Chemosensory receptors recognize chemical signals of odorants and tastants in the environment. Six multigene families are known to encode chemosensory receptors in vertebrates and two multigene families in insects, respectively.
Near-complete repertoires of chemosensory receptor genes have been determined from the genomic sequences of various organisms. These studies have shown that the number of chemosensory receptor genes is generally large and varies greatly among different organisms.
A substantial portion of interspecific variation in gene number can be explained by adaptation to different environments. There was a large increase in the number of olfactory receptor genes when fishes evolved into land animals that needed to detect airborne odorants, but this number decreased drastically when mammals adapted to aquatic life.
Vertebrate species have many chemosensory receptor pseudogenes as well as functional genes. There is no clear relationship between the number of pseudogenes and environmental changes.
Genomic drift, a random process of gene duplication and deletion, has generated a large amount of gene copy-number variation among individuals of the same species. The number of odorant receptor genes and pseudogenes both followed a normal distribution in human populations.
The similarity in the distribution of functional genes to the distribution of pseudogenes suggests that the copy-number variation of functional genes is almost neutral.
The number of chemosensory receptor genes is generally much smaller in insects than in vertebrates. The proportion of pseudogenes is also smaller in insects.
Chemosensory receptors are essential for the survival of organisms that range from bacteria to mammals. Recent studies have shown that the numbers of functional chemosensory receptor genes and pseudogenes vary enormously among the genomes of different animal species. Although much of the variation can be explained by the adaptation of organisms to different environments, it has become clear that a substantial portion is generated by genomic drift, a random process of gene duplication and deletion. Genomic drift also generates a substantial amount of copy-number variation in chemosensory receptor genes within species. It seems that mutation by gene duplication and inactivation has important roles in both the adaptive and non-adaptive evolution of chemosensation.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Glusman, G., Yanai, I., Rubin, I. & Lancet, D. The complete human olfactory subgenome. Genome Res. 11, 685–702 (2001).
Zozulya, S., Echeverri, F. & Nguyen, T. The human olfactory receptor repertoire. Genome Biol. 2, 0018.1–0018.12 (2001). In References 1 and 2, a bioinformatics approach was used for the first time to identify all of the OR genes in the human genome.
Zhang, X. & Firestein, S. The olfactory receptor gene superfamily of the mouse. Nature Neurosci. 5, 124–133 (2002).
Young, J. M. et al. Different evolutionary processes shaped the mouse and human olfactory receptor gene families. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 535–546 (2002).
Gilad, Y., Wiebe, V., Przeworski, M., Lancet, D. & Paabo, S. Loss of olfactory receptor genes coincides with the acquisition of full trichromatic vision in primates. PLoS Biol. 2, e5 (2004).
Niimura, Y. & Nei, M. Evolutionary dynamics of olfactory receptor genes in fishes and tetrapods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6039–6044 (2005).
Liman, E. R. Use it or lose it: molecular evolution of sensory signaling in primates. Pflugers Arch. 453, 125–131 (2006).
Nozawa, M., Kawahara, Y. & Nei, M. Genomic drift and copy number variation of sensory receptor genes in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20421–20426 (2007). This study empirically showed that genomic drift is an important mechanism in the evolution of chemosensory receptor genes.
Buck, L. & Axel, R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65, 175–187 (1991). This is a seminal paper that identified OR genes for the first time and estimated that there are approximately 1,000 OR genes in the mammalian genome.
Liberles, S. D. & Buck, L. B. A second class of chemosensory receptors in the olfactory epithelium. Nature 442, 645–650 (2006).
Dulac, C. & Axel, R. A novel family of genes encoding putative pheromone receptors in mammals. Cell 83, 195–206 (1995).
Herrada, G. & Dulac, C. A novel family of putative pheromone receptors in mammals with a topographically organized and sexually dimorphic distribution. Cell 90, 763–773 (1997).
Matsunami, H. & Buck, L. B. A multigene family encoding a diverse array of putative pheromone receptors in mammals. Cell 90, 775–784 (1997).
Li, X. et al. Human receptors for sweet and umami taste. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 4692–4696 (2002).
Adler, E. et al. A novel family of mammalian taste receptors. Cell 100, 693–702 (2000).
Matsunami, H., Montmayeur, J. P. & Buck, L. B. A family of candidate taste receptors in human and mouse. Nature 404, 601–604 (2000).
Feldmesser, E. et al. Widespread ectopic expression of olfactory receptor genes. BMC Genomics 7, 121 (2006).
Borowsky, B. et al. Trace amines: identification of a family of mammalian G protein-coupled receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8966–8971 (2001).
Zucchi, R., Chiellini, G., Scanlan, T. S. & Grandy, D. K. Trace amine-associated receptors and their ligands. Br. J. Pharmacol. 149, 967–978 (2006).
Dulac, C. & Torello, A. T. Molecular detection of pheromone signals in mammals: from genes to behaviour. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 4, 551–562 (2003).
Brennan, P. A. & Zufall, F. Pheromonal communication in vertebrates. Nature 444, 308–315 (2006).
Baxi, K. N., Dorries, K. M. & Eisthen, H. L. Is the vomeronasal system really specialized for detecting pheromones? Trends Neurosci. 29, 1–7 (2006).
Ikeda, K. New seasonings. Chem. Senses 27, 847–849 (2002). This is an English translation of Ikeda's original paper in Japanese from 1909 on the discovery of the umami taste.
Chandrashekar, J., Hoon, M. A., Ryba, N. J. & Zuker, C. S. The receptors and cells for mammalian taste. Nature 444, 288–294 (2006).
Bachmanov, A. A. & Beauchamp, G. K. Taste receptor genes. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 27, 389–414 (2007).
Clyne, P. J. et al. A novel family of divergent seven-transmembrane proteins: candidate odorant receptors in Drosophila. Neuron 22, 327–338 (1999).
Gao, Q. & Chess, A. Identification of candidate Drosophila olfactory receptors from genomic DNA sequence. Genomics 60, 31–39 (1999).
Clyne, P. J., Warr, C. G. & Carlson, J. R. Candidate taste receptors in Drosophila. Science 287, 1830–1834 (2000).
Bargmann, C. I. Comparative chemosensation from receptors to ecology. Nature 444, 295–301 (2006).
Vosshall, L. B. & Stocker, R. F. Molecular architecture of smell and taste in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 505–533 (2007).
Robertson, H. M., Warr, C. G. & Carlson, J. R. Molecular evolution of the insect chemoreceptor gene superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14537–14542 (2003). This is the first comprehensive study about the evolution of the chemosensory receptor gene superfamily in Drosophila spp.
Jones, W. D., Cayirlioglu, P., Kadow, I. G. & Vosshall, L. B. Two chemosensory receptors together mediate carbon dioxide detection in Drosophila. Nature 445, 86–90 (2007).
Bray, S. & Amrein, H. A putative Drosophila pheromone receptor expressed in male-specific taste neurons is required for efficient courtship. Neuron 39, 1019–1029 (2003).
Benton, R., Sachse, S., Michnick, S. W. & Vosshall, L. B. Atypical membrane topology and heteromeric function of Drosophila odorant receptors in vivo. PLoS Biol. 4, e20 (2006).
Larsson, M. C. et al. Or83b encodes a broadly expressed odorant receptor essential for Drosophila olfaction. Neuron 43, 703–714 (2004).
Malnic, B., Hirono, J., Sato, T. & Buck, L. B. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell 96, 713–723 (1999).
Godfrey, P. A., Malnic, B. & Buck, L. B. The mouse olfactory receptor gene family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 2156–2161 (2004).
Malnic, B., Godfrey, P. A. & Buck, L. B. The human olfactory receptor gene family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 2584–2589 (2004).
Niimura, Y. & Nei, M. Evolution of olfactory receptor genes in the human genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12235–12240 (2003).
Berghard, A. & Dryer, L. A novel family of ancient vertebrate odorant receptors. J. Neurobiol. 37, 383–392 (1998).
Freitag, J., Beck, A., Ludwig, G., von Buchholtz, L. & Breer, H. On the origin of the olfactory receptor family: receptor genes of the jawless fish (Lampetra fluviatilis). Gene 226, 165–174 (1999).
Niimura, Y. & Nei, M. Comparative evolutionary analysis of olfactory receptor gene clusters between humans and mice. Gene 346, 13–21 (2005).
Nei, M. & Kumar, S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).
Go, Y. & Niimura, Y. Similar numbers but different repertoires of olfactory receptor genes in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1897–1907 (2008).
Gibbs, R. A. et al. Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome. Science 316, 222–234 (2007).
Bowmaker, J. K. in Evolution of the Eye and Visual System (eds Cronly-Dillon, J. R. & Gregory, R. L.) 63–81 (CRC, Boca Raton, 1991).
Steiger, S. S., Fidler, A. E., Valcu, M. & Kempenaers, B. Avian olfactory receptor gene repertoires: evidence for a well-developed sense of smell in birds? Proc. Biol. Sci. 275, 2309–2317 (2008).
Laska, M., Seibt, A. & Weber, A. 'Microsmatic' primates revisited: olfactory sensitivity in the squirrel monkey. Chem. Senses 25, 47–53 (2000).
Shephard, G. M. The human sense of smell: are we better than we think? PLoS Biol. 2, 572–575 (2004).
Niimura, Y. & Nei, M. Extensive gains and losses of olfactory receptor genes in mammalian evolution. PLoS ONE 2, e708 (2007). This paper showed that large numbers of gene gains and losses occur during the evolution of mammalian OR genes.
Pettigrew, J. D. Electroreception in monotremes. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 1447–1454 (1999).
Oelschlager, H. H. & Kemp, B. Ontogenesis of the sperm whale brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 399, 210–228 (1998).
Freitag, J., Ludwig, G., Andreini, I., Rossler, P. & Breer, H. Olfactory receptors in aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates. J. Comp. Physiol. A 183, 635–650 (1998).
Kishida, T., Kubota, S., Shirayama, Y. & Fukami, H. The olfactory receptor gene repertoires in secondary-adapted marine vertebrates: evidence for reduction of the functional proportions in cetaceans. Biol. Lett. 3, 428–430 (2007).
McGowen, M. R., Clark, C. & Gatesy, J. The vestigial olfactory receptor subgenome of odontocete whales: phylogenetic congruence between gene-tree reconciliation and supermatrix methods. Syst. Biol. 57, 574–590 (2008).
Li, W. H., Gojobori, T. & Nei, M. Pseudogenes as a paradigm of neutral evolution. Nature 292, 237–239 (1981).
Gilad, Y., Bustamante, C. D., Lancet, D. & Paabo, S. Natural selection on the olfactory receptor gene family in humans and chimpanzees. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, 489–501 (2003).
Zhang, X. et al. Characterizing the expression of the human olfactory receptor gene family using a novel DNA microarray. Genome Biol. 8, R86 (2007).
Balakirev, E. S. & Ayala, F. J. Pseudogenes: are they “junk” or functional DNA? Annu. Rev. Genet. 37, 123–151 (2003).
Duret, L., Chureau, C., Samain, S., Weissenbach, J. & Avner, P. The Xist RNA gene evolved in eutherians by pseudogenization of a protein-coding gene. Science 312, 1653–1655 (2006).
Zheng, D. & Gerstein, M. B. The ambiguous boundary between genes and pseudogenes: the dead rise up, or do they? Trends Genet. 23, 219–224 (2007).
Lai, P. C. et al. An olfactory receptor pseudogene whose function emerged in humans. Nature Precedings 2 Nov 2007 (doi:10.1038/npre.2007.1290.1).
Grus, W. E. & Zhang, J. Distinct evolutionary patterns between chemoreceptors of 2 vertebrate olfactory systems and the differential tuning hypothesis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1593–1601 (2008).
Gloriam, D. E. et al. The repertoire of trace amine G-protein-coupled receptors: large expansion in zebrafish. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 35, 470–482 (2005).
Hashiguchi, Y. & Nishida, M. Evolution of trace amine associated receptor (TAAR) gene family in vertebrates: lineage-specific expansions and degradations of a second class of vertebrate chemosensory receptors expressed in the olfactory epithelium. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 2099–2107 (2007).
Grus, W. E., Shi, P., Zhang, Y. P. & Zhang, J. Dramatic variation of the vomeronasal pheromone receptor gene repertoire among five orders of placental and marsupial mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5767–5772 (2005).
Young, J. M., Kambere, M., Trask, B. J. & Lane, R. P. Divergent V1R repertoires in five species: amplification in rodents, decimation in primates, and a surprisingly small repertoire in dogs. Genome Res. 15, 231–240 (2005).
Grus, W. E., Shi, P. & Zhang, J. Largest vertebrate vomeronasal type 1 receptor gene repertoire in the semiaquatic platypus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 2153–2157 (2007).
Young, J. M. & Trask, B. J. V2R gene families degenerated in primates, dog and cow, but expanded in opossum. Trends Genet. 23, 212–215 (2007).
Liman, E. R. & Innan, H. Relaxed selective pressure on an essential component of pheromone transduction in primate evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 3328–3332 (2003).
Zhang, J. & Webb, D. M. Evolutionary deterioration of the vomeronasal pheromone transduction pathway in catarrhine primates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8337–8341 (2003).
Rodriguez, I., Greer, C. A., Mok, M. Y. & Mombaerts, P. A putative pheromone receptor gene expressed in human olfactory mucosa. Nature Genet. 26, 18–19 (2000).
Shirokova, E., Raguse, J. D., Meyerhof, W. & Krautwurst, D. The human vomeronasal type-1 receptor family — detection of volatiles and cAMP signaling in HeLa/Olf cells. FASEB J. 22, 1416–1425 (2008).
Shepherd, G. M. Smells, brains and hormones. Nature 439, 149–151 (2006).
Shi, P. & Zhang, J. Comparative genomic analysis identifies an evolutionary shift of vomeronasal receptor gene repertoires in the vertebrate transition from water to land. Genome Res. 17, 166–174 (2007).
Bonadonna, F., Miguel, E., Grosbois, V., Jouventin, P. & Bessiere, J. M. Individual odor recognition in birds: an endogenous olfactory signature on petrels' feathers? J. Chem. Ecol. 33, 1819–1829 (2007).
Keller, A., Zhuang, H., Chi, Q., Vosshall, L. B. & Matsunami, H. Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature 449, 468–472 (2007).
Shi, P. & Zhang, J. Contrasting modes of evolution between vertebrate sweet/umami receptor genes and bitter receptor genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 292–300 (2006).
Li, X. et al. Pseudogenization of a sweet-receptor gene accounts for cats' indifference toward sugar. PLoS Genet. 1, 27–35 (2005).
Hashiguchi, Y., Furuta, Y., Kawahara, R. & Nishida, M. Diversification and adaptive evolution of putative sweet taste receptors in threespine stickleback. Gene 396, 170–179 (2007).
McBride, C. S., & Arguello, J. R. Five Drosophila genomes reveal nonneutral evolution and the signature of host specialization in the chemoreceptor superfamily. Genetics 177, 1395–1416 (2007).
Robertson, H. M. & Wanner, K. W. The chemoreceptor superfamily in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: expansion of the odorant, but not gustatory, receptor family. Genome Res. 16, 1395–1403 (2006).
Engsontia, P. et al. The red flour beetle's large nose: an expanded odorant receptor gene family in Tribolium castaneum. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38, 387–397 (2008).
Abdel-Latief, M. A family of chemoreceptors in Tribolium castaneum (Tenebrionidae: Coleoptera). PLoS ONE 2, e1319 (2007).
Nozawa, M. & Nei, M. Evolutionary dynamics of olfactory receptor genes in Drosophila species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7122–7127 (2007).
Serizawa, S. et al. Negative feedback regulation ensures the one receptor–one olfactory neuron rule in mouse. Science 302, 2088–2094 (2003).
Lomvardas, S. et al. Interchromosomal interactions and olfactory receptor choice. Cell 126, 403–413 (2006).
Ray, A., van Naters, W. G., Shiraiwa, T. & Carlson, J. R. Mechanisms of odor receptor gene choice in Drosophila. Neuron 53, 353–369 (2007).
Ray, A., van der Goes van Naters, W. & Carlson, J. R. A regulatory code for neuron-specific odor receptor expression. PLoS Biol. 6, e125 (2008).
Nei, M., Gu, X. & Sitnikova, T. Evolution by the birth-and-death process in multigene families of the vertebrate immune system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7799–7806 (1997).
Nei, M. & Rooney, A. P. Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 121–152 (2005).
Nam, J. & Nei, M. Evolutionary change of the numbers of homeobox genes in bilateral animals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 2386–2394 (2005).
Nei, M. The new mutation theory of phenotypic evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12235–12242 (2007).
Iafrate, A. J. et al. Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nature Genet. 36, 949–951 (2004).
Sebat, J. et al. Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science 305, 525–528 (2004).
Redon, R. et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444, 444–454 (2006). This study showed that the extent of copy number variation in the human genome is approximately 12% and indicates that such variation may be more important than single nucleotide polymorphisms in the generation of genetic variation.
Feuk, L., Carson, A. R. & Scherer, S. W. Structural variation in the human genome. Nature Rev. Genet. 7, 85–97 (2006).
Cooper, G. M., Nickerson, D. A. & Eichler, E. E. Mutational and selective effects on copy-number variants in the human genome. Nature Genet. 39, S22–S29 (2007).
Nozawa, M. & Nei, M. Genomic drift and copy number variation of chemosensory receptor genes in humans and mice. Cytogenet. Genome Res. (in the press).
Young, J. M. et al. Extensive copy-number variation of the human olfactory receptor gene family. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 83, 228–242 (2008).
Kelley, J., Walter, L. & Trowsdale, J. Comparative genomics of natural killer cell receptor gene clusters. PLoS Genet. 1, 129–139 (2005).
Fanciulli, M. et al. FCGR3B copy number variation is associated with susceptibility to systemic, but not organ-specific, autoimmunity. Nature Genet. 39, 721–723 (2007).
Perry, G. H. et al. Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation. Nature Genet. 39, 1256–1260 (2007).
Nguyen, D. Q., Webber, C. & Ponting, C. P. Bias of selection on human copy-number variants. PLoS Genet. 2, e20 (2006).
Cutler, G., Marshall, L. A., Chin, N., Baribault, H. & Kassner, P. D. Significant gene content variation characterizes the genomes of inbred mouse strains. Genome Res. 17, 1743–1754 (2007).
Graubert, T. A. et al. A high-resolution map of segmental DNA copy number variation in the mouse genome. PLoS Genet. 3, e3 (2007).
Kondo, R., Kaneko, S., Sun, H., Sakaizumi, M. & Chigusa, S. I. Diversification of olfactory receptor genes in the Japanese medaka fish, Oryzias latipes. Gene 282, 113–120 (2002).
Gimelbrant, A. A., Skaletsky, H. & Chess, A. Selective pressures on the olfactory receptor repertoire since the human–chimpanzee divergence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9019–9022 (2004).
Yang, Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591 (2007).
Clark, A. G. et al. Inferring nonneutral evolution from human–chimp–mouse orthologous gene trios. Science 302, 1960–1963 (2003).
Emes, R. D., Beatson, S. A., Ponting, C. P. & Goodstadt, L. Evolution and comparative genomics of odorant- and pheromone-associated genes in rodents. Genome Res. 14, 591–602 (2004).
Nielsen, R. et al. A scan for positively selected genes in the genomes of humans and chimpanzees. PLoS Biol. 3, e170 (2005).
Shi, P., Bielawski, J. P., Yang, H. & Zhang, Y. P. Adaptive diversification of vomeronasal receptor 1 genes in rodents. J. Mol. Evol. 60, 566–576 (2005).
Tunstall, N. E., Sirey, T., Newcomb, R. D. & Warr, C. G. Selective pressures on Drosophila chemosensory receptor genes. J. Mol. Evol. 64, 628–636 (2007).
Zuckerkandl, E. & Pauling, L. in Evolving Genes and Proteins (eds Bryson, V. & Vegel, H. J.) 97–166 (Academic, New York, 1965).
King, J. L. & Jukes, T. H. Non-Darwinian evolution. Science 164, 788–798 (1969).
Perutz, M. F. Species adaptation in a protein molecule. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1, 1–28 (1983).
Yokoyama, S., Tada, T., Zhang, H. & Britt, L. Elucidation of phenotypic adaptations: molecular analyses of dim-light vision proteins in vertebrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13480–13485 (2008).
Suzuki, Y. & Nei, M. False-positive selection identified by ML-based methods: examples from the Sig1 gene of the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii and the tax gene of a human T-cell lymphotropic virus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 914–921 (2004).
Hughes, A. L. Looking for Darwin in all the wrong places: the misguided quest for positive selection at the nucleotide sequence level. Heredity 99, 364–373 (2007).
Hughes, A. L. The origin of adaptive phenotypes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13193–13194 (2008).
Suzuki, Y. False-positive results obtained from the branch-site test of positive selection. Genes Genet. Syst. 83, 331–338 (2008).
Menashe, I. et al. Genetic elucidation of human hyperosmia to isovaleric acid. PLoS Biol. 5, e284 (2007). This study showed that copy-number polymorphism of OR genes affects odorant sensitivity in different individuals.
Fisher, R. A., Ford, E. B. & Huxley, J. Taste-testing the anthropoid apes. Nature 144, 750 (1939).
Wooding, S. et al. Independent evolution of bitter-taste sensitivity in humans and chimpanzees. Nature 440, 930–934 (2006).
Tajima, F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585–595 (1989).
McDonald, J. H. & Kreitman, M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351, 652–654 (1991).
Nei, M. Selectionism and neutralism in molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 2318–2342 (2005).
Mayr, E. Animal Species and Evolution (Belknap Press of Harvard Univ., Massachusetts, 1963).
Futuyma, D. J. Evolution (Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts, 2005).
Dobzhansky, T. Genetics and the Origin of Species. 3rd edn (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1951).
Nei, M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1987).
Stoltzfus, A. Mutationism and the dual causation of evolutionary change. Evol. Dev. 8, 304–317 (2006).
Lynch, M. The Origins of Genome Architecture (Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts, 2007).
Lindemann, L. et al. Trace amine-associated receptors form structurally and functionally distinct subfamilies of novel G protein-coupled receptors. Genomics 85, 372–385 (2005).
Gardiner, A., Barker, D., Butlin, R. K., Jordan, W. C. & Ritchie, M. G. Drosophila chemoreceptor gene evolution: selection, specialization and genome size. Mol. Ecol. 17, 1648–1657 (2008).
Hill, C. A. et al. G protein-coupled receptors in Anopheles gambiae. Science 298, 176–178 (2002).
Kent, L. B., Walden, K. K. & Robertson, H. M. The Gr family of candidate gustatory and olfactory receptors in the yellow-fever mosquito Aedes aegypti. Chem. Senses 33, 79–93 (2008).
Bohbot, J. et al. Molecular characterization of the Aedes aegypti odorant receptor gene family. Insect Mol. Biol. 16, 525–537 (2007).
Wanner, K. W. et al. Female-biased expression of odorant receptor genes in the adult antennae of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Mol. Biol. 16, 107–119 (2007).
We thank Y. Go for providing unpublished data. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM020293 to M.N. and Japanese Government Grants 17710162 and 20770192 to Y.N.
The sense of smell and taste.
- Multigene family
A group of genes that have descended from a common ancestor, and therefore have similar functions and similar DNA sequences.
A chemical substance that is released and detected by different individuals of the same species, and triggers physiological and behavioural responses.
- Main olfactory epithelium
A specialized epithelial tissue in the nasal cavity in which olfactory receptor genes are expressed.
- Ectopic expression
The expression of a gene in tissues other than the tissue in which it is normally expressed.
- Vomeronasal organ
An auxiliary olfactory organ that is found in many mammals, reptiles and amphibians.
The tubular organ in insects that is used for feeding and sucking.
- Non-synonymous nucleotide substitution
A nucleotide substitution that results in a change of an amino acid within the coding region of a gene.
- Synonymous nucleotide substitution
A nucleotide substitution that does not change an amino acid in the coding region of a gene.
The ability of an animal to perceive electrical pulses.
The ability of an animal to detect certain kinds of stimuli, such as touch, sound and changes in atmospheric pressure or posture in its environment.
- Toothed whales
A suborder of cetaceans that have teeth rather than baleens (plates of whalebone). Toothed whales include dolphins, sperm whales, beaked whales and killer whales.
A biological sonar mechanism used by several mammals, such as whales and bats. A high-pitched sound (usually clicks) is sent out by an animal, the sound bounces off an object and some of the sound returns to the animal. Whales perceive this returning echo to determine the shape, direction, distance and texture of the object.
- Birth-and-death evolution
An evolutionary mechanism that occurs in multigene families, in which new genes are created by gene duplication and some are retained in the genome for a long time as functional genes, but other genes are inactivated or eliminated from the genome.
- Genetic drift
The random change of the allele frequency in populations.
The increase in the frequency of a neutral allele at a locus that is physically linked to an advantageous allele at a different locus.
- Overdominant selection
A form of selection caused by heterozygote advantage.
About this article
Cite this article
Nei, M., Niimura, Y. & Nozawa, M. The evolution of animal chemosensory receptor gene repertoires: roles of chance and necessity. Nat Rev Genet 9, 951–963 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2480
Cell and Tissue Research (2021)
Diverse Evolution in 111 Plant Genomes Reveals Purifying and Dosage Balancing Selection Models for F-Box Genes
International Journal of Molecular Sciences (2021)
Cell and Tissue Research (2021)
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata (2021)