Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

When enough is enough

Nature Nanotechnology volume 7, pages 409–411 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

In December 2011 the European Commission asked its Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) to provide a scientific opinion on nanosilver1. Specifically, this committee, which consists of independent scientists appointed by the Commission, is being asked to answer four questions under the general heading of 'Nanosilver: safety, health and environmental effects, and role in antimicrobial resistance'. However, most of these questions (and possibly all of them) have already been addressed by no less than 18 review articles in scientific journals, the oldest dating back to 20082,3,4, plus at least seven more reviews and reports commissioned and/or funded by governments and other organizations (Table 1). This raises an important question: when will governments and regulatory agencies stop asking for more reports and reviews, and start taking regulatory action?

Table 1 Many of the reviews on nanosilver that have been published since 2008 (first column) have already addressed the four questions on the environmental, health and safety (EHS) aspects of nanosilver that the SCENIHR was recently asked to review. Page numbers for the part(s) of each review that are relevant to these questions are listed in columns 2–5.
Full size table

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/scenihr_q_027.pdf

  2. Chen, X. & Schluesener, H. J. Toxicol. Lett. 176, 1–12 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Luoma, S. http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/7036/nano_pen_15_final.pdf (2008).

  4. Panyala, N. R. et al. J. Appl. Biomed. 6, 117–129 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharma, V. K. et al. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 145, 83–96 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DEFRA; http://go.nature.com/seP6xK (2009).

  7. BfR; http://go.nature.com/5e2Qnc (2009).

  8. RIVM; http://go.nature.com/bta72t (2009).

  9. Rai, M. et al. Biotechnol. Adv. 27, 76–83 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wijnhoven, S. W. P. et al. Nanotoxicol. 3, 109–138 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahamed, M. et al. Clin. Chim. Acta 411, 1841–1848 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cao, H. & Liu, X. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev. Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2, 670–684 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chaloupka, K. et al. Trends Biotechnol. 28, 580–588 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Christensen, F. M. et al. Nanotoxicol. 4, 284–295 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duran, N. et al. J. Brazilian Chem. Soc. 21, 949–959 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnston, H. J. et al. Critical Rev. Toxicol. 40, 328–346 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marambio-Jones, C. & Hoek, E. M. V. J. Nanoparticle Res. 12, 1531–1551 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Quadros, M. E. & Marr, L. C. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 60, 770–781 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. EPA; http://www.epa.gov/nanoscience/files/NanoPaper1.pdf (2010).

  20. JRC; http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/whats-new/enhres-final-report (2010).

  21. Fabrega, J. et al. Environ. Intl 37, 517–531 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gangwal, S. et al. Environ. Health Perspect. 119, 1539–1546 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Musee, N. et al. J. Environ. Monitoring 13, 1164–1183 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nowack, B. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 1177–1183 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stensberg, M. C. et al. Nanomedicine 6, 879–898 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Danish EPA; http://go.nature.com/qQsSDP (2011).

  27. http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/browse/products

  28. McHugh, G. L. et al. The Lancet 305, 235–240 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Annear, D. I. et al. J. Clin. Pathol. 29, 441–443 (1976).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Silver, S. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27, 341–353 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chopra, I. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59, 587–590 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. European Environment Agency; http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental_issue_report_2001_22 (2002).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Steffen Foss Hansen and Anders Baun are in the Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark,

    Steffen Foss Hansen & Anders Baun

Authors
  1. Steffen Foss Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anders Baun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Foss Hansen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen, S., Baun, A. When enough is enough. Nature Nanotech 7, 409–411 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.115

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.115

Further reading

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Find nanotechnology articles, nanomaterial data and patents all in one place. Visit Nano by Nature Research