flax, hemp and rosin derivatives as renewable compounds to improve their poor mechanical properties.22, 23, 24, 25 We prepared a full bio-based composite by curing ESO in the presence of a poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) nanofiber mat. The nanoscale structural control over the PLLA fiber mat improved the mechanical properties of the plant oil-based network polymer.26

A series of poly(3-hydroxyalkanoate)s, including the poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) homopolymer and the related copolymers, are naturally occurring thermoplastics that behave as intercellular carbon and energy storage compounds in microorganisms such as bacteria.27, 28 PHB is a highly crystalline and brittle polymer; however, it possesses a melting point and mechanical properties that are comparable with those of petroleum-based synthetic polymers.29, 30 The brittleness of PHB is attributed to large spherulites and secondary crystallization. To overcome the shortcomings of PHB, PHB-related copolymers and the blend materials were developed.31, 32, 33, 34, 35 Recently, we reported the fabrication of a blend porous material of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) and polycarbonate.36 In this study, a porous PHB was prepared by thermally induced phase separation and was used as a reinforcement material for an ESO-based network polymer. The resulting composites showed relatively good transparency, along with an improvement in their mechanical properties.

Experimental procedure

Materials

PHB (Mw=1.4 × 105) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). ESO and a thermally latent cationic catalyst (benzylsulfonium hexafluoroantimonate derivative, Sun-Aid SI-60L) were gifts from the Mizutani Paint Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan) and the Sanshin Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (Yamaguchi, Japan), respectively. Other reagents and solvents were commercially available and were used as received.

Synthesis of ESO/PHB composite

The following were typical procedures for the fabrication of PHB porous materials and the synthesis of ESO/PHB composites. PHB powder was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 90 °C for 15 min, and the solution was then cooled at room temperature. After 5 h, the resulting white solid was washed with ethanol several times to obtain the porous PHB. For the synthesis of the ESO/PHB composite, the porous PHB was immersed in ESO containing a thermally latent catalyst, followed by the removal of residual ethanol under reduced pressure at room temperature. Then, the sample was heated at 130 °C for 5 h to obtain the ESO/PHB composite.

Measurements

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using a SU3500 (Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms were measured using a NOVA4200e (Quantachrome Co., Boynton Beach, FL, USA), and BET (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) and Barrett–Joyner–Halendar analyses were performed with the Autosorb program. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was performed with a Nicolet iS5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

Thermogravimetric (TG) analysis was performed using a TG/DTA7200 (Hitachi High-Tech Science Co., Tokyo, Japan) at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under nitrogen. The thermal properties of the samples were measured under a nitrogen atmosphere using a DSC6220 differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) (Hitachi High-Tech Science). The sample was cooled at −100 °C for 2 min and then heated to 200 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. Dynamic viscoelasticity analysis was performed using a DMS6100 (Hitachi High-Tech Science) with a frequency of 1 Hz at a heating rate of 3 °C min−1. Tensile properties were measured using an EZ Graph (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) with a cross-head speed of 10 mm min−1. The sample was cut into sections measuring 40 × 5 × 1 mm.

Results and Discussion

Fabrication of porous PHB material

In this study, porous PHB was used as a reinforcement material for plant oil-based network polymers. Porous materials with a three-dimensional interconnected framework have many exciting properties, including high specific surface area, high permeability, low density and fast mass transfer performance.37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 Owing to these aforementioned properties, porous materials have received a considerable amount of attention in various fields, such as chromatography, catalysis and ion exchange. The porous PHB was fabricated using the thermally induced phase separation method. PHB is insoluble in DMSO at room temperature but soluble when heated. PHB powder was dissolved in DMSO at 90 °C. The solution was then allowed to cool at room temperature and was then washed with ethanol to yield a white porous PHB retaining the shape of the vessel. In this study, three samples of the porous PHB were prepared. The general procedure for the preparation of the porous PHB is illustrated in Figure 1. The morphology of the porous PHB was homogeneously macroporous, with a three-dimensional interconnected fibrous structure, which is shown in Figure 2. This unique structure could be derived from a precursor gel and attributed to the phase separation of the PHB/DMSO solution during the cooling process, in which solvent-rich regions contributed to the formation of pores. However, with the higher PHB concentration, some heterogeneous coagulations of PHB were observed (Figure 2c).

Figure 1
figure 1

General procedure for preparing the porous PHB and ESO/PHB composite.

Figure 2
figure 2

SEM images of porous PHB prepared from different concentrations of PHB in DMSO: (a) 50 g l−1 (b) 100 g l−1 and (c) 150 g l−1.

Figure 3 shows a typical nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm of the porous PHB. The sharp nitrogen uptake near P0 and the hysteresis loop in the P/P0 range from 0.8 to 1.0 were observed, demonstrating the pore size distribution between mesopores and macropores. The surface area of the porous PHB, as determined by BET analysis, varied from 95 to 128 m2 g−1, and the formation of the porous PHB was dependent on the PHB concentration in DMSO (Table 1).

Figure 3
figure 3

Typical nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm of porous PHB (PHB concentration: 100 g l−1).

Table 1 Properties of porous PHB and ESO/PHB composite

Synthesis of ESO/PHB composite

An ESO/PHB composite was prepared by immersion. This method relies on the penetration of ESO into the porous PHB by diffusion. The oxirane group number for the ESO used in this study was 3.7 per molecule, as determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. For the synthesis of ESO/PHB composites, the porous PHB was immersed in ESO containing a thermally latent catalyst, and the crosslinking of ESO was performed at 130 °C, which was below the melting temperature of PHB. The resulting composites showed relatively good transparency, suggesting full impregnation of ESO and a uniform distribution of PHB in the ESO polymer matrix. In the Fourier transform infrared spectrum of the ESO/PHB composite, a peak at 823 cm−1 that corresponds to a C–C antisymmetric stretch of the oxirane groups of ESO was not observed, and a broad peak centered at 3400 cm−1 was observed due to an O–H stretch. These data indicate that the oxirane groups reacted with each other to form a plant oil-based network structure. Moreover, two peaks at 1723 and 1743 cm−1, which are attributed to the C=O stretches of the carboxyl groups of the ESO polymer and PHB, respectively, were observed (see the Supplementary Figure S1).

Figure 4 presents the SEM images of the fracture surface of the ESO homopolymer and the ESO/PHB-100 composite. The ESO homopolymer was brittle, and the fracture occurred where a crack spread easily and freely. The fracture cross-section of the ESO homopolymer showed a smooth and uniform surface. However, the SEM image of the ESO/PHB-100 composite showed a dense filling of the fibrous protrusions that are attributed to the porous PHB.

Figure 4
figure 4

SEM images of the cross-sections of (a) ESO homopolymer and (b) ESO/PHB-100 composite.

Thermal and mechanical properties of ESO/PHB composite

Thermal degradation of the ESO homopolymer, the porous PHB and the ESO/PHB composites was investigated using TG measurements (Figure 5). TG traces of the ESO homopolymer and the porous PHB showed weight loss due to the thermal decomposition at 270 and 400 °C, respectively. Almost no residues were observed at 500 °C. It was found that the ESO/PHB composites decomposed through a two-stage weight loss process, with the first weight loss occurring at ∼300 °C and the second one at ∼400 °C. Comparing the traces of the ESO/PHB composites with those of the ESO homopolymer and the porous PHB, the first and second weight losses could be attributed to the decomposition of PHB and ESO components, respectively. Therefore, TG analysis allowed for the assessment of the PHB content of the composites from the first weight loss (Table 1). The PHB content of the composites increased as a function of the PHB concentration in DMSO. The first decomposition temperature of the ESO/PHB composites was slightly higher than that of the porous PHB, suggesting that the ESO polymer prevents diffusion of volatile decomposition products.47, 48

Figure 5
figure 5

TG traces of (a) ESO homopolymer, (b) ESO/PHB-50, (c) ESO/PHB-100, (d) ESO/PHB-150 composites and (e) porous PHB.

The ESO/PHB composite was soaked in chloroform for 24 h. The PHB component was dissolved in chloroform, and the residue weight was similar to the ESO content obtained by TG analysis. In the SEM image of the residue after the soaking of the composite, pores derived from the depletion of PHB were observed (see the Supplementary Figure S2). These results indicate that the porous structure of PHB is retained without shrinkage during the synthesis of the composite.

DSC measurements of the ESO homopolymer, the porous PHB and the ESO/PHB-100 composite were performed to evaluate the effect of the porous PHB on thermal behaviors (Figure 6). In the first heating curve for the ESO homopolymer, only a glass transition was observed at −34 °C, whereas the curve for the porous PHB showed a glass transition and melting for PHB at −16 and 168 °C, respectively. In the curve for the ESO/PHB-100 composite, two glass transitions that are attributed to the ESO polymer and PHB were observed at −45 and −18 °C, respectively. These data indicate that the majority of the PHB components are immiscible with the ESO polymer. The crystallinity of the PHB component in the ESO/PHB-100 composite was ∼60%, and this value barely changed compared with that of the porous PHB (64%). Furthermore, both curves of the ESO homopolymer and the ESO/PHB composite were almost constant in the higher temperature region, suggesting the quantitative consumption of the oxirane groups of ESO.

Figure 6
figure 6

DSC curves of the first heating scan for (a) ESO homopolymer, (b) porous PHB and (c) ESO/PHB-100 composite.

Figure 7 shows the dynamic viscoelasticity (storage modulus and loss factor) as a function of temperature for the ESO homopolymer and the ESO/PHB-100 composite. For both samples, the storage moduli remained almost constant at low temperatures between −100 and −60 °C and then decreased as the temperature increased. In the rubbery region, the storage modulus of the ESO/PHB composite was higher than that of the ESO homopolymer, suggesting the reinforcement effect of the crystallized PHB. A broad peak of the loss factor of the ESO homopolymer was found near 0 °C, which was regarded as the α-transition that corresponds to the glass transition of the ESO polymer. The α-transition of the ESO/PHB composite shifted to a lower temperature region. This result could be attributed to the fact that the distance between the crosslinking points becomes longer due to the incorporation of the porous PHB. Moreover, a small peak appeared at 25 °C, which corresponded to the glass transition of PHB. This result is consistent with the DSC analysis.

Figure 7
figure 7

Dynamic viscoelasticity of ESO homopolymer and ESO/PHB-100 composite.

To evaluate the reinforcement effect of the porous PHB, a tensile test was performed. The strain–stress curves of the ESO homopolymer and the ESO/PHB composites are shown in Figure 8. The porous PHB was too brittle for the tensile test. The mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced materials are affected by several factors, such as fiber volume, aspect ratio, fiber–matrix adhesion and orientation. Tensile strength and toughness are dependent on the compatibility between the fiber and the matrix, whereas the modulus is influenced by the fiber impregnation or the aspect ratio of the fiber.49 The incorporation of the porous PHB increased the Young’s modulus and the tensile strength compared with those of the ESO homopolymer. These data indicate the good distribution of the PHB component in the ESO polymer. Moreover, the strain at break of the ESO/PHB composites was larger than that of the ESO homopolymer. Plant oils are often used as a plasticizer for biopolymers, such as poly(lactic acid) and poly(3-hydroxyalkanoate)s.50, 51, 52, 53 The three-dimensional fibrous structure of PHB improved the brittleness of the ESO-based network polymer and PHB due to the good interfacial adhesion and the formation of the interaction between the ESO chains and the surface of the porous PHB. The improvements in the mechanical properties were dependent on the PHB content of the composites. The Young’s modulus and tensile strength of the composites increased as the PHB content increased. However, the largest strain at break was found in the ESO/PHB-100 composite. The decrease in the strain at break in the ESO/PHB-150 composite might be due to the aggregation of PHB during the phase separation process (see Figure 2c). Moreover, the toughness of the ESO/PHB composites, defined as the area under the strain–stress curve, was much larger than that of the ESO homopolymer. These data imply that the resulting composites possess a great capacity to absorb energy before breaking.

Figure 8
figure 8

Strain–stress curves of (a) ESO homopolymer, (b) ESO/PHB-50, (c) ESO/PHB-100 and (d) ESO/PHB-150 composites.

Conclusions

In this study, a porous PHB was fabricated via the thermally induced phase separation method using DMSO as a solvent to produce a white material with a three-dimensional interconnected fibrous structure. By changing the concentration of PHB in DMSO, the formation and structure of the porous PHB could be easily controlled. The porous PHB was immersed in ESO with a thermally latent catalyst, and the subsequent curing of ESO afforded the ESO/PHB composite. The resulting composites were relatively transparent due to the nanoscale fibrous structure of PHB. The DSC and DMA results of the composite showed two glass transitions, as well as the melting of PHB. The Young’s modulus and the tensile strength of the ESO/PHB composites were larger than those of the ESO homopolymer. The incorporation of the porous PHB also increased the strain at break, indicating that the resulting composites are effectively reinforced without sacrificing toughness.

Because the present composite consists of plant oil and bacterial polyester, the biomass content of the composite was 100%. Therefore, this study provides a novel method for designing and synthesizing full bio-based composite materials.