This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Russell LB et al. (1996) The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 276: 1172–1177
Kassirer JP and Angell M (1994) The journal's policy on cost-effectiveness analyses. N Engl J Med 331: 669–670
Taylor TN et al. (1996) Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States. Stroke 27: 1459–1466
Hickenbottom SL et al. (2002) A national study of the quantity and cost of informal caregiving for the elderly with stroke. Neurology 58: 1754–1759
Samsa GP et al. (1999) Performing cost-effectiveness analysis by integrating randomized trial data with a comprehensive decision model: application to treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Clin Epidemiol 52: 259–271
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Emma Campbell, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Steering Committee and consultant for Pfizer-Parke-Davis-sponsored SPARCL Trial.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldstein, L. Is simvastatin cost-effective for reducing the risk of vascular events?. Nat Rev Neurol 1, 86–87 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0036
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0036