Article | Published:

Inducible, pharmacogenetic approaches to the study of learning and memory

Nature Neuroscience volume 4, pages 12381243 (2001) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Here we introduce a strategy in which pharmacology is used to induce the effects of recessive mutations. For example, mice heterozygous for a null mutation of the K-ras gene (K-ras+/−) show normal hippocampal mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation, long-term potentiation (LTP) and contextual conditioning. However, a dose of a mitogen-activated/extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor, ineffective in wild-type controls, blocks MAPK activation, LTP and contextual learning in K-ras+/− mutants. These indicate that K-Ras/MEK/MAPK signaling is critical in synaptic and behavioral plasticity. A subthreshold dose of NMDA receptor antagonists triggered a contextual learning deficit in mice heterozygous for a point mutation (T286A) in the αCaMKII gene, but not in K-ras+/− mutants, demonstrating the specificity of the synergistic interaction between the MEK inhibitor and the K-ras+/− mutation. This pharmacogenetic approach combines the high temporal specificity that pharmacological manipulations offer, with the molecular specificity of genetic disruptions.

  • Subscribe to Nature Neuroscience for full access:

    $59

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Pharmacogenetics: a new diagnostic tool in the management of antidepressive drug therapy. Clin. Chim. Acta 308, 33–41 (2001).

  2. 2.

    & Pharmacogenomics: unlocking the human genome for better drug therapy. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 41, 101–121 (2001).

  3. 3.

    , & Knockouts. Targeting the mouse genome: a compendium of knockouts (Part I). Curr. Biol. 5, 625–634 (1995).

  4. 4.

    , & Targeting the mouse genome: a compendium of knockouts (Part II). Curr. Biol. 5, 758–765 (1995).

  5. 5.

    , & Gene targeting and the biology of learning and memory. Annu. Rev. Genet. 31, 527–546 (1997).

  6. 6.

    & Molecular genetic analysis of synaptic plasticity, activity-dependent neural development, learning, and memory in the mammalian brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 157–184 (1997).

  7. 7.

    et al. Temporal control of gene expression in transgenic mice by a tetracycline-responsive promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 9302–9306 (1994).

  8. 8.

    et al. Regulated overexpression of interleukin 11 in the lung. Use to dissociate development-dependent and -independent phenotypes. J. Clin. Invest. 100, 2501–2511 (1997).

  9. 9.

    , & The ERK/MAP-kinases cascade in the nervous system. Neuroreport 10, R24–34 (1999).

  10. 10.

    & Role of MAP kinase in neurons. Mol. Neurobiol. 16, 79–95 (1998).

  11. 11.

    The neuronal MAP kinase cascade: a biochemical signal integration system subserving synaptic plasticity and memory. J. Neurochem. 76, 1–10 (2001).

  12. 12.

    et al. K-ras is essential for the development of the mouse embryo. Oncogene 15, 1151–1159 (1997).

  13. 13.

    et al. K-ras is an essential gene in the mouse with partial functional overlap with N-ras. (published erratum, Genes Dev. 11, 3277, 1997) Genes Dev. 11, 2468–2481 (1997).

  14. 14.

    et al. The mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade couples PKA and PKC to cAMP response element binding protein phosphorylation in area CA1 of hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 19, 4337–4348 (1999).

  15. 15.

    , , , & The MAPK cascade is required for mammalian associative learning. Nat. Neurosci. 1, 602–609 (1998).

  16. 16.

    , , , & A necessity for MAP kinase activation in mammalian spatial learning. Learn. Mem. 6, 478–490 (1999).

  17. 17.

    & A requirement for the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in hippocampal long term potentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19103–19106 (1997).

  18. 18.

    et al. RasGRP, a Ras guanyl nucleotide- releasing protein with calcium- and diacylglycerol-binding motifs. Science 280, 1082–1086 (1998).

  19. 19.

    et al. Regulation of RasGRP via a phorbol ester-responsive C1 domain. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 6995–7008 (1998).

  20. 20.

    & Activation of p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase in hippocampal long term potentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24329–24332 (1996).

  21. 21.

    , , , & The dorsal hippocampus is essential for context discrimination but not for contextual conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 112, 863–874 (1998).

  22. 22.

    Contextual fear, gestalt memories, and the hippocampus. Behav. Brain Res. 110, 73–81 (2000).

  23. 23.

    et al. Enrichment induces structural changes and recovery from nonspatial memory deficits in CA1 NMDAR1-knockout mice. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 238–244 (2000).

  24. 24.

    , , & NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic reinforcement as a crucial process for memory consolidation. Science 290, 1170–1174 (2000).

  25. 25.

    Factors governing one-trial contextual conditioning. Anim. Learn. Behav. 18, 264–270 (1990).

  26. 26.

    & Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 106, 274–285 (1992).

  27. 27.

    , , , & Memory consolidation for contextual and auditory fear conditioning is dependent on protein synthesis, PKA, and MAP kinase. Learn. Mem. 6, 97–110 (1999).

  28. 28.

    , , , & Proteomic analysis of NMDA receptor-adhesion protein signaling complexes. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 661–669 (2000).

  29. 29.

    Signal-processing machines at the postsynaptic density. Science 290, 750–754 (2000).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is associated with the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3239–3244 (1999).

  31. 31.

    & P. in Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (eds. Martinez, J. & Kesner, R.) 89–142 (Academic, San Diego, California, 1998).

  32. 32.

    The CaM kinase II hypothesis for the storage of synaptic memory. Trends Neurosci. 17, 406–412 (1994).

  33. 33.

    , & Activation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and protein kinase C by glutamate in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 22527–22533 (1992).

  34. 34.

    , , , & Visualization of the distribution of autophosphorylated calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II after tetanic stimulation in the CA1 area of the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 17, 5416–5427 (1997).

  35. 35.

    & Neuronal Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 559–601 (1992).

  36. 36.

    , , & Autophosphorylation at Thr286 of the α calcium-calmodulin kinase II in LTP and learning. Science 279, 870–873 (1998).

  37. 37.

    & Memory extinction, learning anew, and learning the new: dissociations in the molecular machinery of learning in cortex. Science 291, 2417–2419 (2001).

  38. 38.

    et al. Regulation of long-term potentiation by H-Ras through NMDA receptor phosphorylation. J. Neurosci. 20, 2504–2511 (2000).

  39. 39.

    et al. Calcium activation of Ras mediated by neuronal exchange factor Ras-GRF. Nature 376, 524–527 (1995).

  40. 40.

    et. al. Hippocampus-dependent learning and memory is impaired in mice lacking the Ras-guanine-nucleotide releasing factor 1 (RAS-GRF1). Neuropharmacology 41, 791–800 (2001).

  41. 41.

    et al. A role for the Ras signalling pathway in synaptic transmission and long- term memory. Nature 390, 281–286 (1997).

  42. 42.

    , , & SynGAP: a synaptic RasGAP that associates with the PSD-95/SAP90 protein family. Neuron 20, 683–691 (1998).

  43. 43.

    , , & A synaptic Ras-GTPase activating protein (p135 SynGAP) inhibited by CaM kinase II. Neuron 20, 895–904 (1998).

  44. 44.

    , , , & Regulatory phosphorylation of AMPA-type glutamate receptors by CaMK-II during long-term potentiation. Science 276, 2042–2045 (1997).

  45. 45.

    & Spatial learning alters hippocampal calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II activity in rats. Brain Res. 711, 234–240 (1996).

  46. 46.

    , , , & Learning-specific, time-dependent increases in hippocampal Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II activity and AMPA GluR1 subunit immunoreactivity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 10, 2669–2676 (1998).

  47. 47.

    , , & Computer-assisted behavioral assessment of Pavlovian fear conditioning in mice. Learn. Mem. 7, 58–72 (2000).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S.A. Josselyn, N.B. Fedorov and K.P. Giese for discussions, and R. Chen and M. Lacuesta for help with genotyping. We also thank J.M. Trzaskos (DuPont Pharmaceuticals Research Laboratories) and T. Jacks (Department of Biology, MIT) for donating SL327 and K-ras+/− mutants, respectively. This work was funded by grants from the McKnight Foundation, Merck Foundation and the NIH (P01HD33098 and AG13622) to A.J.S. M.O. was partially supported by a research fellowship from the Uehara Memorial Foundation for Life Sciences.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Departments of Neurobiology, Psychiatry and Psychology, Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1761, USA

    • Masuo Ohno
    • , Paul W. Frankland
    • , Adele P. Chen
    • , Rui M. Costa
    •  & Alcino J. Silva

Authors

  1. Search for Masuo Ohno in:

  2. Search for Paul W. Frankland in:

  3. Search for Adele P. Chen in:

  4. Search for Rui M. Costa in:

  5. Search for Alcino J. Silva in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alcino J. Silva.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nn771

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.