“Every day, do something that scares you,” urges a song I heard once. Last month, I filled my quota for a long time. As part of my mentoring programme, I went for a mock job interview at a government agency. Questions ranged from the traditional strengths-and-weaknesses to testing my knowledge on politics.

In my answers, I tried to remember what people have told me about selling the PhD as a proof of your abilities rather than a scientific piece of work. Don't call yourself a researcher or scientist — rather say that you have experience in planning and realizing large projects. Don't say you're good at lab work — describe yourself as meticulous and patient. Beware of sounding arrogant. Sadly, one of the prevailing prejudices against PhDs is that they are stuck-up specialists. Show them you can think broadly and be a team player.

The interview was stressful but ultimately rewarding. Although my guess on a budget question was €35 million (US$43 million) off, the interviewers said they liked my ability to think analytically and see the big picture, both products of my graduate education. It was a real boost to see I may be employable.

And the little budget mistake? Well, knowing how to find the facts is more important than actually knowing them by heart. At least, that's what I tell myself. If anybody else shares my opinion that €35 million don't matter, just send the money to me.