The social brain in adolescence

Key Points

  • The 'social brain' is the network of brain regions that are involved in understanding other people, and includes the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS). These regions are key to the process of mentalizing — that is, the attribution of mental states to oneself and to other people.

  • Recent functional neuroimaging research has shown that activity in parts of the social brain during social cognitive tasks changes during adolescence.

  • In particular, there is some indication that activity in the PFC during face-processing tasks increases from childhood to adolescence and then decreases from adolescence to adulthood. Consistent with this, there is evidence that activity in the mPFC during mentalizing tasks decreases between adolescence and adulthood.

  • The prefrontal cortex is one of the brain regions that undergo structural development, including synaptic reorganization, during adolescence. Synaptic density, reflected in grey-matter volume in MRI scans, decreases during adolescence.

  • It is argued that the synaptic reorganization in the PFC might underlie the functional changes that are seen in the social brain during adolescence, as well as the social cognitive changes that are characteristic of this period of life.


The term 'social brain' refers to the network of brain regions that are involved in understanding others. Behaviour that is related to social cognition changes dramatically during human adolescence. This is paralleled by functional changes that occur in the social brain during this time, in particular in the medial prefrontal cortex and the superior temporal sulcus, which show altered activity during the performance of social cognitive tasks, such as face recognition and mental-state attribution. Research also indicates that, in humans, these parts of the social brain undergo structural development, including synaptic reorganization, during adolescence. Bringing together two relatively new and rapidly expanding areas of neuroscience — social neuroscience and the study of brain development during adolescence — will increase our understanding of how the social brain develops during adolescence.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Regions of the social brain.
Figure 2: Activation of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) during mentalizing tasks decreases during adolescence.
Figure 3: Developmental changes in brain activation elicited by looking at fearful faces.
Figure 4: Development of synaptic density and grey-matter volume in sensory and frontal regions.


  1. 1

    Brothers, L. The social brain: a project for integrating primate behavior and neurophysiology in a new domain. Concepts Neurosci. 1, 27–51 (1990).

  2. 2

    Steinberg, L. & Morris, A. S. Adolescent development. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 83–110 (2001).

  3. 3

    Frith, C. D. & Frith, U. Social cognition in humans. Curr. Biol. 17, 724–732 (2007).

  4. 4

    Farroni, T. et al. Newborns' preference for face-relevant stimuli: effects of contrast polarity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 17245–17250 (2005). This elegant study on newborn babies replicated the finding that faces are recognised from birth and demonstrated that contrast polarity has a role in this ability: newborns preferentially looked at photographs and schematics of upright faces only when the pattern of contrast polarity was also face-like.

  5. 5

    Johnson, M. H. Subcortical face processing. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 6, 766–774 (2005).

  6. 6

    Perrett, D. I., Hietanen, J. K., Oram, M. W. & Benson, P. J. Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 335, 23–30 (1992).

  7. 7

    Allison, T., Puce, A. & McCarthy, G. Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 267–278 (2000).

  8. 8

    Puce, A., Allison, T., Bentin, S., Gore, J. C. & McCarthy, G. Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. J. Neurosci. 18, 2188–2199 (1998).

  9. 9

    Johansson, G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 14, 201–211 (1973).

  10. 10

    Bertenthal, B. I., Proffit, D. R. & Cutting, J. E. Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 37, 213–230 (1984).

  11. 11

    Oram, M. W. & Perrett, D. I. Responses of anterior superior temporal polysensory (STPa) neurons to biological motion stimuli. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6, 99–116 (1994).

  12. 12

    Grossman, E. et al. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 711–720 (2000).

  13. 13

    Puce, A. & Perrett, D. Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358, 435–445 (2003).

  14. 14

    Saygin, A. P. Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. Brain 130, 2452–2461 (2007).

  15. 15

    Dolan, R. J. Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science 298, 1191–1194 (2002).

  16. 16

    Winston, J. S., Strange, B. A., O'Doherty, J. & Dolan, R. J. Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neurosci. 5, 277–283 (2002).

  17. 17

    Moll, J. & de Oliveira-Souza, R. Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 319–321 (2007).

  18. 18

    Nakamura, K. et al. Activation of the right inferior frontal cortex during assessment of facial emotion. J. Neurophys. 82, 1610–1614 (1999).

  19. 19

    Fletcher, P. C. et al. Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition 57, 109–128 (1995). The first neuroimaging study to investigate the neural correlates of theory-of-mind. This PET study made use of stories that elicited mental-state attribution and showed activation in the social-brain network for the theory-of-mind stimuli.

  20. 20

    Gallagher, H. L. et al. Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of 'theory of mind' in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia 38, 11–21 (2000).

  21. 21

    Saxe, R. & Kanwisher, N. People thinking about thinking people. The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”. Neuroimage 19, 1835–1842 (2003).

  22. 22

    den Ouden, H. E., Frith, U., Frith, C. & Blakemore, S. J. Thinking about intentions. Neuroimage 28, 787–796 (2005).

  23. 23

    Mitchell, J. P., Heatherton, T. F. & Macrae, C. N. Distinct neural systems subserve person and object knowledge. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15238–15243 (2002).

  24. 24

    Brunet, E., Sarfati, Y., Hardy-Bayle, M. C. & Decety, J. A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task. Neuroimage 11, 157–166 (2000).

  25. 25

    Castelli, F., Happé, F., Frith, U. & Frith, C. D. Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement pattern. Neuroimage 12, 314–325 (2000).

  26. 26

    Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Chiavarino, C. & Humphreys, G. W. Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief. Nature Neurosci. 7, 499–500 (2004). This study of patients with brain damage showed that the left temporoparietal junction is necessary for reasoning about the beliefs of others.

  27. 27

    Happe, F., Malhi, G. S. & Checkley, S. Acquired mind-blindness following frontal lobe surgery? A single case study of impaired 'theory of mind' in a patient treated with stereotactic anterior capsulotomy. Neuropsychologia 39, 83–90 (2001).

  28. 28

    Rowe, A. D., Bullock, P. R., Polkey, C. E. & Morris, R. G. “Theory of mind” impairments and their relationship to executive functioning following frontal lobe excisions. Brain 124, 600–616 (2001).

  29. 29

    Stuss, D. T., Gallup, G. G. Jr & Alexander, M. P. The frontal lobes are necessary for 'theory of mind'. Brain 124, 279–286 (2001).

  30. 30

    Bird, C. M., Castelli, F., Malik, O., Frith, U. & Husain, M. The impact of extensive medial frontal lobe damage on 'Theory of Mind' and cognition. Brain 127, 914–928 (2004). This study reported the surprising finding that theory-of-mind function was not impaired in an adult who had suffered recent damage to the frontal lobes, including the bilateral mPFC.

  31. 31

    Anderson, S. W., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. & Damasio, A. R. Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nature Neurosci. 2, 1032–1037 (1999). Unlike patients with adult-onset prefrontal damage, who tend to show normal social and moral reasoning in laboratory tests, the two patients reported here had suffered early-onset prefrontal damage and showed impairments on socio–moral reasoning tasks. This suggests that the age at which prefrontal damage occurs determines outcome in terms of socio–moral functioning.

  32. 32

    Amodio, D. M. & Frith, C. D. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7, 268–277 (2006).

  33. 33

    Gilbert, S. J. et al. Functional specialization within rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10): a meta-analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 932–948 (2006). This meta-analysis of 104 functional neuroimaging studies provided strong evidence for the existence of distinct subregions of rostral PFC. Activations in the most rostral part of the PFC were particularly associated with multi-tasking, whereas more caudal activations were associated with mentalizing if they were medial and episodic-memory retrieval if they were lateral.

  34. 34

    Vogeley, K. et al. Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. Neuroimage 14, 170–181 (2001).

  35. 35

    Johnson, S. C. et al. Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain 125, 1808–1814 (2002).

  36. 36

    Lou, H. C. et al. Parietal cortex and representation of the mental self. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6827–6832 (2004).

  37. 37

    Ochsner, K. N. et al. Reflecting upon feelings: an fMRI study of neural systems supporting the attribution of emotion to self and other. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1746–1772 (2004).

  38. 38

    Ruby, P. & Decety, J. How would you feel versus how do you think she would feel? A neuroimaging study of perspective-taking with social emotions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 988–999 (2004).

  39. 39

    Goel, V., Grafman, J., Sadato, N. & Hallett, M. Modeling other minds. Neuroreport 6, 1741–1746 (1995).

  40. 40

    Mitchell, J. P., Banaji, M. R. & Macrae, C. N. General and specific contributions of the medial prefrontal cortex to knowledge about mental states. Neuroimage 28, 757–762 (2005).

  41. 41

    McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V. & Trouard, T. A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11832–11835 (2001).

  42. 42

    Gallagher, H. L., Jack, A. I., Roepstorff, A. & Frith, C. D. Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. Neuroimage 16, 814–821 (2002).

  43. 43

    Frith, C. D. The social brain? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 362, 671–678 (2007).

  44. 44

    Gusnard, D. A. & Raichle, M. E. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 2, 685–694 (2001).

  45. 45

    Saxe, R. Uniquely human social cognition. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, 235–239 (2006).

  46. 46

    Mitchell, J. P. Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. Cereb. Cortex 18, 262–271 (2008). This fMRI study examined the extent to which the right TPJ, identified by a theory-of-mind task, also distinguished between trials on a target-detection task that required reorienting attention. Results were incompatible with claims that this region is selective for mental-state attribution, as the same region was also modulated by the non-social attentional task.

  47. 47

    Friston, K. J., Rotshtein, P., Geng, J. J., Sterzer, P. & Henson, R. N. A critique of functional localisers. Neuroimage 30, 1077–1087 (2006).

  48. 48

    Damon, W. in Handbook of Adolescent Psychology 2nd edn (eds Lerner, R. M. & Steinberg, L.) vii–viii (Wiley, New Jersey, 2003).

  49. 49

    Brown, B. B. in Handbook of Adolescent Psychology 2nd edn (eds Lerner, R. M. & Steinberg, L.) 363–394 (Wiley, New Jersey, 2004).

  50. 50

    Carey, S., Diamond, R. & Woods, B. The development of face recognition – a maturational component. Dev. Psychol. 16, 257–269 (1980).

  51. 51

    Diamond, R., Carey, S. & Back, K. Genetic influences on the development of spatial skills during early adolescence. Cognition 13, 167–185 (1983).

  52. 52

    McGivern, R. F., Andersen, J., Byrd, D., Mutter, K. L. & Reilly, J. Cognitive efficiency on a match to sample task decreases at the onset of puberty in children. Brain Cogn. 50, 73–89 (2002).

  53. 53

    Yurgelun-Todd, D. A. & Killgore, W. D. Fear-related activity in the prefrontal cortex increases with age during adolescence: a preliminary fMRI study. Neurosci. Lett. 406, 194–199 (2006).

  54. 54

    Monk, C. S. et al. Adolescent immaturity in attention-related brain engagement to emotional facial expressions. Neuroimage 20, 420–428 (2003).

  55. 55

    Carter, E. J. & Pelphrey, K. A. School-aged children exhibit domain-specific responses to biological motion. Soc. Neurosci. 1, 396–411 (2006).

  56. 56

    Wang, A. T., Lee, S. S., Sigman, M. & Dapretto, M. Developmental changes in the neural basis of interpreting communicative intent. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 1, 107–121 (2006).

  57. 57

    Blakemore, S. J., den Ouden, H., Choudhury, S. & Frith, C. Adolescent development of the neural circuitry for thinking about intentions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2, 130–139 (2007).

  58. 58

    Pfeifer, J. H., Lieberman, M. D. & Dapretto, M. “I know you are but what am I?!”: neural bases of self- and social knowledge retrieval in children and adults. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 1323–1337 (2007).

  59. 59

    Moriguchi, Y., Ohnishi, T., Mori, T., Matsuda, H. & Komaki, G. Changes of brain activity in the neural substrates for theory of mind during childhood and adolescence. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 61, 355–363 (2007).

  60. 60

    Keysar, B., Lin, S. & Barr, D. J. Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition 89, 25–41 (2003). The ingenious paradigm used in this study required participants to take into account a speaker's false belief when following their instructions. It was the first paradigm to show that a mentalizing ability that adults clearly possess might not always be used reliably.

  61. 61

    Huttenlocher, P. R. Synaptic density in human frontal cortex - developmental changes and effects of aging. Brain Res. 163, 195–205 (1979).

  62. 62

    Huttenlocher, P. R., De Courten, C., Garey, L. J. & Van der Loos, H. Synaptic development in human cerebral cortex. Int. J. Neurol. 16–17, 144–154 (1983).

  63. 63

    Cragg, B. G. The development of synapses in the visual system of the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 160, 147–166 (1975).

  64. 64

    Zecevic, N., Bourgeois, J. P. & Rakic, P. Changes in synaptic density in motor cortex of rhesus monkey during fetal and postnatal life. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 50, 11–32 (1989).

  65. 65

    Huttenlocher, P. R. & Dabholkar, A. S. Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 387, 167–178 (1997).

  66. 66

    Giedd, J. N. et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of human brain development: ages 4–18. Cereb. Cortex 6, 551–560 (1996).

  67. 67

    Giedd, J. N. et al. Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neurosci. 2, 861–863 (1999).

  68. 68

    Paus, T. et al. Structural maturation of neural pathways in children and adolescents: in vivo study. Science 283, 1908–1911 (1999).

  69. 69

    Giedd, J. N. et al. Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neurosci. 2, 861–863 (1999).

  70. 70

    Yakovlev, P. A. & Lecours, I. R. in Regional Development of the Brain in Early Life (ed. Minkowski, A.) 3–70 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1967).

  71. 71

    Gogtay, N. et al. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8174–8179 (2004).

  72. 72

    Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., Holmes, C. J., Jernigan, T. L. & Toga, A. W. In vivo evidence for post-adolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Nature Neurosci. 2, 859–861 (1999).

  73. 73

    Sowell, E. R. et al. Mapping cortical change across the life span. Nature Neurosci. 6, 309–3150 (2003).

  74. 74

    Sowell, E. R. et al. Longitudinal mapping of cortical thickness and brain growth in normal children. J. Neurosci. 24, 8223–8231 (2004).

  75. 75

    Lauritzen, M. Reading vascular changes in brain imaging: is dendritic calcium the key? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 6, 77–85 (2005).

  76. 76

    Konrad, K. et al. Development of attentional networks: an fMRI study with children and adults. Neuroimage 28, 429–439 (2005).

  77. 77

    Romeo, R. D. Puberty: a period of both organizational and activational effects of steroid hormones on neurobehavioural development. J. Neuroendocrinol. 15, 1185–1192 (2003).

  78. 78

    Turner, A. M & Greenough, W. T. Differential rearing effects on rat visual cortex synapses. I. Synaptic and neuronal density and synapses per neuron. Brain Res. 329, 195–203 (1985).

  79. 79

    Werker, J. F., Gilbert, J. H., Humphrey, K. & Tees, R. C. Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. Child Dev. 52, 349–355 (1981).

  80. 80

    Buonomano, D. V. & Merzenich, M. M. Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 149–186 (1998).

  81. 81

    Johnson, S. C. Detecting agents. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358, 549–559 (2003).

  82. 82

    Carpenter, M., Nagell, K. & Tomasello, M. Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 63, 1–143 (1998).

  83. 83

    Leslie, A. Pretence and representation. The origin of “theory of mind”. Psychol. Rev. 94, 412–426 (1987).

  84. 84

    Barresi, J. & Moore, C. Intentional relations and social understanding. Behav. Brain Sci. 19, 107–154 (1996).

  85. 85

    Onishi, K. H. & Baillargeon, R. Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science 308, 255–258 (2005).

  86. 86

    Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M. & Frith, U. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 21, 37–46 (1985).

  87. 87

    Abell, F., Happe, F. & Frith, U. Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. J. Cogn. Dev. 15, 1–20 (2000).

  88. 88

    Schulz, K. M. et al. Gonadal hormones masculinize and defeminize reproductive behaviors during puberty in the male Syrian hamster. Horm. Behav. 45, 242–249 (2004).

  89. 89

    Penton-Voak, I. S. et al. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature 399, 741–742 (1999).

  90. 90

    Fleming, A. S., Ruble, D., Krieger, H. & Wong, P. Y. Hormonal and experiential correlates of maternal responsiveness during pregnancy and the puerperium in human mothers. Horm. Behav. 31, 145–158 (1997).

  91. 91

    Fleming, A. S., Corter, C., Stallings, J. & Steiner, M. Testosterone and prolactin are associated with emotional responses to infant cries in new fathers. Horm. Behav. 42, 399–413 (2002).

  92. 92

    Clark, A. S., MacLusky, N. J. & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. Androgen binding and metabolism in the cerebral cortex of the developing rhesus monkey. Endocrinology 123, 932–940 (1988).

  93. 93

    Morse, J. K., Scheff, S. W. & DeKosky, S. T. Gonadal steroids influence axonal sprouting in the hippocampal dentate gyrus: a sexually dimorphic response. Exp. Neurol. 94, 649–658 (1986).

  94. 94

    Giedd, J. N. et al. Quantitative MRI of the temporal lobe, amygdala, and hippocampus in normal human development: ages 4–18 years. J. Comp. Neurol. 366, 223–230 (1996).

  95. 95

    Green, H., McGinnity, A., Meltzer, H., Ford, T. & Goodman, R. Mental Health of children and Young People in Great Britain, 2004 (Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2005).

  96. 96

    Nelson, E. E., Leibenluft, E., McClure, E. B. & Pine, D. S. The social re-orientation of adolescence: a neuroscience perspective on the process and its relation to psychopathology. Psychol. Med. 35, 163–174 (2005).

  97. 97

    McGlashan, T. H. & Hoffman R. E. Schizophrenia as a disorder of developmentally reduced synaptic connectivity. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 57, 637–648 (2000).

  98. 98

    Arseneault, L. et al. Cannabis use in adolescence and risk for adult psychosis: longitudinal prospective study. BMJ 325, 1212–1213 (2002).

  99. 99

    Murray, R. M., Morrison, P. D., Henquet, C. & Di Forti, M. Cannabis, the mind and society: the hash realities. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 8, 885–895 (2007).

  100. 100

    Martin, J. H. Neuroanatomy: Text & Atlas 2nd edn (Appleton and Lange, Stamford, Connecticut, 1996).

  101. 101

    Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. Pictures of Facial Affect (Consulting Psychologists Press, California, 1976).

Download references


The author is funded by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship. I am grateful to C. Frith, U. Frith, C. Sebastian, S. Burnett and I. Dumontheil for reading previous versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Related links

Related links


Sarah-Jayne Blakemore's homepage



Individuals of the same species.


The capacity of an individual to make conscious choices and impose those choices on the world.


The generation of new synapses in the brain.

Synaptic density

The number of synapses per unit brain tissue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blakemore, S. The social brain in adolescence. Nat Rev Neurosci 9, 267–277 (2008).

Download citation

Further reading