Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Prostate cancer

Caveat Emptor — long-term outcomes in the Göteborg active surveillance cohort

Prior reports demonstrate a near-zero risk of prostate-cancer death among patients with very low-risk tumours managed on active surveillance (AS). However, outcomes from an AS cohort in Sweden suggest that observing men with low-risk and intermediate-risk tumours carries a small — but significant — risk of treatment failure and death from prostate cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Cooperberg, M. R. & Carroll, P. R. Trends in management for patients with localized prostate cancer, 1990–2013. JAMA 314, 80–82 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Klotz, L. et al. Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 272–277 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tosoian, J. J. et al. Intermediate and longer-term outcomes from a prospective active-surveillance program for favorable-risk prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 3379–3385 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Godtman, R. A. et al. Long-term results of active surveillance in the Göteborg randomized, population-based prostate cancer screening trial. Eur. Urol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.048 (2016).

  5. Babaian, R. J. et al. A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. J. Urol. 163, 152–157 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siddiqui, M. M. et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA 313, 390–397 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Filson, C. P. et al. Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: the role of systematic and targeted biopsies. Cancer 122, 884–892 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bostrom, P. J. et al. Genomic predictors of outcome in prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 68, 1033–1044 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Newcomb, L. F. et al. Outcomes of active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer in the prospective, multi-institutional Canary PASS cohort. J. Urol. 195, 313–320 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruinsma, S. M. et al. Active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer: the study protocol of the Movember Global Action Plan 3 (GAP3) project. Eur. Urol. Supp. 14, e1036–e1036a (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr Hung-Jui Tan for editorial input for this commentary.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher P. Filson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filson, C. Caveat Emptor — long-term outcomes in the Göteborg active surveillance cohort. Nat Rev Urol 13, 307–308 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2016.85

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2016.85

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer