Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Paediatric urology

Vesicoamniotic shunting for fetal LUTO—questions linger

Subjects

Fetal intervention for lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO) has been technically feasible since the 1980s, with vesicoamniotic shunting being the most commonly employed technique. Despite the recent publication of the first and only randomized trial of fetal shunting, questions linger about the long-term efficacy and clinical impact of prenatal intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Bornes, M. et al. Outcome and etiologies of fetal megacystis according to the gestational age at diagnosis. Prenat. Diagn. 13, 1–5 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reuss, A., Wladimiroff, J. W., Stewart, P. A. & Scholtmeijer, R. J. Non-invasive management of fetal obstructive uropathy. Lancet 2, 949–951 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris, R. K. et al. Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting versus conservative management for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (PLUTO): a randomised trial. Lancet http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60992-7.

  4. Harrison, M. R., Nakayama, D. K., Noall, R. & de Lorimier, A. A. Correction of congenital hydronephrosis in utero II. Decompression reverses the effects of obstruction on the fetal lung and urinary tract. J. Paediatr. Surg. 17, 965–974 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morris, R. K., Malin, G. L., Khan, K. S. & Kilby, M. D. Systematic review of the effectiveness of antenatal intervention for the treatment of congenital lower urinary tract obstruction. BJOG 117, 382–390 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Crombleholme, T. M. et al. Fetal intervention in obstructive uropathy: prognostic indicators and efficacy of intervention. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 162, 1239–1244 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, M. P. et al. Sequential urinalysis improves evaluation of fetal renal function in obstructive uropathy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 173, 59–65 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Biard, J. M. et al. Long-term outcomes in children treated by prenatal vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction. Obstet. Gynecol. 106, 503–508 (2005).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmes, N., Harrison, M. R. & Baskin, L. S. Fetal surgery for posterior urethral valves: long-term postnatal outcomes. Paediatrics 108, 1–7 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. United States National Institutes of Health. Multicenter trial of fetal myelomeningocele repair [online], (2013).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglass B. Clayton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clayton, D., Brock, J. Vesicoamniotic shunting for fetal LUTO—questions linger. Nat Rev Urol 10, 624–625 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.231

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.231

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing