Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Stem cell politics, ethics and medical progress

Nature Medicine volume 5, pages 1339–1341 (1999)Cite this article

Abstract

Tremendous controversy has surrounded efforts to undertake research on totipotent human stem cells. To date public policy in the United States has attempted to skirt the ethical and social questions raised by this research. Annas et al. argue that research using human embryos as a source of totipotent stem cells can secure broad public support if there is an open and public discussion about the ethical justification for undertaking such research and the assurance of adequate federal regulation and oversight.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Thomson, J.A. et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145–1147 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2. Shamblott, M.J. et al. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells from cultured human primordial germ cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13726–13731 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Annas, G.J. & Elias, S. The politics of transplantation of human fetal tissue. N. Engl. J. Med. 320, 1079–1082 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Fact Sheet: Stem Cell Research, January 19, 1999 (2 pp).

  5. Caplan, A. & Garry, D.L. Are there really alternatives to the use of fetal tissue from elective abortions in transplantation research? N. Engl. J. Med. 322, 1592–1596 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Public Law 105–277, sec. 511 (1998).

  7. Annas, G.J., Caplan, A. & Elias, S.E. The politics of human-embryo research–avoiding ethical gridlock. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996; 334: 1329–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research, Final Report. US G.P.O., September 1999.

  9. Feiler, C.L. Human embryo experimentation: regulation and relative rights. Fordham Law Rev. 66, 2435–2465 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lanza, R.P., Cibelli, J.B. & West, M.D. Human therapeutic cloning. Nature Med. 5, 975–977 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Massachusetts General Law code 112, sec. 12J.

  12. Geron Ethics Advisory Board. Research on Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Ethical Considerations 1–14 (Geron Corporation, Menlo Park, California, December 1998).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Health Law Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, 02118, Massachusetts, USA

    George J. Annas

  2. Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, 19104, Pennsylvania, USA

    Arthur Caplan

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, 60612, Illinois, USA

    Sherman Elias

Authors
  1. George J. Annas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arthur Caplan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sherman Elias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Annas, G., Caplan, A. & Elias, S. Stem cell politics, ethics and medical progress. Nat Med 5, 1339–1341 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/70900

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/70900

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing