Abstract
Flower development begins as floral meristems arise in succession on the flank of the inflorescence meristem. Floral meristem identity genes LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1) promote establishment and maintenance of floral identity in newly formed floral primordia1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Without their activity, the floral primordia develop with inflorescence characteristics. The underlying molecular-genetic mechanism is unknown. Here we show that these phenotypes are due in large part to the ectopic expression of AGAMOUS-LIKE 24 (AGL24), a central regulator of floral meristem identity. We present evidence that AGL24 is an early target of transcriptional repression by LFY and AP1. Without such repression, continued AGL24 expression in floral meristems is sufficient to cause floral reversion regardless of the activation of floral organ identity genes. This indicates that LFY and AP1 promote floral development not only by positively regulating genes activated in flower development, but also by repressing AGL24, a promoter of inflorescence fate.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The transition from vegetative to reproductive growth is a marked developmental change in the life of plants, whereby newly formed meristems acquire floral rather than inflorescence identity. Inflorescence meristems are indeterminate, with the production of secondary inflorescences subtended by cauline leaves, or flowers, in a spiral pattern, with internode elongation. The floral meristems that originate from inflorescence meristems are determinate, making the four types of floral organs in whorls. The fate of these meristems depends on an antagonistic interaction between the shoot identity gene TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) and a group of floral meristem identity genes, such as LFY and AP1 (refs. 6,7,9). Previous studies have shown that TFL1 acts predominantly to oppose establishment of floral meristem identity but does not antagonize the maintenance of floral meristems6,7,10,11,12. The simple establishment of floral meristem identity is insufficient to guarantee floral identity, as indicated by the observation that a floral meristem can revert to a flower-generating inflorescence meristem, a phenomenon called floral reversion5,13,14,15. Floral reversion occurs for the most part in mutant genetic backgrounds, such as ap1, lfy and agamous, suggesting that wild-type plants have default processes to suppress this reversion, and that active maintenance of floral meristem identity is required after its establishment. It has been proposed that the primary effect of LFY in maintaining floral meristem identity may be transcriptional repression9, but the potential targets are unknown.
The first indication that AGL24, a member of the MADS-box family of DNA-binding transcription factors, is involved in floral meristem identity came from the phenotype of constitutive expression of AGL24. Such expression changes flowering time16,17 and causes floral reversion. 35S:AGL24 transgenic lines have a uniform, dominant and heritable alteration in flower development. The most notable aspect of this alteration is the partial reversion of floral meristems into inflorescence shoots, which was reminiscent of the effect of strong ap1 mutated alleles (Fig. 1a). In a homozygous 35S:AGL24 line, the floral meristem that would develop into a single flower in a wild-type plant often generated a central primary flower with extra secondary flowers in the axils of sepals (Fig. 1b). At later stages, the base of the ovary in a 35S:AGL24 flower elongated as an inflorescence stem would, and an ectopic inflorescence bearing flowers erupted from the developing ovary (Fig. 1d,e). Furthermore, most of the floral organs in 35S:AGL24 flowers underwent homeotic transformations toward structures normally found in inflorescence shoots (Fig. 1f–l). These phenotypes were attenuated in 35S:AGL24 hemizygotes (Fig. 1c). The observed homeotic phenotypes of 35S:AGL24 plants were not due to the cosuppression of other MADS-box family members, because both expression levels and patterns of floral organ identity genes were almost identical in 35S:AGL24 and agl24 plants (Supplementary Fig. 1 online).
The phenotype of 35S:AGL24 plants suggests that AGL24 promotes inflorescence identity. To test whether the increased inflorescence character of the lfy and ap1 mutants resulted from ectopic expression of AGL24, we crossed the loss-of-function mutation agl24 into the lines with reduced LFY and AP1 activity. The inflorescence phenotype of ap1-1 mutants was the appearance of ectopic flowers or inflorescences in the axils of the leaf-like first whorl floral organs, creating a supernumerary inflorescence apex (Fig. 2a,c). Floral meristems in ap1-1 showed some of the same characteristics as inflorescence meristems (Fig. 2e), to a degree that varied with their position on the main inflorescence stem (Supplementary Table 1 online). Supernumerary inflorescences were markedly suppressed in ap1-1 agl24 double mutants relative to ap1-1 single mutants (Fig. 2b,d). Most of the floral meristems in the double mutant developed as single flowers (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Table 1 online). In general, the average number of flowers produced in each pedicel or peduncle of ap1-1 agl24 mutants was comparable to that produced in wild-type plants. Some floral organ defects of ap1-1 mutants, especially the absence of petals, were also partly rescued by agl24 (Fig. 2f–h).
Loss of AGL24 function also reduced the inflorescence characteristics of lfy-6 mutants4 in three ways. First, flowers in a lfy-6 single mutant were typically subtended by bracts (Fig. 3a,c,e), as secondary inflorescence meristems in wild-type plants are. In lfy-6 agl24 double mutants, most flowers developed as in the wild type, without bracts (Fig. 3b,d,f). Second, floral organs were arranged in a spiral pattern in lfy-6 single mutants (Fig. 3e), as leaves around inflorescence meristems in wild-type plants are. But lfy-6 agl24 double mutants had floral organs largely organized in a whorled pattern (Fig. 3f). Finally, lfy-6 single mutants could have ectopic secondary flowers, but these were not seen in lfy-6 agl24 double mutants. Overall, the inflorescence architecture of a lfy-6 agl24 double mutant more closely resembled that of a wild-type plant than that of a lfy-6 mutant (Fig. 3g). The floral organ defects in lfy-6 mutants were not rescued in the lfy-6 agl24 double mutant, which indicates that LFY and AP1 function through distinct mechanisms in the regulation of floral organ identity. lfy-6 ap1-1 double mutants showed enhanced inflorescence phenotypes as compared with single mutants4, and these were rescued in an agl24 background, as in the single mutants (data not shown). These genetic data indicate that AGL24 contributes much of the inflorescence character of lfy and ap1 mutants, supporting the possibility that LFY and AP1 act to repress AGL24 in wild-type plants.
To test directly the potential repression of AGL24 by the floral meristem identity genes, we carried out in situ hybridization with the AGL24 probe to lfy-6 and ap1-1 inflorescences. In wild-type plants during their vegetative phase, AGL24 is expressed in the entire shoot apical meristem and in emerging leaf primordia16. During floral transition, AGL24 RNA was detectable in the transitional shoot apex and in young cauline leaves (Fig. 4d). AGL24 expression in early floral meristems differed from that in inflorescence meristems. In floral meristems from stages 1 to 4, AGL24 was expressed only in the tunica, the superficial layers of the meristems (Fig. 4a). The absence of AGL24 RNA in the corpus of floral primordia coincided with the developmental stages at which LFY and AP1 are expressed in the floral primordia4,18. Thus, in the corpus but not in the tunica, the activity of LFY and AP1 may repress AGL24. At later stages of floral development, AGL24 RNA was weakly expressed in the distal parts of stamens and carpels (Fig. 4b). Its expression was restricted to pollen and the adaxial surface of the gynoecium after floral stage 9 (Fig. 4c).
In ap1-1 mutants, AGL24 was ectopically expressed in the corpus of the young floral primordia (Fig. 4e), and its strong expression was persistent in all of the floral organs at later stages of flower development (Fig. 4f,g). We observed similar ectopic expression of AGL24 in the supernumerary meristems of ap1-1 cal-1 mutants (Fig. 4h), indicating that ectopic expression of AGL24 was responsible for the enhanced inflorescence traits in ap1-1 cal-1 mutants. In lfy-6 mutants, ectopic expression of AGL24 was also apparent throughout the young floral meristems (Fig. 4i), which coincided with the reduced expression of AP1 RNA in the same region (Fig. 4m,n). The later expression of AP1 in lfy-6 mutants is comparable to that in the wild type (Fig. 4o,p). The ectopic expression of AGL24 in emerging floral primordia and the corresponding cauline leaves in an lfy-6 mutant (Fig. 4l) seemed stronger than its expression in the transitional inflorescence meristem of a wild-type plant (Fig. 4d). This indicates that floral primordia in lfy-6 mutants initiated with some degree of inflorescence character. AGL24 RNA in lfy-6 mutants was also distributed in floral organ primordia (Fig. 4j), predominantly in the irregularly fused carpels at later stages (Fig. 4k). It is therefore possible to conclude that the increase of inflorescence traits in flowers of ap1-1 and lfy-6 mutants, which mimics the phenotypes of gain of function of AGL24, resulted from ectopic expression of AGL24.
To further confirm that LFY and AP1 act as transcriptional repressors of AGL24, we used steroid-inducible versions of AP1 and LFY in transgenic plants19. Before using the AP1-GR construct, we tested its biological activity. The development of 35S:AP1-GR transformants was indistinguishable from that of wild-type plants in the absence of applied steroid. After treatment with dexamethasone, both the primary and secondary inflorescences of 35S:AP1-GR plants terminated as floral meristems and formed terminal flowers, which is characteristic of AP1 gain-of-function plants20. Activation of 35S:AP1-GR in an ap1-1 genetic background resulted in partial or full rescue of ap1-1 mutant phenotypes (Fig. 5a–d), suggesting that the AP1-GR fusion was biologically functional in a hormone-dependent manner.
Treatment with dexamethasone of inflorescence apices of ap1-1 35S:AP1-GR plants for 4 h or longer resulted in a reduction of AGL24 RNA level relative to mock-treated controls (Fig. 5e). A combined treatment of dexamethasone and cycloheximide, an inhibitor of translation, at the 4-h time point resulted in a similar reduction of AGL24 RNA as observed with dexamethasone treatment alone (Fig. 5f), indicating that AGL24 may be an immediate target of transcriptional repression by AP1. We also investigated AGL24 expression in the established 35S:LFY-GR system19. AGL24 RNA level was decreased after treatment of lfy-6 35S:LFY-GR plants with dexamethasone for 4 h or more (Fig. 5e), suggesting that LFY also acts as a repressor of AGL24. But we did not observe similar repression after a combined treatment with dexamethasone and cycloheximide (Fig. 5f), indicating that this repression may be modulated by other mediators that require translation after LFY activation, which may include AP1.
Taken together, the results presented here suggest that AGL24 is among the central regulators of floral meristem development, acting to promote inflorescence identity, and is repressed by the floral meristem identity genes LFY and AP1. This negative interaction identifies two antagonistic genetic pathways in flower development (Fig. 6), in which LFY and AP1 not only activate the ABC floral organ identity genes to promote flower development21,22,23, but also repress AGL24 to secure the maintenance of floral rather than inflorescence meristem identity.
Methods
Plant materials.
All mutations used in this study are in the Landsberg erecta (Ler) background except when stated otherwise. We grew them at 22 °C in continuous light. We obtained the Ler near-isogenic agl24 line by three backcrosses of the agl24 Columbia line into Ler16. We identified the lfy-6 agl24 and ap1-1 agl24 double mutants by screening for mutant phenotypes and confirmed their identification by PCR genotyping of all three genes. We genotyped agl24, lfy-6, and ap1-1 as reported previously8,17,24. We screened 35S:AP1-GR plants by Basta selection and further tested them for phenotypic effects after dexamethasone treatment. We selected one transgenic line, which contains only one transgene insertion and shows the phenotype closely resembling 35S:AP1 transformants20 after hormone induction, to cross with ap1-1 to generate ap1-1 35S:AP1-GR plants. The selection of 35S:AGL24 plants has been described elsewhere16.
Plasmid constructs.
The construction of 35S:AGL24 is described previously16. For 35S:AP1-GR, we constructed a derivative pGreen-35S vector by cloning a 35S promoter cassette from p35S-2 into the EcoRV and StuI sites of pGREEN0229 (ref. 25). We amplified the hormone-binding domain of the rat glucocorticoid receptor (GR) by PCR from pBI-ΔGR26. We removed an internal EcoRI site in this GR fragment by silent mutagenesis and cloned the resulting fragment into pBSII-SK (Stratagene). We released the GR fragment from pBSII-SK at the SacI and EcoRI sites and cloned it into pGREEN0229-35S to generate pGREEN0229-35S:GR. We amplified the AP1 coding region18 by PCR and cloned it into the vector pZERO blunt II TOPO (Invitrogen). We then cut out the AP1 fragment with XbaI and BamHI and inserted it into pGREEN0229-35S:GR to yield pGREEN0229-35S:AP1-GR. We sequenced the construct to detect potential PCR-introduced mutations.
Expression analyses.
Dexamethasone treatment and sample collection were previously described19. We extracted total RNA by RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) and reverse-transcribed it using the ThermoScript RT-PCR system (Invitrogen). We carried out RT-PCR and then detected expression by Southern-blot analysis as described previously16. We synthesized antisense RNA probes for in situ hybridization from plasmids pHY301(AGL24)16, pDW124(LFY)4, pAM128(AP1)18, pD793(AP3)27 and pCIT565(AG)28. We carried out nonradioactive in situ hybridization according to a published protocol29.
Scanning electron microscopy.
We prepared samples as described30.
Note: Supplementary Information is available on the Nature Genetics website.
References
Irish, V.F. & Sussex, I.M. Function of the apetala-1 gene during Arabidopsis floral development. Plant Cell 2, 741–753 (1990).
Schultz, E.A. & Haughn, G.W. LEAFY, a homeotic gene that regulates inflorescence development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 3, 771–781 (1991).
Huala, E. & Sussex, I.M. LEAFY Interacts with Floral Homeotic Genes to Regulate Arabidopsis Floral Development. Plant Cell 4, 901–913 (1992).
Weigel, D., Alvarez, J., Smyth, D.R., Yanofsky, M.F. & Meyerowitz, E.M. LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Cell 69, 843–859 (1992).
Bowman, J.L., Alvarez, J., Weigel, D., Meyerowitz, E.M. & Smyth, D.R. Control of flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana by APETALA1 and interacting genes. Development 119, 721–743 (1993).
Shannon, S. & Meeks-Wagner, D.R. Genetic interactions that regulate inflorescence development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 5, 639–655 (1993).
Ratcliffe, O.J., Bradley, D.J. & Coen, E.S. Separation of shoot and floral identity in Arabidopsis. Development 126, 1109–1120 (1999).
Ferrandiz, C., Gu, Q., Martienssen, R. & Yanofsky, M.F. Redundant regulation of meristem identity and plant architecture by FRUITFULL, APETALA1 and CAULIFLOWER. Development 127, 725–734 (2000).
Parcy, F., Bomblies, K. & Weigel, D. Interaction of LEAFY, AGAMOUS and TERMINAL FLOWER1 in maintaining floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Development 129, 2519–2527 (2002).
Shannon, S. & Meeks-Wagner, D.R. A mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 gene affects inflorescence meristem development. Plant Cell 3, 877–892 (1991).
Bradley, D., Ratcliffe, O., Vincent, C., Carpenter, R. & Coen, E. Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science 275, 80–83 (1997).
Ratcliffe, O.J. et al. A common mechanism controls the life cycle and architecture of plants. Development 125, 1609–1615 (1998).
Clark, S.E., Running, M.P. & Meyerowitz, E.M. CLAVATA1, a regulator of meristem and flower development in Arabidopsis. Development 119, 397–418 (1993).
Okamuro, J.K., den Boer, B.G. & Jofuku, K.D. Regulation of Arabidopsis flower development. Plant Cell 5, 1183–1193 (1993).
Mizukami, Y. & Ma, H. Determination of Arabidopsis floral meristem identity by AGAMOUS. Plant Cell 9, 393–408 (1997).
Yu, H., Xu, Y., Tan, E.L. & Kumar, P.P. AGAMOUS-LIKE 24, a dosage-dependent mediator of the flowering signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16336–16341 (2002).
Michaels, S.D. et al. AGL24 acts as a promoter of flowering in Arabidopsis and is positively regulated by vernalization. Plant J. 33, 867–874 (2003).
Mandel, M.A., Gustafson-Brown, C., Savidge, B. & Yanofsky, M.F. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature 360, 273–277 (1992).
Wagner, D., Sablowski, R.W. & Meyerowitz, E.M. Transcriptional activation of APETALA1 by LEAFY. Science 285, 582–584 (1999).
Mandel, M.A. & Yanofsky, M.F. A gene triggering flower formation in Arabidopsis. Nature 377, 522–524 (1995).
Parcy, F., Nilsson, O., Busch, M.A., Lee, I. & Weigel, D. A genetic framework for floral patterning. Nature 395, 561–566 (1998).
Ng, M. & Yanofsky, M.F. Activation of the Arabidopsis B class homeotic genes by APETALA1. Plant Cell 13, 739–753 (2001).
Weigel, D. & Meyerowitz, E.M. The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell 78, 203–209 (1994).
Blazquez, M.A., Soowal, L.N., Lee, I. & Weigel, D. LEAFY expression and flower initiation in Arabidopsis. Development 124, 3835–3844 (1997).
Hellens, R., Edwards, E., Leyland, N., Bean, S. & Mullineaux, P. pGreen: a versatile and flexible binary Ti vector for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 819–832 (2000).
Lloyd, A.M., Schena, M., Walbot, V. & Davis, R.W. Epidermal cell fate determination in Arabidopsis: patterns defined by a steroid-inducible regulator. Science 266, 436–439 (1994).
Jack, T., Brockman, L.L. & Meyerowitz, E.M. The homeotic gene APETALA3 of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a MADS box and is expressed in petals and stamens. Cell 68, 683–697 (1992).
Drews, G.N., Bowman, J.L. & Meyerowitz, E.M. Negative regulation of the Arabidopsis homeotic gene AGAMOUS by the APETALA2 product. Cell 65, 991–1002 (1991).
Long, J.A. & Barton, M.K. The development of apical embryonic pattern in Arabidopsis. Development 125, 3027–3035 (1998).
Bowman, J.L., Smyth, D.R. & Meyerowitz, E.M. Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development 112, 1–20 (1991).
Acknowledgements
We thank P.P. Kumar and members of the laboratory of E.M.M. for comments. This work was supported by a grant from the US National Institutes of Health (to E.M.M.). H.Y. was supported by an overseas postdoctoral fellowship from National University of Singapore and a grant from the US National Institutes of Health (to E.M.M.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, H., Ito, T., Wellmer, F. et al. Repression of AGAMOUS-LIKE 24 is a crucial step in promoting flower development. Nat Genet 36, 157–161 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1286
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1286
This article is cited by
-
IiSVP of Isatis indigotica can reduce the size and repress the development of floral organs
Plant Cell Reports (2023)
-
Evolutionary origin and functional specialization of Dormancy-Associated MADS box (DAM) proteins in perennial crops
BMC Plant Biology (2022)
-
The oilseed rape developmental expression resource: a resource for the investigation of gene expression dynamics during the floral transition in oilseed rape
BMC Plant Biology (2020)
-
Comparative transcriptome analysis of gynoecious and monoecious inflorescences reveals regulators involved in male flower development in the woody perennial plant Jatropha curcas
Plant Reproduction (2020)
-
Isolation, functional characterization and evolutionary study of LFY1 gene in Prunus mume
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) (2019)