Introduction

High-performance concrete (HPC) is a novel construction material that exhibits higher workability, greater mechanical properties and better durability than conventional concrete.1, 2 Superplasticizer is an essential component in HPC.3, 4

Superplasticizers can be classified into three groups according to their chemical structure:5, 6 naphthalene formaldehyde sulfonated condensates, melamine formaldehyde sulfonated condensates and polycarboxylate polymers with long comb-type side chains.7, 8, 9

Over the last two decades, new water-soluble monocyclic aromatic (MA) polymers have been developed: sulfonated phenol–formaldehyde polymer (SPF), aminosulfonate–phenol–formaldehyde polymer (AS) and aminosulfonate–phenol–salicylic acid–formaldehyde polymer (AH). The main chains of MA polymers are bound by alternating phenyl and methylene groups that possess −OH, −COOH, −NH2 and –SO3 hydrophilic groups. Researchers have recently studied synthetic methods for producing MA polymers as well as the application properties of MA polymers in concrete.10, 11, 12, 13, 14 However, the effect of functional groups bonded to the molecular backbone of MA polymers on the application properties of concrete has not been a subject of research.

In this study, three types of MA polymer with different functional groups were synthesized. The molecular structure of the MA polymers was characterized by gel permeation chromatography and infrared spectroscopy. The effect of the functional groups bonded to the molecular structure of the MA polymers on water reduction, workability preservation of concrete and setting time of cement paste was studied. The relationship between the setting time and slump loss in concrete containing MA polymers with different functional groups, the compressive strength of concrete containing MA polymers with different functional groups at difference dosages and the water/cement (W/C) ratios were also investigated.

Experimental procedure

Synthesis of MA polymer

Synthesis of SPF polymer. Sodium bisulfite (S) and phenol (P) were dissolved in water in a reaction vessel equipped with a stirrer and reflex condenser. The temperature of the solution was heated to 80 °C before the solution became clear; as soon as the solution became clear, the pH value of the solution was adjusted to pH 10–11 with a 40% sodium hydroxide solution. A 37% concentration formaldehyde (F) solution was fed into the reactor through a dropping funnel for 10–20 min, and the temperature of the solution was kept at 80 °C. The temperature of the solution was raised to 85–90 °C, and the reaction was allowed to continue for 4 h.

Synthesis of AS polymer. Sodium sulfanilate and phenol (P) were dissolved in water in a reaction vessel equipped with a stirrer and reflex condenser. The temperature of the solution was raised to 80 °C before the solution became clear; as soon as the solution became clear, the pH value of the solution was adjusted to pH 10–11 with a 40% sodium hydroxide solution. The temperature was kept at 80 °C, and a 37% concentration formaldehyde (F) solution was fed into the reactor through a dropping funnel for 10–20 min. Then, the temperature of the solution was raised to 85–90 °C, and the reaction was allowed to continue for 4 h.

Synthesis of AH polymer. Sodium sulfanilate, salicylic acid (C) and phenol (P) were dissolved in water in a reaction vessel equipped with a stirrer and reflex condenser. The temperature of the solution was raised to 80 °C before the solution became clear; as soon as the solution became clear, the pH value of the solution was adjusted to pH 10.45 with a 40% sodium hydroxide solution. The temperature was kept at 80 °C, and a 37% concentration formaldehyde (F) solution was fed into the reactor through a dropping funnel for 10–20 min. Then the temperature of the solution was raised to 85–90 °C, and the reaction was allowed to continue for 4 h.

The molecule structure characterization of MA polymer

Gel permeation chromatographymeasurements. The molecular weight (MW) and MW distribution of the MA polymers were determined using a Waters 1515 (USA) gel permeation chromatograph instrument equipped with Ultrahydrogel 120 and 250 columns, 0.10 mol l−1 of sodium chloride solution as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.60 ml min−1 and sodium polystyrene sulfonate as a standard.

Fourier transform infrared analysis. The dried MA polymer was further ground into powder before the determination of the MA polymer molecular structure and other procedures. Then, the proper amount of MA polymer powder samples was mixed with predried KBr and pressed into disks. Transmission infrared spectra of the disk samples was recorded using a Genesis FT–IR instrument (NEXUS 670 FT–IRESP, Nicolet, USA) in the region from 400 to 4000 cm–1.

The application properties test of concrete

Materials. Cement: Ordinary Portland cement (CEM1) according to BS EN 197(see ref. 15) was used in this study. The chemical compositions and physical properties of cement are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1 Chemical compositions of cement (%)
Table 2 Physical properties of cement

Polymer: The chemical structure of the MA polymers is shown in Figure 1; the properties of the MA polymers are shown in Table 3.

Figure 1
figure 1

Chemical structure of monocyclic aromatic (MA) polymer. (a) Sulfonated phenol-formaldehyde polymer (SPF). (b) Aminosulfonate-phenol-formaldehyde polymer (AS). (c) Aminosulfonate-phenol-salicylic acid-formaldehyde polymer (AH).

Table 3 Properties of MA polymer

Aggregates: Natural crushed stone with particles sizes between 5 and 20 mm with continuous gradation was used in this study. The fine aggregates used were natural river sand from China. The physical properties and the particle size distribution of fine and coarse aggregates are presented in Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4 Physical properties of fine aggregate and coarse aggregate
Table 5 Grading of fine aggregate and coarse aggregates

Mixture proportions. Concrete containing the MA polymer was prepared. The mixed proportion of concrete was as follows: cement/sand/gravel=1:2.16:3.54, cement=330 kg m−3, initial slump=8.0–9.0 cm and air content <4.5%. The mixed proportions of concrete with different dosages of MA polymer are shown in Table 6.

Table 6 Mix proportions of concrete with difference dosages MA polymer

Preparation of samples. The components of concrete were batched by weight. Cement was premixed with coarse and fine aggregates for 1 min. Then, the mixing water with the dissolved MA polymer was added and mixed for 3 min. Finally, the concrete mixture was mixed for an additional 2 min, resulting in a total mixing period of 6 min. The samples were compacted using a laboratory vibrating table for 2–3 min at a frequency of 50 Hz and a vibration amplitude of 0.5 mm; the samples were cured at 20 °C in molds covered by a polyethylene film to prevent moisture loss according to GOST10180.16 The samples were removed from the molds after 24 h and cured under a humidified atmosphere at a temperature of 20 °C with a relative humidity of 90±5%, until testing.

Experimental methods. Workability test: The workability of concrete was indicated by the initial slump value of the material measured by a slump test according to BS EN 12350 Part 2 (BS EN.2000).17 The workability change of concrete with different dosages of MA polymer was measured by the slump variations of concrete during the elapsed time. Before the test, concrete with different dosages of MA polymer was mixed for 1–2 min by hand; the slump values of concrete were checked 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after the first test.

Setting times test: The setting times of the cement pastes were tested according to the European standard EN 196-3.18

Compressive strength test: Concrete samples in the form of 100 mm3 cubes were prepared. Compressive strength tests were carried out at 3, 7 and 28 days according to GOST 10180.

Results and Discussion

Molecular structure characterization of synthesized MA polymer

Gel permeation chromatography.

Fourier transform infrared analysis.

Molecular structure characterization of MA polymer. The molecular weight (MW) and weight distribution of MA polymers are shown in Table 7, which shows that the weight-average MW and the number-average MW (Mn) of the MA polymers are 1.9 × 104–2.6 × 104 Da and 1.58 × 104–2.29 × 104 Da. The polydispersity (MW/Mn) of the MA polymers is about 1.1–1.505, suggesting that the MW of the synthesized MA polymers is distributed across a narrower range in which the most probable distribution is centered around 16 000–23 000 Da. The MA polymers have approximately the same MW.

Table 7 Characteristic of molecular distributing on MA polymer

Although the MA polymers have approximately the same MW, they possess different application properties in concrete. To understand this difference, functional groups bonded to the MA polymer molecular structure were examined and are shown in Table 8; the molecular structure of the SPF, AS and AH polymers has –OH and –SO3; –SO3, –OH and −NH2; and –SO3, −NH2 COOH and a large number of –OH groups, respectively.19, 20, 21 These functional groups are bonded to the main chain of the SPF, AS and AH polymers.

Table 8 FT–IR characteristic bands of the synthesized MA polymer (cm−1)

The application properties of MA polymer in concrete

Effect of MA polymer dosage on water reduction percentage in concrete. Figure 2 shows that the water-reduction percentage values increase with the MA polymer dosage from 0.3 to 0.5% (the ratio to cement content by mass). Above an MA polymer dosage of 0.5%, the percentage of water reduction increases very slowly. The main reason for this is that the effect of MA polymer on water reduction in concrete is determined by the degree of adsorption of the polymer on cement particle surfaces and the ξ-potential of cement particle surfaces. MA polymer is adsorbed on cement particle surfaces at a monolayer adsorption of 0.3–0.5%, where the dosage and ξ-potential of cement particle surfaces are positively related to the polymer dosage. Above a 0.5% dosage, the cement particle surfaces were fully covered with MA polymer molecules, and with multilayer adsorption, the ξ-potential of the cement particle surfaces does not increase with MA polymer dosage.22

Figure 2
figure 2

Water-reduction percentage by monocyclic aromatic (MA) polymer at different dosages. A full color version of this figure is available at Polymer Journal online.

Figure 2 also indicates that the functional groups bonded to the MA polymers have an effect on the water-reduction percentage. The SPF polymer at 0.5% dosage showed 18.3% water reduction, whereas the percentage of water reduction for the AS and AH polymers at same dosage was 28.5% and 32.2%, respectively. The AH polymer exhibited the highest water reduction percentage at the same dosage due to the greater number of –COOH groups bonded to the AH polymer.

Effect of MA polymer on workability of concrete. The change in workability of concrete with time slump elapsed is very important for field applications. The lower degree of workability change will prolong the available time for transporting and handling of concrete.23 The relationship between the time and workability change of concrete containing MA polymer at different dosages and W/C ratios is shown in Figures 3, 4, 5.

Figure 3
figure 3

Slump change with time for sulfonated phenol–formaldehyde polymer (SPF) polymer at difference dosages and water/cement (W/C) ratios. A full color version of this figure is available at Polymer Journal online.

Figure 4
figure 4

Slump change with time for aminosulfonate–phenol–formaldehyde polymer (AS) polymer at difference dosages and water/cement (W/C) ratios. A full color version of this figure is available at Polymer Journal online.

Figure 5
figure 5

Slump change with time for aminosulfonate–phenol–salicylic acid–formaldehyde polymer (AH) polymer at difference dosages and water/cement (W/C) ratios. A full color version of this figure is available at Polymer Journal online.

From Figure 3, it can be seen that workability of concrete with SPF polymer at different dosages sharply decreases with time elapsed. The main reason for this is that the molecular structure of the SPF polymer has more –SO3 and fewer –OH groups. The sharp decrease in the workability of the SPF polymer with time elapsed shows that this polymer is not appropriate for in situ applications requiring longer workability times. In Figure 4, the change in workability properties of concretes containing AS polymer with time elapsed at different dosages and W/C ratios is presented. Concrete containing AS polymer at different dosages has a better effect on the preservation of fluidity of cement paste; however, the increase in the AS polymer dosage generally decreased the slump loss of concrete with time elapsed.

Figure 5 shows the workability preservation properties of concrete containing AH polymer at different dosages and W/C ratios. The slump loss of concrete containing AH polymer was somewhat smaller than that of concrete containing AS polymer at the same dosage due to the greater number of –OH and –COOH functional groups bonded to the AH polymer molecule.

Effect of MA polymer on setting times of cement pastes. The setting times of cement pastes incorporating a 0.3–0.5% dosage of MA polymer are presented in Figure 6. The setting times of the investigated cement pastes were determined using Portland cement with initial and final setting times of 307 and 440 min, respectively.

Figure 6
figure 6

Effect of monocyclic aromatic (MA) polymer on setting times of cement paste. A full color version of this figure is available at Polymer Journal online.

From Figure 6, it is clear that the MA polymer dosage has an effect on the setting times of cement pastes. The initial and final setting times of cement paste increase rapidly with the addition of MA polymer, from 0 to 0.3% dosage. The initial setting times of cement pastes containing SPF, AS and AH polymers at 0.3% dosage are prolonged by 83, 110 and 120 min, respectively, with respect to the initial setting time of cement pastes without polymer. Meanwhile, the final setting times of cement pastes containing SPF, AS and AH polymers are prolonged from a time of 440 min, for cement pastes without polymer, to 535, 634 and 658 min, at a 0.3% polymer dosage. When the dosage of MA polymers is greater than 0.4%, the initial and final setting times increase very slowly for cement pastes containing SPF, AS and AH polymer. The effect of AH polymers on the setting times of the cement pastes at the same dosage is more significant in the three types of MA polymers studied here, which can be related to the type and number of functional groups bonded to the MA polymer molecular structure.

Relationship between setting time and slump loss of concrete. The relationship between the prolonging of the final setting time and slump loss rate of concrete with MA polymer (after 2 h) was investigated at different dosages and W/C ratios, as shown in Figures 7 and 8.

Figure 7
figure 7

Effects of polymer on lengthening of final setting time at different dosages and water/cement (W/C) ratios. A full color version of this figure is available at Polymer Journal online.

Figure 8
figure 8

Effects of polymer on slump loss rate (after 2 h) at different dosages and water/cement (W/C) ratios. A full color version of this figure is available at Polymer Journal online.

The properties of MA polymer on the prolonging of the final setting time of cement pastes and slump loss rates of concrete are presented in Figures 7 and 8. SPF polymer has a smaller negative influence on the prolonging of the final setting time of cement pastes. When using SPF polymer, the slump loss rate of concrete is extremely high and independent of polymer dosage, whereas the final setting time retarding effects of cement pastes containing AS and AH polymer are significant at polymer dosages ranging from 0.3 to 0.5%. The slump loss rate of concrete containing AS and AH polymer is dependent on polymer dosage; proper AS and AH polymer dosages were used, and it was shown that the slump loss rate of concrete containing AS and AH polymer could be reduced to negligible values.

Studies on the prolonging of the final setting time of cement pastes and the slump loss rate of fresh concrete containing MA polymer at different dosages and W/C ratios show that the application of SPF polymer in concrete with a higher slump loss rate did not lengthen the setting times of cement paste, whereas concrete containing AS and AH polymer with good workability retention usually prolonged the setting time of cement paste. It is possible to change the application properties of MA polymer in concrete by introducing new functional groups in the main chain of the MA polymer molecule, and it was also proved that concrete with a longer final setting time and a slow slump loss rate over a period of 2 h could be created by using the AS and AH polymer at appropriate dosages (0.6%).

Effect of MA polymer on the compressive strength development of concrete. The most critical influence of the polymers was that on the change in the development of compressive strength in concrete. The development of compressive strength in concrete without polymer was compared with that of concrete with MA polymer at 3, 7 and 28 days, as shown in Figures 9, 10, 11.

Figure 9
figure 9

Compressive strength development of sulfonated phenol–formaldehyde polymer (SPF) polymer incorporated concretes at different dosages and water/cement (W/C) ratios. A full color version of this figure is available at Polymer Journal online.

Figure 10
figure 10

Compressive strength development of aminosulfonate–phenol–formaldehyde polymer (AS) polymer incorporated concretes at different dosages and water/cement (W/C) ratios. A full color version of this figure is available at Polymer Journal online.

Figure 11
figure 11

Compressive strength development of aminosulfonate–phenol–salicylic acid–formaldehyde polymer (AH) polymer incorporated concretes at different dosages and W/C ratios. A full color version of this figure is available at Polymer Journal online.

Figures 9, 10, 11 show that the compressive strength of concrete without polymer and with MA polymer at different dosages and W/C ratios increases after curing for 3, 7 and 28 days. The early compressive strength development of concrete containing MA polymer is very rapid. The 3-day compressive strength of concrete containing 0.5% MA polymer reached 70–80% after curing for 28 days and the 7-day compressive strength of concrete containing 0.5% MA polymer was 80–95% after curing for 28 days. The compressive strength of concrete without polymer and with MA polymer at different dosages and W/C ratios increases at later curing ages.

The compressive strength of concrete containing 0.3% SPF, AS and AH polymer can reach 24.13, 30.12, and 40.13 MPa; 42.04, 50.12, and 57.92 MPa and 41.36, 44.18, and 56.97 MPa at curing times of 3, 7 and 28 days, respectively. The compressive strength was 135, 126 and 114%; 235, 211 and 165%; and 232, 186 and 162% for concrete without polymer at the same curing time. The compressive strength of concrete containing MA polymer is higher than that of concrete without polymer at the same curing time. The higher compressive strength values of concrete were obtained from concretes containing MA polymer, which are due to the high water-reducing capacity of the MA polymer, which also results in a decrease in the W/C ratio.

The compressive strength of concrete containing MA polymer at the same curing time and dosage shows some differences because of the molecular structures of the different MA polymers. The compressive strength of concrete containing the AS and AH polymers is higher than that of concrete containing the SPF polymer at the same curing time and polymer dosage. Concrete containing the AS polymer has a higher compressive strength than that of concrete containing the AH polymer at the same dosage because the molecular structure of the AH polymer features more –OH and –COOH groups than that of the AS polymer. As a result, the effect of the AH polymer on the prolonging of the final setting time of cement paste at the same polymer dosage is more significant than that of the AS polymer.

Conclusions

On the basis of results of this experimental investigation, the following conclusions are drawn:

  1. 1

    MA polymer was synthesized. Gel permeation chromatography shows that the MA polymers have approximately the same MW. The Fourier transform infrared spectra show that the molecular structures of the SPF, AS and AH polymers have –OH and –SO3; –SO3, –OH and −NH2; and –SO3, −NH2 –COOH and a greater number of –OH groups. These functional groups are chemically bonded to the main chain of the SPF, AS and AH polymer molecules.

  2. 2

    MA polymer has a higher water-reduction percentage at a lower dosage. An MA polymer dosage greater than 0.5% produces a very slow increase in the percentage of water reduction. The water-reducing capacity of the MA polymers follows the order AH>AS>SPF at the same polymer dosage.

  3. 3

    The workability preservation properties of concrete containing MA polymer with time at the same dosages and W/C ratios ranks AH>AS>SPF.

  4. 4

    The setting times of cement paste increase rapidly with the addition of MA polymer from 0 to 0.3% dosage. At a dosage of MA polymer greater than 0.4%, the setting times of the cement pastes containing MA polymer increase very slowly. The retardation of the setting time for cement pastes featuring the three types of MA polymer follows the order AH>AS>SPF.

  5. 5

    The molecular structure of the SPF polymer has more –SO3 and less –OH groups. SPF polymer shows a high percentage of water reduction, high slump loss and poor workability-preservation properties. The molecular structure of the AS and AH polymers possess –SO3 and –COOH as dispersion groups and −OH and –NH2 as fluidity-preservation groups. AS and AH polymers have better water-reducing capacity and workability preservation properties and show prolonged setting times of cement paste and higher compressive strengths in concrete than SPF polymer at the same curing time and same dosage.