Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Will there be noise in their ears?

Stochastic resonance may be just a few steps away from a practical application to cochlear implants for treating deafness (pages 928–932).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Benzi, R., Parisi, G., Sutera, A. & Vulpiani, A. Stochastic resonance in climatic change. Tellus 34, 10–16 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicolis, C. Long term climatic transitions and stochastic resonance. J. Statis. Phys. 70, 3–14 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiesenfeld, K. & Moss, F. Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: From the ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs. Nature 373, 33–36 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bulsara, A. & Gammaitoni, L. Tuning in to noise. Phys. Today 49, 39–45 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Douglass, J.K., Wilkens, L., Pantazelou, E. & Moss, F. Noise enhancement of the information transfer in crayfish mechanoreceptors by stochastic resonance. Nature 365, 337–340 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Levin, J.E. & Miller, J.P. Broadband neural encoding in the cricket cereal sensory system enhanced by stochastic resonance. Nature 380, 165–168 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiou-Tan, F. et al. Enhancement of subthreshold sensory nerve action potentials during muscle tension mediated noise. Inf. J. Bifurc. Chaos, (in the press).

  8. Morse, R.P. & Evans, E.F. Enhancement of vowel coding for cochlear implants by addition of noise. Nature Med. 2, 928–932 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hartmann, R., Topp, G. & Klinke, R. Discharge patterns of primary auditory fibres with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hearing Res. 13, 47–62 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiseifis, S. & Schleich, H. Response characteristics of units of gerbil auditory cortex to intracochlear electrical stimulation. In Proc. 24th Göttingen Neurobiol. Conf., Vol. II, (ed. Elsner, N. & Schnitzler, H.-U) 456 (Thieme, Stuttgart, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plotz, K. et al. AM-coded stimuli psychophysically improve channel-selectivity in cochlear-implant-patients with 22-electrode-arrays. In Proc. 24th Göttingen Neurobiol. Conf., Vol II, (ed. Elsner, N. & Schnitzler, H.-U) 209 (Thieme, Stuttgart, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moss, F., Chiou-Tan, F. & Rainer Klinke, F. Will there be noise in their ears?. Nat Med 2, 860–862 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0896-860

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0896-860

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing