Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Aseismic zone and earthquake segmentation associated with a deep subducted seamount in Sumatra

Abstract

The subduction of large topographic features such as seamounts has been linked to plate locking1,2,3,4,5,6,7, earthquake generation8 and segmentation6, as well as crustal erosion9,10,11 at subduction zones. However, the role of subducted features in the generation of megathrust earthquakes has been difficult to discern because traditional imaging techniques are limited to the upper 12 km of the Earth’s crust12, whereas these ruptures initiate at depths of 20–40 km (ref. 13). Here we use a deeply penetrating imaging technique with a low-energy source to identify a seamount 3–4 km high and 40 km wide that has been subducted to a depth of 30–40 km below the Sumatra forearc mantle. We find that the seamount has remained intact despite more than 160 km of subduction, and that there is no seismic activity either above or below the seamount. We therefore conclude that the coupling between the seamount and overriding plate is weak and aseismic14. We suggest that the subduction of a topographic feature such as a seamount could lead to the segmentation of the subduction zone, which could in turn reduce the maximum size of megathrust earthquakes in these localities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Study area and Sumatra aseismic gap.
Figure 2: Seismic Profile CGGV040.
Figure 3: Seamount Image and bathymetry profile.
Figure 4: Subducted seamount.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cloos, M. Thrust type subduction zone earthquakes and seamount asperities: A physical model for earthquake rupture. Geology 20, 601–604 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scholz, C. H. & Small, C. The effect of seamount subduction on seismic coupling. Geology 25, 487–490 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kodaira, S., Takahashi, N., Nakanishi, A., Miura, S. & Kaneda, Y. Subducted seamount imaged in the rupture zone of the 1946 Nankaido earthquake. Science 289, 104–106 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bilek, S. L., Schwartz, S. Y. & DeShon, H. R. Control of seafloor roughness on earthquake rupture behaviour. Geology 31, 455–458 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson, D. P., Das, S. & Watts, A. B. Earthquake rupture stalled by subducting fracture zone. Science 312, 1203–1205 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cummins, P. R., Baba, T., Kodaira, S. & Kaneda, Y. The 1946 Nankai earthquake and segmentation of the Nankai Trough. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 132, 75–87 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mochizuki, K., Yamada, T., Shinohara, M., Yamanaka, Y. & Kanazawa, T. Weak interplate coupling by seamounts and repeating M7 earthquakes. Science 321, 1194–1197 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abercrombie, R. E., Antolik, M. & Ekström, G. The June 2000 Mw 7.9 earthquake south of Sumatra: Deformation in the India–Australia Plate. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2018 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ranero, C.R. & van Huene, R. Subduction erosion along the Middle America convergent margin. Nature 404, 748–752 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bangs, N. L. B., Gulick, S. P. S. & Shipley, T. H. Seamount subduction erosion in the Nankai Trough and its potential impact on the seismogenic zone. Geology 34, 701–704 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. von Huene, R., Ranero, C. R. & Vannucchi, P. Generic model of subduction erosion. Geology 32, 913–916 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. von Huene, R. When seamounts subduct. Science 321, 1165–1166 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Das, S. & Scholz, C. H. Why large earthquakes do not nucleate at shallow depth. Nature 305, 621–623 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chlieh, M., Avouac, J-P., Sieh, K., Natawidjaja, D. H. & Galetzka, J. Investigation of interseismic strain accumulation along the Sunda megathrust, offshore Sumatra. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B05305 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Konca, A. O. et al. Partial rupture of a locked patch of the Sumatra megathrust during the 2007 earthquake sequence. Nature 456, 631–635 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fitch, T. J. Plate convergence, transcurrent faults, and internal deformation adjacent to Southeast Asia and the western Pacific. J. Geophys. Res. 77, 4432–4462 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Prawirodirdjo, L., McCaffrey, R., Chadwell, C. D., Bock, Y. & Subarya, C. Geodetic observation of an earthquake cycle at the Sumatra subduction zone: Role of interseismic strain segmentation. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B03414 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kopp, H., Flueh, E., Klaeschen, D., Bialas, J. & Reichert, C. Crustal structure of the central Sunda margin at the onset of oblique subduction. Geophys. J. Int. 147, 449–474 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh, S. C. et al. Evidence of active backthrusting at the NE Margin of Mentawai Islands, SW Sumatra. Geophys. J. Int. 180, 703–714 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chauhan, A. et al. Seismic imaging of forearc backthrusts at northern Sumatra subduction zone. Geophys. J. Int. 179, 1772–1780 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh, S. C. et al. Seismic evidence for broken oceanic crust in the 2004 Sumatra earthquake epicentral region. Nature Geosci. 1, 777–781 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dessa, J-X. et al. Megathrust earthquakes can nucleate in the forearc mantle: Evidence from the 2004 Sumatra event. Geology 37, 659–662 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Simoes, M., Avouac, J. P., Cattin, R. & Henry, P. Sumatra subduction zone: A case for a locked fault zone extending into the mantle. J. Geophys. Res. 109, B10402 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schöffel, H-J. & Das, S. Fine details of the Wadati–Benioff zone under Indonesia and its geodynamic implications. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 13101–13114 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dominguez, S., Malavieille, J. & Lallemand, S. E. Deformation of accretionary wedges in response to seamount subduction: Insights from sandbox experiments. Tectonics 19, 182–196 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sclater, J. G. & Christie, P. A. F. Continental stretching: An explanation of the post—mid-Cretaceous subsidence of the Central North Sea basin. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 3711–3739 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Diament, M. et al. Mentawai fault zone off Sumatra—a new key to the geodynamics of western Indonesia. Geology 20, 259–262 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cande, S. C. & Kent, D. V. Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity time scale for the late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 6093–6095 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dewey, J. W. Seismic Studies with the Method of Joint Hypocenter Determination, PhD Thesis, Univ. of California, Berkeley (1971).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Chairman and CEO of CGGVeritas for supporting and funding the project. The Oxford group was partially supported by the UK Natural Environment Research Council grant NE/D004381/1. Institut de Physique du Globe contribution number 3131.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.C.S. led the project and wrote the paper. N.H. participated in the experiment and in writing the paper. M.M. and S.D. participated in writing the paper. D.P.R. relocated the earthquakes and participated in writing the paper. A.C., H.C., B.G. and Y.D. participated in the experiment. S.M. helped in designing the experiment. H.H. was instrumental in obtaining permits to acquire the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satish C. Singh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 1943 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, S., Hananto, N., Mukti, M. et al. Aseismic zone and earthquake segmentation associated with a deep subducted seamount in Sumatra. Nature Geosci 4, 308–311 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1119

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing