Strong, tough and stiff bioinspired ceramics from brittle constituents

  • A Corrigendum to this article was published on 01 December 2017


High strength and high toughness are usually mutually exclusive in engineering materials. In ceramics, improving toughness usually relies on the introduction of a metallic or polymeric ductile phase, but this decreases the material’s strength and stiffness as well as its high-temperature stability. Although natural materials that are both strong and tough rely on a combination of mechanisms operating at different length scales, the relevant structures have been extremely difficult to replicate. Here, we report a bioinspired approach based on widespread ceramic processing techniques for the fabrication of bulk ceramics without a ductile phase and with a unique combination of high strength (470 MPa), high toughness (17.3 MPa m1/2), and high stiffness (290 GPa). Because only mineral constituents are needed, these ceramics retain their mechanical properties at high temperatures (600 °C). Our bioinspired, material-independent approach should find uses in the design and processing of materials for structural, transportation and energy-related applications.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Design strategy describing the control at multiple scales of structural self-organization, and densification strategy.
Figure 2: Comparison of microstructures.
Figure 3: Mechanical properties of nacre-like alumina and nacre.
Figure 4: Comparison of the relative materials performance.

Change history

  • 10 November 2017

    In the original version of this Article, the R-curves, which quantify how the toughness increases when the crack propagates, were measured following published guidelines (M. E. Launey, Acta Mater. 57, 2919–2932; 2009). Robert Ritchie (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) proposes that the 2013 ASTM E1820 standard (Standard Test Method for the Measurement of Fracture Toughness) is a more appropriate guideline. The authors agree, and have therefore corrected the toughness values in the Article to meet the ASTM standard. Specifically, Figs 3c,j and 4 have been amended and the original toughness values (in MPa m1/2) of 22 (abstract and page 510) and 21 (page 511) have been replaced with 17.3 and 16.4, respectively. For consistency, the following changes have been made. On page 510, the text "By taking into account the local deflection as well as the other dissipation mechanisms with a J-integral, and by using the equivalence in the stress intensity factor, we find that the maximum increase of toughness is extremely high, around 22 MPa m1/2. This corresponds to a 350% increase compared to the KIc toughness (600% increase with respect to the reference alumina)." has been changed to "According to the ASTM criterion, the maximum increase of toughness is extremely high, around 17.3 MPa m1/2. This corresponds to a 300% increase compared to the KIc toughness (500% increase with respect to the reference alumina)." On page 512, the sentence “The unique combination of specific strength ((σf/ρ) and specific toughness (Kc/ρ) of our bioinspired ceramic material actually matches that of engineering aluminium and magnesium alloys (Fig. 4b) while exhibiting higher hardness (16 GPa), stiffness and operating temperature.” has been changed to "The unique combination of specific strength ((σf/ρ) and specific toughness (Kc/ρ) of our bioinspired ceramic material actually matches that of glass-fibre-reinforced plastics (GFRP; Fig. 4b) while exhibiting high hardness (16 GPa), stiffness and operating temperature." On page 513, the following sentence has been removed: "However, toughness measurements can be considered valid until the data becomes geometry dependent due to large-scale bridging37, which here corresponds to Δa=0.8 mm. The values reported here were thus always obtained within a valid range of crack extension." In the caption of Fig. 4, "The nacre-like aluminas have specific strength/toughness properties similar to those of titanium or magnesium metallic alloys" has been changed to "The nacre-like aluminas have specific strength/toughness properties similar to those of GFRP".


  1. 1

    Ashby, M. F. Materials Selection in Mechanical Design 624 (ASTM International, (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Ritchie, R. O. The conflicts between strength and toughness. Nature Mater. 10, 817–822 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Koester, K. J., Ager, J. W. & Ritchie, R. O. The true toughness of human cortical bone measured with realistically short cracks. Nature Mater. 7, 672–677 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Peterlik, H., Roschger, P., Klaushofer, K. & Fratzl, P. From brittle to ductile fracture of bone. Nature Mater. 5, 52–55 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Barthelat, F. & Rabiei, R. Toughness amplification in natural composites. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 59, 829–840 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Barthelat, F. et al. On the mechanics of mother-of-pearl: A key feature in the material hierarchical structure. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55, 306–337 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Okumura, K. & De Gennes, P. G. Why is nacre strong? Elastic theory and fracture mechanics for biocomposites with stratified structures. Eur. Phys. J. E 4, 121–127 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Song, F., Soh, A. K. & Bai, Y. L. Structural and mechanical properties of the organic matrix layers of nacre. Biomaterials 24, 3623–3631 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Meyers, M. A., McKittrick, J. & Chen, P-Y. Structural biological materials: Critical mechanics-materials connections. Science 339, 773–779 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Bonderer, L. J., Studart, A. R. & Gauckler, L. J. Bioinspired design and assembly of platelet reinforced polymer films. Science 319, 1069–1073 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Clegg, W. J., Kendall, K., Alford, N. M., Button, T. W. & Birchall, J. D. A simple way to make tough ceramics. Nature 347, 455–457 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Munch, E. et al. Tough, bio-inspired hybrid materials. Science 322, 1516–1520 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Erb, R. M., Libanori, R., Rothfuchs, N. & Studart, A. R. Composites reinforced in three dimensions by using low magnetic fields. Science 335, 199–204 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Deville, S. et al. Metastable and unstable cellular solidification of colloidal suspensions. Nature Mater. 8, 966–972 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Hunger, P. M., Donius, A. E. & Wegst, U. G. K. Platelets self-assemble into porous nacre during freeze casting. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 19, 87–93 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Herring, C. Effect of change of scale on sintering phenomena. J. Appl. Phys. 21, 301–303 (1950).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Zaitsev, A., Litvina, A. D., Mogutnov, B. M. & Tsaplin, A. A. Thermodynamic properties and phase equilibria in the system CaO-SiO2-Al2O3 . High Temp. Mater. Sci. 34, 223–231 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Faber, K. T. & Evans, A. G. Crack deflection processes-I Theory. Acta Metall. 31, 564–576 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Kolednik, O., Predan, J., Fischer, F. D. & Fratzl, P. Bioinspired design criteria for damage-resistant materials with periodically varying microstructure. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 3634–3641 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Koester, K. J., Ager, J. W. & Ritchie, R. O. The effect of aging on crack-growth resistance and toughening mechanisms in human dentin. Biomaterials 29, 1318–1328 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Cook, J., Gordon, J. E., Evans, C. C. & Marsh, D. M. A mechanism for the control of crack propagation in all-brittle systems. Proc. R. Soc. A 282, 508–520 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Dimas, L. S. & Buehler, M. J. Tough and stiff composites with simple building blocks. J. Mater. Res. 28, 1295–1303 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Launey, M. E. et al. A novel biomimetic approach to the design of high-performance ceramic-metal composites. J. R. Soc. Inter. 7, 741–753 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Munro, R. G. Evaluated material properties for a sintered alpha-alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 28, 1919–1928 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Pavlacka, R., Bermejo, R., Chang, Y., Green, D. J. & Messing, G. L. Fracture behavior of layered alumina microstructural composites with highly textured layers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 9, 1577–1585 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Zhan, G-D., Kuntz, J. D., Wan, J. & Mukherjee, A. K. Single-wall carbon nanotubes as attractive toughening agents in alumina-based nanocomposites. Nature Mater. 2, 38–42 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Tuan, W. H., Wu, H. H. & Yang, T. J. The preparation of Al2O3/Ni composites by a powder coating technique. J. Mater. Sci. 30, 855–859 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Travitzky, N., Gutmanas, E. & Claussen, N. Mechanical properties of composites fabricated by pressureless infiltration technique. Mater. Lett. 33, 47–50 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Prielipp, H. et al. Strength and fracture toughness of aluminum/alumina composites with interpenetrating networks. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 197, 19–30 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Aghajanian, M. K., MacMillan, N. H., Kennedy, C. R., Luszcz, S. J. & Roy, R. Properties and microstructures of Lanxide Al2O3-Al ceramic composite materials. J. Mater. Sci. 24, 658–670 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Chen, R., Chiu, Y. & Tuan, W. Toughening alumina with both nickel and zirconia inclusions. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 20, 1901–1906 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Wei, T. et al. The effect of carbon nanotubes microstructures on reinforcing properties of SWNTs/alumina composite. Mater. Res. Bull. 43, 2806–2809 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Peigney, A., Laurent, C., Flahaut, E. & Rousset, a. Carbon nanotubes in novel ceramic matrix nanocomposites. Ceram. Int. 26, 677–683 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Yamamoto, G., Omori, M., Hashida, T. & Kimura, H. A novel structure for carbon nanotube reinforced alumina composites with improved mechanical properties. Nanotechnology 19, 315708 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Liu, J., Yan, H. & Jiang, K. Mechanical properties of graphene platelet-reinforced alumina ceramic composites. Ceram. Int. 39, 6215–6221 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    ASTM E1820-06, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 0301: Metals—Mechanical Testing; Elevated and Low-Temperature Tests; Metallography (ASTM International, (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Launey, M. E. et al. Designing highly toughened hybrid composites through nature-inspired hierarchical complexity. Acta Mater. 57, 2919–2932 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Nalla, R. K., Stölken, J. S., Kinney, J. H. & Ritchie, R. O. Fracture in human cortical bone: Local fracture criteria and toughening mechanisms. J. Biomech. 38, 1517–1525 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST Structural Ceramics Database (SCD) (2002);

  40. 40

    Libanori, R., Erb, R. M. & Studart, A. R. Mechanics of platelet-reinforced composites assembled using mechanical and magnetic stimuli. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 5, 10794–10805 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Becher, P. F. Microstructural design of toughened ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 255–269 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Rahaman, M. N., Yao, A., Bal, B. S., Garino, J. P. & Ries, M. D. Ceramics for prosthetic hip and knee joint replacement. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90, 1965–1988 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Wegst, U. G. K. & Ashby, M. F. The mechanical efficiency of natural materials. Phil. Mag. 84, 2167–2186 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge the financial support of the ANRT (Association Nationale Recherche Technologie) and Saint-Gobain through a CIFRE fellowship, convention #808/2010. We are indebted to the Centre Lyonnais de Microscopie (CLYM) for access to the FIB microscope. Acknowledgements are due to Guillaume Bonnefont from MATEIS for his assistance on the sintering equipment, and C. Barentin from the ILM for tipping us on the Carbopol to obtain a yield stress suspension.

Author information




S.D. and E.M. designed the research, F.B. processed the sample and performed the mechanical testing, F.B. and S.M. performed the high-temperature mechanical testing, F.B. and B.V.d.M. investigated the structure, all authors analysed and discussed the results, F.B., A.J.S. and S.D. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvain Deville.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 364 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouville, F., Maire, E., Meille, S. et al. Strong, tough and stiff bioinspired ceramics from brittle constituents. Nature Mater 13, 508–514 (2014).

Download citation

Further reading