Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Use of ureteral access sheaths in ureteroscopy

Key Points

  • A ureteral access sheath (UAS) enables the urologist to repeatedly pass the ureteroscope into the upper ureter and kidney, without a need to pass the ureteroscope over a working wire

  • The ureteral access sheath (UAS) has a hydrophilic coating and is designed to be resistant to kinking and buckling during retrograde passage into the ureter

  • Use of a UAS improves the flow of irrigation fluid and visualization within the ureter, reduces operative times and overall costs and improves the effectiveness of surgery

  • Use of a UAS can cause injury to the ureter, might increase the risk of ureteral wall ischaemia, and, theoretically, carries an increased risk of ureteral strictures

  • To minimize the risk of postoperative complications, a ureteral stent is typically placed at the end of a procedure in which a UAS has been used

Abstract

The ureteral access sheath (UAS) facilitates the use of flexible ureteroscopy, enabling improved minimally invasive management of complex upper urinary tract diseases. The UAS, which comes in a variety of diameters and lengths, is passed in a retrograde fashion, aided by a hydrophilic coating and other features designed to confer smooth passage into the ureter with sufficient resistance to kinking and buckling. Use of a UAS has the advantage of enabling repeated passage of the ureteroscope while minimizing damage to the ureter, thus improving the flow of irrigation fluid and visualization within the urethra with reductions in operative times, which improves both the effectiveness of the surgery and reduces the costs. Placement of the UAS carries an increased risk of ureteral wall ischaemia and injury to the mucosal or muscular layers of the ureter, and a theoretically increased risk of ureteral strictures. A ureteral stent is typically placed after ureteroscopy with a UAS. Endourologists have found several additional practical uses of a UAS, such as the percutaneous treatment of patients with ureteral stones, and solutions to other endourological challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The ureteral access sheath.
Figure 2: Advancement of a ureteroscope within the ureter.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Monga, M. et al. Ureteral access for upper urinary tract disease: the access sheath. J. Endourol. 15, 831–834 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Takayasu, H. & Aso, Y. Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter. J. Urol. 112, 176–178 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vanlangendonck, R. & Landman, J. Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheath. Urol. Clin. North Am. 31, 71–81 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kourambas, J., Byrne, R. R. & Preminger, G. M. Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J. Urol. 165, 789–793 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pietrow, P. K. et al. Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity. Urology 60, 784–788 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pedro, R. N., Hendlin, K., Durfee, W. K. & Monga M. Physical characteristics of next-generation ureteral access sheaths: buckling and kinking. Urology 70, 440–442 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Monga, M. et al. Prospective randomized comparison of 2 ureteral access sheaths during flexible retrograde ureteroscopy. J. Urol. 172, 572–573 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shields, J. M., Tunuguntla, H. S., Bhalani, V. K., Ayyathurai, R. & Bird, V. G. Construction-related differences seen in ureteral access sheaths: comparison of reinforced versus nonreinforced ureteral access sheaths. Urology 73, 241–244 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Qahtani, S. M. et al. Which ureteral access sheath is compatible with your flexible ureteroscope? J. Endourol. 28, 286–290 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pedro, R. N., Weiland, D., Reardon, S. & Monga, M. Ureteral access sheath insertion forces: implications for design and training. Urol. Res. 35, 107–109 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De, S., Sarkissian, C., Torricelli, F. C., Brown, R. & Monga M. New ureteral access sheaths: a double standard. Urology 85, 757–763 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harper, J. D. et al. Comparison of a novel radially dilating balloon ureteral access sheath to a conventional sheath in the porcine model. J. Urol. 179, 2042–2045 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bach C. et al. The new digital flexible ureteroscopes: “size does matter”—increased ureteric access sheath use! Urol. Int. 89, 408–411 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Traxer, O. & Thomas, A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J. Urol. 189, 580–584 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawahara, T. et al. Early ureteral catheter removal after ureteroscopic lithotripsy using ureteral access sheath. Urolithiasis 41, 31–35 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miernik, A. et al. Standardized flexible ureteroscopic technique to improve stone-free rates. Urology 80, 1198–1202 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bourdoumis, A. et al. The difficult ureter: stent and come back or balloon dilate and proceed with ureteroscopy? what does the evidence say? Urology 83, 1–3 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mogilevkin, Y., Sofer, M., Margel, D., Greenstein, A. & Lifshitz, D. Predicting an effective ureteral access sheath insertion: a bicenter prospective study. J. Endourol. 28, 1414–1417 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stern, J. M., Yiee, J. & Park, S. Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J. Endourol. 21, 119–123 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh, A. et al. Ureteral access sheath for the management of pediatric renal and ureteral stones: a single center experience. J. Urol. 175, 1080–1082 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, H.-H. et al. Use of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy in children. J. Urol. 186, S1728–S1733 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rehman, J. et al. Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. Urology 61, 713–718 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Landman, J. et al. Comparison of intrarenal pressure and irrigant flow during percutaneous nephroscopy with an indwelling ureteral catheter, ureteral occlusion balloon, and ureteral access sheath. Urology 60, 584–587 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Auge, B. K. et al. Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J. Endourol. 18, 33–36 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ng, Y. H. et al. Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure. J. Endourol. 24, 1915–1920 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Monga, M., Bodie, J. & Ercole, B. Is there a role for small-diameter ureteral access sheaths? Impact on irrigant flow and intrapelvic pressures. Urology 64, 439–441 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. L'esperance J. O. et al. Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology 66, 252–255 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Berquet, G., Prunel, P., Verhoest, G., Mathieu, R. & Bensalah, K. The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones. World J. Urol. 32, 229–232 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rizkala, E. R. & Monga, M. Controversies in ureteroscopy: wire, basket, and sheath. Indian J. Urol. 29, 244–248 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lallas, C. D. et al. Laser doppler flowmetric determination of ureteral blood flow after ureteral access sheath placement. J. Endourol. 16, 583–590 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Delvecchio, F. C. et al. Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath. Urology 61, 518–522 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Traxer, O. et al. Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J. Urol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1582–8.

  33. Abrahams, H. M. & Stoller M. L. The argument against the routine use of ureteral access sheaths. Urol. Clin. North Am. 31, 83–87 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gurbuz C. et al. The cost analysis of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in 302 cases. Urolithiasis 42, 155–158 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen, Y.- T. et al. Is ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy? a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J. Urol. 167, 1977–1980 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Boddy, S. A. et al. Acute ureteric dilatation for ureteroscopy. An experimental study. Br. J. Urol. 61, 27–31 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Torricelli, F. C., De, S., Hinck, B. Noble, M. & Monga M. Flexible ureteroscopy with a ureteral access sheath: when to stent? Urology 83, 278–281 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rapoport, D., Perks, A. E. & Teichman, J. M. Ureteral access sheath use and stenting in ureteroscopy: effect on unplanned emergency room visits and cost. J. Endourol. 21, 993–998 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Auge, B. K., Sarvis, J. A, L'Esperance, J. O. & Preminger, G. M. Practice patterns of ureteral stenting after routine ureteroscopic stone surgery: a survey of practicing urologists. J. Endourol. 21, 1287–1292 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Winter, M., Lynch, C., Appu, S. & Kourambas, J. Access sheath-aided percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy; a novel approach to the ureter: surgery illustrated. BJU Int. 108, 620–622 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kadlec, A. O., Ross, M. J. & Milner, J. E. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ureteral access sheath in a transplanted kidney: case report and literature review. Urol. Int. 91, 236–238 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sountoulides, P. G. et al. Endoscopy-guided percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: benefits of ureteroscopic access and therapy. J. Endourol. 23, 1649–1654 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gur, U., Holland, R., Lask, D. M., Livne, P. M. & Lifshitz, D. A. Expanding use of ureteral access sheath for stones larger than access sheath's internal diameter. Urology 69, 170–172 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu, N. Z., Auge, B. K. & Preminger, G. M. Simplified ureteral stent placement with the assistance of a ureteral access sheath. J. Urol. 166, 206–208 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gorin, M. A., Santos Cortes, J. A., Kyle, C. C., Carey, R. I. & Bird, V. G. Initial clinical experience with use of ureteral access sheaths in the diagnosis and treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urology 78, 523–527 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pardalidis, N. P., Papatsoris, A. G., Kapotis, C. G. & Kosmaoglou, E. V. Treatment of impacted lower third ureteral stones with the use of the ureteral access sheath. Urol. Res. 34, 211–214 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Auge, B. K., Wu, N. Z., Pietrow, P. K., Delvecchio, F. C. & Preminger, G. M. Ureteral access sheath facilitates inspection of incision of ureteropelvic junction. J. Urol. 169, 1070–1073 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made a substantial contribution to researching data for this article and discussions of content, A.G.K. and G.M.P. wrote the manuscript, M.E.L., C.D.S. and G.M.P. edited and/or reviewed the manuscript prior to submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn M. Preminger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.E.L. and G.M.P. have acted as consultants for Boston Scientific and Olympus. The other authors declare no competing interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaplan, A., Lipkin, M., Scales, C. et al. Use of ureteral access sheaths in ureteroscopy. Nat Rev Urol 13, 135–140 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.271

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.271

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing