Decarbonylative organoboron cross-coupling of esters by nickel catalysis


The Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling is a metal-catalysed reaction in which boron-based nucleophiles and halide-based electrophiles are reacted to form a single molecule. This is one of the most reliable tools in synthetic chemistry, and is extensively used in the synthesis of pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals and organic materials. Herein, we report a significant advance in the choice of electrophilic coupling partner in this reaction. With a user-friendly and inexpensive nickel catalyst, a range of phenyl esters of aromatic, heteroaromatic and aliphatic carboxylic acids react with boronic acids in a decarbonylative manner. Overall, phenyl ester moieties function as leaving groups. Theoretical calculations uncovered key mechanistic features of this unusual decarbonylative coupling. Since extraordinary numbers of ester-containing molecules are available both commercially and synthetically, this new ‘ester’ cross-coupling should find significant use in synthetic chemistry as an alternative to the standard halide-based Suzuki–Miyaura coupling.


The Suzuki–Miyaura coupling, a palladium- or nickel-catalysed cross-coupling reaction of boron-based nucleophiles and organic electrophiles1,2, is one of the most reliable reactions in synthetic organic chemistry, indispensable in the synthesis of a range of functional organic materials ranging from pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, organic electronic devices and liquid crystals (Fig. 1a). Conventionally, the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling uses organic halides as the electrophilic component3. The development of a new mode of bond/group activation is expected to offer great opportunities, particularly when it leads to unconventional, streamlined organic syntheses. Recent advances include the successful utilization of aniline derivatives such as diazonium and ammonium salts4,5, anisole derivatives6 and many other compounds7,8,9,10,11 as coupling partners for boronic acids. Here we describe a rare example of the unconventional use of esters as the electrophilic component in a nickel-catalysed Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling.

Figure 1: Esters as electrophiles in the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling.

(a) Electrophiles (R–Z) in the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling with organoboron compounds catalysed by palladium or nickel; Z=halogen (standard), Z=N, O, S (emerging), Z=CO2Ph (esters; this work). (b) Advantages of using esters as electrophilic coupling partners in Suzuki–Miyaura coupling. (c) Our mechanistic blueprint of decarbonylative cross-coupling of esters and boronic acids catalysed by nickel.

The use of esters in the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling is important not only because this avoids the production of corrosive halide-containing wastes, but also because it opens access to a vast number of commercially and synthetically available ester-containing molecules (Fig. 1b). Moreover, ester groups are often associated with heterocycle synthesis, for example, Knorr pyrrole synthesis, Feist–Bénary furan synthesis and Hantzsch dihydropyridine synthesis, where these functionalities are important components of the heterocycle cores (Fig. 1b). Thus, the successful implementation of this simple ‘ester-based’ Suzuki–Miyaura coupling would permit these ester groups to be used directly as leaving groups. Given the recent rapid progress in C–H borylation chemistry12, which has enormously increased the accessibility of boron-based reagents, the target ‘ester-based’ Suzuki–Miyaura coupling is expected to significantly advance organic synthesis. Furthermore, the use of earth-abundant first-row metal nickel as a catalyst in the target coupling makes this reaction commercially more appealing.

In recent years, there is a growing interest in the use of aroyl compounds in metal-catalysed decarboxylative or decarbonylative coupling reactions13,14. Gooßen et al.15 reported that aromatic carboxylic acids and haloarenes could be cross-coupled in a decarboxylative manner employing a palladium-copper bimetallic catalytic system. Arising from this groundbreaking discovery, a number of decarboxylative or decarbonylative cross-coupling reactions with aroyl compounds have been reported13,14. Gooßen and Paetzoid16 reported that arylcarboxylic anhydrides can be cross-coupled with arylboroxines in a decarbonylative manner in the presence of rhodium catalyst to give the corresponding biaryls. A chelation-assisted decarbonylative coupling of ethyl benzo[h]quinoline-10-carboxylate and arylboronic acids is also possible with rhodium catalyst17. The decarbonylative transformations of carboxylic anhydrides are also reported in nickel-based system18,19,20. For example, Rovis and co-workers19 reported that cyclic anhydrides react with diphenylzinc in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of nickel complex to provide the corresponding decarbonylative phenylation products. Phthalimides also react in a similar manner with diorganozinc reagents, but this reaction also requires a stoichiometric amount of nickel complex20.

Although ester groups have remained elusive electrophiles in the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling, we devised a decarbonylative cross-coupling manifold employing Ni0/NiII redox catalysis (Fig. 1c). Prior experimental and theoretical investigations18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25 have shown that oxidative addition of the C(acyl)–O bond of certain carboxylic acid esters to Ni0 complexes leads to the formation of an acylnickel(II) intermediate that could then undergo (i) transmetalation reaction with a boronic acid and (ii) decarbonylation to produce a diorganonickel(II) intermediate. Subsequent reductive elimination releases the decarbonylative cross-coupling product and regenerates Ni0 species. Armed by these knowledge and the discovered beneficial impact of a phenyl substituent on the cleavage of C(acyl)–O bonds by nickel catalysts22,25, we primarily focused on the use of phenyl esters of arenecarboxylic acids (ArCO2Ph) in this study.


Discovery of decarbonylative cross-coupling of esters

We initiated this study by finding suitable catalytic conditions for the decarbonylative cross-coupling of esters and boronic acids, using phenyl 3-pyridinecarboxylate (1A) and p-anisylboronic acid (2a) as model substrates. We focused on the use of nickel catalysts due to their low cost and our extensive experience26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34. Representative results are shown in Table 1 (see Supplementary Tables 1–3 for full details). We found that, in the presence of a catalytic amount of Ni(cod)2 (10 mol%; cod (1,5-cyclooctadiene)) and Na2CO3 as base, the decarbonylative cross-coupling did not proceed even at 150 °C (entry 1). The use of previously successful bidentate phosphines22,25,31,32,33,34, such as dcype (1,2-bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)ethane) and dppe (1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) as ligands for nickel, did not produce coupling product 3Aa either (entries 2 and 3). Gratifyingly, further screening showed that the use of dpph (1,6-bis(diphenylphosphino)hexane) furnished 3Aa in 51% yield (entry 4). With the assumption that dpph is acting as a monodentate ligand, we turned our attention to monodentate phosphine ligands, and we were delighted to discover that commercially available and inexpensive P(n-Bu)3 performed well in the decarbonylative cross-coupling (PCy3, 26%; PPh2Me, 47% and P(n-Bu)3, 65%). We determined Na2CO3 to be the optimal base due to its relatively low cost, but an equally important finding is the successful coupling in the absence of an exogenous base (entry 8) as is usually required in typical halide-based Suzuki–Miyaura couplings1,2. The coupling can also be conducted in various solvents (ethers, hydrocarbons and alcohols). Fortunately, the use of toluene, which is also inexpensive and a preferred solvent in process chemistry, provided 95% yield of 3Aa (entry 9). Even more pleasingly, we found that Ni(OAc)2, which is much more stable and less expensive than Ni(cod)2 and typical palladium complexes (Ni(OAc)2·4H2O, $108 per kg from Sigma-Aldrich), functioned as a pre-catalyst yielding 3Aa in 88% yield at 5 mol% catalyst loading (entry 10). Temperature effects were also examined, and 150 °C was determined to be optimal. Esters prepared from phenol and its derivatives are effective substrates in this particular coupling, and ethyl esters are virtually unreactive under otherwise identical conditions. In almost all cases, we did not observe the formation of carbonylated coupling product (diarylketone)13, which indicates the high capability of nickel to facilitate the decarbonylation process. Taken together, we have established an operationally simple, economical/ecological sound, user-friendly, nickel-based catalytic system affecting organoboron-based, decarbonylative cross-coupling reactions using esters as electrophilic coupling partners.

Table 1 Effect of parameters in the nickel-catalysed decarbonylative cross-coupling of 1A and 2a.

Mechanistic considerations

Having established a new coupling protocol, we then turned our attention to elucidate key mechanistic features of this decarbonylative Suzuki–Miyaura coupling by comprehensive theoretical calculation. Shown in Fig. 2a is the operative mechanism of the reaction in the presence of base (Na2CO3). The performed density functional theory calculations (see Supplementary Information and caption of Fig. 2 for details of the used computational methods) show that the initial step of the reaction, that is, C(acyl)–O oxidative addition of phenyl 3-pyridinecarboxylate to Ni[P(n-Bu)3]2 (A), proceeds through an intermediate π-complex B (Fig. 2b). The existing donor–acceptor interactions between π-bonds of phenyl and pyridyl rings with empty d-orbitals of nickel exist (see Supplementary Fig. 159 for details) in the π-complex B is predicted to play a key role in C(acyl)–O bond activation since ethyl esters are virtually unreactive. Computation has shown that the addition of Na2CO3 to the reaction mixture has almost no impact on the C–O oxidative addition step. In contrast, it has profound effect on the mechanism of the subsequent steps of the reaction (Fig. 2a). At first, Na2CO3 reacts with the oxidative addition intermediate C with almost no energy barrier, and leads to the formation of the unprecedented Ni-[NaCO3NaOPh] cluster complex D (Fig. 2b)24,25,35,36,37. Overall reaction, C+Na2CO3D, is found to be exergonic by 22.2 kcal mol−1.

Figure 2: Calculation of nickel-catalysed reaction.

(a) Schematic presentation of the elementary steps of the decarbonylative coupling of phenyl 3-pyridinecarboxylate and p-anisylboronic acid in the presence of Ni-P(nBu)3 and Na2CO3. (b) The important reactive intermediates B and D, and transmetalation transition state TS2. Hydrogen atoms and n-butyl groups on phosphorous atoms are omitted for clarity. (c) Relative energies of representative intermediates and transition states. The presented Gibbs free relative energies (ΔG) are obtained at the M06/{Lanl2dzNi+[6–31G(d,p)]} level of theory, in toluene solution (by using the polarizable continuum model (PCM) solvation method), and at the experimentally reported temperature (423.15 K) and pressure (1 atm).

Although there was an important question from the outset of this work whether the subsequent step is transmetalation or decarbonylation, the calculations uncovered that the former is the case. Transmetalation of D with p-anisylboronic acid occurs to give complex E with an energy barrier of 22.3 kcal mol−1 (Fig. 2c). The following decarbonylation occurs with higher barrier of 29.2 kcal mol−1 to give intermediate F, which then undergoes smooth reductive elimination to furnish the decarbonylative cross-coupling product and nickel(0) species. Overall, the decarbonylation is a rate-determining step of the present coupling under the optimized conditions with Na2CO3. It should be noted that the calculations have also determined a slight high-energy reaction pathway in the absence of base, in which the rate-determining step is transmetalation from C (barrier 31.9 kcal mol−1). Thus, the calculations shed light on why this reaction occurs without base, yet is somewhat accelerated on the addition of Na2CO3 (Table 1).

Scope of decarbonylative organoboron cross-coupling of esters

After establishing optimal catalytic conditions [Ni(OAc)2, P(n-Bu)3, Na2CO3 and toluene, 150 °C, 24 h] and elucidating mechanistic details, we performed the decarbonylative cross-coupling with a wide range of substrates. As shown in Table 2, the scope is very broad with regard to both partners. Various electronically and sterically diverse arenecarboxylic acid esters were found to cross-couple with p-anisylboronic acid (2a) in high to excellent yields. Esters of heterocycles such as thiophenes, furans, benzothiophenes, oxazoles, thiazoles, pyridines and quinolines reacted smoothly to provide the corresponding heterobiaryls. Apart from 2-pyridyl, 2-pyrazyl and 2-quinolinyl groups, most heteroaryl groups were transferred into the product in high to excellent yields. Easy access to heteroarene coupling partners is worth mentioning. For example, esters of oxazoles and thiazole 1Q1S could be prepared easily, while several steps are needed for the synthesis of halogen analogues of these coupling partners. The present decarbonylative cross-coupling is also applicable to the synthesis of flavone and its derivatives (3ABh and 3ABa), which are of significant scientific and public interest. Halide-containing substrates, except for organofluorines, are problematic as aryl–halogen bonds are also activated and arylated by the Ni(OAc)2/P(n-Bu)3 catalyst. By competitive experiments, we estimated the reactivity order as Ar–I≥Ar–Br>Ar–Cl≥Ar–CO2PhAr–F (see Supplementary Table 5). The scope of this reaction with respect to arylboronic acids is also very broad. In addition to various substituted phenyl groups including sterically hindered o-disubstituted groups (3Am), heteroarene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon moieties (3Ao and 3Ap) could also be coupled. Moreover, alkenylboronic acids also participated well in the decarbonylative cross-coupling to afford the corresponding substituted alkenes in good yields (3Wq and 3Aq), when NaCl was employed as an additive (see Supplementary Table 6). The effect of NaCl or related salt remains unclear, but one possibility might be that it works as a dehydrating agent for the water that is generated from arylboronic acids. As mentioned above, the present coupling is selective for phenol-derived esters. Thus, methyl esters in either of the coupling partners are left intact (3Fa, 3Za and 3Ai). It should also be highlighted that the present coupling has been conducted on a gram scale in high yield (3Aa: 1.44 g, 78%).

Table 2 Scope of decarbonylative cross-coupling catalysed by Ni(OAc)2/P(n-Bu)3.

In this study, we primarily focused on the development of biaryl- and heterobiaryl-forming reactions in the context of accessing privileged structures in a useful and unconventional way. Broadening the scope of present catalysis to an aliphatic system (sp3-sp2 cross-coupling) would have significant impact in synthetic chemistry. Though still preliminary, we found that this coupling is feasible (Table 2). When arylacetic acid phenyl esters 1AF1AH were treated with 2a under the standard conditions, the corresponding decarbonylative coupling products (3AFa, 3AGa and 3AHa) were produced. The addition of a catalytic amount of DMAP (N,N-dimethylaminopyridine) to the reaction system had a positive effect on the coupling reaction (see Supplementary Table 7). Although there is room for further optimization of this particular coupling partner, this successful alkyl–aryl cross-coupling speaks well for the potential of our present nickel catalysis with regard to the development of unconventional yet useful synthetic chemistry.


While highly chemoselective coupling at the phenol-derived ester moiety is an advantage of the present protocol, there is a need to transform a molecule of interest into an activated phenyl ester form. To simplify this pre-activation step, we have also established a one-pot protocol starting directly from carboxylic acids (Fig. 3a). For example, 2-thiophenecarboxylic acid could be converted to the corresponding phenyl ester 1K by the treatment with diphenyl iodonium triflate (Ph2IOTf) and K2CO3 in toluene at 130 °C for 2 h38. After removing iodobenzene (co-product of esterification) under reduced pressure, 2a, nickel catalyst and Na2CO3 were added to the same reaction flask, and the corresponding decarbonylative cross-coupling product 3Ka was obtained in 61% yield (two steps) after stirring the mixture at 150 °C.

Figure 3: Further applications of ‘ester’ Suzuki–Miyaura coupling.

(a) One-pot transformation of thiophene-2-carboxylic acid to biaryl 3Ka. (b) Application to the synthesis of telmisartan derivatives. (c) Orthogonal coupling of 6; decarbonylative cross-coupling catalysed by Ni(OAc)2/P(n-Bu)3 (first step) and C–H/C–O coupling catalysed by Ni(cod)2/dcypt (second step). dcypt, 3,4-bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)thiophene. (d) Sequential coupling of 1Q; decarbonylative C–B coupling catalysed by Ni(OAc)2/P(n-Bu)3 (first step) and decarbonylative C–H coupling catalysed by Ni(cod)2/dcype (second step). (e) Orthogonal coupling of 10: decarbonylative C–H coupling catalysed by Ni(cod)2/dcype (first step) and decarbonylative C–B coupling catalysed by Ni(OAc)2/P(n-Bu)3 (second step).

The nickel-catalysed decarbonylative cross-coupling was also viable with complex molecular precursors. For example, telmisartan, an angiotensin blocker that is under use for treatment of hypertension39, could be subjected to decarbonylative cross-coupling with 2a (after esterification) to produce aryl analogue 5 in 78% yield (Fig. 3b). The successful coupling of heterocycle-rich compound 4 bodes well for the high versatility of present catalysis in many molecular transformations particularly in complex molecule synthesis.

The molecular recognition ability and chemoselectivity of the Ni(OAc)2/P(n-Bu)3 catalyst is exceptionally high (Fig. 3c). 3-Hydroxybenzoic acid derivative 6, in which the phenol end and the acid end are protected as a pivalate and phenyl ester, respectively, provides an interesting example. This compound underwent selective activation of the latter phenyl ester moiety (highlighted in blue in Fig. 3c) by the Ni(OAc)2/P(n-Bu)3 catalyst, leading to the selective coupling with 2a to produce 7 in 74% yield. There are a number of reports that nickel complexes catalyse the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of a range of aryl pivalates and related aryl C–O bonds with arylboronic acids6,40,41,42,43. However, under the present conditions, aryl pivalate moiety (highlighted in green) remained intact. This result underscores the capability of the Ni(OAc)2/P(n-Bu)3 catalyst to distinguish subtle difference in the steric environment of the two aryl ester moieties. Moreover, we found that the remaining phenyl ester moiety of 7 could be activated by another recently developed nickel catalyst Ni(cod)2/dcypt to effect the C–H/C–O coupling reaction with benzoxazole31,34, yielding teraryl 8 in 85% yield (Fig. 3c).

A sequence of decarbonylative C–B coupling and decarbonylative C–H coupling22 is also possible. For example, by the action of Ni(OAc)2/P(n-Bu)3 catalyst, phenyl oxazole-4-carboxylate (1Q) reacted with (4-methoxyphenyl)boroxine in a decarbonylative C–B coupling manner to afford aryloxazole 3Qa in 57% yield (Fig. 3d). The oxazole C–H bond of 3Qa can be further arylated by decarbonylative C–H coupling with phenyl isonicotinate in the presence of Ni(cod)2/dcype catalyst to afford diaryloxazole 9 in 99% yield (Fig. 3d). A sequential coupling of bifunctional aromatic 10 having boron and phenyl ester moieties is also possible (Fig. 3e). In the presence of Ni(cod)2/dcype catalyst, 10 underwent decarbonylative C–H coupling with benzoxazole to give 11 in 50% yield. Note that the boronate group of compound 10 was tolerated under these conditions. Subsequently, the boronate group of 11 can be arylated by decarbonylative C–B coupling with phenyl nicotinate by Ni(OAc)2/P(n-Bu)3 catalyst to afford triaryl 12 in 52% yield.

In conclusion, we have developed a user-friendly nickel-based catalytic system (Ni(OAc)2/P(n-Bu)3) for the decarbonylative organoboron cross-coupling using esters as coupling partners. In this report, we also described (1) the elucidation of key mechanistic features of this newly developed reaction by comprehensive theoretical calculation, (2) the broad scope with regard to both coupling partners (esters and boron), (3) successful aliphatic cross-coupling, (4) a gram-scale cross-coupling, (5) one-pot cross-coupling protocol starting directly from carboxylic acids, (6) application to complex molecular settings and (7) exceptionally high molecular recognition ability of Ni(OAc)2/P(n-Bu)3 catalyst that allows unconventional orthogonal cross-coupling. Overall, the new ‘ester’ Suzuki–Miyaura coupling described herein not only is useful as an alternative to the standard halide-based cross-coupling, but also allows strategic and unconventional utilization of ubiquitous ester functionalities in chemical synthesis. Further optimization of catalyst and reaction conditions to achieve broader scope and allow lower temperature coupling is ongoing in our laboratory.


General procedure for Ni-catalysed decarbonylative coupling

A 20-ml glass vessel equipped with J. Young O-ring tap containing a magnetic stirring bar and Ni(OAc)2·4H2O (5.0 mg, 0.020 mmol, 5 mol%) was dried with a heatgun under reduced pressure and filled with N2 gas after cooling to room temperature. To this vessel was added phenyl arenecarboxylic acid phenyl ester 1 (0.40 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), arylboronic acid 2 (0.60 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) and Na2CO3 (84.8 mg, 0.8 mmol, 2.0 equiv.). The vessel was vacuumed and refilled with N2 gas three times. To this was added P(n-Bu)3 (19.0 μl, 0.08 mmol, 20 mol%) and toluene (1.6 ml). The vessel was sealed with O-ring tap and then heated at 150 °C for 24 h in an eight-well reaction block with stirring. After cooling the reaction mixture to room temperature, the mixture was passed through a short silica-gel pad with EtOAc. The filtrate was concentrated and the residue was purified by silica-gel chromatography to afford the corresponding cross-coupling product 3.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Muto, K. et al. Decarbonylative organoboron cross-coupling of esters by nickel catalysis. Nat. Commun. 6:7508 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8508 (2015).


  1. 1

    Cross-Coupling Reactions: A Practical Guide. ed. Miyaura N. vol. 219, Springer (2002).

  2. 2

    Miyaura, N. & Suzuki, A. Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of organoboron compounds. Chem. Rev. 95, 2457–2483 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Lee, J. C. H. & Hall, D. G. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions and More eds de Meijere A., Bräse S., Oestreich M. 65–132Wiley-VCH (2014).

  4. 4

    Roglans, A., Pla-Quintana, A. & Moreno-Mañas, M. Diazonium salts as substrates in palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions. Chem. Rev. 106, 4622–4643 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Blakey, S. B. & MacMillan, D. W. C. The first Suzuki cross-couplings of aryltrimethylammonium salts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 6046–6047 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Rosen, B. M. et al. Nickel-catalyzed cross-couplings involving carbon−oxygen bonds. Chem. Rev. 111, 1346–1416 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Modha, S. G., Mehta, V. P. & Van der Eycken, E. V. Transition metal-catalyzed C–C bond formation via C–S bond cleavage: an overview. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 5042–5055 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Yu, D.-G. et al. Carbon–carbon formation via Ni-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura coupling through C–CN bond cleavage of aryl nitrile. Org. Lett. 11, 3374–3377 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Chen, X., Engle, K. M., Wang, D.-H. & Yu, J.-Q. Palladium(II)-catalyzed C–H activation/C–C cross-coupling reactions: versatility and practicality. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 5094–5115 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Sun, C.-L., Li, B.-J. & Shi, Z.-J. Pd-catalyzed oxidative coupling with organometallic reagents via C–H activation. Chem. Commun. 46, 677–685 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Yamaguchi, J. & Itami, K. in Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions and More eds de Meijere A., Bräse S., Oestreich M. 1315–1387Wiley-VCH (2014).

  12. 12

    Mkhalid, I. A. I., Barnard, J. H., Marder, T. B., Murphy, J. M. & Hartwig, J. F. C–H activation for the construction of C–B bonds. Chem. Rev. 110, 890–931 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Gooßen, L. J., Rodríguez, N. & Gooßen, K. Carboxylic acids as substrates in homogeneous catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 3100–3120 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Dzik, W., Lange, P. & Gooßen, L. Carboxylates as sources of carbon nucleophiles and electrophiles: comparison of decarboxylative and decarbonylative pathways. Chem. Sci. 3, 2671–2678 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Gooßen, L. J., Deng, G. & Levy, L. M. Synthesis of biaryls via catalytic decarboxylative coupling. Science 313, 662–664 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Gooßen, L. J. & Paetzoid, J. New synthesis of biaryls via Rh-catalyzed decarbonylative Suzuki-coupling of carboxylic anhydrides with arylboroxines. Adv. Synth. Catal. 346, 1665–1668 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Wang, J., Liu, B., Zhao, H. & Wang, J. Rhodium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of carboxylate and organoboron compounds via chelation-assisted C–C bond activation. Organometallics 31, 8598–8607 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Trost, B. & Chen, F. Transition metal mediated eliminations in anhydrides and thioanhydrides. Tetrahedron Lett. 28, 2603–2607 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    O’Brien, E. M., Bercot, E. A. & Rovis, T. Decarbonylative cross-coupling of cyclic anhydride: introducing stereochemistry at an sp3 carbon in the cross-coupling event. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 10498–10499 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Havlik, S., Simmons, J., Winton, V. & Johnson, J. Nickel-mediated decarbonylative cross-coupling of phthalimides with in situ generated diorganozinc reagents. J. Org. Chem. 76, 3588–3593 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Yamamoto, T., Ishizu, J., Kohara, T., Komiya, S. & Yamamoto, A. Oxidative addition of aryl carboxylates to nickel(0) complexes involving cleavage of the acyl-oxygen bond. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 3758–3764 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Amaike, K., Muto, K., Yamaguchi, J. & Itami, K. Decarbonylative C–H coupling of azoles and aryl esters: unprecedented nickel catalysis and application to the synthesis of muscoride A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 13573–13576 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Hong, X., Liang, Y. & Houk, K. N. Mechanisms and origins of switchable chemoselectivity of Ni-catalyzed C(aryl)–O and C(acyl)–O activation of aryl esters with phosphine ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 2017–2025 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Lu, Q., Yu, H. & Fu, Y. Mechanistic study of chemoselectivity in Ni-catalyzed coupling reactions between azoles and aryl carboxylates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 8252–8260 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Xu, H. et al. Key mechanistic features of Ni-catalyzed C–H/C–O biaryl coupling of azoles and naphthalene-2-yl pivalates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 14834–14844 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Tasker, S. Z., Standley, E. A. & Jamison, T. F. Recent advances in homogeneous nickel catalysis. Nature 509, 299–309 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Yamaguchi, J., Muto, K. & Itami, K. Recent progress in nickel-catalyzed biaryl coupling. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 19–30 (2013).

  28. 28

    Nakao, Y., Oda, S. & Hiyama, T. Nickel-catalyzed arylcyanation of alkynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 13904–13905 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Watson, M. P. & Jacobsen, E. N. Asymmetric intramolecular arylcyanation of unactivated olefins via C–CN bond activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 12594–12595 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Murakami, M., Ashida, S. & Matsuda, T. Nickel-catalyzed intermolecular alkyne insertion into cyclobutanones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 6932–6933 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Muto, K., Yamaguchi, J. & Itami, K. Nickel-catalyzed C–H/C–O coupling of azoles with phenol derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 169–172 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Meng, L., Kamada, Y., Muto, K., Yamaguchi, J. & Itami, K. C–H alkenylation of azoles with enols and esters by nickel catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 10048–10051 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Muto, K., Yamaguchi, J., Lei, A. & Itami, K. Isolation, structure, and reactivity of an arylnickel(II) pivalate complex in catalytic C–H/C–O biaryl coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 16384–16387 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Takise, R., Muto, K., Yamaguchi, J. & Itami, K. Nickel-catalyzed α-arylation of ketones with phenol derivatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 6791–6794 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Liu, L. et al. Mechanistic insight into the nickel-catalyzed cross-coupling of aryl phosphates with arylboronic acids: potassium phosphate is not a spectator base but is involved in the transmetalation step in the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction. Chem. Asian J. 8, 2592–2595 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Ananikov, V. P. Nickel: the “spirited horse” of transition metal catalysis. ACS Catal. 5, 1964–1971 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Figg, T. M., Wasa, M., Yu, J.-Q. & Musaev, D. G. Understanding the reactivity of Pd0/PR3-catalyzed intermolecular C(sp3)–H bond arylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 14206–14214 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Petersen, T. B., Khan, R. & Olofsson, B. Metal-free synthesis of aryl esters from carboxylic acids and diaryliodonium salts. Org. Lett. 13, 3462–3465 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Battershill, A. J. & Scott, L. J. Telmisartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. Drugs 66, 51–83 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Quasdorf, K. W., Tian, X. & Garg, N. K. Cross-coupling reactions of aryl pivalates with boronic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 14422–14423 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Guan, B.-T., Wang, Y., Li, B.-J., Yu, D.-G. & Shi, Z.-J. Biaryl construction via Ni-catalyzed C–O activation of phenolic carboxylates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 14468–14470 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Tobisu, M., Shimasaki, T. & Chatani, N. Nickel-catalyzed cross-coupling of aryl methyl ethers with aryl boronic esters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 4866–4869 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Antoft-Finch, A., Blackburn, T. & Snieckus, V. N,N-Diethyl O-carbamate: directed metalation group and orthogonal Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling partner. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 17750–17752 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the ERATO program from JST (K.I.), the Funding Program for Next Generation World-Leading Researchers from JSPS (220GR049 to K.I.), a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas ‘Molecular Activation Directed toward Straightforward Synthesis’ (25105720 to J.Y.) and KAKENHI (25708005 to J.Y.) from MEXT. The computational studies were supported by the National Science Foundation under the CCI Center for Selective C–H Functionalization (CHE-1205646). D.G.M. acknowledges NSF MRI-R2 grant (CHE-0958205) and the resources of the Cherry Emerson Center for Scientific Computation. K.M. thanks the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for fellowships. Dr Lingkui Meng and Mr. Kazuma Amaike (Nagoya University) are acknowledged for their early studies. We thank Dr Ayako Miyazaki (Nagoya University), Prof. Cathleen M. Crudden (Queen’s University) and Dr Kei Murakami (Nagoya University) for fruitful discussion and critical comments. ITbM is supported by the World Premier International Research Center (WPI) Initiative, Japan.

Author information




K.I. and J.Y. conceived the concept and directed the project. K.M. conducted the experiments. D.G.M. designed and performed the calculations. K.I wrote the manuscript with feedback from other authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Junichiro Yamaguchi or Djamaladdin G. Musaev or Kenichiro Itami.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-158, Supplementary Tables 1-13, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary References (PDF 25056 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muto, K., Yamaguchi, J., Musaev, D. et al. Decarbonylative organoboron cross-coupling of esters by nickel catalysis. Nat Commun 6, 7508 (2015).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing