International perspectives on engaging the public in neuroethics

Abstract

With an ever-increasing understanding of the brain mechanisms associated with core human attributes and values, there is an increasing public interest in the results of neuroscience research and the ways in which that new knowledge will be used. Here, we present perspectives on engaging the public on these issues on an international scale, the role of the media, and prospects for the new field of neuroethics as both a focus and a driver of these efforts.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Roach, M. The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers (W. W. Norton and Company, London, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Zimmer, C. Soul Made Flesh: The Discovery of the Brain — and How it Changed the World (Free Press, New York, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Gross, C. G. Rembrandt's 'The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Joan Deijman'. Trends Neurosci. 21, 237–240 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Leshner, A. It's time to go public with neuroethics. Am. J. Bioeth. 5, 1–2 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Illes, J., Kirschen, M. P. & Gabrieli, J. D. E. From neuroimaging to neuroethics. Nature Neurosci. 6, 250 (2003).

  6. 6

    Hyman, S. The millennium of mind, brain and behavior. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 57, 88–89 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Illes, J. & Racine, E. Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. Am. J. Bioeth. 5, 5–18 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Marcus, S. Neuroethics: Mapping the Field (The Dana Foundation Press, New York, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Garland, G. Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Illes, J. (ed.) Ethical Challenges in Advanced Neuroimaging (Academic, New York, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Donway, W. (ed.) Cerebrum (The Dana Foundation Press, New York, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Focus on neuroethics. Am. J. Bioeth. 5 (2), 1–63 (2005).

  13. 13

    Obot, I. S., Poznyak, V. & Monterio, M. From basic research to public health policy: WHO report on the neuroscience of substance dependence. Addict. Behav. 29, 1497–1502 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Gazzaniga, M. The Ethical Brain (The Dana Foundation Press, New York, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U. & Fehr, E. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435, 571–572 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Damasio, A. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain (HarperCollins, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Hall, W., Carter, L. & Morley, K. I. Neuroscience research on the addictions: a prospectus for future ethical and policy analysis. Addict. Behav. 29, 1481–1495 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Foster, K. in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy (ed. Illes, J.) 185–200 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, in the press).

  19. 19

    Zardetto-Smith, A. M., Mu, K., Phelps, C. L., Hotuz, L. E. & Royen, C. B. Brains rule! Fun = learning = neuroscience literacy. Neuroscientist 8, 396–404 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Grainger-Monsen, M. & Karetsky, K. in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy (ed. Illes, J.) 297–311 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, in the press).

  21. 21

    Okuma, T. The present and future of sleep research in Asia. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 49, 91–97 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Ito, M. Nurturing the brain as an emerging research field involving child neurology. Brain Dev. 26, 429–433 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Koizumi, H. The concept of 'developing the brain': a new natural science for learning and education. Brain Dev. 25, 434–441 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Hensch, T. K. Critical period regulation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 549–579 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Takahashi, T. & Tsukahara, Y. Pocket Monster incident and low luminance visual stimuli: special reference to deep red flicker stimulation. Acta. Paediatr. Jpn. 40, 631–637 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Uchida, K. et al. Potential functional neural repair with grafted neural stem cells of early embryonic neuroepithelial origin. Neurosci. Res. 52, 276–286 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Tatsuno, Y. & Sakai, K. L. Language-related activations in the left prefrontal regions are differentially modulated by age, proficiency, and task demands. J. Neurosci., 1637–1644 (2005).

  28. 28

    Higuchi, M. et al. 19F and 1H MRI detection of amyloid β plaques in vivo. Nature Neurosci. 8, 527–533 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. & Miller, L. E. Brain-machine interfaces: computational demands and clinical needs meet basic neuroscience. Trends Neurosci. 26, 329–334 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Levi, G., Meldolesi, J. & Strata, P. (eds) Viaggio nel cervello (Zadig, Milan, 2004) (in Italian).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    First International Symposium on Roboethics [online] http://www.scuoladirobotica.it/roboethics (2004).

  32. 32

    International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2005 Workshop on Robo-Ethics in Barcelona [online] <http://www-arts.sssup.it/IEEE_TC_RoboEthics/> (2005).

  33. 33

    Herculano-Houzel, S. What does the public want to know about the brain? Nature Neurosci. 6, 325 (2003).

  34. 34

    Birbeck, G. Barriers to care for patients with neurologic disease in rural Zambia. Arch. Neurol. 57, 414–417 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Quirk, G. J. Neuroscience in developing countries: getting around the problems. Int. J. Neurosci. 99, 89–103 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Blakemore, C. Neuroscience and the media: the need for communication. Neuroscience 57, 217–226 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Thompson, R. A. & Nelson, C. A. Developmental science and the media: early brain development. Am. Psychol. 56, 5–15 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Racine, E., Bar-Ilan, O. & Illes, J. fMRI in the public eye. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 6, 159–164 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Timpane, J. in Cerebrum (ed. Donway, W.) 100–107 (The Dana Foundation Press, New York, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Rose, S. P. How to (or not to) communicate science. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31, 307–312 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Durodié, B. Limitations of public dialogue in science and the rise of new 'experts'. Crit. Rev. Intl Soc. Polit. Philos. 6, 82–92 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Bodmer, W. The Public Understanding of Science (The Royal Society, London, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Illes, J., Racine, E. & Kirschen, M. P. in Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, Policy (ed. Illes, J.) (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, in the press).

  44. 44

    Hansson, M. G. in Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Embryo Selection (ed. Jónsdóttir, I.) 80–90 (TemaNord, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, in the press).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The generous support of The Greenwall Foundation in underwriting the first neuroethics program at Stanford University is gratefully acknowledged. This work is also supported by a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS; part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)) grant to J.I.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judy Illes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Related links

Related links

FURTHER INFORMATION

Forskning

Organisation for Economic Co-opertaion and Development

Roboethics at Stanford University

The brain from top to bottom

The brain from top to bottom (in French)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Illes, J., Blakemore, C., Hansson, M. et al. International perspectives on engaging the public in neuroethics. Nat Rev Neurosci 6, 977–982 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1808

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing