Turning point: Mike Runge

Designing a way to save the polar bear means learning to disagree respectfully.

US Geological Survey (USGS) wildlife ecologist Mike Runge co-chairs a team that released a species-recovery plan on 6 July for the polar bear — one of the first high-profile mammals to be listed as threatened in connection with climate-change projections. He explains how he learned to balance science with policy.

Credit: Sharon R. Runge

What best prepared you to work in science policy?

I taught secondary school for five years after getting my undergraduate degree in molecular biology and philosophy. You can't teach calculus to 17-year-olds at 8 a.m. unless you think about their motivations and what will engage them. It was an extraordinarily valuable job that taught me how to listen, be fair-minded and communicate effectively with people in different settings — skills that are crucial for me today.

How did you get into the field?

In my PhD programme in wildlife science, my project was to develop quantitative models of beaver-population dynamics. I combined population models with factors that affect trapping efforts, such as pelt price and cost of gas, which New York wildlife managers could use to help to regulate beaver trapping. I use that approach to integrate quantitative scientific methods into real-world settings.

When did you begin to work on polar bears?

After I started a postdoc with the USGS, I got a call to work on predictive population models of manatees. They are protected under both the US Endangered Species Act and the US Marine Mammal Protection Act, so I learned about the legal frameworks under which science is used. In 2007, when the US Fish and Wildlife Service was petitioned to list polar bears as threatened, the USGS was tapped to study the bears' current and projected population numbers in the face of climate change. Thanks to my manatee experience, I was asked to join the polar-bear population-modelling team and, later, the recovery-plan team.

What was the biggest challenge in writing the recovery plan?

Polar bears are an icon of the Arctic. Everybody cares about them. And there are diverse groups of people — from Alaska's natives to its oil-and-gas industry to Polar Bears International, an advocacy organization — that are passionate about different aspects of the Arctic. It was a challenge to identify and bring together such a broad array of voices so that each one can be heard. But it is also an opportunity to create something enduring — a shared vision for how polar bears should be managed.

Were negotiations tense?

The hard part was getting everyone to lay their cards on the table so that we could work out a solution together. I've tried to create a template for facing contentious issues and trade-offs straight on and with respect. At first, I thought that the politicians at the top would be the worst when it came to cooperation. But I've found that many lawmakers — those who work on the big, highly visible issues every day — know how to disagree respectfully and seek solutions through compromise.

What advice would you give to scientists who work in politically sensitive areas?

To be fair-minded. I've had the privilege to meet with different groups and to learn how aspects of wildlife management affect their lives. Lots of these situations are political and tense and require a non-judgemental understanding of multifaceted interests in the natural world.

Are you writing the rules for how climate-change-related recovery plans should proceed?

We didn't set out to create the template. The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration fisheries service released a recovery plan for coral species early this year, which was the first to address species-level impacts and mitigation strategies in the face of climate change. We want to do the best that we can for polar bears. I think that a number of other recovery teams will have to go through a similar process.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.


Additional information

Interview by Virginia Gewin

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Outreach: Speak up for science

Stand up for science

Policy: The art of science advice to government

Nature outlook: Assessing science

Nature special: Impact — the search for the science that matters

Related external links

Michael Runge

Polar Bear Conservation Management Plan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gewin, V. Turning point: Mike Runge. Nature 523, 493 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7561-493a

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing