Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Prostate cancer

HIFU is effective, but associated morbidity still remains unclear

The average age of men diagnosed with prostate cancer is falling, and thus the burden of morbidity associated with its treatment is of great interest. Physicians want to provide their patients with definitive cancer treatment, but without the morbidity which is associated with surgery and radiotherapy. Ablative therapy, using modalities such as high-frequency focused ultrasound (HIFU), offers an exciting prospect for in situ definitive treatment of prostate cancer, with a theoretical reduction in associated adverse effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Draisma, G. et al. Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 101, 374–383 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schroder, F. H. et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 1320–1328 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hugosson, J. et al. Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial. Lancet Oncol. 11, 725–732 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bill-Axelson, A. et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 1977–1984 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Emanuel, E. J. & Fuchs, V. R. The perfect storm of overutilization. JAMA 299, 2789–2791 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crawford, E. D., Black, L., Eaddy, M. & Kruep, E. J. A retrospective analysis illustrating the substantial clinical and economic burden of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 13, 162–167 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Crouzet, S. et al. Multicentric oncologic outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer in 803 patients. Eur. Urol. 58, 559–566 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zapatero, A. et al. Post-treatment prostate biopsies in the era of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy: what can they teach us? Eur. Urol. 55, 902–909 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pollack, A. et al. Biochemical failure as a determinant of distant metastasis and death in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 57, 19–23 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Blana, A. et al. Morbidity associated with repeated transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of localized prostate cancer. World J. Urol. 24, 585–590 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ward, J. HIFU is effective, but associated morbidity still remains unclear. Nat Rev Urol 7, 597–598 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.176

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.176

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing