Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

fMRI in the public eye

Abstract

The wide dissemination and expanding applications of functional MRI have not escaped the attention of the media or discussion in the wider public arena. From the bench to the bedside, this technology has introduced substantial ethical challenges. Are the boundaries of what it can and cannot achieve being communicated to the public? Are its limitations understood? And given the complexities that are inherent to neuroscience, are current avenues for communication adequate?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Composition of the sample of articles returned to a search of print media coverage (general and specialized sources combined) of fMRI from January 1991 to June 2004.
Figure 2: Unidirectional communication in neuroscience.
Figure 3: Multidirectional communication in neuroscience.

References

  1. Illes, J., Kirschen, M. P. & Gabrieli, J. D. From neuroimaging to neuroethics. Nature Neurosci. 6, 205 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Editorial. Brain scam? Nature Neurosci. 7, 683 (2004).

  3. Jaffe, S. Fake method for research impartiality (fMRI). Scientist 18, 64 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Butler, D. Advances in neuroscience 'may threaten human rights'. Nature 391, 316 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. 328 (President's Council on Bioethics/Harper Collins, Washington DC, 2003).

  6. Editorial. Does neuroscience threaten human values? Nature Neurosci. 1, 535–536 (1998).

  7. Nelkin, D. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Neuendorf, K. A. The Content Analysis Guidebook (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anonymous. Fear of pain may be worse than pain itself. The New York Times (New York) 14 (22 Jun 1999).

  10. Anonymous. The cutting edge. The Washington Post (Washington) Z05 (17 Dec 1999).

  11. Anonymous. Acupuncture: brain images demonstrate pain relief. Pain Cent. Nerv. Syst. Week 13 (17 Dec 1999).

  12. Biskup, A. Fat really does bring pleasure. The Boston Globe (Boston) C3 (13 Apr 2004).

  13. Cookson, C. Brain can banish unwanted memorie. Financial Times (Lond.) 11 (9 Jan 2004).

  14. Blakeslee, S. How brain stores languages. Plain Dealer (Cleveland) 2J (27 Jul 1997).

  15. Anonymous. Brain stores perceptions into small meaningful chunks. The Hindu (India) (27 Jul 2001).

  16. Sample, I. & Adam, D. The brain can't lie: brain scans reveal how you think and feel and even how you might behave. The Guardian (Lond.) 4 (20 Nov 2003).

  17. Anonymous. Odds are that gambling addict's brain is built differently. Times–Picayune (New Orleans) 3 (18 Sep 2003).

  18. Begley, S. How it all starts inside your brain. Newsweek (New York) 137, 40–42 (12 Feb 2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bacon, J. Group to prove pornography is addictive. The Daily Universe (Brigham Young University) (12 May 2004).

  20. Hall, S. S. The scientific method: test–tube moms. The New York Times (New York) 22 (5 Apr 1998).

  21. Editorial. Silence of the neuroengineers. Nature 423, 787 (2003).

  22. Hoag, H. Neuroengineering: remote control. Nature 423, 796–798 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rudolph, A. Military: brain-machine could benefit millions. Nature 424, 369 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rizzuto, D. S., Breznen, B. & Greger, B. Military-funded research is not unethical. Nature 424, 369 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Abella, H. A. fMRI knows your secrets. Diagn. Imaging 9 (1 Mar 2004).

  26. Conrad, P. Genetic optimism: framing genes and mental illness in the news. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 25, 225–247 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Geller, G., Bernhardt, B. A. & Holtzman, N. A. The media and the public reaction to genetic research. JAMA 287, 773 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Condit, C. M., Ferguson, A., Thadhani, C. & Parrott, R. An exploratory study on the impact of news headlines on genetic determinism. Sci. Commun. 22, 379–395 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Herculano-Houzel, S. Do you know your brain? A survey on public neuroscience literacy at the closing of the decade of the brain. Neuroscientist 8, 98–110 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Diefenbach, G. J., Diefenbach, D., Baumeister, A. & West, M. Portrayal of lobotomy in the popular press: 1935–1960. J. Hist. Neurosci. 8, 60–69 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Farah, M. J. & Wolpe, P. R. Monitoring and manipulating brain function: new neuroscience technologies and their ethical implications. Hastings Cent. Rep. 34, 35–45 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Illes, J. & Kirschen, M. New prospects and ethical challenges for neuroimaging within and outside the health care system. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 24, 1932–1934 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thompson, R. A. & Nelson, C. A. Developmental science and the media. Am. Psychol. 56, 5–15 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmitz, M. F., Filippone, P. & Edelman, E. M. Social representations of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder 1988–1997. Cult. Psychol. 9, 383–406 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Goldman, L. S., Genel, M., Bezman, R. & Slanetz, P. J. Diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. JAMA 279, 1100–1107 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Diller, L. H. The run on Ritalin: attention deficit disorder and stimulant treatment in the 1990s. Hastings Cent. Rep. 26, 12–18 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rose, S. P. 'Smart drugs': do they work? Are they ethical? Will they be legal? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3, 975–979 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Farah, M. J. et al. Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 5, 421–425 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Racine, E., Gareau, I. & Doucet, H. The press and public debate: a study of genomics in francophone press (1992–2001). GE3LS Symposium,Vancouver, Canada, 5 Feb 2004.

  40. Moreno, C., Lujan, J. & Moreno, L. La ingeníera genética humana en la prensa: Analisis de contenido de ABC, El Pais, y La Vanguardia (1988–1993). (Instituto de Estudios Avanzados (CSIC), Madrid, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mulkay, M. Embryos in the news. Public Underst. Sci. 3, 33–51 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kohring, M. & Matthes, J. The face(t)s of biotech in the nineties: how the German press framed modern biotechnology. Public Underst. Sci. 11, 143–154 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Priest, S. H. & Talbert, J. Mass media and the ultimate technological fix: newspaper coverage of biotechnology. SWMCJ 10, 76–85 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Craig, D. A. Ethical language and themes in news coverage of genetic testing. J&MCQ 77, 160–174 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Petersen, A. Biofantasies: genetics and medicine in the print news media. Soc. Sci. Med. 52, 1255–1268 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Monasterky, R. Land mines in the world of mental maps. The Chronicle of Higher Education (USA) 20 (2 Nov 2001).

  47. Tambor, E. S., Bernhardt, B. A., Rodgers, J., Holtzman, N. A. & Geller, G. Mapping the human genome: an assessment of media coverage and public reaction. Genet. Med. 4, 31–36 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gostin, L. O. Ethical considerations of psychosurgery: the unhappy legacy of the prefrontal lobotomy. J. Med. Ethics 6, 149–156 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kulynych, J. Legal and ethical issues in neuroimaging research: human subjects protection, medical privacy, and the public communication of research results. Brain Cogn. 50, 345–357 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Illes, J. & Racine, E. Imaging or Imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. Am. J. Bioeth. (in the press).

  51. Editorial. A scared new world? Lancet Neurol. 1, 137 (2002).

  52. Editorial. Open your mind. The Economist (25 May 2002).

  53. Fins, J. J. The ethical limits of neuroscience. Lancet Neurol. 1, 213 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Dalgleish, T. The emotional brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 5, 582–589 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Sheridan, J. F. & McClintock, M. K. Multi-level integrative analyses of human behavior: social neuroscience and the complementing nature of social and biological approaches. Psychol. Bull. 126, 829–843 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Rose, S. P. R. How to (or not to) communicate science. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31, 307–312 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. van Dijck, J. After the 'two cultures': toward a '(multi)cultural' practice of science communication. Sci. Commun. 25, 177–190 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. The International HapMap Consortium. Integrating ethics and science in the International HapMap Project. Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 467–475 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Racine, E. Discourse ethics as an ethics of responsibility: comparison and evaluation of citizen involvement in population genomics. J. Law Med. Ethics 31, 390–397 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Condit, C. M., Parrott, R. L. & O'Grady, B. in Genetics and Public Health in the 21st Century: Using Genetic Information to Improve Health and Prevent Disease (eds Koury, M., Burke, W. & Thomson, E. J.) 549–568 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford/New York, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  61. Garland, M. J. Experts and the public: a needed partnership for genetic policy. Public Underst. Sci. 8, 2241–2254 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sclove, R. E. Better approaches to science policy. Science 279, 1283 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Abelson, J. et al. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc. Sci. Med. 57, 239–251 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Cameron, W. & Chudler, E. A role for neuroscientist in engaging young minds. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 4, 1–6 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Damon, W. Good Work: When Excellence and Ethics Meet (Basic Books, New York, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S. & Baczek, L. Media coverage of scientific meetings: too much, too soon? JAMA 287, 2859–2863 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported by The Greenwall Foundation, the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (J.I.) and an FQRSC postdoctoral fellowship to E.R. The authors extend their thanks to C. Jennings for inspiring this project and to S. W. Atlas, T. A. Raffin, P. Schraedley Desmond and M. Gallo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judy Illes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Related links

Related links

FURTHER INFORMATION

Society for Neuroscience Guide to Public Advocacy

International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO (Article 6)

Quebec Network of Applied Genetic Medicine

Danish Board of Technology

Dana Centre

President's Council on Bioethics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Racine, E., Bar-Ilan, O. & Illes, J. fMRI in the public eye. Nat Rev Neurosci 6, 159–164 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1609

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1609

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing