Review Article | Published:

Sociogenomics: social life in molecular terms

Nature Reviews Genetics volume 6, pages 257270 (2005) | Download Citation



Spectacular progress in molecular biology, genome-sequencing projects and genomics makes this an appropriate time to attempt a comprehensive understanding of the molecular basis of social life. Promising results have already been obtained in identifying genes that influence animal social behaviour and genes that are implicated in social evolution. These findings — derived from an eclectic mix of species that show varying levels of sociality — provide the foundation for the integration of molecular biology, genomics, neuroscience, behavioural biology and evolutionary biology that is necessary for this endeavour.

Key points

  • Studying the molecular basis of social life (sociogenomics) requires an integration of molecular biology, genomics, neuroscience, behavioural biology, evolutionary biology and new forms of bioinformatics.

  • An eclectic mix of species that show varying levels of sociality is being used to study the molecular basis of social life, especially social behaviour.

  • Sociogenomics is predicated on two of the most significant insights in biology to emerge from the later half of the twentieth century. First, social life has a biological basis and is therefore influenced to some extent by genes and the forces of evolution. Second, the molecular functions of many genes are highly conserved across species, even for complex traits such as behaviour.

  • Genes have been identified that both regulate social behaviour and that are implicated in the evolution of social behaviour.

  • One emerging theme that relates to the relationship between genes and social behaviour is that genes involved in solitary behaviour are also used for social behaviour.

  • A second theme is that the genome is highly sensitive to social influence, through social regulation of gene expression in the brain.

  • A transcriptomics-based approach is the method of gene discovery most easily used for model social species.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    & The Major Transitions in Evolution (Oxford, New York, 1995).

  2. 2.

    , & Insect societies and the molecular biology of social behavior. Bioessays 19, 1099–1108 (1997).

  3. 3.

    Integrative animal behaviour and sociogenomics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 202–205 (1997).

  4. 4.

    Sociogenomics takes flight. Science 297, 204–205 (2002).

  5. 5.

    Sociobiology: the New Synthesis (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1975).

  6. 6.

    Animal Behavior: an Evolutionary Approach (Sinauer, Sunderland, 1998).

  7. 7.

    et al. Genetic tools for studying adaptation and the evolution of behavior. Am. Nat. 160, S143–S159 (2002).

  8. 8.

    Drosophila: genetics meets behaviour. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 879–890 (2001). Together with references 82 and 83, this article provides an authoritative review of the state of the genes and behaviour field for model genetic animals.

  9. 9.

    et al. Regulation of behavioral maturation in honeybees by a new primer pheromone. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17559–17564 (2004).

  10. 10.

    , , & Behavior influenced by gene action across different time scales. Science 296, 742–744 (2002). Reports that an orthologue of the Drosophila melanogaster foraging gene influences the onset age of foraging in honeybees by changing mRNA levels in the brain. Together with the findings reviewed in reference 8, this shows that the same gene can exert a different influence on related behaviours, over an evolutionary timescale in flies and an ontogenetic timescale in bees.

  11. 11.

    , Social behavior and comparative genomics: new genes or new gene regulation? Genes Brain Behav. 4, 197–203 (2002).

  12. 12.

    , & Pleiotropy, epistasis and new QTL: the genetic architecture of honeybee foraging behavior. J. Hered. 95, 481–491 (2004).

  13. 13.

    & Colony state and regulation of pollen foraging in the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30, 387–393 (1992).

  14. 14.

    , & The emergence of hymenopteran genetics. Genetics 160, 375–379 (2002). This paper reviews haplodiploidy and its advantages for QTL analysis.

  15. 15.

    , & Regulation of body size and behavioral state of C. elegans by sensory perception and the EGL-4 cGMP-dependent protein kinase. Neuron 36, 1091–1102 (2002).

  16. 16.

    , & Task-specific expression of the foraging gene in harvester ants. Mol. Ecol. (in the press).

  17. 17.

    & In search of food: exploring the evolutionary link between cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) and behaviour. Integr. Comp. Biol. 44, 28–36 (2004).

  18. 18.

    , & Phenotypic deconstruction reveals involvement of manganese transporter malvolio in honeybee division of labour. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 3281–3288 (2004).

  19. 19.

    & in Hormones, Brain, and Behavior (eds Pfaff, D. W. et al.) 435–525 (Academic, New York, 2002).

  20. 20.

    et al. Developmental control of foraging and social behavior by the Drosophila neuropeptide Y-like system. Neuron 39, 147–161 (2003).

  21. 21.

    & Natural variation in a neuropeptide Y receptor homolog modifies social behavior and food response in C. elegans. Cell 94, 679–689 (1998).

  22. 22.

    et al. Oxygen sensation and social feeding mediated by a C. elegans guanylate cyclase homologue. Nature 430, 317–322 (2004).

  23. 23.

    , , , & Social feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans is induced by neurons that detect aversive stimuli. Nature 419, 899–903 (2002).

  24. 24.

    Social eating for stress. Nature 419, 893–894 (2002).

  25. 25.

    Behavioral Neurobiology: the Cellular Organization of Natural Behavior (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2000).

  26. 26.

    et al. FoxP2 expression in avian vocal learners and non-learners. J. Neurosci. 24, 3164–3175 (2004).

  27. 27.

    , , , & Parallel FoxP1 and FoxP2 expression in songbird and human brain predicts functional interaction. J. Neurosci. 24, 3152–3163 (2004).

  28. 28.

    et al. Language fMRI abnormalities associated with FOXP2 gene mutation. Neuron 23, 513–522 (1999).

  29. 29.

    et al. Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature 418, 869–872 (2002).

  30. 30.

    , & Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 6818–6822 (1992). This is the first demonstration of gene activation in response to bird-song perception.

  31. 31.

    The genomic action potential. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 74, 185–216 (2000). The author proposes an insightful conceptual framework for understanding how immediate early genes (IEGs) regulate neural plasticity by analogy to the classical neuronal action potential. According to this paper, IEG activation increases the responsiveness of neurons to subsequent exposures of key environmental stimuli.

  32. 32.

    , & Context-specific habituation of the zenk gene response to song in adult zebra finches. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 82, 91–108 (2004).

  33. 33.

    Songbird genomics: methods, mechanisms, opportunities, and pitfalls. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1016, 45–60 (2004).

  34. 34.

    et al. A framework for integrating the songbird brain. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188, 961–980 (2002).

  35. 35.

    & Molecular detection of pheromone signals in mammals: from genes to behaviour. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 4, 551–562 (2003). This article reviews progress in identifying genes that encode pheromone receptors in mice and in using these findings to trace the neural circuits involved in mating-related chemical communication.

  36. 36.

    Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 1161–1192 (2001).

  37. 37.

    et al. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nature Neurosci. 7, 847–854 (2004). The first demonstration of epigenetic effects of social behaviour. This paper reports that the genomic basis of the striking and permanent behavioural and physiological effects of maternal care on offspring is mediated by histone acetylation and demethylation of a response element in the glucocortocoid receptor gene.

  38. 38.

    in Developmental Origins of Aggression (eds Tremblay, R. M., Hartup, W. W. & Archer, J.) 63–82 (Guilford Press, New York, 2004).

  39. 39.

    et al. Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science. 301, 386–389 (2003).

  40. 40.

    et al. Serotonin transporter genetic variation and the response of the human amygdala. Science 297, 400–403 (2002).

  41. 41.

    & Animal behaviour: coalition among male fiddler crabs. Nature 430, 417 (2004).

  42. 42.

    & A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432, 218–222 (2004).

  43. 43.

    et al. (eds) Foundation in Social Neuroscience. (Bradford Book, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002).

  44. 44.

    & Dominance hierarchy influences adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus. J. Neurosci. 24, 6755–6759 (2004).

  45. 45.

    , & Social regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 2567–2581 (2002).

  46. 46.

    , & Social status regulates growth rate: consequences for life-history strategies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 14171–14176 (1999).

  47. 47.

    Social Regulation of Reproduction. Thesis, Stanford Univ. (2000).

  48. 48.

    , , , & Three gonadotropin-releasing hormone genes in one organism suggest novel roles for an ancient peptide. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8363–8367 (1995). An example that behavioural novelty can possibly evolve through gene duplication. It reports that plasticity in dominance behaviour in the cichlid Haplochromus burtoni is regulated by just one member of the GnRH family.

  49. 49.

    , & Biologically meaningful expression profiling across species using heterologous hybridization to a cDNA microarray. BMC Genomics 5, 1–13 (2004).

  50. 50.

    , , , & Serotonin and aggressive motivation in crustaceans: altering the decision to retreat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5939–5942 (1997). This paper reports the use of sophisticated behavioural analysis to dissect neurochemical effects on behaviour, providing a firm underpinning for interpreting the action of genes involved in aggressive behaviour.

  51. 51.

    , & The effect of social experience on serotonergic modulation of the escape circuit of crayfish. Science 271, 366–369 (1996).

  52. 52.

    , , , & Abnormal behavior associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A. Science 262, 578–580 (1993). A pedigree analysis that identified a genetic polymorphism associated with impulsive behaviour in humans (including aggression); results from knockout mice that are reported in reference 53 provide experimental evidence for this association.

  53. 53.

    et al. Aggressive behavior and altered amounts of brain serotonin and norepinephrine in mice lacking MAOA. Science 268, 1763–1766.

  54. 54.

    Aggression in mice and men? (letter) Science 270, 361 (1995).

  55. 55.

    The Insect Societies (Belknap, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1971).

  56. 56.

    Eusociality in a coral-reef shrimp. Nature 381, 512–514 (1996).

  57. 57.

    , & The Biology of the Naked Mole-Rat. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology (Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey, 1991).

  58. 58.

    & The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997) References 56–58 document the identification of eusocial species outside the traditional ant, bee, wasp and termite lineages.

  59. 59.

    & The Ants (Belkap, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1990).

  60. 60.

    , & in Hormones, Brain, and Behavior (eds Pfaff, D. W. et al.) 195–235 (Academic, New York, 2002).

  61. 61.

    , & Differential expression of mitochondrial genes between queens and workers during caste determination in the honeybee Apis mellifera. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 929–938 (1999).

  62. 62.

    & Differential gene expression between developing queens and workers in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5575–5580 (1999).

  63. 63.

    & Gene expression profiles during the honeybee caste program. Genome Biol. 2, research0001.1–research0001.6 (2000).

  64. 64.

    & Evolution of the gene network underlying the wing polyphenism in ants. Science 297, 249–252 (2002).

  65. 65.

    A major evolutionary transition to more than two sexes? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2, 83–86 (2004). Several laboratories have reported genotypic influences on caste determination in Pogonomyrmex barbatus harvester ants. This paper reviews these findings and suggests a provocative hypothesis about their evolutionary significance.

  66. 66.

    , et al. Soldier caste-specific gene expression in the mandibular glands of Hodotermopsis japonica (Isoptera: Termopsidae). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13874–13879 (1999).

  67. 67.

    et al. Venomous protease of aphid soldier for colony defense. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 11338–11343 (2004).

  68. 68.

    Genomics and integrative analyses of division of labor in honeybee colonies. Am. Nat. 160, S160–S172 (2002).

  69. 69.

    , & Behavioral rhythmicity, age, division of labor and period expression in the honeybee brain. J. Biol. Rhythms 16, 444–456 (2001).

  70. 70.

    , , & Changes in neuronal acetylcholinesterase gene expression and division of labor in honeybee colonies. J. Molec. Neurosci. 17, 1–12 (2001)

  71. 71.

    & Molecular profiling of behavioural development: differential expression of mRNAs for inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate 3-kinase isoforms in naive and experienced honeybees (Apis mellifera). Mol. Brain Res. 99, 92–101 (2002).

  72. 72.

    , & Expression of amylase and glucose oxidase in the hypopharyngeal gland with an age-dependent role change of the worker honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Eur. J. Biochem. 265, 127–133 (1999).

  73. 73.

    , , , & The family of major royal jelly proteins and its evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 49, 290–297 (1999).

  74. 74.

    et al. Identification of genes expressed preferentially in the honeybee mushroom bodies by combination of differential display and cDNA microarray. FEBS Lett. 513, 230–234 (2002).

  75. 75.

    & Evaluation of differential gene expression during behavioral development in the honeybee using microarrays and northern blots. Genome Biol. 3, RESEARCH0007 (2002).

  76. 76.

    , & Gene expression profiles in the brain predict behavior in individual honeybees. Science 302, 296–269 (2003).

  77. 77.

    , , & Behavioral plasticity and gene expression in the brain: microarray analysis of the influences of environment and genotype on behavioral maturation in the honeybee. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 627, 15 (2003).

  78. 78.

    , , & Pheromone-mediated gene expression in the honeybee brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100 (Suppl. 2), 14519–14525 (2003).

  79. 79.

    , , & Genomic plasticity in behavior, power and replicability in microarray analysis. Genes, Brain and Behav. (in the press). This paper uses microarrays to look for honeybee genes that are differentially regulated in association with guarding the nest entrance and removing corpses.

  80. 80.

    et al. Genomic analysis in the sting-2 quantitative trait locus for defensive behavior in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Genome Res. 13, 2588–2593 (2003). The authors report on the search for genes in QTLs that are associated with variation in honeybee defensive behaviours.

  81. 81.

    Gene targeting: technical confounds and potential solutions in behavioural brain research. Behav. Brain Res. 125, 13–21 (2001).

  82. 82.

    From gene to identified neuron to behaviour in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 622–630 (2002).

  83. 83.

    & The mouse: genetics meets behaviour. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 114–123 (2002).

  84. 84.

    , , , & The gene csd is the primary signal for sexual development in the honeybee and encodes an SR-type protein. Cell 114, 419–429 (2003).

  85. 85.

    et al. Enhanced partner preference in a promiscuous species by manipulating the expression of a single gene. Nature 429, 754–757 (2004).

  86. 86.

    Nanoparticulate systems for brain delivery of drugs. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 47, 65–81 (2001).

  87. 87.

    , & Octopamine receptors in the honeybee (Apis mellifera) brain and their disruption by RNA-mediated interference. J. Insect Physiol. 50, 701–713 (2004).

  88. 88.

    et al. Expression profiling using a hexamer-based universal microarray. Nature Biotechnol. 22, 418–426 (2004).

  89. 89.

    et al. Advanced sequencing technologies: methods and goals. Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 335–344 (2004).

  90. 90.

    Top-down proteomics. Anal. Chem. 76, 197A–203A (2004).

  91. 91.

    , & A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2, 343–373 (2001).

  92. 92.

    , & From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design (Blackwell Science, Malden, 2001).

  93. 93.

    et al. Candidate genes for behavioural ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 96–104 (2005).

  94. 94.

    et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431, 99–104 (2004).

  95. 95.

    Beyond nature and nurture. Science 304, 397–399 (2004).

  96. 96.

    Discovery of genes involved with learning and memory: an experimental synthesis of Hirschian and Benzerian perspectives. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13460–13467 (1996).

  97. 97.

    & Evolutionary and ecological functional genomics. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 651–657 (2003).

  98. 98.

    , & Audience drives male songbird response to partner's voice. Nature 430, 448–451 (2004).

  99. 99.

    & Unto Others: the Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998).

  100. 100.

    , , & Genome organization and social evolution in Hymenoptera. Naturwiss. 87, 87–89 (2000). This paper explores the possibility that recombination rates are positively correlated with extent of sociality.

  101. 101.

    & Identification of a major gene regulating complex social behavior. Science 295, 328–332 (2002).

  102. 102.

    & Kin recognition and the major histocompatibility complex: an integrative review. Am. Nat. 143, 435–461 (1994).

  103. 103.

    et al. MHC Class 1 peptides as chemosensory signals in the vomeronasal organ. Science 306, 1033–1037 (2004).

  104. 104.

    et al. Abnormal maternal behaviour and growth retardation associated with loss of the imprinted gene Mest. Nature Genet. 20, 163–169 (1998).

  105. 105.

    Genomic imprinting and the theory of parent–offspring conflict. Semin. Dev. Biol. 3, 153–160 (1992). The author interprets genomic imprinting from an evolutionary perspective.

  106. 106.

    , & Social exploitation of vitellogenin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1799–1802 (2003).

  107. 107.

    , , & Reproductive ground plan may mediate colony-level selection effects on individual foraging behavior in honeybees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 11350–11355 (2004). Uses insights from strains of honeybees artificially selected for storing high and low amounts of pollen in the hive to speculate on the mechanisms involved in the evolution of eusociality.

  108. 108.

    The social brain hypothesis. Evol. Anthropol. 6, 178–190 (1998).

  109. 109.

    Gestational drive and the green-bearded placenta. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 6547–6551 (1996).

  110. 110.

    The Cellular Slime Molds (Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey, 1967).

  111. 111.

    , , & Single-gene greenbeard effects in the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum. Science 299, 105–106 (2003).

  112. 112.

    , , , & Pleiotropy as a mechanism to stabilise cooperation. Nature 431, 693–696 (2004).

  113. 113.

    , & Developmental cheating in the social bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. Nature, 404, 598–601 (2000).

  114. 114.

    & Competitive fates of bacterial social parasites: persistence and self-induced extinction of Myxococcus cheaters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 1527–1534 (2003).

  115. 115.

    Drive: Neurobiological and Molecular Mechanisms of Sexual Motivation (Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999).

  116. 116.

    , and Are complex behaviors specified by dedicated regulatory genes? Reasoning from Drosophila. Cell 105, 13–24 (2001).

  117. 117.

    Functional genomics of neural and behavioral plasticity. J. Neurobiol. 54, 272–282 (2003).

  118. 118.

    & The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am. J. Psychiat. 160, 636–645 (2003).

  119. 119.

    , , , & cGMP-dependent changes in phototaxis: a possible role for the foraging gene in honeybee division of labour. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 2507–2515 (2003).

  120. 120.

    Dance Language and Orientation of the Honeybee (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1967).

  121. 121.

    & The neurobiology of attachment. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 2, 129–136 (2001).

  122. 122.

    , & Deficit in attachment behavior in mice lacking the μ-opioid receptor gene. Science 304, 1983–1986 (2004).

  123. 123.

    & Extraordinary diversity in vasopressin (V1a) receptor distributions among wild prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): patterns of variation and covariation. J. Comp. Neurol. 466, 564–576 (2003).

  124. 124.

    , , & PKA and PKC content in the honeybee central brain differs in genotypic strains with distinct foraging behavior. J. Comp. Physiol. A 189, 555–562 (2003).

  125. 125.

    , & Song-induced gene expression: a window on song auditory processing and perception. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1016, 263–281 (2004).

  126. 126.

    & A putative Drosophila pheromone receptor expressed in male-specific taste neurons is required for efficient courtship. Neuron 39, 1019–1029 (2003).

  127. 127.

    , et al. Identification and functional characterization of a sex pheromone receptor in the silkmoth Bombyx mori. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16653–16658 (2004).

  128. 128.

    et al. Molecular transfer of a species-specific behavior from Drosophila simulans to Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 251, 1082–1085 (1991).

  129. 129.

    , , , & Temporal mating isolation driven by a behavioral gene in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 13, 140–145 (2003).

  130. 130.

    , , & Neural, hormonal and genetic mechanisms for the activation of brain and behavior. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 480, 229–231 (2003).

  131. 131.

    The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila. Heredity 88, 85–93 (2002). This article reviews the behavioural and physiological effects on females of male proteins that are transferred during mating.

  132. 132.

    & Impaired maternal behavior in mice lacking norepinephrine and epinephrine. Cell 91, 583–592 (1997).

  133. 133.

    et al. Social interaction and sensorimotor gating abnormalities in mice lacking Dvl1. Cell 90, 895–905 (1997).

  134. 134.

    , , , Expanded characterization of the social interaction abnormalities in mice lacking Dvl1. Genes Brain Behav. 3, 51–62 (2004).

Download references


We thank H.A. Hoffman and R.E. Lenski for helpful advice. We also thank A.B. Barron, Y. Ben-Shahar, G. Bloch, S.E. Fahrbach, A.L. Toth, B. Schatz, M.B. Sokolowski and three anonymous reviewers for comments that improved the manuscript. Research by the authors was supported by grants from the US National Institutes of Health, US National Science Foundation, US Department of Agriculture and the Burroughs Wellcome Trust (G.E.R.), a University of Illinois-Beckman Postdoctoral Fellowship (C.M.G.), and a US National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship in Bioinformatics (C.W.W.).

Author information

Author notes

    • Christina M. Grozinger

    Current address: Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA.


  1. Neuroscience Program, Department of Entomology, 505 South Goodwin Avenue, 320 Morrill Hall, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.

    • Gene E. Robinson
    • , Christina M. Grozinger
    •  & Charles W. Whitfield
  2. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.

    • Christina M. Grozinger


  1. Search for Gene E. Robinson in:

  2. Search for Christina M. Grozinger in:

  3. Search for Charles W. Whitfield in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gene E. Robinson.



A group of organisms from the same species that live in the same area and engage in repeated interactions with each other, both cooperative and competitive. The more extensive the cooperation, the more developed the society.


A measured phenotype, such as disease status or a quantitative character, which is influenced by many environmental and genetic factors, and potentially by interactions in and between them.


Social interactions in which both parties benefit.


William D. Hamilton's theory to explain the evolution of the hallmark of social life: altruistic cooperation (carrying out functions that are costly to the individual but that benefit others). By helping a relative, an individual increases its fitness by increasing the number of copies of its genes in the population.


Robert L. Trivers' theory to explain altruism, according to which altruism occurs when the individual is likely to later be the recipient of similar altruistic acts.


A key characteristic of the most structured societies those with the highest levels of cooperation in which individuals specialize in specific occupations. In insect societies, queens reproduce while workers engage in all tasks that are related to colony growth and development; young workers tend to work in the nest, whereas older individuals forage outside.


A gene that is thought to be more likely to be involved in the control of a trait in one species compared with a random gene from the genome, based on known functions in another species.


A global way of looking at gene-expression patterns. This can involve measurements of thousands of genes simultaneously with microarrays or measurements of small numbers of genes that are facilitated by global sequence information from EST or genome-sequencing projects.


A chemical released by members of a species that influences the behaviour of other members of that species.


(QTLs). Loci that control quantitative (that is, continuous) traits. QTLs are identified by showing a statistical association between genetic markers and measurable phenotypes.


Broadly describes the distribution of gene effects that produce a given phenotype. It includes a description of the number of genes that influence the trait, their relative position and magnitude of the effects, and the nature of the interactions between them.


Unfertilized eggs produce males and fertilized eggs produce females. This results in certain asymmetries in relatedness, including sisters being more closely related to each other than mothers and daughters. Recognition of this in the Hymenoptera (ants, bees, wasps) led Hamilton to propose kin selection as a principal force in the evolution of eusociality.


A type of gene predicted by Richard Dawkins that shows the following three effects: production of a recognizable trait (for example, a green beard), recognition of that trait in others and preferential treatment of those with the trait.


In this context, an insect society that is headed by a single female (the queen).


In this context, an insect society that is headed by many females (queens).


Expression of only one of two alleles of a gene owing to differential methylation of either the maternal or paternal copy.


Derived from sex-specific differences in gamete size that led to predictions of sex-specific differences in mating strategies, parental investment and genomic imprinting.


A technique used to identify differentially expressed genes. The DNA species present in one sample are specifically enriched by hybridizing with nucleic acids from another sample and removing the associated double-stranded molecules.


The first genes expressed in response to cell stimulation that then lead to cascades of expression of other genes.


David F. Clayton invoked the classical neuronal action potential to describe by analogy how gene expression, beginning with activation of immediate early genes, increases the responsiveness of neurons to key environmental stimuli.


Modifications of chromatin or DNA (for example, histone deacetylation and cytosine methylation) that can be stably transmitted through many cell divisions, but can also be reset (unlike changes in DNA sequence).


The posture of a female rodent when receptive to mating; includes raised tail and hind quarters, and an arched back.


Genes that are involved in the production and regulation of circadian (intrinsic daily) rhythms.


In behavioural endocrinology, relatively rapid behavioural effects that are caused by actions of a hormone increase or decrease on established neural systems. This concept can also be usefully applied to describe similar effects that are caused by gene products.


In behavioural endocrinology, hormone effects that occur early in development and result in permanent changes in adult neural systems, and so behaviour. This concept can also be usefully applied to describe similar effects that are caused by gene products.


A biogenic amine that can function as a neurotransmitter, neuromodulator or neurohormone, and controls many physiological and behavioural processes.


The influence of specific combinations of genetic and environmental factors on a trait that goes beyond the additive action of these factors. This can refer to genes that control sensitivity to the environment or environmental factors that influence gene expression.


Region of the vertebrate brain that is involved with emotions, including anger and fear.


A group of bony fish that includes nearly all the important food and game fish, and many aquarium fish.


Endocrine and neuroendocrine tissues that together control physiological and behavioural aspects of reproductive maturation in vertebrates. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), made in the hypothalamus, causes the pituitary to release gonadotropins, which leads to the release of gonadal steroid hormones.


Social species that show three features: an extreme dominance hierarchy with some individuals reproducing a great deal and others little or not at all overlapping generations of adults in the nest and cooperative care of offspring.


In insect societies, a group of individuals that specialize in carrying out particular tasks. This behavioural specialization is often associated with differences in age, anatomy and morphology.


A special form of group selection, first described by Charles Darwin, to explain the evolution of altruistic (sterile) workers in insect societies.


A technique for detecting those genes that are expressed only under specific conditions. It involves isolation and comparison of mRNA from two or more populations, PCR amplification of mRNA and resolution on a DNA-sequencing gel.


A component of a complex behavioural phenotype that can facilitate the identification of relevant genes and elucidate their function. An endophenotype can involve a simpler behaviour or an underlying endocrine or neural mechanism.


A region of the insect brain that is involved in multimodal sensory integration, learning and memory.


The study of how organisms keep time, from circadian rhythms to seasonal changes, at all levels of biological organization.


A nanoparticle that can be used to deliver nucleic acids and drugs.


Genes that contain a 180-base-pair sequence involved in the regulation of animal and plant development. This sequence encodes a DNA-binding helix–turn–helix motif, indicating that homeobox-containing gene products function as transcription factors.

About this article

Publication history



Further reading