This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
[No authors listed] (1999) Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Lancet 354: 708–715
Cannon CP et al. (2001) Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med 344: 1879–1887
de Winter RJ et al. (2005) Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 353: 1095–1104
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Hannah Camm, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
King, S. Do elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes benefit from early invasive treatment?. Nat Rev Cardiol 3, 188–189 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0506
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0506