Abstract
X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) ensures the equality of X-chromosome dosages in male and female mammals by silencing one X in the female1. To achieve the mutually exclusive designation of active X (Xa) and inactive X (Xi), the process necessitates that two Xs communicate in trans through homologous pairing2,3. Pairing depends on a 15-kb region within the genes Tsix and Xite2. Here, we dissect molecular requirements and find that pairing can be recapitulated by 1- to 2-kb subfragments of Tsix or Xite with little sequence similarity. However, a common denominator among them is the presence of the protein Ctcf, a chromatin insulator4,5,6,7 that we find to be essential for pairing. By contrast, the Ctcf-interacting partner, Yy1 (ref. 8), is not required. Pairing also depends on transcription. Transcriptional inhibition prevents new pair formation but does not perturb existing pairs. The kinetics suggest a pairing half-life of <1 h. We propose that pairing requires Ctcf binding and co-transcriptional activity of Tsix and Xite.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lyon, M.F. Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 190, 372–373 (1961).
Xu, N., Tsai, C.L. & Lee, J.T. Transient homologous chromosome pairing marks the onset of X inactivation. Science 311, 1149–1152 (2006).
Bacher, C.P. et al. Transient colocalization of X-inactivation centres accompanies the initiation of X inactivation. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 293–299 (2006).
Chao, W., Huynh, K.D., Spencer, R.J., Davidow, L.S. & Lee, J.T. CTCF, a candidate trans-acting factor for X-inactivation choice. Science 295, 345–347 (2002).
Bell, A. & Felsenfeld, G. Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene. Nature 405, 482–485 (2000).
Hark, A.T. et al. CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus. Nature 405, 486–489 (2000).
Kanduri, C. et al. Functional association of CTCF with the insulator upstream of the H19 gene is parent of origin-specific and methylation-sensitive. Curr. Biol. 10, 853–856 (2000).
Donohoe, M.E., Zhang, L., Xu, N., Shi, Y. & Lee, J.T. Identification of a CTCF co-factor, YY1, for the X-chromosome binary switch. Mol. Cell 25, 43–56 (2007).
Ogawa, Y. & Lee, J.T. Xite, X-inactivation intergenic transcription elements that regulate the probability of choice. Mol. Cell 11, 731–743 (2003).
Lee, J.T., Davidow, L.S. & Warshawsky, D. Tsix, a gene antisense to Xist at the X-inactivation centre. Nat. Genet. 21, 400–404 (1999).
Lee, J.T. & Lu, N. Targeted mutagenesis of Tsix leads to nonrandom X inactivation. Cell 99, 47–57 (1999).
Sado, T., Wang, Z., Sasaki, H. & Li, E. Regulation of imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice by Tsix. Development 128, 1275–1286 (2001).
Brockdorff, N. et al. The product of the mouse Xist gene is a 15 kb inactive X-specific transcript containing no conserved ORF and located in the nucleus. Cell 71, 515–526 (1992).
Brown, C.J. et al. The human XIST gene: analysis of a 17 kb inactive X-specific RNA that contains conserved repeats and is highly localized within the nucleus. Cell 71, 527–542 (1992).
Wutz, A., Rasmussen, T.P. & Jaenisch, R. Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA. Nat. Genet. 30, 167–174 (2002).
Lee, J.T. Regulation of X-chromosome counting by Tsix and Xite sequences. Science 309, 768–771 (2005).
Vigneau, S., Augui, S., Navarro, P., Avner, P. & Clerc, P. An essential role for the DXPas34 tandem repeat and Tsix transcription in the counting process of X chromosome inactivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 7390–7395 (2006).
Lee, J.T. Homozygous Tsix mutant mice reveal a sex-ratio distortion and revert to random X-inactivation. Nat. Genet. 32, 195–200 (2002).
Navarro, P., Pichard, S., Ciaudo, C., Avner, P. & Rougeulle, C. Tsix transcription across the Xist gene alters chromatin conformation without affecting Xist transcription: implications for X-chromosome inactivation. Genes Dev. 19, 1474–1484 (2005).
Sado, T., Hoki, Y. & Sasaki, H. Tsix silences Xist through modification of chromatin structure. Dev. Cell 9, 159–165 (2005).
Sun, B.K., Deaton, A.M. & Lee, J.T. A transient heterochromatic state in Xist preempts X inactivation choice without RNA stabilization. Mol. Cell 21, 617–628 (2006).
Cohen, D.E. et al. The Dxpas34 repeat regulates random and imprinted X-inactivation. Dev. Cell 12, 57–71 (2007).
Stavropoulos, N., Rowntree, R.K. & Lee, J.T. Identification of developmentally specific enhancers for Tsix in the regulation of X chromosome inactivation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 2757–2769 (2005).
Kurukuti, S. et al. CTCF binding at the H19 imprinting control region mediates maternally inherited higher-order chromatin conformation to restrict enhancer access to Igf2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10684–10689 (2006).
Ling, J.Q. et al. CTCF mediates interchromosomal colocalization between Igf2/H19 and Wsb1/Nf1. Science 312, 269–272 (2006).
Syken, J., De-Medina, T. & Munger, K. TID1, a human homolog of the Drosophila tumor suppressor l(2)tid, encodes two mitochondrial modulators of apoptosis with opposing functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8499–8504 (1999).
Kim, T.H. et al. Analysis of the vertebrate insulator protein CTCF-binding sites in the human genome. Cell 128, 1231–1245 (2007).
Workman, C.T. et al. enoLOGOS: a versatile web tool for energy normalized sequence logos. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W389–92 (2005).
Spilianakis, C.G., Lalioti, M.D., Town, T., Lee, G.R. & Flavell, R.A. Interchromosomal associations between alternatively expressed loci. Nature 435, 637–645 (2005).
Nichols, J. et al. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 95, 379–391 (1998).
Acknowledgements
We thank all members of the Lee laboratory for stimulating discussion and feedback throughout this work. S.S.S. is partially funded by a doctoral fellowship from the Gulbenkian Institute–Portugal (Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/9614/2002). This work was supported by an US National Institutes of Health grant (RO1-GM58839) to J.T.L., who is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.X., M.E.D. and J.T.L. designed this study; N.X. created and analyzed transgenes and performed pairing, RNA FISH, immunofluorescence and transcription analyses; M.E.D. performed knockdowns, western blot, ChIP, EMSA, bioinformatics and qRT-PCR analyses; S.S. contributed to pairing analyses; J.T.L. wrote the paper and supervised the research.
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 (PDF 466 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, N., Donohoe, M., Silva, S. et al. Evidence that homologous X-chromosome pairing requires transcription and Ctcf protein. Nat Genet 39, 1390–1396 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2007.5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2007.5
This article is cited by
-
Gene regulation in time and space during X-chromosome inactivation
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2022)
-
Regulation of epigenetic processes by non-coding RNAs
The Nucleus (2021)
-
NPM1c impedes CTCF functions through cytoplasmic mislocalization in acute myeloid leukemia
Leukemia (2020)
-
Decapping enzyme 1A breaks X-chromosome symmetry by controlling Tsix elongation and RNA turnover
Nature Cell Biology (2020)
-
Nuclear positioning and pairing of X-chromosome inactivation centers are not primary determinants during initiation of random X-inactivation
Nature Genetics (2019)