Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Surgery

Laparoscopic promontofixation is safe and effective for POP

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common problem experienced by women. A recent research article examined the outcomes of women with POP treated with laparoscopic promontofixation. This technique—a relatively new approach to POP surgery—was associated with symptom improvements and a low rate of recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Maher, C. et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub4 (2010).

  2. Bacle, J. et al. Laparoscopic promontofixation for pelvic organ prolapse: a 10-year single center experience in a series of 501 patients. Int. J. Urol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02857.x.

  3. Rozet, F. et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases. Eur. Urol. 47, 230–236 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ross, J. W. & Preston, M. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe vaginal vault prolapse: five-year outcome. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 12, 221–226 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Perez, T. et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for management of pelvic organ prolapse enhances quality of life at one year: a prospective observational study. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 18, 747–754 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cundiff, G. W. et al. Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 199, 688.e1–688e5 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paraiso, M. F., Jelovsek, J. E., Frick, A., Chen, C. C. & Barber, M. D. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 118, 1005–1013 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maher, C. F. et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 204, 360.e1–360e7 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. US FDA. FDA Safety Communication: Update on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse [online], (2011).

  10. Swan, K. & Advincula, A. P. Advances in urogynaecological robotic surgery. BJU Int. 108 (6 Pt 2), 1024–1027 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnold P. Advincula.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A. P. Advincula has acted as a consultant for Cooper Surgical, Covidien, Ethicon Women's Health & Urology, Genzyme, Intuitive Surgical. T. Jackson declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, T., Advincula, A. Laparoscopic promontofixation is safe and effective for POP. Nat Rev Urol 9, 128–129 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2011.221

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2011.221

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing