Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Consistent in-frame internal tandem duplications of BCOR characterize clear cell sarcoma of the kidney

Abstract

Clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK) is one of the major pediatric renal neoplasms, but its associated genetic abnormalities are largely unknown. We identified internal tandem duplications in the BCOR gene (BCL6 corepressor) affecting the C terminus in 100% (20/20) of CCSK tumors but in none (0/193) of the other pediatric renal tumors. CCSK tumors expressed only an aberrant BCOR allele, indicating a close correlation between BCOR aberration and CCSK tumorigenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: BCOR aberration in CCSK.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Argani, P. et al. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 24, 4–18 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oue, T. et al. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 25, 923–929 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Furtwängler, R. et al. Eur. J. Cancer 49, 3497–3506 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Seibel, N.L. et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 468–473 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tournade, M.F. et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 19, 488–500 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Perlman, E.J. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 8, 320–338 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. O'Meara, E. et al. J. Pathol. 227, 72–80 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ueno, H. et al. PLoS ONE 8, e62233 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Viré, E. et al. Nature 439, 871–874 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fuks, F., Hurd, P.J., Deplus, R. & Kouzarides, T. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 2305–2312 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gadd, S., Sredni, S.T., Huang, C.C. & Perlman, E.J. Lab. Invest. 90, 724–738 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Junco, S.E. et al. Structure 21, 665–671 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gearhart, M.D., Corcoran, C.M., Wamstad, J.A. & Bardwell, V.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 6880–6889 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Blackledge, N.P. et al. Cell 157, 1445–1459 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pugh, T.J. et al. Nature 488, 106–110 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, J. et al. Nature 481, 329–334 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shern, J.F. et al. Cancer Discov. 4, 216–231 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grossmann, V. et al. Blood 118, 6153–6163 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pierron, G. et al. Nat. Genet. 44, 461–466 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rothermel, B. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8719–8725 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Grant from the National Center for Child Health and Development (24-4, 26-20), grants from the Program for Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health Sciences of the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO; 10-41, 10-42, 10-43, 10-44, 10-45), and a research program of the Project for Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics (11035153) and Tailor-Made Medical Treatment Program (BioBankJapan), Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.U.-Y. and H.O. designed the study. H.U.-Y., H.O., K.N. and S.A. performed the experiments. H.O. and J.H. conducted a pathological review. T.K. and M.F. provided patient materials. H.U.-Y., H.O. and N.K. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hajime Okita.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Histopathological features of CCSK.

Hematoxylin-eosin staining shows typical histopathological features of CCSK. Scale bar, 100 µm.

Supplementary Figure 2 Genomic sequence alignment of wild-type and aberrant BCOR.

Genomic sequences corresponding to 5,068–5,268 nt of BCOR (CCDS48093.1) are aligned.

Supplementary Figure 3 BCOR expression in pediatric renal tumors and kidney.

(a) Quantitative RT-PCR of BCOR. The beeswarm and box plots present relative values of BCOR expression normalized with ACTB. (b) Two P values were calculated by pairwise comparisons using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with the methods of Bonferroni and FDR.

Supplementary Figure 4 Western blot detection of BCOR protein expression in kidney, CCSK and other pediatric renal tumors.

Top, BCOR (arrowhead, full length). Bottom, lamin A/C (large fragment, lamin A; small fragment, lamin C). M, pre-stained protein marker (Broad Range, Nacalai Tesque); 1, HEK293; 2, Kidney6; 3, Kidney7; 4, CCSK8; 5, CCSK13; 6, RTK4; 7, RTK7; 8, CMN5; 9, CMN6; 10, Wilms43; 11, Wilms53.

Supplementary Figure 5 Immunohistochemical staining of BCOR in CCSK and non-CCSK tissues.

Scale bar, 100 µm.

Supplementary Figure 6 Immunoblotting and soft agar colony formation assay of HEK293 cells expressing exogenous BCORs.

(a) Detection of endogenous and exogenous BCOR proteins in HEK293 cells. Top, BCOR (arrowhead, full length). Bottom, lamin A/C (large fragment, lamin A; small fragment, lamin C). Lane 1, empty vector; lane 2, wild-type BCOR; lane 3, mutant 1 BCOR; lane 4, mutant 2 BCOR. (b) Soft agar colony formation assay with HEK293 cells expressing exogenous BCOR proteins. Error bars, s.e.m. *P < 0.05 (Welch’s t test, two-sided). (c) Images are the magnified center part (1.5 mm2) of wells.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–6 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. (PDF 915 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ueno-Yokohata, H., Okita, H., Nakasato, K. et al. Consistent in-frame internal tandem duplications of BCOR characterize clear cell sarcoma of the kidney. Nat Genet 47, 861–863 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3338

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3338

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer