Comment | Published:

Funding pathways to a low-carbon transition

Nature Energy volume 1, Article number: 16087 (2016) | Download Citation

The framing of funding programmes can sustain existing ways of conceptualizing particular problems, as well as create new ones. Yet, without more prominent roles for social sciences and humanities, the techno-economic conceptualization of energy consumers could hinder long-term low-carbon aspirations.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton Univ. Press, 1986).

  2. 2.

    Br. J. Sociol. 61, 176–195 (2010).

  3. 3.

    Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 24, 645–659 (2006).

  4. 4.

    & Energy Policy 27, 217–227 (1999).

  5. 5.

    Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia? (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).

  6. 6.

    & Sociology 48, 590–605 (2014).

  7. 7.

    Horizon 2020: A Paradigm Shift for Funding Research and Innovation in Europe (European Commission, 2014);

  8. 8.

    Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2016–2017: Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy (European Commission, 2015);

  9. 9.

    What is Horizon 2020? (European Commission, 2016);

  10. 10.

    Factsheet: Horizon 2020 Budget (European Commission, 2013);

  11. 11.

    Constr. Build. Mater. 51, 151–162 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy (European Commission, 2016);

  13. 13.

    Towards an Integrated Strategic Energy Technology (SET) Plan: Accelerating the European Energy System Transformation (European Commission, 2015);

  14. 14.

    Scoping Paper for Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge ‘Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy’ (European Commission, 2014).

  15. 15.

    , , & Nature Clim. Change 2, 780–788 (2012).

  16. 16.

    , & Local Environ. 13, 743–758 (2008).

  17. 17.

    Energy Policy 25, 833–835 (1997).

  18. 18.

    J. Consum. Cult. 5, 131–153 (2005).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Interventions in Practice: Re-framing Policy Approaches to Consumer Behaviour (Sustainable Practices Research Group, 2013).

  20. 20.

    et al. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 6, 95–99 (2015).

  21. 21.

    et al. Nature Clim. Change 4, 763–768 (2014).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Chris Foulds is at the Global Sustainability Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB1 1PT, UK.

    • Chris Foulds
  2. Toke Haunstrup Christensen is at the Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University, A. C. Meyers Vænge 15, Copenhagen 2450, Denmark.

    • Toke Haunstrup Christensen

Authors

  1. Search for Chris Foulds in:

  2. Search for Toke Haunstrup Christensen in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Foulds.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.87

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing