Article | Open

Regional climate impacts of a possible future grand solar minimum

  • Nature Communications 6, Article number: 7535 (2015)
  • doi:10.1038/ncomms8535
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Any reduction in global mean near-surface temperature due to a future decline in solar activity is likely to be a small fraction of projected anthropogenic warming. However, variability in ultraviolet solar irradiance is linked to modulation of the Arctic and North Atlantic Oscillations, suggesting the potential for larger regional surface climate effects. Here, we explore possible impacts through two experiments designed to bracket uncertainty in ultraviolet irradiance in a scenario in which future solar activity decreases to Maunder Minimum-like conditions by 2050. Both experiments show regional structure in the wintertime response, resembling the North Atlantic Oscillation, with enhanced relative cooling over northern Eurasia and the eastern United States. For a high-end decline in solar ultraviolet irradiance, the impact on winter northern European surface temperatures over the late twenty-first century could be a significant fraction of the difference in climate change between plausible AR5 scenarios of greenhouse gas concentrations.

Introduction

The past few decades have been characterized by a period of relatively high solar activity. However, the recent prolonged solar minimum and subsequent weak solar cycle 24 have led to suggestions that the grand solar maximum may be at an end1. Using past variations of solar activity measured by cosmogenic isotope abundance changes, analogue forecasts for possible future solar output have been calculated. An 8% chance of a return to Maunder Minimum-like conditions within the next 40 years was estimated in 2010 (ref. 2). The decline in solar activity has continued, to the time of writing, and is faster than any other such decline in the 9,300 years covered by the cosmogenic isotope data1. If this recent rate of decline is added to the analysis, the 8% probability estimate is now raised to between 15 and 20%.

A number of studies have indicated that the decreases in global mean temperature associated with a future decline in solar activity are likely to be relatively small3,4,5,6,7. However, variability in ultraviolet solar irradiance has been linked to changes in surface pressure that resemble the Arctic and North Atlantic Oscillations (AO/NAO)8,9,10 and studies of both the 11-year solar cycle11,12 and centennial timescales13 suggest the potential for larger regional effects. The mechanism for these changes is via a stratospheric pathway, a so-called ‘top-down’ mechanism, and involves altered heating of the stratosphere by solar ultraviolet irradiance. Anomalous temperatures in the region of the tropical stratopause give rise to changes in the subtropical stratospheric winds, in geostrophic balance with the modified equator-to-pole temperature gradient. This signal then propagates poleward and downward and is amplified by altered planetary wave activity8 before being communicated throughout the depth of the troposphere in the Pacific and Atlantic basins14. This mechanism can also drive changes in tropical lower stratosphere temperatures, which can additionally affect the troposphere15.

There is currently uncertainty regarding the ultraviolet variability that accompanies changes in total solar irradiance (TSI)16. Recent satellite measurements from the Spectral Irradiance Monitor (SIM) on the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment satellite17 show that the variability in ultraviolet over part of the declining phase of solar cycle 23 might be considerably larger than indicated by previous estimates17,18.

Here, our experiments aim to explore the impact of this uncertainty in ultraviolet in the future Maunder Minimum scenario2, using both Naval Research Laboratory Spectral Solar Irradiance model output19 and the SIM data as a basis to estimate lower (EXPT-A) and upper (EXPT-B) bounds for the change in ultraviolet.

Regional structure is found in the wintertime response in both experiments, with enhanced relative cooling over northern Eurasia and the eastern United States. For EXPT-B, the change in winter northern European surface temperatures over the late twenty-first century is found to be of similar magnitude to the difference between RCP6.0 and RCP4.5 projections for this region. We conclude that solar forcing may be an important source of uncertainty in regional climate projections.

Results

Solar forcing scenarios

The future solar forcing scenarios are imposed on an ocean–atmosphere climate model following the representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5 for the period 2005 to 2100. Information on the model, experiment ensemble sizes and details of the construction of the solar forcing scenarios can be found in Methods. The scenarios are illustrated in Fig. 1, which shows the time variation in TSI and ultraviolet irradiance (defined here to be in the range 200–320 nm) for the control (hereafter CTRL-8.5) and experiments with respect to the mean of CTRL-8.5. The mean difference relative to the repeated solar cycle in CTRL-8.5 is a reduction in TSI of 1.74 W m−2 (0.127%) for EXPT-A and 1.76 W m−2 (0.129%) for EXPT-B. For the ultraviolet component, the reduction is 0.25 W m−2 (0.91%) for EXPT-A and 1.76 W m−2 (6.43%) for EXPT-B.

Figure 1: Future solar forcing scenarios.
Figure 1

Variations in solar forcing for Total Solar Irradiance (W m−2) and ultraviolet irradiance in the 200–320 nm spectral band (W m−2) relative to the mean of the repeated cycle in CTRL-8.5 for (a) CTRL-8.5 (black), (b) EXPT-A (blue) and (c) EXPT-B (red). The value of this mean is 1,366.2 W m−2 for TSI and 27.4 W m−2 for the ultraviolet band.

Global mean temperature response

As a result of the decrease in solar irradiance, both experiments show widespread cooling with respect to CTRL-8.5 (Fig. 2). The relative annual global mean near-surface temperature change for the period 2050–2099 is a cooling of 0.13 and 0.12 °C for EXPT-A and EXPT-B, respectively. This offsets or delays the global warming trend by 2 years and is small compared with the modelled global warming. This is consistent with other recently published results3,4,5,6,7, which indicate that any change in global mean temperature due to a future prolonged solar minimum would do little to substantially offset or delay the warming due to projected increases in long-lived greenhouse gases. A comparison of forcings and responses can be found in ref. 20. In some of these studies, potential for regional variation is indicated4,6,7, and we now explore this in more detail in our experiments.

Figure 2: Annual mean surface temperature response for future solar experiments.
Figure 2

Difference in near-surface temperature (°C) between (a) EXPT-A and (b) EXPT-B and CTRL-8.5 for the period 2050–2099. Solid white contours indicate significance with a 95% confidence interval.

Northern hemisphere winter response

In our experiments, while cooling is evident year round, the largest and most coherent anomalies are in the northern hemisphere in boreal winter and spring. Much of this structure can be explained by a relative change in atmospheric circulation. During December to February, a negative AO/NAO-like mean sea-level pressure pattern is seen in both experiments (Fig. 3a,e). Over the North Pacific, the deepened Aleutian low is consistent with the observed pressure response to changes in solar activity10,21,22. In the Atlantic sector, EXPT-B has a stronger and more significant response, showing a weakening in the NAO (defined for the model as the difference in sea-level pressure between gridpoints nearest to the Azores and southwest Iceland) of 1.8 hPa, which is a notable proportion of the interannual standard deviation of 7–8 hPa. Again, the NAO pattern is consistent with the observed response associated with the 11-year cycle over the recent re-analysis period11, which has been found to be significant and maximizes at a lag of 3–4 years for the period 1870–2010 (ref. 10). Relative to the historical control period (1971–2000), CTRL-8.5 has a negative shift in the NAO with a significant decrease of 3.2 hPa for the period 2050–2099 (not shown). This is broadly consistent with other modelling studies where the models have well resolved stratospheres23,24.

Figure 3: Winter climate response for future solar minimum experiments.
Figure 3

Differences between experiments and CTRL-8.5 for the period 2050–2099 for (a,e) sea-level pressure (hPa), (b,f) near-surface temperature (°C), (d,h) precipitation (mm day−1). (c,g) They are as in b and f but with control lagged by 2 years to give similar global mean temperature. Upper panel plots are for EXPT-A and lower panel plots are for EXPT-B. Anomalies are for December to February. Solid white contours indicate significance with a 95% confidence interval.

There are marked regional differences in the wintertime pattern of cooling in the northern hemisphere with enhanced cooling over northern Eurasia and in the eastern U.S. in both experiments (Fig. 3b,f). Average temperature changes for northern hemisphere geographic regions25 (Table 1) show overall cooling, but with significant and larger or comparable cooling for EXPT-B in the above regions consistent with the stronger negative NAO/AO in this experiment. Cooling to the east of Greenland in EXPT-B, and to a lesser extent in EXPT-A, is associated with a relative increase in the southward transport of sea ice by the East Greenland current (not shown); however, the observed relationship between the NAO and East Greenland sea ice is thought to be epoch dependent26, and different models show a range of such relationships27, so this element of our model’s response may not be robust.

Table 1: Regional winter temperature response.

The quadrupole surface temperature response associated with a decrease in the AO/NAO28 is evident when the global warming spatial pattern, defined for the purposes of this demonstration as the mean temperature in CTRL-8.5 at a lag of 2 years, has been removed (Fig. 3c,g). The general pattern of warming over northeastern North America/Greenland and southern Europe/northern Africa and cooling over southeastern North America and northern Europe can be seen more clearly in EXPT-B (Fig. 3g). Analysis of the stratospheric circulation20 indicates that these changes are associated with a ‘top-down’ stratospheric pathway, as identified in a number of solar studies8,9,12.

In EXPT-B, precipitation (Fig. 3h) increases in a wide band across the Atlantic and southern parts of Europe, extending eastwards across the Eurasian continent. There are decreases in precipitation over northern Europe. In general, EXPT-A (Fig. 3d) shows a similar but noisier response, with less significant signals. These changes are associated with a southward shift of the jet stream and decreased (increased) blocking over southern (northern) Europe in the experiments20.

Changes in the frequency of extreme events are also affected. CTRL-8.5 shows a large decrease in frost days (20–35 days per winter) over much of southern and central Europe, northern Africa and southeast US for 2050–2099 relative to the historical simulation (1971–2000). There are also large changes over sea areas on the Canadian east coast and to the east of Greenland associated with the retreat of sea ice owing to anthropogenic climate change (Fig. 4a). In EXPT-B (Fig. 4c), and to a lesser extent in EXPT-A (Fig. 4b), we can see the clear signature of the negative AO/NAO with increases of a few frost days per winter in northern Europe and southeast US relative to CTRL-8.5, again consistent with NAO variability on other timescales29.

Figure 4: Change in average number of frost days.
Figure 4

Difference in winter (December to February) frost days (days) between (a) CTRL-8.5 (2050–2099) and the historical period (1971–2000), (b) EXPT-A and CTRL-8.5 (2050–2099) and (c) EXPT-B and CTRL-8.5 (2050–2099). Here, frost days correspond to a daily minimum surface air temperature <0 °C. White stippling indicates significance with a 95% confidence interval.

European winter response

Examining the European response in more detail, average temperature changes for a northern European region are shown in Fig. 5. Relative to the historical period (1971–2000), RCP4.5 and CTRL-8.5 show substantial warming with a mean difference for 2050–2099 of 4.1 °C and 6.6 °C, respectively. EXPT-A and EXPT-B follow the same trajectory as CTRL-8.5, but with a reduced warming. Relative to CTRL-8.5, we find decreases in regional temperature for 2050–2099 of 0.4 °C (EXPT-A) and nearly 0.8 °C (EXPT-B). This regional cooling is therefore a notable fraction, 30% for EXPT-B, of the difference between the temperature changes for CTRL-8.5 and RCP4.5. Indeed, compared with temperature changes for a more comprehensive range of scenarios run using a closely related model30, the difference between CTRL-8.5 and EXPT-B is similar to the difference between RCP6.0 and RCP4.5 for this region (Fig. 5, inset).

Figure 5: Winter European surface temperature response.
Figure 5

Mean winter (December to February) northern European (10° W–40° E, 48–75° N) near-surface temperature change (°C, land points only) for 2050–2099 for future scenarios relative to the historical simulation (1971–2000). Shading shows the standard error. The data has been smoothed by applying a 33-year running mean. The inset shows mean winter northern European near-surface temperature differences for 2050–2099 relative to 1971–2000 for the current experiments and for a range of RCP scenarios run with the closely related HadGEM2-ES model30. Whiskers show s.e.

Both RCP4.5 and CTRL-8.5 show significant increases in winter precipitation for northern Europe for 2050–2099 relative to the historical period, with a 12% increase for CTRL-8.5 (Fig. 6a). As expected with the more negative NAO-like pattern in the solar scenarios, the associated southward shift in the storm track acts to oppose this trend, with both EXPT-A and EXPT-B showing a relative decrease in precipitation compared with CTRL-8.5. In addition, the more southerly storm track enhances precipitation for southern Europe which tends to lessen the drying trend in this region in RCP4.5 and CTRL-8.5 (Fig. 6b). The CMIP5 multi-model ensemble projects drying for the Mediterranean region31, so in this sensitive region, wintertime alleviation is likely to be important. However, we note that the changes in this region are small and the confidence is relatively low. As with temperature, the changes in precipitation associated with the solar scenarios, are again large fractions of the absolute difference between CTRL-8.5 and RCP4.5; 65% for northern Europe and 90% for southern Europe in EXPT-B, although the uncertainty for southern Europe is large.

Figure 6: Winter European precipitation response.
Figure 6

Mean winter (December to February) European precipitation change (mm month−1) for 2050–2099 for future scenarios relative to the historical simulation (1971–2000) for (a) northern Europe (10° W–30° E, 45–65° N) and (b) southern Europe (10° W–30° E, 35–45° N). Whiskers show the s.e. Differences between EXPT-B and CTRL-8.5 are significant with a 90% (75%) confidence interval for northern Europe (southern Europe).

We note that low solar activity does not guarantee cold conditions in any specific European winter as additional variability is introduced by other factors. The 360-year Central England Temperature record for December–February shows that the coldest winters in the UK occurred at low solar activity, but, for example, 1685/6, near the centre of the Maunder minimum, was the 5th warmest winter in the entire record32. This highlights the fact that solar variability acts only to bias the intrinsic year-to-year variability, which remains substantial for this region33. An example of this from all simulations is that for 12 of the 50 individual years in the period 2050–2099, the warmest ensemble member for northern European winter comes from EXPT-B (Fig. 7).

Figure 7: Variability in modelled European winter temperatures.
Figure 7

Winter (December to January) northern European (10° W–40° E, 48–75° N) near-surface temperatures (°C, land points only) for 2050 to 2099 for individual ensemble members of EXPT-A (blue), EXPT-B (red) and CTRL-8.5 (black).

Possible feedback mechanisms

It has been suggested that solar variability may have affected past variations in North Atlantic temperature and salinity34. A positive ocean–atmosphere feedback on the cold northern European temperatures could occur through altered Atlantic heat content35 and we see a clear signal of a reduced meridional surface temperature gradient over the west North Atlantic for EXPT-B (Fig. 3f). Feedbacks could also occur through decreased Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) associated either with the persistent negative NAO forcing36 or with more complex sea ice–ocean–atmosphere mechanisms37,38,39. However, there is uncertainty in the sign of the AMOC response to declining solar activity, with two recent studies suggesting a relative strengthening, associated with weaker radiative forcing and a possible change in stratosphere–troposphere coupling6 or increased evaporation and densification in the North Atlantic40. In our experiments, we find little appreciable change in the AMOC relative to the anthropogenically forced decreasing trend in CTRL-8.5 (not shown). Both experiments show significant changes in tropical precipitation associated with shifts in the Intertropical Convergence Zone, with a southward shift in the Atlantic. These changes are of a pattern and magnitude that has been shown elsewhere41 to be capable of inducing a compensating strengthening of the AMOC of the magnitude required to balance the effects of negative NAO forcing. However, detailed analysis of the mechanisms of AMOC response is beyond the scope of this paper.

Discussion

Numerous studies have identified links between past climate and solar variability42,43. During the Maunder Minimum (1645-1715), very few sunspots were seen despite regular observations44. If the past relationships between TSI and ultraviolet irradiance and sunspots are the same as are observed for modern solar variability, then a decline in both TSI and ultraviolet for this period can be assumed. The Maunder Minimum coincided with more severe winters in the UK and continental Europe32 and many reconstructions45,46 suggest atmospheric conditions were broadly comparable with the regional effects on European atmospheric circulation found here. Some modelling studies13,47 also support the idea that similar regional cooling and circulation changes occurred during this period. On longer timescales, cosmogenic isotopes provide a proxy for TSI variations and only indirect meteorological information is available, nevertheless linkages can be made. For example, lake sediments have been analysed to demonstrate that a grand minimum of solar activity, the Homeric Minimum (2,750–2,550 years before present), affected climate conditions through western Europe through altered regional circulation consistent with the negative phase of the NAO48. While these paleoclimatic studies appear largely consistent with our model result that weak solar ultraviolet irradiance can have a significant impact on European winter circulation through ‘top-down’ dynamical forcing, detailed modelling and attribution for these events is beyond the scope of this paper. We note that, to date, a variety of strengths of model response for past events have been obtained13,47,49, which could, in part, be related to uncertainties in solar forcing and to the efficiency of the ‘top-down’ mechanism in different models14.

We note that there are some uncertainties in our model response to solar forcing. The peak-to-trough variability in global mean temperature for the 11-year solar cycle is 0.06 °C but observational estimates suggest this may be too small. For example, a signal of 0.1 °C was obtained using a multivariate analysis with up-to-date estimates of natural (including volcanic aerosols) and anthropogenic forcing50. In general, climate models appear to underestimate this variability5. The modelled Atlantic atmospheric circulation response may also be larger if, as has recently been suggested, the ocean feedback is underestimated in the model35.

The changes in TSI that are applied in our experiments are representative of current scientific understanding31 and are smaller than those reported in earlier IPCC reports. The ultraviolet changes are designed to bracket the current uncertainty in spectral irradiance at these wavelengths, but we note that EXPT-B is likely to be at the high end of any estimate of ultraviolet change and the appreciable changes in climate that we find should therefore be viewed as a high estimate in this respect. This research highlights the need for accurate and long-term measurements of spectral solar irradiance to reduce current uncertainties.

In the solar scenario presented here, there is a gradual descent to Maunder Minimum-like conditions, which are then maintained for a period of 50 years until the end of the experiment. A modelling study which includes representation of the end of a solar minimum7 indicates that global mean temperatures approach the reference model climatology within a few years of a return to the reference solar forcing. Although timescales may depend on the exact details of the forcing scenario and model, we would expect a reversal of the climate impacts described in our experiment following the end of the event. Estimates of the duration of grand solar minima, based on model reconstruction from 14C data51 and from 10Be data52, vary from a few decades to more than 100 years53.

The latest data1 (updated October 2013) on sunspot number, near-Earth interplanetary conditions, cosmic ray fluxes and geomagnetic activity are all consistent with the most rapid fall scenario used here2. All these data are in the upper 5 percentile of the distributions (lower 5 percentile in the case of cosmic rays which anti-correlate with solar activity) of predictions extended to these parameters53. Note also that these statistical predictions51 are very similar to the predictions made using spectral techniques54. Thus all the current indicators are consistent with the most extreme decline discussed by Lockwood2. However, it should be remembered these predictions are statistical and not physical in nature, being based on past behaviour.

The northern hemisphere winter regional temperature and precipitation changes associated with the reduced solar forcing can amount to a substantial fraction of the difference between plausible RCP scenarios. Our results therefore suggest that uncertainties in natural forcing, in this case both the uncertainty in future solar output and uncertainty in spectral solar irradiance, should be taken into account alongside uncertainties in emissions in future climate forcing scenarios.

Methods

The control model

We use the Met Office Hadley Centre general circulation model, HadGEM2-CC (carbon cycle)55, with historical and future forcings specified according to the Fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) as used in HadGEM2-ES (Earth System)30. This version of HadGEM2 is a ‘high top’ model with 60 vertical levels and an upper boundary at 84 km, so is capable of resolving relevant stratospheric processes56,57,58. The horizontal resolution is 1.875° longitude by 1.25° latitude. The ocean resolution is 1° × 1°, increasing in the tropics to 0.3°, with 40 vertical levels. The TSI is partitioned across six shortwave spectral bands (0.2–10 μm) with spectral changes associated with changing TSI accounted for. For the historical period, the TSI and spectrally resolved irradiance (SSI) used is that recommended by CMIP5 (Lean, Calculations of solar irradiance, http://sparcsolaris.gfz-potsdam.de/cmip5.php, accessed 2 June 2009 from the earlier fuberlin site), with a repeating 11-year cycle, based on the period 1998–2008, imposed for future scenarios. Time-varying ozone distributions include a component related to solar variability30.

Grand solar minimum scenario

The solar forcing is based on the most rapidly declining Lockwood2 solar activity scenario and uncertainty in future levels of ultraviolet is explored with two experiments designed to bracket uncertainty in ultraviolet spectral irradiance. Experiments are initialized from 1 December 2005 with the same initial conditions as the parallel CTRL-8.5 ensemble. The derivation of the forcing is as follows:

EXPT-A

The future TSI for EXPT-A is constructed by relating changes in the historical TSI to the past solar modulation parameter, then applying this relationship to the future scenario for the parameter1,2. The SSIs are calculated by extrapolation of second-order polynomial fits of SSI versus TSI from the CMIP5 historical forcing data set. This experiment describes a relatively modest change in ultraviolet. The solar component in the prescribed ozone field also scales with the change in TSI.

EXPT-B

For EXPT-B, 200–320 nm data from the SIM instrument (2004–2009) are fitted to a typical solar cycle shape, giving an estimate for a peak-to-trough change in ultraviolet of 1.17 W m−2. The SIM data used in this study is based on more reliable SORCE SIM Version 17 processing, but these results are consistent with the published version, Version 22, available at: http://lasp.colorado.edu/home/sorce/data/. Next, a scaling factor is derived between the Open Solar Flux (OSF) measure of solar activity1,2 and ultraviolet. It is important to note that the use of the OSF proxy introduces a secular change in the past (and predicted future) ultraviolet irradiance that would not be obtained if other solar activity indices (such as the F10.7 radio flux) were used: however, ultraviolet-driven changes in the stratosphere are more highly correlated with OSF than indices such as F10.7 that do not show the same secular trends59. The scaling used here is based on calculating the average of peak-to-trough values in de-trended OSF data for the period 1982–2008 and taking this average to be equal to the SIM data estimate giving a relationship of 2.19 OSF units equalling 1 W m−2 of ultraviolet irradiance. The future projection in ultraviolet forcing is calculated by scaling the OSF for the grand solar minimum scenario, deriving a change in ultraviolet irradiance that would be consistent with the SIM data scaling linearly with the assumed future trend in OSF. The baseline period for normalizing the OSF with respect to the HadGEM2-CC historical forcing is 1964–2008. In EXPT-B, only the ultraviolet (200–320 nm) component of the shortwave irradiance is adjusted. Radiation bands 2 to 6 are unaltered, and so retain variability on the 11-year timescale out to 2100. This means that the reduction in TSI is by definition equal to the reduction in ultraviolet. In this experiment, the prescribed ozone is the same as that in CTRL-8.5. This enables direct comparison of the impact of UV changes with CTRL-8.5 and we believe it is justified as the large change in ultraviolet is likely to dominate the change in stratospheric heating in this case. We might expect inclusion of interactive ozone to enhance the response, but think this is likely to be of secondary importance for EXPT-B. However, we note that GCM studies have shown sensitivity to the magnitude and distribution of specified ozone changes22,60.

Ensemble sizes and experiments used for comparison

HadGEM2-CC: CTRL-8.5, EXPT-B and EXPT-A have three ensemble members, while RCP4.5 has just a single member. The historical runs have three ensemble members.

HadGEM2-ES: All RCPs and historical runs have four ensemble members. All the results are for ensemble means, unless otherwise stated.

Statistics

Model statistical significance is tested using the Mann–Whitney test (a nonparametric test) with the null hypothesis that the difference in means are not significantly different from zero. One-tailed tests are used, given the prior evidence for a negative AO/NAO response8,10.

Code availability

Due to intellectual property right restrictions, we cannot provide either the source code or the documentation papers for HadGEM2. The Met Office Unified Model (MetUM) is available for use under licence. A number of research organizations and national meteorological services use the MetUM in collaboration with the Met Office to undertake basic atmospheric process research, produce forecasts, develop the MetUM code and build and evaluate Earth system models. For further information on how to apply for a licence, see http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/collaboration/um-collaboration.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Ineson, S. et al. Regional climate impacts of a possible future grand solar minimum. Nat. Commun. 6:7535 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8535 (2015).

References

  1. 1.

    Reconstruction and prediction of variations in the open solar magnetic flux and interplanetary conditions . Living Rev. Solar Phys. 10, 4 (2013).

  2. 2.

    Solar change and climate: an update in the light of the current exceptional solar minimum. Proc. R. Soc. A 466, 303–329 (2010).

  3. 3.

    & On the effect of a new grand minimum of solar activity on the future climate on Earth. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L05707 (2010).

  4. 4.

    , , & Modeling of the atmospheric response to a strong decrease of the solar activity. Proc. Int. Astron. Union 7, 215–224 (2011).

  5. 5.

    , & What influence will future solar activity changes over the 21st century have on projected global near-surface temperature changes? J. Geophys. Res. 117, D05103 (2012).

  6. 6.

    et al. Impact of a potential 21st century “grand solar minimum” on surface temperatures and stratospheric ozone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 4420–4425 (2013).

  7. 7.

    , & Could a future “Grand Solar Minimum” like the Maunder Minimum stop global warming? Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 1789–1793 (2013).

  8. 8.

    & Effect of solar activity on the polar-night jet oscillation in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere winter. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn 80, 973–984 (2002).

  9. 9.

    , , & Transfer of the solar signal from the stratosphere to the troposphere: Northern winter. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D06108 (2006).

  10. 10.

    et al. A lagged response to the 11 year solar cycle in observed winter Atlantic/European weather patterns. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 13,405–13,420 (2013).

