Abstract
Antiplatelet therapy is more effective than anticoagulation for the prevention of noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke. The choice of antiplatelet regimen, however, remains contentious. Recent controversies regarding aspirin resistance and the optimal dosing of aspirin, as well as recognition of the variable bioactivation of clopidogrel, have added further confusion to the debate. The American Heart Association (AHA) and American Stroke Association (ASA) recently released their third joint guideline in the past 5 years on secondary stroke prevention. The European Stroke Organisation has published three guidelines on this issue since 2000. These frequent updates have been necessary because of rapidly accumulating data from clinical trials. Careful consideration of the sometimes confusing trial results reveals that the 2011 AHA–ASA guidelines are correct in no longer specifying a 'preferred' antiplatelet regimen from among the choices recently studied. This recommendation does not, however, mean that all antiplatelet regimens should be considered equal. This Review discusses the various antiplatelet regimens, and the trials that led to the rapid evolution of the guidelines for secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke.
Key Points
-
Numerous organization-specific guidelines and frequent guideline updates have made the selection of appropriate antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention of noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke challenging
-
Aspirin, with strong efficacy data, good tolerability and low cost, is recommended as first-line therapy at a dose of 81–162 mg/day
-
Trials directly comparing clopidogrel with aspirin for secondary stroke prevention are lacking, but clopidogrel is considered an acceptable alternative for patients who cannot take aspirin or have experienced a cerebrovascular event while taking aspirin
-
Evidence supports the superiority of extended-release dipyridamole plus aspirin over aspirin monotherapy, but tolerability issues and compliance limit use of this agent in clinical practice
-
Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin, and adjusted-dose anticoagulation do not provide benefit compared with aspirin monotherapy and are associated with harmful outcomes
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lloyd-Jones, D. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-—2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 121, e46–e215 (2010).
European Stroke Initiative Executive Committee & EUSI Writing Committee. European Stroke Initiative recommendations for stroke management—update 2003. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 16, 311–337 (2003).
Furie, K. L. et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 42, 227–276 (2011).
Singer, D. E. et al. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 133 (Suppl. 6), 546S–592S (2008).
Halkes, P. H., van Gijn, J., Kappelle, L. J., Koudstaal, P. J. & Algra, A. Aspirin plus dipyridamole versus aspirin alone after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (ESPRIT): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 367, 1665–1673 (2006).
Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 324, 71–86 (2002).
Hanley, D. et al. Determining the appropriateness of selected surgical and medical management options in recurrent stroke prevention: a guideline for primary care physicians from the National Stroke Association work group on recurrent stroke prevention. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 13, 196–207 (2004).
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee & ESO Writing Committee. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 25, 457–507 (2008).
Adams, R. J. et al. Update to the AHA/ASA recommendations for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke 39, 1647–1652 (2008).
Albers, G. W., Amarenco, P., Easton, J. D., Sacco, R. L. & Teal, P. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 133 (Suppl. 6), 630S–669S (2008).
Sacco, R. L. et al. Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke 37, 577–617 (2006).
Davi, G. & Patrono, C. Platelet activation and atherothrombosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 2482–2494 (2007).
[No authors listed] Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy—I: Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. BMJ 308, 81–106 (1994).
[No authors listed] Secondary prevention of vascular disease by prolonged antiplatelet treatment. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 296, 320–331 (1988).
Baigent, C. et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet 373, 1849–1860 (2009).
Quick, A. J. Salicylates and bleeding: the aspirin tolerance test. Am. J. Med. Sci. 252, 265–269 (1966).
Fields, W. S., Lemak, N. A., Frankowski, R. F. & Hardy, R. J. Controlled trial of aspirin in cerebral ischemia. Stroke 8, 301–314 (1977).
Chimowitz, M. I. et al. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 1305–1316 (2005).
Mohr, J. P. et al. A comparison of warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 1444–1451 (2001).
Halkes, P. H., van Gijn, J., Kappelle, L. J., Koudstaal, P. J. & Algra, A. Medium intensity oral anticoagulants versus aspirin after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (ESPRIT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 6, 115–124 (2007).
Wolf, P. A. et al. Preventing ischemic stroke in patients with prior stroke and transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association. Stroke 30, 1991–1994 (1999).
[No authors listed] European Stroke Initiative recommendations for stroke management. European Stroke Council, European Neurological Society and European Federation of Neurological Societies. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 10, 335–351 (2000).
Johnson, E. S. et al. A metaregression analysis of the dose-response effect of aspirin on stroke. Arch. Intern. Med. 159, 1248–1253 (1999).
Algra, A. & van Gijn, J. Aspirin at any dose above 30 mg offers only modest protection after cerebral ischaemia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 60, 197–199 (1996).
Farrell, B., Godwin, J., Richards, S. & Warlow, C. The United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: final results. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 54, 1044–1054 (1991).
[No authors listed] A comparison of two doses of aspirin (30 mg vs. 283 mg a day) in patients after a transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke. The Dutch TIA Trial Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 325, 1261–1266 (1991).
De Schryver, E. L., Algra, A. & van Gijn, J. Dipyridamole for preventing stroke and other vascular events in patients with vascular disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001820.pub3 (2007).
Guiraud-Chaumeil, B. et al. Prevention of recurrences of cerebral ischemic vascular accidents by platelet antiaggregants. Results of a 3-year controlled therapeutic trial [French]. Rev. Neurol. (Paris) 138, 367–385 (1982).
Bousser, M. G. et al. “AICLA” controlled trial of aspirin and dipyridamole in the secondary prevention of athero-thrombotic cerebral ischemia. Stroke 14, 5–14 (1983).
Diener, H. C. et al. European Stroke Prevention Study. 2. Dipyridamole and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of stroke. J. Neurol. Sci. 143, 1–13 (1996).
[No authors listed] The European Stroke Prevention Study (ESPS). Principal end-points. The ESPS Group. Lancet 330, 1351–1354 (1987).
[No authors listed] United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: interim results. UK-TIA Study Group. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 296, 316–320 (1988).
Albers, G. W., Hart, R. G., Lutsep, H. L., Newell, D. W. & Sacco, R. L. AHA Scientific Statement. Supplement to the guidelines for the management of transient ischemic attacks: a statement from the Ad Hoc Committee on Guidelines for the Management of Transient Ischemic Attacks, Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 30, 2502–2511 (1999).
Chaturvedi, S. Acetylsalicylic acid + extended-release dipyridamole combination therapy for secondary stroke prevention. Clin. Ther. 30, 1196–1205 (2008).
Verro, P., Gorelick, P. B. & Nguyen, D. Aspirin plus dipyridamole versus aspirin for prevention of vascular events after stroke or TIA: a meta-analysis. Stroke 39, 1358–1363 (2008).
Sacco, R. L. et al. Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 1238–1251 (2008).
Roden, D. M. & Stein, C. M. Clopidogrel and the concept of high-risk pharmacokinetics. Circulation 119, 2127–2130 (2009).
Sudlow, C. L., Mason, G., Maurice, J. B., Wedderburn, C. J. & Hankey, G. J. Thienopyridine derivatives versus aspirin for preventing stroke and other serious vascular events in high vascular risk patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD001246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001246.pub2 (2009).
Gent, M. et al. The Canadian American Ticlopidine Study (CATS) in thromboembolic stroke. Lancet 1, 1215–1220 (1989).
Hass, W. K. et al. A randomized trial comparing ticlopidine hydrochloride with aspirin for the prevention of stroke in high-risk patients. Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 321, 501–507 (1989).
Quinn, M. J. & Fitzgerald, D. J. Ticlopidine and clopidogrel. Circulation 100, 1667–1672 (1999).
Juurlink, D. N. Proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel: putting the interaction in perspective. Circulation 120, 2310–2312 (2009).
Storey, R. F. Clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome: to genotype or not? Lancet 373, 276–278 (2009).
Pare, G. et al. Effects of CYP2C19 genotype on outcomes of clopidogrel treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 1704–1714 (2010).
Mega, J. L. et al. Cytochrome P-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 354–362 (2009).
[No authors listed] A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet 348, 1329–1339 (1996).
Yusuf, S. et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 494–502 (2001).
Steinhubl, S. R. et al. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288, 2411–2420 (2002).
Diener, H. C. et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 364, 331–337 (2004).
Bhatt, D. L. et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. N. Engl. J. Med. 354, 1706–1717 (2006).
Hankey, G. J. et al. Effect of clopidogrel on the rate and functional severity of stroke among high vascular risk patients: a prespecified substudy of the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial. Stroke 41, 1679–1683 (2010).
Bhatt, D. L. et al. Patients with prior myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the CHARISMA trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 49, 1982–1988 (2007).
Benavente, O. R. et al. The Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3) study. Int. J. Stroke 6, 164–175 (2011).
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee & ESO Writing Committee. Guidelines for the management of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 25, 457–507 (2008).
Thijs, V., Lemmens, R. & Fieuws, S. Network meta-analysis: simultaneous meta-analysis of common antiplatelet regimens after transient ischaemic attack or stroke. Eur. Heart J. 29, 1086–1092 (2008).
O'Donnell, M. J., Hankey, G. J & Eikelboom, J. W. Antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of noncardioembolic ischemic stroke: a critical review. Stroke 39, 1638–1646 (2008).
Wiviott, S. D. et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 2001–2015 (2007).
Davies, M. J. Pathology of arterial thrombosis. Br. Med. Bull. 50, 789–802 (1994).
Schafer, A. I. Antiplatelet therapy. Am. J. Med. 101, 199–209 (1996).
[No authors listed] A randomized trial of anticoagulants versus aspirin after cerebral ischemia of presumed arterial origin. The Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischemia Trial (SPIRIT) Study Group. Ann. Neurol. 42, 857–865 (1997).
Clarke, R. J., Mayo, G., Price, P. & FitzGerald, G. A. Suppression of thromboxane A2 but not of systemic prostacyclin by controlled-release aspirin. N. Engl. J. Med. 325, 1137–1141 (1991).
Mega, J. L. et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 9–19 (2012).
Chang, Y. J., Ryu, S. J. & Lee, T. H. Dose titration to reduce dipyridamole-related headache. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 22, 258–262 (2006).
Lindgren, A., Husted, S., Staaf, G. & Ziegler, B. Dipyridamole and headache—a pilot study of initial dose titration. J. Neurol. Sci. 223, 179–184 (2004).
Williams, C. D., Cherala, G. & Serebruany, V. Application of platelet function testing to the bedside. Thromb. Haemost. 103, 29–33 (2010).
Price, M. J. et al. Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial. JAMA 305, 1097–1105 (2011).
Mega, J. L. et al. Dosing clopidogrel based on CYP2C19 genotype and the effect on platelet reactivity in patients with stable cardiovascular disease. JAMA 306, 2221–2228 (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to researching data for the article and discussion of the article content. B. A. Warden and C. D. Williams wrote the article. All authors contributed to review and/or editing of the manuscript before submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Table 1
Trials of non-aspirin antiplatelet therapies for secondary stroke prevention (DOC 57 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Warden, B., Willman, A. & Williams, C. Antithrombotics for secondary prevention of noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke. Nat Rev Neurol 8, 223–235 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.33
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.33