Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Gender differences in incidence and outcomes of urothelial and kidney cancer

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 20 October 2015

This article has been updated

Key Points

  • Several studies have reported gender as an independent factor that can influence incidence, recurrence and progression of urological malignancies, but data are inconsistent

  • Men have a threefold higher risk of developing bladder cancer than women

  • Women with bladder cancer are often diagnosed with higher tumour stage and tend to have a worse prognosis than men after adjusting for stage at the diagnosis

  • Men seem to have a higher incidence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma than women; however, survival outcomes might be independent of gender, but data are lacking

  • Men are more frequently diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma than women and also tend to have larger tumours of higher stage and grade

  • Smoking habits, occupational risk factors, tumour biology and sex steroid hormones and their receptors could all have a role in causing the observed gender disparities in patients with urological cancers

Abstract

A gender discrepancy exists in the incidence of both urothelial and kidney carcinomas, with more men presenting with these cancers than women. Men have a threefold greater risk of developing bladder cancer than women, but female gender has been identified as an independent adverse prognostic factor for both recurrence and progression of this disease. In particular, women with bladder cancer are often diagnosed with a higher tumour stage than men. Conclusive data on the influence of gender on outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma are currently lacking, although men seem to have a higher disease incidence, whereas survival outcomes might be independent of gender. Patients with renal cell carcinoma are more often men and they typically have larger tumours and higher stage and grade disease than women with this cancer. Smoking habits, tumour biology, occupational risk factors and sex steroid hormones and their receptors could have a role in these observed gender disparities. The majority of data support the theory that gender influences incidence and prognosis of urothelial and kidney cancers; men and women are different genetically and socially, making the consideration of gender a key factor in the clinical decision-making process. Thus, the inclusion of this variable in validated prognostic tables and nomograms should be discussed as a matter of importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Differences in bladder cancer between genders.
Figure 2: Differences in upper tract urothelial carcinoma between genders.
Figure 3: Differences in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) between genders.
Figure 4: Differences in benign renal tumours between genders.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 20 October 2015

    In the originally published article, the first line of the section on Bladder cancer epidemiology “Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer worldwide” should read “Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men and the seventeenth most common in women, worldwide”. This error has been corrected for the PDF and HTML versions of the article.

References

  1. Page, D. C. 2003 Curt Stern Award address. On low expectation exceeded; or, the genomic salvation of the Y chromosome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 399–402 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Shastry, B. S. SNP alleles in human disease and evolution. J. Hum. Genet. 47, 561–566 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kunath, F. et al. Is gender becoming relevant in uro-oncological research? A bibliographical analysis. World J. Urol. 31, 1065–1072 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lucca, I., Fajkovic, H. & Klatte, T. Sex steroids and gender differences in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Curr. Opin. Urol. 24, 500–505 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kunath, F. et al. Is gender becoming relevant in uro-oncological research? A bibliographical analysis. World J. Urol. 31, 1065–1072 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Siegel, R., Naishadham, D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J. Clin. 63, 11–30 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallerand, H. et al. Targeted therapies in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer according to the signaling pathways. Urol. Oncol. 29, 4–11 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burger, M. et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 63, 234–241 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shariat, S. F. et al. Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary series from the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium. J. Urol. 176, 2414–2422 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horstmann, M., Witthuhn, R., Falk, M. & Stenzl, A. Gender-specific differences in bladder cancer: a retrospective analysis. Gend. Med. 5, 385–394 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. American Cancer Society. cancer.org[online], (2014).

  12. Davis-Dao, C. A. et al. Lower risk in parous women suggests that hormonal factors are important in bladder cancer etiology. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 20, 1156–1170 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Weibull, C. E., Eloranta, S., Altman, D., Johansson, A. L. V. & Lambe, M. Childbearing and the risk of bladder cancer: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Eur. Urol. 63, 733–738 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weibull, C. E., Eloranta, S., Johansson, A. L. V., Altman, D. & Lambe, M. Reply to Silvia Selinski, Daniel Ovsiannikov, Jan G. Hengstler and Klaus Golka's Letter to the editor re: Caroline E. Weibull, Sandra Eloranta, Daniel Altman, Anna L. V. Johansson, Mats Lambe. Childbearing and the risk of bladder cancer: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Eur. Urol. 64, e81 (2013).

  15. Daugherty, S. E. et al. Reproductive factors and menopausal hormone therapy and bladder cancer risk in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Int. J. Cancer 133, 462–472 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cantwell, M. M., Lacey, J. V., Schairer, C., Schatzkin, A. & Michaud, D. S. Reproductive factors, exogenous hormone use and bladder cancer risk in a prospective study. Int. J. Cancer 119, 2398–2401 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kluth, L. A. et al. Prognostic and Prediction Tools in Bladder Cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature. Eur. Urol. 68, 238–253 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sylvester, R. J. et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: A combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur. Urol. 49, 466–475 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandez-Gomez, J. et al. Prognostic factors in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin: multivariate analysis of data from four randomized CUETO trials. Eur. Urol. 53, 992–1001 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Soave, A. et al. Gender-specific outcomes of bladder cancer patients: a stage-specific analysis in a contemporary, homogenous radical cystectomy cohort. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 41, 368–377 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fajkovic, H. et al. Impact of gender on bladder cancer incidence, staging, and prognosis. World J. Urol. 29, 457–463 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chamie, K. et al. Recurrence of high-risk bladder cancer: a population-based analysis. Cancer 119, 3219–3227 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shariat, S. F. et al. The effect of age and gender on bladder cancer: a critical review of the literature. BJU Int. 105, 300–308 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kluth, L. A. et al. Female gender is associated with higher risk of disease recurrence in patients with primary T1 high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. World J. Urol. 31, 1029–1036 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Soave, A. et al. Gender-specific outcomes of bladder cancer patients: A stage-specific analysis in a contemporary, homogenous radical cystectomy cohort. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 41, 368–377 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Messer, J. C. et al. Female gender is associated with a worse survival after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a competing risk analysis. Urology 83, 863–867 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Keck, B. et al. Female sex is an independent risk factor for reduced overall survival in bladder cancer patients treated by transurethral resection and radio- or radiochemotherapy. World J. Urol. 31, 1023–1028 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Boorjian, S. A., Zhu, F. & Herr, H. W. The effect of gender on response to bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy for patients with non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. BJU Int. 106, 357–361 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Puente, D. et al. Gender-related differences in clinical and pathological characteristics and therapy of bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 43, 53–62 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Crivelli, J. J. et al. Effect of smoking on outcomes of urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature. Eur. Urol. 65, 742–754 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rink, M. et al. Impact of smoking on outcomes of patients with a history of recurrent nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. J. Urol. 188, 2120–2127 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rink, M. et al. Smoking reduces the efficacy of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 62, 1204–1206 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jamal, A. et al. Current cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2005–2013. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 63, 1108–1112 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ng, M. et al. Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980–2012 JAMA 311, 183–92 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, Y. Understanding the gender disparity in bladder cancer risk: the impact of sex hormones and liver on bladder susceptibility to carcinogens. J. Environ. Sci. Health. C. Environ. Carcinog. Ecotoxicol. Rev. 31, 287–304 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Miyamoto, H. et al. Expression of androgen and oestrogen receptors and its prognostic significance in urothelial neoplasm of the urinary bladder. BJU Int. 109, 1716–1726 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Boorjian, S. et al. Androgen receptor expression is inversely correlated with pathologic tumor stage in bladder cancer. Urology 64, 383–388 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shortliffe, L. M. D., Ye, Y., Behr, B. & Wang, B. Testosterone Changes Bladder and Kidney Structure in Juvenile Male Rats. J. Urol. 191, 1913–1919 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Miyamoto, H. et al. Promotion of bladder cancer development and progression by androgen receptor signals. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 99, 558–568 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jing, Y. et al. Activated androgen receptor promotes bladder cancer metastasis via Slug mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Lett. 348, 135–145 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gakis, G. & Stenzl, A. Gender-specific differences in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: the concept of sex steroid sensitivity. World J. Urol. 31, 1059–1064 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Izumi, K. et al. Androgen deprivation therapy prevents bladder cancer recurrence. Oncotarget 5, 12665–12674 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Wu, S. et al. Somatic mutation of the androgen receptor gene is not associated with transitional cell carcinoma: a 'negative' study by whole-exome sequencing analysis. Eur. Urol. 64, 1018–1019 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mir, C. et al. Loss of androgen receptor expression is not associated with pathological stage, grade, gender or outcome in bladder cancer: a large multi-institutional study. BJU Int. 108, 24–30 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hsu, I., Vitkus, S., Da, J. & Yeh, S. Role of oestrogen receptors in bladder cancer development. Nat. Rev. Urol. 10, 317–326 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kauffman, E. C. et al. Estrogen receptor-β expression and pharmacological targeting in bladder cancer. Oncol. Rep. 30, 131–138 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Hsu, I. et al. Estrogen receptor alpha prevents bladder cancer via INPP4B inhibited akt pathway in vitro and in vivo. Oncotarget 5, 7917–7935 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Han, B., Cui, D., Jing, Y., Hong, Y. & Xia, S. Estrogen receptor β (ERβ) is a novel prognostic marker of recurrence survival in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer potentially by inhibiting cadherin switch. World J. Urol. 32, 149–155 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hsu, I. et al. Suppression of ERβ signaling via ERβ knockout or antagonist protects against bladder cancer development. Carcinogenesis 35, 651–661 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov[online],

  51. US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov[online],

  52. Garg, T. et al. Gender disparities in hematuria evaluation and bladder cancer diagnosis: a population based analysis. J. Urol. 192, 1072–1077 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Henning, A. et al. Do differences in clinical symptoms and referral patterns contribute to the gender gap in bladder cancer? BJU Int. 112, 68–73 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Cohn, J. A., Vekhter, B., Lyttle, C., Steinberg, G. D. & Large, M. C. Sex disparities in diagnosis of bladder cancer after initial presentation with hematuria: a nationwide claims-based investigation. Cancer 120, 555–561 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Raman, J. D., Messer, J., Sielatycki, J. A. & Hollenbeak, C. S. Incidence and survival of patients with carcinoma of the ureter and renal pelvis in the USA, 1973–2005 BJU Int. 107, 1059–1064 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ehdaie, B., Shariat, S. F., Savage, C., Coleman, J. & Dalbagni, G. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence and cancer-specific death for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: comparison to American Joint Committee on Cancer staging classification. Urol. J. 11, 1435–1441 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Rouprêt, M. et al. European guidelines on upper tract urothelial carcinomas: 2013 update. Eur. Urol. 63, 1059–1071 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Green, D. A. et al. Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and the upper tract: disparate twins. J. Urol. 189, 1214–1221 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hurel, S. et al. Influence of preoperative factors on the oncologic outcome for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. World J. Urol. 33, 335–341 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Espiritu, P. N. et al. Effect of tumor size on recurrence-free survival of upper tract urothelial carcinoma following surgical resection. Urol. Oncol. 32, 619–624 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Xylinas, E. et al. Prediction of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy: development of a clinical decision-making tool. Eur. Urol. 65, 650–658 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tanaka, N. et al. The predictive value of positive urine cytology for outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy in patients with primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. Urol. Oncol. 32, 48.e19–48.e26 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Liu, J.-Y. et al. Age-specific effect of gender on upper tract urothelial carcinoma outcomes. Med. Oncol. 30, 640 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Shyr, C.-R. et al. The expression and actions of androgen receptor in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUTUC) tissues and the primary cultured cells. Endocrine 43, 191–199 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Chen, C.-C. et al. Androgen receptor promotes the migration and invasion of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma cells through the upregulation of MMP-9 and COX-2. Oncol. Rep. 30, 979–985 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Brookman-May, S. D. et al. Time to recurrence is a significant predictor of cancer-specific survival after recurrence in patients with recurrent renal cell carcinoma—results from a comprehensive multi-centre database (CORONA/SATURN-Project). BJU Int. 112, 909–916 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hew, M. N. et al. Age and gender related differences in renal cell carcinoma in a European cohort. J. Urol. 188, 33–38 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Ljungberg, B. et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur. Urol. 67, 913–924 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Macleod, L. C. et al. Risk factors for renal cell carcinoma in the VITAL study. J. Urol. 190, 1657–1661 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Iseki, K. Gender differences in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 74, 415–417 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. El-Serag, H. B. Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 142, 1264–1273e1 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Doumas, M., Papademetriou, V., Faselis, C. & Kokkinos, P. Gender differences in hypertension: myths and reality. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 15, 321–330 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Appelman, Y., van Rijn, B. B., Ten Haaf, M. E., Boersma, E. & Peters, S. A. E. Sex differences incardiovascular risk factors and disease prevention. Atherosclerosis 241, 211–218 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Karami, S., Daugherty, S. E. & Purdue, M. P. A prospective study of alcohol consumption and renal cell carcinoma risk. Int. J. Cancer 137, 238–242 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Lipworth, L. et al. Renal cell cancer histologic subtype distribution differs by race and sex. BJU Int. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.12950, (2014).

  76. Steffens, S. et al. Clinical behavior of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma is less aggressive than that of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, independent of Fuhrman grade or tumor size. Virchows Arch. 465, 439–444 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Brannon, A. R. et al. Meta-analysis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma gene expression defines a variant subgroup and identifies gender influences on tumor biology. Eur. Urol. 61, 258–268 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Banks, R. E. et al. Genetic and epigenetic analysis of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene alterations and relationship with clinical variables in sporadic renal cancer. Cancer Res. 66, 2000–2011 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Volpe, A. & Patard, J. J. Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma. World J. Urol. 28, 319–327 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Hofbauer, S. L. et al. Associations between presenting symptoms, clinicopathological parameters, and prognosis in a contemporary series of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Korean J. Urol. 55, 505–510 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Aron, M., Nguyen, M. M., Stein, R. J. & Gill, I. S. Impact of gender in renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the SEER database. Eur. Urol. 54, 133–140 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. May, M. et al. Gender differences in clinicopathological features and survival in surgically treated patients with renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the multicenter CORONA database. World J. Urol. 31, 1073–1080 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Rampersaud, E. N. et al. The effect of gender and age on kidney cancer survival: younger age is an independent prognostic factor in women with renal cell carcinoma. Urol. Oncol. 32, 30.e9–13 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Kates, M., Korets, R., Sadeghi, N., Pierorazio, P. M. & McKiernan, J. M. Predictors of locally advanced and metastatic disease in patients with small renal masses. BJU Int. 109, 1463–1467 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Zucchetto, A. et al. Reproductive, menstrual, and other hormone-related factors and risk of renal cell cancer. Int. J. Cancer 123, 2213–2216 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Lee, J. E., Hankinson, S. E. & Cho, E. Reproductive factors and risk of renal cell cancer: the Nurses' Health Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 169, 1243–1250 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Kutikov, A. et al. Anatomic features of enhancing renal masses predict malignant and high-grade pathology: a preoperative nomogram using the RENAL Nephrometry score. Eur. Urol. 60, 241–248 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Lane, B. R. et al. A preoperative prognostic nomogram for solid enhancing renal tumors 7 cm or less amenable to partial nephrectomy. J. Urol. 178, 429–434 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Yu, C.-P. et al. Estrogen inhibits renal cell carcinoma cell progression through estrogen receptor-β activation. PLoS ONE 8, e56667 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Stone, L. Kidney cancer: Androgen receptor —a new target in renal cell carcinoma? Nat. Rev. Urol. 11, 425 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. He, D. et al. ASC-J9 suppresses renal cell carcinoma progression by targeting an androgen receptor-dependent HIF2α/VEGF signaling pathway. Cancer Res. 74, 4420–4430 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Williams, E. M., Higgins, J. P., Sangoi, A. R., McKenney, J. K. & Troxell, M. L. Androgen receptor immunohistochemistry in genitourinary neoplasms. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 47, 81–85 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Zhu, G. et al. The expression and evaluation of androgen receptor in human renal cell carcinoma. Urology 83, e19–e24 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Noh, S. J. et al. Acetylation status of P53 and the expression of DBC1, SIRT1, and androgen receptor are associated with survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients. Pathology 45, 574–580 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Tan, C. et al. Impact of Gender in Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Relationship of FABP7 and BRN2 Expression with Overall Survival. Clin. Med. Insights. Oncol. 8, 21–27 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Mauermann, J. et al. Gender differences in benign renal masses. World J. Urol. 31, 1051–1057 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Van der Walt, J. D., Reid, H. A., Risdon, R. A. & Shaw, J. H. Renal oncocytoma. A review of the literature and report of an unusual multicentric case. Virchows Arch. A. Pathol. Anat. Histopathol. 398, 291–304 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Boorjian, S. A. et al. Hormone receptor expression in renal angiomyolipoma: clinicopathologic correlation. Urology 72, 927–932 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Lane, B. R. et al. Adult cystic nephroma and mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney: clinical, radiographic, and pathologic characteristics. Urology 71, 1142–1148 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. De Martino, M., Böhm, M. & Klatte, T. Malignant solitary fibrous tumour of the kidney: report of a case and cumulative analysis of the literature. [German] Aktuelle Urol. 43, 59–62 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Rouprêt, M. et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma: 2015 Update. Eur. Urol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.044.

  102. Witjes, J. A. et al. EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines. Eur. Urol. 65, 778–792 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I.L. was supported by the development fund of the CHUV-University Hospital and the European Urological Scholarship Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I.L. researched data for and wrote the article, I.L., T.K., M.d.M. and S.F.S. contributed to the discussion of the content and all authors contributed to reviewing and editing the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahrokh F. Shariat.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lucca, I., Klatte, T., Fajkovic, H. et al. Gender differences in incidence and outcomes of urothelial and kidney cancer. Nat Rev Urol 12, 585–592 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.232

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.232

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer