Article | Published:

Start-up costs of thermal power plants in markets with increasing shares of variable renewable generation

Nature Energy volume 2, Article number: 17050 (2017) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The emerging literature on power markets with high shares of variable renewable energy sources suggests that the costs of more frequent start-ups of thermal power plants may become an increasing concern. Here we investigate how this develops in Germany, where the share of variable renewables is expected to grow from 14% in 2013 to 34% in 2030. We show that the overall number of start-ups grows by 81%, while respective costs increase by 119% in this period. Related to variable renewables’ production, start-up costs increase by a mere €0.70 per additional megawatt hour. While the expansion of variable renewables alone would increase start-up costs, more flexible biomass power plants and additional power storage have counteracting effects. Yet changes in reserve provision and fuel prices increase start-up costs again. The relevance of start-up costs may grow further under continued renewable expansion, but could be mitigated by increasing system flexibility.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Gesetz für den Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz, 2017).

  2. 2.

    Residual load, renewable surplus generation and storage requirements in Germany. Energy Policy 73, 65–79 (2014).

  3. 3.

     & Impacts of intermittent renewables on electricity generation system operation. Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 1, 3–18 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Power System Economics Ch. 3–9 (IEEE, 2002).

  5. 5.

    ,  & Market-Clearing Electricity Prices and Energy Uplift Harvard Working Paper (2007);

  6. 6.

    , , ,  & Efficient market-clearing prices in markets with nonconvexities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164, 269–285 (2005).

  7. 7.

    ,  & Strommarktdesign: Zur Ausgestaltung der Auktionsregeln an der EEX. Z. Energ. 32, 147–161 (2008).

  8. 8.

    ,  & Block order restrictions in combinatorial electric energy auctions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196, 1202–1206 (2009).

  9. 9.

    The Power of Transformation. Wind, Sun and the Economics of Flexible Power Systems (IEA, 2014);

  10. 10.

     & Flexibility requirements of renewable energy based electricity systems—a review of research results and methodologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53, 10–22 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power IEA WIND Task 25 VTT Research Notes 2493 (VTT, 2009);

  12. 12.

    , ,  & Flexibility in Europe’s power sector—an additional requirement or an automatic complement? Energy Econ. 53, 118–131 (2016).

  13. 13.

    ,  & Base-load cycling on a system with significant wind penetration. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25, 1088–1097 (2010).

  14. 14.

     & Changes in the Economic Value of Variable Generation at High Penetration Levels: A Pilot Case Study of California LBNL-5445E (Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2012);

  15. 15.

    et al. Western Interconnection Flexibility AssessmentFinal Report (Energy and Environmental Economics, NREL, 2015);

  16. 16.

    ,  & Electricity market-clearing prices and investment incentives: the role of pricing rules. Energy Econ. 47, 42–51 (2015).

  17. 17.

    et al. The Western Wind and Solar Integration Study Phase 2 Technical Report NREL/TP-5500-55588 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2013);

  18. 18.

     & Impact of Utility-Scale Distributed Wind on Transmission-Level System Operations Technical Report NREL/TP-5D00-61824 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2014);

  19. 19.

    et al. The value of day-ahead solar power forecasting improvement. Sol. Energy 129, 192–203 (2016).

  20. 20.

     & Power system impacts of electric vehicles in Germany: Charging with coal or renewables? Appl. Energy 156, 185–196 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Genehmigung des Szenariorahmens für die Netzentwicklungsplanung Az.: 6.00.03.05/14-12-19/Szenariorahmen 2025 (Bundesnetzagentur, 2015);

  22. 22.

    et al. Alternatives no more: wind and solar power are mainstays of a clean, reliable, affordable grid. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 13, 78–87 (2015).

  23. 23.

    et al. The frontiers of energy. Nat. Energy 1, 15020 (2016).

  24. 24.

    World Energy Outlook 2016 (International Energy Agency, 2016);

  25. 25.

    Start-up Costs of Thermal Power Plants in Markets with Increasing Shares of Variable Renewable Generation (Zenodo, 2017);

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Diekmann, P. Hanemann, C. Kemfert, F. Kunz, K. Neuhoff and O. Tietjen as well as the participants of the July 2015 Strommarkttreffen in Berlin and the Berlin Conference on Energy and Electricity Economics 2015 for valuable comments on earlier drafts. We further thank V. d. O. Campos for assistance concerning the sensitivity with endogenous cross-border exchange. Not least, we also thank Stiftung Mercator and Agora Energiewende for funding this research as part of the project ‘A Renewable Energy Dominated Power Market: Challenges & Solutions for Market Design and Policy Instruments’. The views expressed here are our own.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), Mohrenstr. 58, 10117 Berlin, Germany

    • Wolf-Peter Schill
  2. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany

    • Michael Pahle
    •  & Christian Gambardella

Authors

  1. Search for Wolf-Peter Schill in:

  2. Search for Michael Pahle in:

  3. Search for Christian Gambardella in:

Contributions

All authors jointly developed the research design. W.-P.S. developed and calibrated the model, carried out the simulations, and processed the model outcomes. All authors contributed to writing the article.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolf-Peter Schill.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Notes 1–5, Supplementary Tables 1–5, Supplementary Figures 1–12, Supplementary References.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.50