  11. 11.

    , , , & Enhanced signature of solar variability in Eurasian winter climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L20805 (2010).

  12. 12.

    et al. Solar forcing of winter climate variability in the northern hemisphere. Nat. Geosci. 4, 753–757 (2011).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Solar forcing of regional climate change during the Maunder Minimum. Science 294, 2149–2152 (2001).

  14. 14.

    et al. Assessing and understanding the impact of stratospheric dynamics and variability on the earth system. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 845–859 (2012).

  15. 15.

    , & The role of eddies in driving the tropospheric response to stratospheric heating perturbations. J. Atmos. Sci. 66, 1347–1365 (2009).

  16. 16.

    et al. Recent variability of the solar spectral irradiance and its impact on climate modelling. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 3945–3977 (2013).

  17. 17.

    , , , & Trends in solar spectral irradiance variability in the visible and infrared. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L07801 (2009).

  18. 18.

    , , & An influence of solar spectral variations on radiative forcing of climate. Nature 467, 696–699 (2010).

  19. 19.

    Evolution of the Sun’s Spectral Irradiance since the Maunder Minimum. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 2425–2428 (2000).

  20. 20.

    et al. Possible impacts of a future Grand Solar Minimum on climate: stratospheric and global circulation changes. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. .

  21. 21.

    & Solar cycle signals in sea level pressure and sea surface temperature. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 3147–3153 (2010).

  22. 22.

    , , , & The surface climate response to 11-yr solar forcing during northern winter: observational analyses and comparisons with GCM simulations. J. Clim. 26, 7489–7506 (2013).

  23. 23.

    et al. Anthropogenic forcing of the northern annular mode in CCMVal2 models. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D00M03 (2010).

  24. 24.

    et al. Climate change projections and stratosphere-troposphere interaction. Clim. Dyn. 38, 2089–2097 (2012).

  25. 25.

    & Uncertainties in regional climate change predictions. A regional analysis of ensemble simulations with the HADCM2 GCM. Clim. Dyn. 16, 169–182 (2000).

  26. 26.

    & The link between the North Atlantic Oscillation and Arctic Sea ice export through Fram Strait. J. Clim. 14, 3932–3943 (2001).

  27. 27.

    & Modeled winter sea ice variability and the North Atlantic Oscillation: a multi-century perspective. Clim. Dyn. 34, 515–525 (2010).

  28. 28.

    & The Arctic Oscillation signature in the wintertime geopotential height and temperature fields Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 1297–1300 (1998).

  29. 29.

    , , , & European climate extremes and the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Clim. 21, 72–83 (2008).

  30. 30.

    et al. The HadGEM2-ES implementation of CMIP5 centennial simulations. Geosci. Model Dev. 4, 543–570 (2011).

  31. 31.

    IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis eds Stocker T.et al. Cambridge Univ. Press (2013).

  32. 32.

    , , & Are cold winters in Europe associated with low solar activity? Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 024001 (2010).

  33. 33.

    , , , & European seasonal and annual temperature variability, trends, and extremes since 1500. Science 303, 1499–1503 (2004).

  34. 34.

    , , , & Solar forcing of North Atlantic surface temperature and salinity over the past millennium. Nat. Geosci. 7, 275–278 (2014).

  35. 35.

    et al. A mechanism for lagged North Atlantic climate response to solar variability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 434–439 (2013).

  36. 36.

    & Mechanism of Interannual to Decadal Variability of the North Atlantic Circulation. J. Clim. 14, 2266–2280 (2001).

  37. 37.

    et al. Abrupt onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by sea-ice/ocean feedbacks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L02708 (2012).

  38. 38.

    , , & Amplified inception of European Little Ice Age by sea ice–ocean–atmosphere feedbacks. J. Clim. 26, 7586–7602 (2013).

  39. 39.

    & A volcanically triggered regime shift in the subpolar North Atlantic Ocean as a possible origin of the Little Ice Age. Clim. Past 9, 1321–1330 (2013).

  40. 40.

    & Naturally forced multidecadal variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Clim. Dyn. 42, 1347–1362 (2014).

  41. 41.

    , & Processes governing the recovery of a perturbed thermohaline circulation in HadCM3. J. Clim. 15, 764–780 (2002).

  42. 42.

    et al. Simulation of the role of solar and orbital forcing on climate. Adv. Space Res. 37, 1629–1634 (2006).

  43. 43.

    et al. Solar influences on climate. Rev. Geophys. 48, RG4001 (2010).

  44. 44.

    The Maunder Minimum. Science 192, 1189–1202 (1976).

  45. 45.

    et al. The late Maunder Minimum (1675-1715) - A key period for studying decadal scale climatic change in Europe. Clim. Change 49, 441–462 (2001).

  46. 46.

    & Past and recent changes in the North Atlantic oscillation. WIREs Clim. Change 3, 79–90 (2012).

  47. 47.

    et al. Transient climate simulations from the Maunder Minimum to present day: role of the stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D00I10 (2010).

  48. 48.

    et al. Regional atmospheric circulation shifts induced by a grand solar minimum. Nat. Geosci. 5, 397–401 (2012).

  49. 49.

    et al. Impact of solar versus volcanic activity variations on tropospheric temperatures and precipitation during the Dalton Minimum. Clim. Past 10, 921–938 (2014).

  50. 50.

    & How natural and anthropogenic influences alter global and regional surface temperatures: 1889 to 2006. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, (2008).

  51. 51.

    , & Grand minima and maxima of solar activity: new observational constraints. Astron. Astrophys. 471, 301–309 (2007).

  52. 52.

    , & Solar modulation during the Holocene. Astrophys. Space Sci. Trans. 4, 1–6 (2008).

  53. 53.

    et al. Predicting space climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L16103 (2011).

  54. 54.

    & Prediction of solar activity for the next 500 years. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 118, 1861–1867 (2013).

  55. 55.

    et al. The HadGEM2 family of Met Office Unified Model climate configurations. Geosci. Model Dev. 4, 723–757 (2011).

  56. 56.

    , , , & The effect of a well-resolved stratosphere on surface climate: differences between CMIP5 simulations with high and low top versions of the Met Office Climate Model. J. Clim. 25, 7083–7099 (2012).

  57. 57.

    et al. The effect of climate change on the variability of the Northern Hemisphere stratospheric polar vortex. J. Atmos. Sci. 69, 2608–2618 (2012).

  58. 58.

    , , , & Stratospheric variability in twentieth-century CMIP5 simulations of the Met Office climate model: high top versus low top. J. Clim. 26, 1595–1606 (2013).

  59. 59.

    et al. Top-down solar modulation of climate: evidence for centennial-scale change. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 034008 (2010).

  60. 60.

    GCM study of climate change in response to the 11-year solar cycle. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 125, 871–892 (1999).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Joint DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101) and also by the EU project SPECS funded by the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Research Programme under the grant agreement 308378 (Met Office Hadley Centre authors), by the NERC National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS) Climate directorate (L.J.G. and A.C.M.), an ERC ACCI grant (A.C.M) and an AXA Postdoctoral Fellowship (A.C.M.). We thank Neal Butchart, Steven Hardiman, Tim Hinton, Dan Mitchell and Scott Osprey for their work in developing the ‘high top’ version of HadGEM2 and support in running the simulations, and Neal Butchart and Gareth Jones for helpful discussions on the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK

    • Sarah Ineson
    • , Adam A. Scaife
    • , Nick J. Dunstone
    • , Jeff R. Knight
    • , James C. Manners
    •  & Richard A. Wood
  2. Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK

    • Amanda C. Maycock
  3. National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK

    • Amanda C. Maycock
    •  & Lesley J. Gray
  4. Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK

    • Lesley J. Gray
  5. Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80303 USA

    • Jerald W. Harder
  6. Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6BB, UK

    • Mike Lockwood

Authors

  1. Search for Sarah Ineson in:

  2. Search for Amanda C. Maycock in:

  3. Search for Lesley J. Gray in:

  4. Search for Adam A. Scaife in:

  5. Search for Nick J. Dunstone in:

  6. Search for Jerald W. Harder in:

  7. Search for Jeff R. Knight in:

  8. Search for Mike Lockwood in:

  9. Search for James C. Manners in:

  10. Search for Richard A. Wood in:

Contributions

A.A.S., L.J.G. and S.I. planned the experiments. J.W.H. provided the SIM data, M.L. supplied the TSI/OSF scenario, and N.J.D. and J.C.M. adapted the data for use in the model. S.I. and A.C.M. ran the experiments and analysed the results. J.R.K. advised on statistical methods. All the authors contributed to discussing the results and writing the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Ineson.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY-NC-SAThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/