Review Article | Published:

The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond

Nature Neuroscience volume 20, pages 15041513 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

The 'cognitive map' hypothesis proposes that brain builds a unified representation of the spatial environment to support memory and guide future action. Forty years of electrophysiological research in rodents suggest that cognitive maps are neurally instantiated by place, grid, border and head direction cells in the hippocampal formation and related structures. Here we review recent work that suggests a similar functional organization in the human brain and yields insights into how cognitive maps are used during spatial navigation. Specifically, these studies indicate that (i) the human hippocampus and entorhinal cortex support map-like spatial codes, (ii) posterior brain regions such as parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices provide critical inputs that allow cognitive maps to be anchored to fixed environmental landmarks, and (iii) hippocampal and entorhinal spatial codes are used in conjunction with frontal lobe mechanisms to plan routes during navigation. We also discuss how these three basic elements of cognitive map based navigation—spatial coding, landmark anchoring and route planning—might be applied to nonspatial domains to provide the building blocks for many core elements of human thought.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol. Rev. 55, 189–208 (1948).

  2. 2.

    & The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Res. 34, 171–175 (1971).

  3. 3.

    & The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map (Clarendon, Oxford, 1978).

  4. 4.

    & Can we reconcile the declarative memory and spatial navigation views on hippocampal function? Neuron 83, 764–770 (2014).

  5. 5.

    et al. Viewpoints on the hippocampus. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1633–1641 (2017).

  6. 6.

    & The representation of space in the brain. Behav. Processes 135, 113–131 (2017).

  7. 7.

    , , , & Path integration and the neural basis of the 'cognitive map'. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 663–678 (2006).

  8. 8.

    The head direction signal: origins and sensory-motor integration. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 181–207 (2007).

  9. 9.

    , & Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery. Psychol. Rev. 114, 340–375 (2007).

  10. 10.

    , , & Vectorial representation of spatial goals in the hippocampus of bats. Science 355, 176–180 (2017).

  11. 11.

    & Similarity in form and function of the hippocampus in rodents, monkeys, and humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 (Suppl. 2), 10365–10370 (2013).

  12. 12.

    , , & The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man. Cereb. Cortex 6, 823–829 (1996).

  13. 13.

    et al. Mental navigation along memorized routes activates the hippocampus, precuneus, and insula. Neuroreport 8, 739–744 (1997).

  14. 14.

    et al. Knowing where and getting there: a human navigation network. Science 280, 921–924 (1998).

  15. 15.

    & A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392, 598–601 (1998).

  16. 16.

    & Thoughts, behaviour, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world. Neuroimage 31, 1826–1840 (2006).

  17. 17.

    & Solving the detour problem in navigation: a model of prefrontal and hippocampal interactions. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 125 (2015).

  18. 18.

    , , & The well-worn route and the path less traveled: distinct neural bases of route following and wayfinding in humans. Neuron 37, 877–888 (2003).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Cognitive strategies dependent on the hippocampus and caudate nucleus in human navigation: variability and change with practice. J. Neurosci. 23, 5945–5952 (2003).

  20. 20.

    , & Cognitive mappers to creatures of habit: differential engagement of place and response learning mechanisms predicts human navigational behavior. J. Neurosci. 31, 15264–15268 (2011).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Human hippocampal CA1 involvement during allocentric encoding of spatial information. J. Neurosci. 29, 10512–10519 (2009).

  22. 22.

    & Acquiring “the Knowledge” of London's layout drives structural brain changes. Curr. Biol. 21, 2109–2114 (2011).

  23. 23.

    , , , & Hippocampal size predicts rapid learning of a cognitive map in humans. Hippocampus 23, 515–528 (2013).

  24. 24.

    & An association between human hippocampal volume and topographical memory in healthy young adults. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 338 (2012).

  25. 25.

    , , & Distances between real-world locations are represented in the human hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 31, 1238–1245 (2011).

  26. 26.

    et al. Decoding neuronal ensembles in the human hippocampus. Curr. Biol. 19, 546–554 (2009).

  27. 27.

    , , & An event map of memory space in the hippocampus. Elife 5, e16534 (2016).

  28. 28.

    , , , & Human hippocampus represents space and time during retrieval of real-world memories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11078–11083 (2015).

  29. 29.

    , & Evidence for grid cells in a human memory network. Nature 463, 657–661 (2010).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Grid-like processing of imagined navigation. Curr. Biol. 26, 842–847 (2016).

  31. 31.

    et al. Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation. Nature 425, 184–188 (2003).

  32. 32.

    et al. Direct recordings of grid-like neuronal activity in human spatial navigation. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1188–1190 (2013).

  33. 33.

    , , & Repeating spatial activations in human entorhinal cortex. Curr. Biol. 25, 1080–1085 (2015).

  34. 34.

    , , & A proposed architecture for the neural representation of spatial context. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 28, 201–218 (2004).

  35. 35.

    , & Understanding memory through hippocampal remapping. Trends Neurosci. 31, 469–477 (2008).

  36. 36.

    , , , & Long-term plasticity in hippocampal place-cell representation of environmental geometry. Nature 416, 90–94 (2002).

  37. 37.

    , , , & Attractor dynamics in the hippocampal representation of the local environment. Science 308, 873–876 (2005).

  38. 38.

    et al. Hippocampal attractor dynamics predict memory-based decision making. Curr. Biol. 26, 1750–1757 (2016).

  39. 39.

    & Pattern separation in the hippocampus. Trends Neurosci. 34, 515–525 (2011).

  40. 40.

    , , , & Successful retrieval of competing spatial environments in humans involves hippocampal pattern separation mechanisms. Elife 4, e10499 (2015).

  41. 41.

    , , & Overlap among spatial memories triggers repulsion of hippocampal representations. Curr. Biol. 27, 2307–2317.e5 (2017).

  42. 42.

    et al. Hippocampal representation of related and opposing memories develop within distinct, hierarchically organized neural schemas. Neuron 83, 202–215 (2014).

  43. 43.

    & Memory for places learned long ago is intact after hippocampal damage. Nature 400, 675–677 (1999).

  44. 44.

    , & Navigation around London by a taxi driver with bilateral hippocampal lesions. Brain 129, 2894–2907 (2006).

  45. 45.

    et al. Impairments in precision, rather than spatial strategy, characterize performance on the virtual Morris water maze: a case study. Neuropsychologia 80, 90–101 (2016).

  46. 46.

    & Dissociable retrosplenial and hippocampal contributions to successful formation of survey representations. J. Neurosci. 25, 3333–3340 (2005).

  47. 47.

    , , , & “I have often walked down this street before”: fMRI studies on the hippocampus and other structures during mental navigation of an old environment. Hippocampus 14, 826–835 (2004).

  48. 48.

    , & Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition. J. Neurosci. 27, 6141–6149 (2007).

  49. 49.

    et al. Long-term consolidation switches goal proximity coding from hippocampus to retrosplenial cortex. Preprint at bioRxiv (2017).

  50. 50.

    & Neural systems for landmark-based wayfinding in humans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 369, 20120533 (2013).

  51. 51.

    & Path integration in mammals. Hippocampus 14, 180–192 (2004).

  52. 52.

    The Organization of Learning (MIT Press, 1990).

  53. 53.

    , , & Differential recruitment of the hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, and the human motion complex during path integration in humans. J. Neurosci. 27, 9408–9416 (2007).

  54. 54.

    et al. Hippocampus and retrosplenial cortex combine path integration signals for successful navigation. J. Neurosci. 33, 19304–19313 (2013).

  55. 55.

    Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 13, 615–628 (1987).

  56. 56.

    & Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation. Physiol. Rev. 91, 1245–1279 (2011).

  57. 57.

    , & Origins of landmark encoding in the brain. Trends Neurosci. 34, 561–571 (2011).

  58. 58.

    & Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognit. Psychol. 43, 274–310 (2001).

  59. 59.

    , , , & Grid cell symmetry is shaped by environmental geometry. Nature 518, 232–235 (2015).

  60. 60.

    , , & Shearing-induced asymmetry in entorhinal grid cells. Nature 518, 207–212 (2015).

  61. 61.

    , & 25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20, 1033–1054 (2013).

  62. 62.

    A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition 23, 149–178 (1986).

  63. 63.

    , , & Environmental geometry aligns the hippocampal map during spatial reorientation. Curr. Biol. 27, 309–317 (2017).

  64. 64.

    , , & Geometric cues influence head direction cells only weakly in nondisoriented rats. J. Neurosci. 31, 15681–15692 (2011).

  65. 65.

    & Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning. Nature 361, 631–633 (1993).

  66. 66.

    , & A central role for the retrosplenial cortex in de novo environmental learning. Elife 4, e09031 (2015).

  67. 67.

    , & Place cells, head direction cells, and the learning of landmark stability. J. Neurosci. 15, 1648–1659 (1995).

  68. 68.

    & Environmental anchoring of head direction in a computational model of retrosplenial cortex. J. Neurosci. 36, 11601–11618 (2016).

  69. 69.

    & Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons. Nature 381, 425–428 (1996).

  70. 70.

    , , & Experience-dependent rescaling of entorhinal grids. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 682–684 (2007).

  71. 71.

    , , , & Establishing the boundaries: the hippocampal contribution to imagining scenes. J. Neurosci. 30, 11688–11695 (2010).

  72. 72.

    , & Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5915–5920 (2008).

  73. 73.

    , & Geometric determinants of human spatial memory. Cognition 94, 39–75 (2004).

  74. 74.

    , , & How do room and apparatus cues control navigation in the Morris water task? Evidence for distinct contributions to a movement vector. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 33, 100–114 (2007).

  75. 75.

    Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 388–396 (2008).

  76. 76.

    et al. Scene-selective cortical regions in human and nonhuman primates. J. Neurosci. 31, 13771–13785 (2011).

  77. 77.

    , , & Multiple object properties drive scene-selective regions. Cereb. Cortex 24, 883–897 (2014).

  78. 78.

    & Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 673–677 (2004).

  79. 79.

    , , & A network for scene processing in the macaque temporal lobe. Neuron 79, 766–781 (2013).

  80. 80.

    , & Retrosplenial cortex codes for permanent landmarks. PLoS One 7, e43620 (2012).

  81. 81.

    et al. Reference frames for spatial cognition: different brain areas are involved in viewer-, object-, and landmark-centered judgments about object location. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1517–1535 (2004).

  82. 82.

    , , , & Selective role of lingual/parahippocampal gyrus and retrosplenial complex in spatial memory across viewpoint changes relative to the environmental reference frame. Behav. Brain Res. 242, 62–75 (2013).

  83. 83.

    & Common neural representations for visually guided reorientation and spatial imagery. Cereb. Cortex 27, 1457–1471 (2017).

  84. 84.

    , , & Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1598–1606 (2014).

  85. 85.

    , , & The human retrosplenial cortex and thalamus code head direction in a global reference frame. J. Neurosci. 36, 6371–6381 (2016).

  86. 86.

    & Medial parietal cortex encodes perceived heading direction in humans. J. Neurosci. 30, 12897–12901 (2010).

  87. 87.

    & Abstract representations of location and facing direction in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 33, 6133–6142 (2013).

  88. 88.

    The network of reference frames theory: a synthesis of graphs and cognitive maps. in Spatial Cognition VI. Learning, Reasoning, and Talking about Space (eds. Freksa, C. et al.) 344–360 (Springer, 2008).

  89. 89.

    , & Schematic representations of local environmental space guide goal-directed navigation. Cognition 158, 68–80 (2017).

  90. 90.

    , , , & Head-direction cells in the rat posterior cortex. I. Anatomical distribution and behavioral modulation. Exp. Brain Res. 101, 8–23 (1994).

  91. 91.

    & Head direction, place, and movement correlates for cells in the rat retrosplenial cortex. Behav. Neurosci. 115, 3–25 (2001).

  92. 92.

    & Retrosplenial cortex maps the conjunction of internal and external spaces. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1143–1151 (2015).

  93. 93.

    , , & Navigation-associated medial parietal neurons in monkeys. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17001–17006 (2006).

  94. 94.

    et al. An independent, landmark-dominated head-direction signal in dysgranular retrosplenial cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 173–175 (2017).

  95. 95.

    Neural systems for visual scene recognition. Scene Vision (eds. Kveraga, K. & Bar, M.) 105–134 (2014).

  96. 96.

    , , & Outside looking in: landmark generalization in the human navigational system. J. Neurosci. 35, 14896–14908 (2015).

  97. 97.

    , & Scene representations in parahippocampal cortex depend on temporal context. J. Neurosci. 32, 7202–7207 (2012).

  98. 98.

    , & The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 379–390 (2013).

  99. 99.

    , & The occipital place area represents first-person perspective motion information through scenes. Cortex 83, 17–26 (2016).

  100. 100.

    , , & The occipital place area is causally involved in representing environmental boundaries during navigation. Curr. Biol. 26, 1104–1109 (2016).

  101. 101.

    & Coding of navigational affordances in the human visual system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4793–4798 (2017).

  102. 102.

    & Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy. Brain 122, 1613–1628 (1999).

  103. 103.

    The retrosplenial contribution to human navigation: a review of lesion and neuroimaging findings. Scand. J. Psychol. 42, 225–238 (2001).

  104. 104.

    , , , & Interaction of egocentric and world-centered reference frames in the rat posterior parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 34, 5431–5446 (2014).

  105. 105.

    & Linear look-ahead in conjunctive cells: an entorhinal mechanism for vector-based navigation. Front. Neural Circuits 6, 20 (2012).

  106. 106.

    , , & Using grid cells for navigation. Neuron 87, 507–520 (2015).

  107. 107.

    & A goal-directed spatial navigation model using forward trajectory planning based on grid cells. Eur. J. Neurosci. 35, 916–931 (2012).

  108. 108.

    & Hippocampal place-cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals. Nature 497, 74–79 (2013).

  109. 109.

    & Hippocampal theta sequences reflect current goals. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 289–294 (2015).

  110. 110.

    , , , & Anterior hippocampus and goal-directed spatial decision making. J. Neurosci. 31, 4613–4621 (2011).

  111. 111.

    et al. The hippocampus and entorhinal cortex encode the path and Euclidean distances to goals during navigation. Curr. Biol. 24, 1331–1340 (2014).

  112. 112.

    , , & Neural mechanisms of hierarchical planning in a virtual subway network. Neuron 90, 893–903 (2016).

  113. 113.

    & A navigational guidance system in the human brain. Hippocampus 17, 618–626 (2007).

  114. 114.

    , , , & A goal direction signal in the human entorhinal/subicular region. Curr. Biol. 25, 87–92 (2015).

  115. 115.

    et al. Hippocampal and prefrontal processing of network topology to simulate the future. Nat. Commun. 8, 14652 (2017).

  116. 116.

    , & Reconceiving the hippocampal map as a topological template. Elife 3, e03476 (2014).

  117. 117.

    & Hippocampal replay captures the unique topological structure of a novel environment. J. Neurosci. 34, 6459–6469 (2014).

  118. 118.

    et al. The neural representation of prospective choice during spatial planning and decisions. PLoS Biol. 15, e1002588 (2017).

  119. 119.

    Specific impairments of planning. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 298, 199–209 (1982).

  120. 120.

    & Neural correlates of forward planning in a spatial decision task in humans. J. Neurosci. 31, 5526–5539 (2011).

  121. 121.

    et al. A neural signature of hierarchical reinforcement learning. Neuron 71, 370–379 (2011).

  122. 122.

    et al. Memory and space: towards an understanding of the cognitive map. J. Neurosci. 35, 13904–13911 (2015).

  123. 123.

    , & The global record of memory in hippocampal neuronal activity. Nature 397, 613–616 (1999).

  124. 124.

    , , & Hippocampal “time cells” bridge the gap in memory for discontiguous events. Neuron 71, 737–749 (2011).

  125. 125.

    , & Mapping of a non-spatial dimension by the hippocampal-entorhinal circuit. Nature 543, 719–722 (2017).

  126. 126.

    , , , & Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature 435, 1102–1107 (2005).

  127. 127.

    et al. A map for social navigation in the human brain. Neuron 87, 231–243 (2015).

  128. 128.

    , & Organizing conceptual knowledge in humans with a gridlike code. Science 352, 1464–1468 (2016).

  129. 129.

    , , & Statistical learning of temporal community structure in the hippocampus. Hippocampus 26, 3–8 (2016).

  130. 130.

    , & A map of abstract relational knowledge in the human hippocampal-entorhinal cortex. Elife 6, e17086 (2017).

  131. 131.

    & Space, time, and episodic memory: the hippocampus is all over the cognitive map. Hippocampus (2017).

  132. 132.

    & Similarity breeds proximity: pattern similarity within and across contexts is related to later mnemonic judgments of temporal proximity. Neuron 81, 1179–1189 (2014).

  133. 133.

    , , , & The role of spatial boundaries in shaping long-term event representations. Cognition 154, 151–164 (2016).

  134. 134.

    , , & Place recognition and heading retrieval are mediated by dissociable cognitive systems in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6503–6508 (2015).

  135. 135.

    & Heterogeneous modulation of place cell firing by changes in context. J. Neurosci. 23, 8827–8835 (2003).

  136. 136.

    & Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 38, 347–358 (2003).

  137. 137.

    & Brain regions that represent amodal conceptual knowledge. J. Neurosci. 33, 10552–10558 (2013).

  138. 138.

    & Two cortical systems for memory-guided behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 713–726 (2012).

  139. 139.

    et al. A specific role of the human hippocampus in recall of temporal sequences. J. Neurosci. 29, 3475–3484 (2009).

  140. 140.

    , , , & Coding of event nodes and narrative context in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 36, 12412–12424 (2016).

  141. 141.

    & Neural ensembles in CA3 transiently encode paths forward of the animal at a decision point. J. Neurosci. 27, 12176–12189 (2007).

  142. 142.

    et al. Prospective representation of navigational goals in the human hippocampus. Science 352, 1323–1326 (2016).

  143. 143.

    & Deconstructing episodic memory with construction. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 299–306 (2007).

  144. 144.

    Beyond the Cognitive Map: From Place Cells to Episodic Memory (MIT Press, 1999).

  145. 145.

    How We Remember: Brain Mechanisms of Episodic Memory (MIT Press, 2011).

  146. 146.

    , & Dorsal hippocampus contributes to model-based planning. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1269–1276 (2017).

  147. 147.

    The role of the hippocampus in prediction and imagination. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 61, 27–48 (2010).

  148. 148.

    & Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 130–138 (2013).

  149. 149.

    , , , & Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nat. Methods 8, 665–670 (2011).

  150. 150.

    , , & An algorithmic method for functionally defining regions of interest in the ventral visual pathway. Neuroimage 60, 2357–2364 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Jeffery for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (EY022350 and EY027047 to R.A.E.), National Science Foundation (GRFP to J.B.J.), JSMF (to H.J.S.) and Wellcome Trust (094850/Z/10/Z to H.J.S.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

    • Russell A Epstein
    •  & Joshua B Julian
  2. Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, Department of Experimental Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

    • Eva Zita Patai
    •  & Hugo J Spiers

Authors

  1. Search for Russell A Epstein in:

  2. Search for Eva Zita Patai in:

  3. Search for Joshua B Julian in:

  4. Search for Hugo J Spiers in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Russell A Epstein or Hugo J Spiers.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4656

Further reading