Subjects

Nat. Med. 12, 1294–1300 (2006); published online 22 October 2006; corrected after print 10 May and 10 October 2007 and 18 July 2008

In the version of this article initially published, of the 122 samples assayed for sensitivity to daunorubicin for which the authors applied a predictor of adriamycin sensitivity, 27 samples were replicated owing to the fact that the same samples were included in several separate series files in the Gene Expression Omnibus generated in 2004 and 2005, which were the source of the data provided for the study. The authors have reanalyzed the prediction of adriamycin sensitivity using only the 95 unique samples and find a revised accuracy of 74%. Additionally, the authors have added two more accession numbers (GSE2351 and GSE649) to more clearly identify the sources of the samples. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0808-889

Authors

  1. Search for Anil Potti in:

  2. Search for Holly K Dressman in:

  3. Search for Andrea Bild in:

  4. Search for Richard F Riedel in:

  5. Search for Gina Chan in:

  6. Search for Robyn Sayer in:

  7. Search for Janiel Cragun in:

  8. Search for Hope Cottrill in:

  9. Search for Michael J Kelley in:

  10. Search for Rebecca Petersen in:

  11. Search for David Harpole in:

  12. Search for Jeffrey Marks in:

  13. Search for Andrew Berchuck in:

  14. Search for Geoffrey S Ginsburg in:

  15. Search for Phillip Febbo in:

  16. Search for Johnathan Lancaster in:

  17. Search for Joseph R Nevins in: