Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Bladder cancer

Validity of the 2004 system for grading Ta bladder cancer

Assessment of the clinical validity of the 2004 WHO grading system for bladder cancer staged pTa revealed three important aspects: the presence of substantial interobserver variability; that tumor grade is analogous to stage; and that the system has prognostic value (as low-grade tumors progress, but do so sporadically).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Pellucchi, F. et al. Clinical reliability of the 2004 WHO histological classification system compared with the 1973 WHO system for Ta primary bladder tumors. J. Urol. 186, 2194–2199 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goebell, P. J. & Knowles, M. A. Bladder cancer or bladder cancers? Genetically distinct malignant conditions of the urothelium. Urol. Oncol. 28, 409–428 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Falke, J. & Witjes, J. A. Contemporary management of low-risk bladder cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 8, 42–49 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eble, J. N., Sauter, G., Epstein, J. I. & Sesterhenn, I. A. (eds) World Health Organisation Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. 110 (IARC Press, Lyon, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  5. May, M. et al. Prognostic accuracy of individual uropathologists in noninvasive urinary bladder carcinoma: a multicentre study comparing the 1973 and 2004 World Health Organisation classifications. Eur. Urol. 33, 801 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Rhijn, B. W. et al. The pathologist's mean grade is constant and individualizes the prognostic value of bladder cancer grading. Eur. Urol. 57, 1052–1057 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burger, M. et al. Prediction of progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer by WHO 1973 and 2004 grading and by FGFR3 mutation status: a prospective study. Eur. Urol. 54, 835–843 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burger, M. et al. Does the current World Health Organization classification predict the outcome better in patients with noninvasive bladder cancer of early or regular onset? BJU Int. 102, 194–197 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Otto, W. et al. The WHO classification of 1973 is more suitable than the WHO classification of 2004 for predicting survival in pT1 urothelial bladder cancer. BJU Int. 107, 404–408 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buethe, D. D. & Sexton, W. J. Bladder cancer: validating the EORTC risk tables in BCG-treated patients. Nat. Rev. Urol. 8, 480–481 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maximilian Burger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burger, M., Goebell, P. Validity of the 2004 system for grading Ta bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol 9, 126–127 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.8

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing