Toward better representations of sound with cochlear implants

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: The RTI team in 1986.
Figure 2: Members of the RTI team in 2001, along with a research subject and his wife.
Figure 3: The payoff: what the intervention and associated technology can do for deaf and severely hearing-impaired persons.

References

  1. 1

    Bilger, R.C. et al. Evaluation of subjects presently fitted with implanted auditory prostheses. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 86 (3, Pt. 2, Suppl. 38), 1–176 (1977).

  2. 2

    Wilson, B.S. & Dorman, M.F. Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future. Hear. Res. 242, 3–21 (2008).

  3. 3

    Wilson, B.S. & Dorman, M.F. Better Hearing with Cochlear Implants: Studies at the Research Triangle Institute (Plural, 2012).

  4. 4

    Wilson, B.S. et al. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352, 236–238 (1991).

  5. 5

    National Institutes of Health. Cochlear implants. NIH Consens. Statement 7(2), 1–9 (1988).

  6. 6

    National Institutes of Health. Cochlear implants in adults and children. NIH Consens. Statement 13(2), 1–30 (1995).

  7. 7

    Gifford, R.H., Shallop, J.K. & Peterson, A.M. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiol. Neurootol. 13, 193–205 (2008).

  8. 8

    Vale, R.D. How lucky can one be? A perspective from a young scientist at the right place at the right time. Nat. Med. 18, 1486–1488 (2012).

  9. 9

    Wilson, B.S., Dorman, M.F., Woldorff, M.G. & Tucci, D.L. Cochlear implants: matching the prosthesis to the brain and facilitating desired plastic changes in brain function. Prog. Brain Res. 194, 117–129 (2011).

  10. 10

    Wilson, B.S. & Dorman, M.F. Signal processing strategies for cochlear implants. in Cochlear Implants and Other Implantable Hearing Devices (ed. Ruckenstein, M.J.) (Plural, 2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The principal support for our work was provided by the NIH. This support included funding for the seven projects described in this essay plus additional projects also in the field of cochlear implants. Further financial and other support was provided by the RTI, Duke University, UCSF, the University of Iowa, MED-EL, Cochlear Americas, Advanced Bionics and the Storz Instrument Company. Of course, we could not have done anything without our research subjects, and we were blessed with some of the best. Indeed, we were continually amazed by their engagement in the studies, and by their generosity in spending time with us and in helping to improve the human condition. Many sponsors, research subjects, administrators, collaborating investigators and colleagues at the cochlear-implant companies made essential contributions to our shared efforts. The most important source of support for me is my wonderful family. We have had spectacularly good times together, and my wife and our two daughters have tolerated with gracious good humor my 'daydreams' and my time away in intense work or protracted travel. I am so very lucky.

Author information

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, B. Toward better representations of sound with cochlear implants. Nat Med 19, 1245–1248 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3343

Download citation

Further reading