Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Technology Insight: applications of tissue engineering and biological substitutes in urology

Abstract

Patients suffering from diseased or injured organs may be treated with transplanted organs. Engineered tissue has a variety of potential applications throughout urology, from reconstruction of the urethra or bladder following trauma or surgery, to growing reproductive organs for individuals with congenital malformations. In this review, Anthony Atala discusses the different techniques and materials employed in tissue regeneration and tissue engineering, and their urologic applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Tissue engineering of the urethra using a collagen matrix.
Figure 2: Combining therapeutic cloning and tissue engineering to produce kidney tissue.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen F et al. (1999) Acellular collagen matrix as a possible “off the shelf” biomaterial for urethral repair. Urology 54: 407–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dahms SE et al. (1998) Composition and biomechanical properties of the bladder acellular matrix graft: comparative analysis in rat, pig and human. Br J Urol 82: 411–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Piechota HJ et al. (1998) In vitro functional properties of the rat bladder regenerated by the bladder acellular matrix graft. J Urol 159: 1717–1724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoo JJ et al. (1998) Bladder augmentation using allogenic bladder submucosa seeded with cells. Urology 51: 221–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim B and Mooney DJ (1998) Development of biocompatible synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 16: 224–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergsma JE et al. (1995) In vivo degradation and biocompatibility study of in vitro pre-degraded as-polymerized polyactide particles. Biomaterials 16: 267–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hynes RO (1992) Integrins: versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell 69: 11–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Deuel TF (1997) Growth factors. In: Principles of Tissue Engineering 133–149 (Eds Lanzer RP et al.) New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pariente JL et al. (2001) In vitro biocompatibility assessment of naturally derived and synthetic biomaterials using normal human urothelial cells. J Biomed Mater Res 55: 33–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pariente JL et al. (2002) In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of naturally derived and synthetic biomaterials using normal human bladder smooth muscle cells. J Urol 167: 1867–1871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li ST (1995) Biologic biomaterials: tissue-derived biomaterials (collagen). In: The Biomedical Engineering Handbook, 627–647 Vol 1(Ed Bronzino JD) Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Silver FH and Pins G (1992) Cell growth on collagen: a review of tissue engineering using scaffolds containing extracellular matrix. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2: 67–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sams AE and Nixon AJ (1995) Chondrocyte-laden collagen scaffolds for resurfacing extensive articular cartilage defects. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 3: 47–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Smidsrod O and Skjak-Braek G (1990) Alginate as immobilization matrix for cells. Trends Biotechnol 8: 71–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim F and Sun AM (1980) Microencapsulated islets as bioartificial endocrine pancreas. Science 210: 908–910

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilding DK (1981) Biodegradable polymers. In: Biocompatibility of Clinical Implant Materials, 209–232 (Ed Williams DF) Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  17. Freed LE et al. (1994) Biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biotechnology (NY) 12: 689–693

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mikos AG et al. (1994) Preparation and characterization of poly(L-lactic acid) foams. Polymer 35: 1068–1077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Harris LD et al. (1998) Open pore biodegradable matrices formed with gas foaming. J Biomed Mater Res 42: 396–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peppas NA and Langer R (1994) New challenges in biomaterials. Science 263: 1715–1720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bazeed MA et al. (1983) New treatment for urethral strictures. Urology 21: 53–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Atala A et al. (1992) Formation of urothelial structures in vivo from dissociated cells attached to biodegradable polymer scaffolds in vitro. J Urol 148: 658–662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Olsen L et al. (1992) Urethral reconstruction with a new synthetic absorbable device. An experimental study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 26: 323–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kropp BP et al. (1998) Rabbit urethral regeneration using small intestinal submucosa onlay grafts. Urology 52: 138–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sievert KD et al. (2000) Homologous acellular matrix graft for urethral reconstruction in the rabbit: histological and functional evaluation. J Urol 163: 1958–1965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoo JJ et al. (1999) Autologous engineered cartilage rods for penile reconstruction. J Urol 162: 1119–1121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. El-Kassaby AW et al. (2003) Urethral stricture repair with an off-the-shelf collagen matrix. J Urol 169: 170–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. De Filippo RE et al. (2002) Total penile urethral replacement with autologous cell-seeded collagen matrices [abstract]. J Urol 167 (Suppl): 152–153

    Google Scholar 

  29. De Filippo RE et al. (2002) Urethral replacement using cell seeded tubularized collagen matrices. J Urol 168: 1789–1793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Atala A et al. (1993) Implantation in vivo and retrieval of artificial structures consisting of rabbit and human urothelium and human bladder muscle. J Urol 150: 608–612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Oberpenning F et al. (1999) De novo reconstitution of a functional mammalian urinary bladder by tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 17: 149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kershen RT et al. (2002) Reconstitution of human corpus cavernosum smooth muscle in vitro and in vivo. Tissue Eng 8: 515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kwon TG et al. (2002) Autologous penile corpora cavernosa replacement using tissue engineering techniques. J Urol 168: 1754–1758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang T et al. (2003) Creation of an engineered uterus for surgical reconstruction [abstract 391]. In Proceedings of the American Academy of Pediatrics Annual Meeting: November 1–5; New Orleans, LA. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics

    Google Scholar 

  35. De Filippo RE et al. (2003) Engineering of vaginal tissue in vivo. Tissue Eng 9: 301–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. De Filippo RE et al. (2003) Engineering of vaginal tissue for total reconstruction. J Urol 169 (Suppl): 1057

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lanza RP et al. (2002) Generation of histocompatible tissues using nuclear transplantation. Nat Biotechnol 20: 689–696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Evans MJ et al. (1999) Mitochondrial DNA genotypes in nuclear transfer-derived cloned sheep. Nat Genet 23: 90–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hiendleder S et al. (1999) Transmitochondrial differences and varying levels of heteroplasmy in nuclear transfer cloned cattle. Mol Reprod Dev 54: 24–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Steinborn R et al. (2000) Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in cloned cattle produced by fetal and adult cell cloning. Nat Genet 25: 255–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Auchincloss H and Bonventre JV (2002) Transplanting cloned cells into therapeutic promise. Nat Biotechnol 20: 665–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony Atala.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Glossary

HYPOSPADIAS

Congenital defect in males where the urethral opening is on the underside of the penis or the perineum, rather than on the glans

EPISPADIAS

Congenital defect more common in males, where the upper wall of the urethra is absent

CAVERNOSOGRAPHY

An imaging technique whereby the corpus cavernosum is visualized by radiography

CAVERNOSOMETRY

A way of measuring vascular pressure within the corpus cavernosum, it can be used with dynamic infusion to give a visual representation

ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSPOT (ELISPOT) ASSAY

This is a technique for analyzing immunological functions in blood and lymphocytes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atala, A. Technology Insight: applications of tissue engineering and biological substitutes in urology. Nat Rev Urol 2, 143–149 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0121

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing