Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Unconventional oil and gas: The role of politics and proximity

Political divisions are important in understanding public perceptions of unconventional oil and natural gas development, but so is proximity to drilling activities. New research highlights that, as geographical distance from development areas increases, political ideology becomes more influential in explaining diverging perceptions.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Perception, distance and ideology.


  1. 1

    Davis, C. & Fisk, J. M. Rev. Pol. Res. 31, 1–16 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Boudet, H. et al. Energy Pol. 65, 57–67 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Clarke, C. E. et al. Energy Pol. 97, 301–309 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Cornell National Social Survey 2013 (Cornell University Survey Research Institute, 2013).

  5. 5

    Abbott, A. Soc. Forces 75, 1149–1182 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chelsea Schelly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schelly, C. Unconventional oil and gas: The role of politics and proximity. Nat Energy 1, 16163 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing