Abstract
Liquid helium becomes a superfluid and flows with zero viscosity at low temperatures. Superfluidity is manifested by a failure to rotate, as its mass is decoupled from the rotation of the containing cell. Supersolid helium should show similar behaviour; apparent rotational inertia decreases when the solid helium is set into torsional oscillation below 200 mK (refs 1, 2). However, a number of later experiments3,4,5,6,7 revealed characteristics unexpected within a conventional superfluid framework. Recent observations include hysteresis in the resonant period8,9 and relaxation dynamics10. To account for the inconsistencies, there are various proposals that include superfluid grain boundaries11, glassy behaviour12,13, viscoelasticity14, a vortex fluid15 and a superglass16. Here we systematically investigate the hysteresis and relaxation processes with a set of temperature and velocity sweeps. We unveil two hidden states associated with pinning of low-temperature excitations and construct a new phase diagram.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Unlike a typical superfluid, the non-classical rotational inertia fraction (NCRIF) has been found to be partially hysteretic8. The low-temperature (T<∼20 mK) value of NCRIF for a sample was smaller when cooled down in a high-velocity field (HVF), versus that obtained at low speeds. On reducing the velocity at the lowest temperature, the NCRIF recovered the unsuppressed value. However, subsequent increases in the velocity did not result in any suppression of the NCRIF up to at least 800 μm s−1. This hysteresis was observed only below about 40 mK. Slow warming and cooling cycles (all below 65 mK) following the above type of velocity sweeps have revealed that the NCRIF can be multivalued at the lowest temperatures9. The two research groups involved have described these findings in terms of the pinning of low-temperature excitations (such as dislocations and/or vortices) in solid 4He.
Here we examine the phenomena systematically by measuring the dynamic response of a torsional oscillator containing a bulk 4He sample at a pressure of 40 bar. The sample was grown using the blocked capillary method. The torsional oscillator has an open volume of 1.92 cm3 in a cylindrical form, with a 13 mm diameter and a height of 14.5 mm. The surface-area to volume (S/V) ratio is 4.46 cm−1. The empty cell has a resonant period of 1.328 ms and a mechanical quality factor of 2×106 at 4.2 K.
Two procedures were used to reach a fixed temperature and rim velocity, both of which represent a different history. The first is a typical method from previous studies. After setting the driving voltage at 500 mK, the torsional oscillator was cooled to the base temperature of 23 mK. After equilibration at the lowest temperature, a slow warming scan was carried out. We will refer to this cooling procedure and the corresponding NCRIF as HVF cooling and HVF NCRIF, respectively. As the rim velocity vR of the torsional oscillator is temperature dependent for a constant driving voltage, we consistently denote each data set by the value of vR recorded at 23 mK.
The second procedure was as follows. At 500 mK, the driving voltage was set to a low value such that vR at 23 mK is less than 33 μm s−1. The sample was then cooled down to a particular target temperature. The time evolution of the period and that of the amplitude were subsequently measured as the driving voltage was increased discretely in several steps. When the driving voltage is stepped up or down there is an abrupt jump—dominated by an instrumental artefact—in the resonant period, followed by slow relaxation. Following each relaxation process, we acquire a value for the NCRIF at the target temperature for each respective rim velocity (see Fig. 1). Owing to the low-velocity field (LVF) cooling to each target temperature, we label each of these traces as LVF NCRIF.
The maximum value of LVF NCRIF observed was 0.03%, which saturated at this value for T<∼35 mK while cooling with vR=33 μm s−1. This is one of the smallest reported values so far. Although a quantitatively accurate correlation is not well established, torsional oscillators with small S/V ratios tend to display smaller NCRIF values. This may in part be due to large defect densities near the walls of the cell17, and also the inefficiency to quickly drain away the latent heat of crystallization so as not to generate thermally induced strains18.
For HVF cooling, NCRIF at 23 mK is suppressed and projected to disappear at ∼3 mm s−1. Above a specific point that we call the depinning temperature Td, the HVF and LVF NCRIF values show the same temperature dependence all the way up to the onset temperature To. Below Td, where the two begin to differ, LVF NCRIF is always greater than HVF NCRIF. Moreover, the NCRIF recovers from the HVF value to its unsuppressed value (red curve in Fig. 1b) when the velocity is reduced to 33 μm s−1. This demonstrates that, below Td, the NCRIF depends on both the temperature and velocity histories of the sample.
We must emphasize that Td is not simply the temperature at which a difference between HVF and LVF NCRIF emerges, but also the point where the dynamic response of the torsional oscillator changes. Above Td, the resonant period decays exponentially on a relatively short timescale (see Fig. 2g–j). In contrast, decay takes place much more slowly below Td (see Fig. 2c–f). Interestingly, at even lower T, below what we define as the pinning temperature Tp, long-timescale characteristics once again disappear (see Fig. 2a and b). We note that Tp also represents the (velocity dependent) temperature above which LVF NCRIF is suppressed. As Tp is below 23 mK for vR>547 μm s−1, we extrapolated the low-T data to estimate the suppression temperature for high velocities (see Fig. 1a and Supplementary Information).
In Fig. 3 we have constructed a phase diagram in the vR–T plane on the basis of the observed Tp, Td and To. Identification of each phase was possible by analysing the relaxation dynamics of the torsional oscillator. In the red shaded region, the time evolution of the resonant period is exponential. The equilibrium time constant τ is of the order of a few hundred seconds near To. This is shorter than that of the empty cell, indicating that there is an extra dissipative process in the solid sample that provides damping to the torsional oscillator. We find that τ increases for T<100 mK, which is consistent with the literature10,19. An increase in τ, that is, a slowing down of the internal relaxation of 4He, can be explained by the progressive freezing out of excitations present in the solid10,20. The leading candidates for these excitations are dislocations21,22, vortices and glassy topological defects12.
In the yellow shaded region between Tp and Td, the same exponential decay manifested above Td is present with τ constantly increasing with decreasing temperatures. However, as mentioned earlier, there is a relaxation process that takes place on a different timescale. This behaviour has also been observed in previous works8,9. We follow the argument in ref. 8 and fit to a logarithmic time dependence, which is quite successful, as shown in Fig. 2c–f. The logarithmic behaviour could be caused by creep of weakly pinned excitations23,24. That is, if the pinned state is metastable in this region, excitations can escape one trapping site and creep to another. As the temperature is reduced, the thermal energy of the excitations will decrease accordingly, allowing them to be weakly pinned on local pinning sites. The pinning of originally free excitations through this mechanism is a continuous process; thus, Td would not correspond to a thermodynamic phase transition.
Although the type of excitations cannot be directly identified, the velocity dependence of Td can provide us with some insight. The positive slope of Td in vR–T phase space is at first glance counterintuitive. A higher rim velocity adds more kinetic energy to the system so that one would expect a higher probability of depinning (resulting in a negative slope of Td). However, if the excitations are vortices, the increasing velocity will result in their proliferation and ultimately will yield stronger vortex–vortex interactions. This would give an extra constraint to free-flowing vortices, hence leading to higher depinning temperatures at higher velocities. However, there is no conclusive evidence at this point.
Below Tp, the jump in the resonant period is followed by exponential relaxation, and is similar to that seen in the empty cell. This indicates that the excitations present in solid 4He are no longer metastably pinned, but rather, completely pinned. Such a process would be expected to result from a change in the pinning potential at Tp; that is, the potential is diverging such that excitations can no longer escape. This is different from a gradual crossover from an unpinned to a weakly pinned state, and could possibly be a true phase transition. This is also the region that presents the hysteresis originally observed previously8. It is argued that this could be analogous to the Meissner–Ochsenfeld effect in superconductors, implying that Tp is the temperature at which vortices freeze in both position and number. As Tp is velocity dependent, by inverting the relation, the temperature dependence of the velocity at which NCRIF suppression occurs can be obtained. This is the critical velocity vc(T) of the hidden Meissner–Ochsenfeld-like state. Determining vc(0) cannot be done accurately owing to the lack of data below 20 mK. Nevertheless, vc(0)>2 mm s−1, which is much closer to that of superfluid 4He than original estimates1,2.
Note that Tp≈35 mK in the zero-velocity limit coincides with the temperature at which NCRIF saturation is observed. Similar behaviour was found in ref. 8, in which they see saturation at ∼40 mK (see Fig. 2 in ref. 8). In ref. 10, NCRIF saturation is not achieved even down to 20 mK. Thus, the continuously increasing relaxation time with decreasing temperature that they observed is to be expected. Fig. 3A and B in ref. 10 show that the change in the frequency shift and dissipation both become smaller as T approaches 20 mK, indicating that the time evolution will eventually vanish at a lower temperature (this is also implied in Fig. 3C of their work). The relatively small Tp reported in ref. 10 (the point at which their observed relaxation will disappear) might be related to a rather large NCRIF (4.8%), as opposed to ours (0.03%) or that of ref. 8 (0.1%).
Another type of hysteresis observed in ref. 9 is seen by LVF cooling of the sample, followed by a single-step velocity increase. This will put the solid 4He in the yellow shaded region of our phase diagram. Temperature variation in this region then creates a mixed state between the weakly pinned and HVF-cooled states, resulting in a multivalued NCRIF. Comparison with previous measurements8,9,10,19 reveals that despite the variation in the exact values of velocity and temperature, the general features of the phase diagram seem to be universal.
References
Kim, E. & Chan, M. H. W. Probable observation of a supersolid helium phase. Nature 427, 225–227 (2004).
Kim, E. & Chan, M. H. W. Observation of superflow in solid helium. Science 305, 1941–1944 (2004).
Day, J., Herman, T. & Beamish, J. Freezing and pressure-driven flow of solid helium in vycor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 035301 (2005).
Day, J. & Beamish, J. Pressure-driven flow of solid helium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 105304 (2006).
Aoki, Y., Kojima, H. & Lin, X. Search for fourth sound propagation in supersolid 4He. Low Temp. Phys. 34, 329–339 (2008).
Kim, E. et al. Effect of 3He impurities on the nonclassical response to oscillation of solid 4He. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 065301 (2008).
Kwon, S., Mulders, N. & Kim, E. Absence of slow sound modes in supersolid 4He. J. Low Temp. Phys. 158, 590–595 (2009).
Aoki, Y., Graves, J. C. & Kojima, H. Oscillation frequency dependence of nonclassical rotation intertia of solid 4He. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 015301 (2007).
Clark, A. C., Maynard, J. D. & Chan, M. H. W. Thermal history of solid 4He under oscillation. Phys. Rev. B 77, 184513 (2008).
Hunt, B. et al. Evidence for a superglass state in solid 4He. Science 324, 632–636 (2009).
Pollet, L. et al. Superfluidity of grain boundaries in solid 4He. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 135301 (2007).
Nussinov, Z., Balatsky, A. V., Graf, M. J. & Trugman, S. A. Origin of the decrease in the torsional-oscillator period of solid 4He. Phys. Rev. B 76, 014530 (2007).
Andreev, A. F. Supersolidity of glasses. JETP Lett. 85, 585–587 (2007).
Yoo, C.-D. & Dorsey, A. T. Theory of viscoelastic behaviour of solid 4He. Phys. Rev. B 79, 100504 (2009).
Anderson, P. W. Two new vortex liquids. Nature Phys. 3, 160–162 (2007).
Boninsegni, M., Prokof’ev, N. & Svistunov, B. Superglass phase of 4He. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 105301 (2006).
Rittner, A. S. C. & Reppy, J. D. Probing the upper limit of nonclassical rotational inertia in solid helium 4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 155301 (2008).
West, J. T., Lin, X., Cheng, Z. G. & Chan, M. H. W. Supersolid behaviour in confined geometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 185302 (2009).
Aoki, Y., Keiderling, M. C. & Kojima, H. New dissipation relaxation phenomenon in oscillating solid 4He. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 215303 (2008).
Nemirovskii, S. K., Shimizu, N., Yasuta, Y. & Kubota, M. Vortex fluid relaxation model for torsional oscillation responses of solid 4He. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/0907.0330v2 (2009).
Day, J. & Beamish, J. Low-temperature shear modulus changes in solid 4He and connection to supersolidity. Nature 450, 853–856 (2007).
West, J. T., Syshchenko, O., Beamish, J. & Chan, M. H. W. Role of shear modulus and statistics in the supersolidity of helium. Nature Phys. 5, 598–601 (2009).
Anderson, P. W. Theory of flux creep in hard superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 309–311 (1962).
Cottrell, A. H. Dislocations And Plastic Flow in Crystals (Clarendon, 1965).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from the National Research Foundation of Korea through the Creative Research Initiatives. We also thank M. H. W. Chan, H. Kojima, A. C. Clark and the members of the Center for Supersolid & Quantum Matter Research for their helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.K. designed the project and experiments. H.C. carried out most of the experimental work and data analysis. H.C. and E.K. wrote the manuscript. S.K. and D.Y.K. carried out parts of experimental work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 543 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, H., Kwon, S., Kim, D. et al. Observation of hidden phases in supersolid 4He. Nature Phys 6, 424–427 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1630
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1630
This article is cited by
-
Hysteretic Response of Torsionally Oscillated Solid 4He and Its Dependence on 3He Impurity Concentration
Journal of Low Temperature Physics (2012)
-
Generalized Rotational Susceptibility Studies of Solid 4He
Journal of Low Temperature Physics (2012)
-
On the Mobile Behavior of Solid 4He at High Temperatures
Journal of Low Temperature Physics (2011)