Long distance spin communication in chemical vapour deposited graphene


Graphene is an ideal medium for long-distance spin communication in future spintronic technologies. So far, the prospect is limited by the smaller sizes of exfoliated graphene flakes and lower spin transport properties of large-area chemical vapour-deposited (CVD) graphene. Here we demonstrate a high spintronic performance in CVD graphene on SiO2/Si substrate at room temperature. We show pure spin transport and precession over long channel lengths extending up to 16 μm with a spin lifetime of 1.2 ns and a spin diffusion length 6 μm at room temperature. These spin parameters are up to six times higher than previous reports and highest at room temperature for any form of pristine graphene on industrial standard SiO2/Si substrates. Our detailed investigation reinforces the observed performance in CVD graphene over wafer scale and opens up new prospects for the development of lateral spin-based memory and logic applications.


Two-dimensional atomic crystals represent a new class of nanoscale materials for fundamental studies and potential applications in future electronics. Since the discovery of graphene, its superlative transport properties and their prospects in the field of nanoelectronics have been demonstrated1. Graphene also remains at the forefront for spintronic applications, being ideal for long-distance spin communication2. Owing to the low intrinsic spin–orbit coupling and negligible hyperfine interaction, the proposed spin coherence length (λs) in graphene can extend up to 100 μm with spin lifetime (τs) 1 μs3,4,5. Spin-logic technologies6 aim to harness this giant spintronic potential for manipulating nanomagnets7 via spin currents transmitted over long graphene channels. This will potentially bring novel developments in spintronic device designs from the conventional giant magnetoresistance (GMR) and tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) structures where a spin transport of only few nanometre distance is used6,8. The realization of these functionalities can lead to all-spin-logic and memory devices with high performance and low power consumption6. Pioneering experiments9 and subsequent important studies10,11,12,13,14,15,16 on pure spin transport showed λs 2 μm with τs in the range of 100–770 ps for exfoliated graphene on Si/SiO2 substrate9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. Although chemically modified graphene such as hydrogenated graphene has been reported to show enhanced λs7 μm and τs2.7 ns20, hydrogenation leading to colossal spin–orbit coupling21 with reduced λs1 μm and τs90 ps, and additional spin relaxation by created magnetic moments22 have also been reported. Even though extremely large values of λs and τs were estimated in epitaxial graphene on SiC substrates via magnetoresistance measurements23, the pure spin transport experiments revealed values for λs and τs up to 2 μm and 2 ns, respectively24,25. High-mobility exfoliated graphene on atomically flat hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) substrates and suspended graphene structures2,15,26 have been employed for enhanced spin parameters, with τs 150–400 ps and λs reaching up to 4.7 μm. More recently, spin diffusion length nearly double in magnitude with nanosecond spin lifetime in high-quality h-BN encapsulated exfoliated graphene structures27,28 have also been acheived. Most of these studies were performed using exfoliated flakes of graphene and h-BN due to their higher quality, but their size limitation to few micrometres has severely restricted any practical applicability.

Out of the different approaches to produce large-area graphene, chemical vapour deposition (CVD) is by far the most viable and industry compatible technique29,30,31,32. Such large area wafer scale graphene can be transferred to desired substrates, patterned and modified locally, achieving different electronic functionalities for the much anticipated all-graphene circuits33,34. Compared with exfoliated graphene, the electronic quality of the CVD form is seen to be compromised by polycrystalline domains, wrinkles, ripples, foreign contaminations, inter-grain connectivity and strain fields due to graphene–substrate interaction, introduced during the growth and subsequent transfer process31,35,36,37,38,39. Some of these features affect the charge transport substantially and thus can potentially alter the spin transport in CVD graphene. The challenges involved in CVD graphene device processing and their effect on sensitive spin currents so far resulted in fewer reports with spin parameters limited to τs200 ps and λs2 μm with channel length up to 4 μm on Si/SiO2 substrates at room temperature12,40,41,42. Even though theoretical studies advocate larger spin lifetimes on SiO2 substrates39 with spin transport being less influenced by imperfections such as grain boundaries or ripples in CVD graphene43 and flexural distortions44, studies involving microscopic descriptions37,45 attribute a greater role of grain boundaries in relaxation. The later studies37,45 indicate that achieving improved grain connectivity while decreasing impurities during the transfer and fabrication processes is key to enhanced charge and spin transport in CVD graphene. These facts point out that there exists an immense potential for long-distance spin transport in large-scale CVD graphene on SiO2/Si substrate, which remains a challenge to be realized experimentally.

In this study, we demonstrate the long-distance spin transport capability of CVD graphene in channels extending up to 16 μm on SiO2/Si substrate at room temperature. Pure spin transport and precession measurements in such long channels give rise to a spin lifetime of 1.2 ns with spin diffusion length 6 μm, which are the highest values obtained so far for any form of pristine graphene on SiO2/Si substrates at 300 K. Comprehensive measurements with various channel lengths and gate voltages performed at different temperatures enable us to understand the spin-scattering mechanism and evolution of the spin parameters in CVD graphene. The demonstration of long-distance spin transport in CVD graphene constitutes a major advancement for lateral spintronic memory and logic technologies.


Device and measurement

A schematic representation of a device along with the nonlocal (NL) technique for measurement of spin signal is shown in Fig. 1a. Spin polarization in CVD graphene is created by electrical spin injection (current I) from a ferromagnetic tunnel contact and the pure spin transport signal (voltage V) is detected by a similar contact placed nonlocally at a distance L. A modulation in the NL spin signal with magnetic field gives an estimate of induced spin polarization, and other spin parameters such as the spin lifetime τs and diffusion length λs in graphene. Essentially, two kinds of measurements are performed in all our CVD graphene devices having different channel lengths. First, the spin injection efficiency and spin transport distance are evaluated from spin valve measurement, where an in-plane magnetic field (B) parallel to the ferromagnetic electrodes is swept to measure the change in pure spin signal between parallel and antiparallel configurations of magnetizations of the ferromagnetic electrodes. Next, the spin lifetime τs, diffusion constant Ds and diffusion length λs are obtained by Hanle measurement, in which an out-of-plane magnetic field (B) perpendicular to the magnetization of ferromagnetic electrodes is swept to obtain continuous variation in spin signal due to spin precession. Devices having long CVD graphene channels with ferromagnetic tunnel contacts (TiO2/Co) were fabricated to achieve long-distance spin transport. We employed large-area CVD graphene grown on copper foil, which was transferred onto SiO2/Si substrate and patterned into long channels. The ferromagnetic tunnel contacts were prepared by electron beam lithography and liftoff techniques. The TiO2 barrier in the tunnel contacts was prepared by an evaporation of 8 Å of Ti and oxidation in an oxygen atmosphere. Subsequently, 65 nm of Co and a capping layer of 4 nm of Al were deposited by electron beam evaporation. The details of the device fabrication process are described in the Methods section. An optical microscope image of a fabricated device with 16-μm-long graphene channel and multiple TiO2/Co contacts is presented in Fig. 1b. The spin transport measurements were performed using DC currents, in the temperature range of 4.2–300 K.

Figure 1: CVD graphene field effect device for pure spin transport.

(a) Schematic representation of a graphene device with ferromagnetic tunnel contacts for spin injection and detection in NL geometry. The current (I) injection circuit creates spin polarization in graphene via electrical spin injection and the isolated voltage (V) measurement circuit probes the NL pure spin signal. The red colour represents the spin density, which diffuses away from the place of injection in the graphene channel. The highly doped Si with SiO2 layer is used as the back gate to control the carrier density (n) in graphene. (b) Optical microscope image of a fabricated long channel CVD graphene device on SiO2/Si substrate with multiple ferromagnetic tunnel contacts of Co/TiO2 patterned by electron-beam lithography. The NL measurement scheme is presented for 16-μm-long graphene channel with current (I) and voltage (V) circuits.

Structural and electrical characterization of CVD graphene

To understand the quality of graphene channel and the TiO2/Co tunnel contacts, we performed detailed structural and electrical characterization of the devices. Figure 2a displays an atomic force microscope image of the graphene channel in a device with relatively low density of ripples and resist residues on a region extending over 20 μm. Our optimized fabrication process ensured that the ripples introduced during the transfer process are sparse (height 1 nm shown in Fig. 2a). Figure 2b shows a representative Raman spectrum of CVD graphene, where a dominant 2D peak is observed compared to the G peak confirming its single-layer nature. In addition, the D peak was found to be of negligible intensity, indicating a low sp3-type or vacancy defect density46. Raman spectra taken at different places in all graphene channels yielded similar results, indicating uniformity in the CVD graphene.

Figure 2: Characterization of the CVD graphene and ferromagnetic tunnel contacts.

(a) Atomic force microscope image of a graphene channel, with scale bar of 5 μm along with a magnified image of a ripple featuring region and its height profile scan. (b) Representative micro Raman spectrum of CVD graphene channel. (c) Graphene channel resistance (Rch) for different channel lengths as a function of gate voltage (Vg)–Dirac point (VD) (Dirac curves) at room temperature. (d) The linear enhancement of the resistance with graphene channel length at VgVD=0. (e) Three-terminal IV characteristics of a Co/TiO2/graphene contact at different temperatures. (f) Differential conductance g(dI/dV) plot of the contact as a function of bias voltage at different temperatures.

Next, the quality of the graphene was electrically assessed by the Dirac curves obtained from four probe channel resistance measured as a function of the gate voltage (Vg). As shown in Fig. 2c, the resistance scales linearly with channel lengths, indicating a global uniformity of the CVD graphene. The carrier mobility evaluated from the Dirac curves was found to be 2,000 cm2 V−1 s−1 with sheet resistance 5 kΩ/□ for different channels at room temperature. The similar sheet resistance of channels indicates a similar diffusion constant (Dc) over a large area (see Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Table 1). The Dirac points (VD) were seen to lie in the range of −3 to −10 V, indicating a low doping of graphene. The typical temperature dependence of the Dirac curves of a graphene channel are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. It reveals a weak temperature dependence of graphene resistivity, indicating a dominating role of static scatterers. We obtain momentum scattering time τp20–50 fs and electron mean free path lmfp20–50 nm (depending on the gate voltage) for all graphene channels. The low mean free path compared with the device dimension (several μm) along with a similar charge diffusion constant (Dc) confirms the diffusive regime of electrical transport in CVD graphene (see Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Grain boundaries in CVD graphene can contribute substantially to the residual resistance Rch(4.2 K)37, and the nature of impurities at the grain boundaries can further affect spin transport in CVD graphene. The grain size in the CVD graphene employed here was found to lie between 1 and 10 μm with median grain size 2 μm over a large scale. We also note that the grain concentration varied from device to device (as the device dimensions are comparable to the grain size, especially for shorter channels). In spite of this, we obtained a fairly linear dependence of resistance with length of the channel (shown in Fig. 2d), indicating a low contribution of grain boundary scattering to the resistance. In addition, the low mean free path further indicates the dominance of intra-grain scattering to the momentum relaxation and thus the spin relaxation. Such intra-grain scattering can be attributed to substrate-induced disorder effects and defects induced during transfer process39,45. The interface resistance (Ri) of the ferromagnetic tunnel contacts obtained from three-terminal measurements was found to be 4–5 kΩ at room temperature. Figure 2e shows typical nonlinear tunnelling current–voltage (I–V) characteristics of a TiO2/Co contact with weak temperature dependence. The corresponding differential conductance in Fig. 2f also shows a minimum at zero voltage at all the temperatures. These characteristics indicate the dominating tunnelling transport in Co/TiO2/graphene contacts47. The contact resistances Ri are found to be of the order of the square resistance of graphene channel RSq (see Supplementary Fig. 2) and can circumvent the conductivity mismatch problem48,49 for spin injection.

Long-distance spin transport and precession in CVD graphene

To demonstrate the long-distance spin transport in CVD graphene, systematic measurements were performed on various channel lengths extending up to 16 μm. The spin valve and Hanle precession measurements were carried out in four-terminal NL configurations (as depicted in Fig. 3). Spin-polarized electrons are electrically injected from the ferromagnetic tunnel contact in the current circuit, which diffuse in the graphene channel and are detected by the NL voltage circuit. The isolated current and voltage circuits in the NL configuration ensure measurement of pure spin signals without spurious charge-related magneto-resistive contributions from ferromagnetic contacts or graphene channel. For an NL spin signal V=VNL measured at the detector (Det) with respect to reference electrode, an NL resistance is defined as RNL=VNL/I, with I being the current through the injector (Inj). A change in the magnetization configuration of the injector (Inj) and detector (Det) ferromagnets from parallel (↑↑ or ↓↓) to antiparallel (↑↓ or ↓↑) alignment leads to a spin valve signal change ΔVNL, characterized by an NL resistance change ΔRNLVNL/I. It is a measure of the spin splitting (Δμ=μμ, with μ and μ being the chemical potentials of up (↑) and down (↓) spins, respectively) present in the graphene channel under the detector contact. The different shape anisotropies of the ferromagnets (Inj and Det) ensure different switching fields for the observation of spin valve signal by sweeping an in-plane magnetic field B. In Fig. 3a, we show the spin valve signal obtained on a graphene channel with L =16 μm at room temperature and a gate voltage Vg=0 V. Spin valve signals with clear switching in such long channels have not been observed before in any form of pristine graphene on conventional Si/SiO2 substrates at room temperature. The spin signals for channel lengths beyond 16 μm were dominated by noise in our measurements.

Figure 3: Long-distance spin transport in CVD graphene device at room temperature.

(a) NL spin valve signal with channel length L=16 μm with in-plane magnetic field (B) sweep as depicted in the figure. The high and low values of NL resistance RNL correspond to the parallel (↑↑ or ↓↓) and antiparallel (↑↓ or ↓↑) configurations of the ferromagnetic injector (Inj) and detector (Det) electrodes, respectively. The blue and red colours indicate the direction of magnetic field sweep as represented by the arrows with respective colours. (b) NL Hanle spin precession signal obtained by a perpendicular magnetic field (B) sweep in parallel configuration (↑↑) of ferromagnetic electrodes for L=16 μm graphene channel. The raw data points are fitted with the Hanle equation, to extract spin lifetime τs and spin diffusion constant Ds.

We further establish the spin transport in such long channels and evaluate the spin parameters through NL Hanle spin precession measurements (Fig. 3b). In the Hanle geometry, although the ferromagnetic electrodes are kept parallel, the injected spins undergo Larmor precession (frequency ; Landé g-factor g=2) about the perpendicular magnetic field (B) resulting in a modulation of the detected spin signal. To evaluate the spin parameters (signal amplitude ΔRNL, lifetime τs, diffusion length λs, diffusion constant Ds), we fit the data with the empirical formula Eq. (1) encompassing the spin diffusion, precession and dephasing contributions9,11,13.

where L is the effective channel length between the injector and the detector in our devices. The width W of the graphene channel is 5 μm and the measured graphene square conductivity σs200 μS. At 300 K, for Vg=0 and L=16 μm, we obtain a spin lifetime of τs=1.23±0.101 ns with spin diffusion constant Ds=0.0264±0.002 m2 s−1, yielding a spin diffusion length λs6 μm. These values are the highest spin parameters achieved so far in CVD graphene and also in any form of pristine graphene on SiO2/Si substrate at room temperature. The parameters are also higher than the reports of high-quality exfoliated graphene on h-BN substrate2 or suspended devices15,26 and comparable to the most recent h-BN encapsulated high-quality exfoliated graphene devices27,28.

Channel length dependence of the spin signal

Systematic NL measurements were performed on various channel lengths L=2–16 μm at room temperature. Figure 4a shows representative spin valve and Hanle measurements for channel lengths of 4, 6 and 12 μm. The NL spin valve resistance ΔRNL is found to decrease for increasing channel lengths, from 4 Ω in L=2 μm to 20 mΩ in L=16 μm at room temperature. Figure 4b presents the corresponding Hanle data measured for different channels along with fits to equation (1). The extracted spin parameters from Hanle fits are found to be in the range of τs=0.4–1.2 ns, Ds=0.018–0.026 m2 s−1 and λs3–6 μm for various channel lengths with Vg=40 V at room temperature (see Supplementary Table 1). Note that for each channel the charge diffusion constants (Dc) evaluated from the Dirac curves matched reasonably well with the spin diffusion constants (Ds), which supports our current analysis. Although at a constant carrier density, small disparity and variations between the Dc and Ds are observed, including device to device variation, but the differences are very close and well within affordable limits (Dc=0.022±0.005) as widely reported2,10,20. We observe higher values of extracted τs and λs for longer graphene channels as presented in Fig. 4c. Notably, the longer channels increase the diffusion time, ensuring a higher accuracy in probing the graphene channel properties and hence the spin parameters. Such devices with longer channels also reduce the effect of contacts and dimensionality problems that can lead to possible underestimation of spin parameters50,51.

Figure 4: Channel length-dependent spin transport in CVD graphene.

(a) Spin valve measurements in device with different graphene channel lengths at room temperature and Vg=0 V. (b) Hanle spin precession measurements at room temperature in device with different graphene channel lengths along with fitting with equation (1) and extracted spin parameters τs and Ds at Vg=40 V. (c) Spin lifetime τs and spin diffusion length λs with graphene channel L=2–16 μm at Vg=0 (blue circles) and 40 V (red circles) at room temperature as extracted from the Hanle fitting. (d) Length dependence of the spin signal and scaling fit () to spin signal for graphene channel L=2–6 μm on a device using one injection contact at 100 and 300 K for Vg=0 V.

To avoid any ambiguity, we also evaluated the spin parameters in an alternative way from the length dependence of the spin signal . Figure 4d shows the length dependence of the ΔRNL for L=2–6 μm graphene channels at 300 and 100 K for Vg=0 V. It has to be noted that the measurements with L=2–6 μm belong to a single device with the same contact being used for spin injection. With a fairly good uniformity in the electronic quality of our CVD graphene over a large area, we obtained spin diffusion lengths λs=8.5 and 6.3 μm at 100 and 300 K, respectively. We did not consider devices having different injector contacts or devices from different batches of fabrication, as they might lead to uncertainty arising out of varied contact properties. The spin diffusion length obtained here complements the results of the Hanle measurements (λs6 μm) for the longest channel fairly well.

Temperature and carrier density dependence of spin parameters

We now present the detailed temperature and gate-dependent measurements showing the evolution of the spin transport in CVD graphene. The temperature dependence of spin parameters in devices with different channel lengths (shown in Fig. 5a,b) indicates an increase in ΔRNL and τs at lower temperatures. Such increase has also been observed in previous studies on exfoliated graphene crystals11. Similarly, enhancement of ΔRNL and τs are also observed with increase in applied gate voltage Vg (increased carrier concentration n in graphene) as displayed in Fig. 5c,d. Increased carrier concentrations can effectively reduce the spin–orbit coupling in graphene on SiO2 substrate, as theoretically proposed recently52. This can significantly reduce the spin flip scattering and enhance the spin lifetime as observed in our devices. Such enhancement of ΔRNL and τs can also be attributed to the competition between the resistances of graphene channel Rch and the tunnel contacts Ri, as Rch is observed to decrease with gate voltage. A high Ri is expected to prevent back diffusion of spins into the ferromagnet and faster spin relaxation48. The observed enhancement in ΔRNL and τs in our case is in agreement with behaviour expected for relatively low resistive tunnel barriers (RiRch)10,53. In addition, recent theoretical results based on spin–pseudo spin interaction in graphene also show reduction of spin parameter at low energy (closer to Dirac point)54. In convergence with theoretical predictions, the increasing trends of ΔRNL and τs were reproducibly observed in all CVD graphene channels in our study. These observations also clearly indicate that the spin parameters at room temperature can be further enhanced with higher carrier density in graphene, which can be achieved by using ultra-thin gate dielectrics on graphene channels. The data presented here were measured using an injection current of 30 μA. No significant variation of either the ΔRNL or τs was detected for bias currents in the range 5–50 μA.

Figure 5: Temperature and carrier density dependence of spin parameters.

(a,b) Temperature (T) dependence of spin signal ΔRNL and spin lifetime τs at Vg=0 for different graphene channel lengths. (c,d) Carrier density (n) dependence of spin signal ΔRNL and spin lifetime τs at room temperature. Carrier density (n) of graphene channel are controlled by application of back gate voltage (Vg) in the range of −40 V to +40 V. Colours represent the channel lengths: L=4 μm (blue), 6 μm (green), 12 μm (red) and 16 μm (black).


The observation of long distance spin transport (L=16 μm) and enhanced spin parameters (λs=6 μm and τs1.2 ns) in CVD graphene on SiO2/Si substrate with reasonable mobility (μ2,000 cm2 V−1 s−1) is quite striking and beyond expectations. It is also contrary to the conventional belief that such spin transport can only be realized in high-mobility single crystal graphene devices, structures with suspended schemes15,26, h-BN substrate2 and encapsulation27,28 schemes. However, the experimental outcomes2,15,26 and recent theories do indicate that the SiO2 substrate should not affect the spin parameters significantly55,56. It has also been demonstrated that a variation of mobility does not alter the observed spin lifetimes in graphene57. The ripples or wrinkles, which the CVD graphene features, are predicted and seen to weakly affect the spin parameters43,44. Corrugations and flexural distortions are also seen to set only the upper limit of spin lifetime in graphene44. Such extrinsic factors and in-plane defects predominantly show Elliot–Yafet (EY) relaxation58 signature in graphene as reported previously11,12. However, the substrate disorder and surface ad-atoms56 can locally enhance the Rashba spin–orbit coupling, leading to a substantial contribution of D’yakonov–Perel (DP) mechanism of spin relaxation52. A simple analysis of the dependence of spin relaxation time τs on momentum relaxation time τp (see Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 3) shows the contribution of both EY and DP mechanisms for spin relaxation in CVD graphene, which is similar to the latest study on exfoliated graphene2. However, we acknowledge that such phenomenological analysis on experimental data is far from theoretical perspectives and the microscopic origin of spin relaxation mechanisms in graphene still needs to be uncovered5. The primary source of spin relaxation remains an open question, as both EY and DP mechanism suggest theoretical τs in the microsecond range3,58,59 in contrast to the τs1 ns observed here and other graphene experiments. Instead, the recently proposed spin-flip exchange field from magnetic moments of impurity atoms or vacancies and magnetic impurities trapped at grain boundaries60,61 can provide faster spin relaxation and can lead to practical τs1 ns, as observed in our experiments. More recently, for further understanding of spin relaxation in graphene in general, spin–orbit-induced entanglement of spin and pseudospin leading to spin relaxation in quasi-ballistic transport regime has also been proposed54. In addition to these proposed mechanisms, the role of ferromagnetic contacts and channel length as observed in our experiments should also be considered in theory for a more quantitative and precise understanding of spin relaxation in graphene62.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated long-distance spin transport in CVD graphene channels with enhanced spin diffusion length and lifetime at room temperature. Employing 16-μm-long graphene channels, we observed a spin diffusion length 6 μm and spin lifetimes up to 1.2 ns at room temperature. The spin signal and lifetime showed further enhancements at higher gate voltages and lower temperatures. The spin parameters obtained in our experiments are up to six times higher than previous reports on CVD graphene and are also the highest reported values for any form of pristine graphene on SiO2 substrate at room temperature. The comprehensive measurements and analysis showing enhanced spin parameters with graphene channel length give a further insight into the effect of contacts in spin relaxation. The accomplishment of long-distance superior spin transport in wafer-scale CVD graphene on SiO2 substrate makes this study a vital step for future graphene spintronics technologies. With the recent reports of high-quality wafer-scale mono-domain CVD graphene63 and the possibility to grow all CVD graphene/h-BN-encapsulated heterostructures, the spintronic functionalities in CVD graphene can take a giant leap in the near future. Our results will proliferate the development of long-distance spin communication in devices and circuits based on CVD graphene channels.


Device Fabrication

The CVD graphene spintronic devices are prepared on doped Si wafer with a thermally grown 285-nm-thick SiO2 layer. The commercially procured CVD graphene (from Graphenea) was transferred onto the Si/SiO2 substrate using a thicker polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-assisted wet transfer process18. The CVD graphene was then patterned by optical lithography into long stripes (20–30 μm) and the rest of the graphene was etched away by oxygen plasma with 50 W power for 30 s. This was followed by annealing in Ar/H2 atmosphere at 400 °C, to remove possible resist residues. Ferromagnetic tunnel contacts (Co/TiO2) were fabricated on the CVD graphene stripes with long channel lengths having multiple spacing (L=2–20 μm) for studying the length dependence of the spin signal. The patterning for the ferromagnetic tunnel contacts was done by electron beam lithography. The layer of 8-Å-thick TiO2 tunnel barrier was achieved by a twofold deposition of 4 Å Ti by electron beam evaporation and oxidation in oxygen atmosphere. Subsequently, a layer of 65 nm Co was deposited and capped with 4 nm Al. The Al oxidizes to form a native AlOx to protect the oxidation of Co contacts.

Characterization of CVD graphene

Atomic force microscope and Raman spectroscopy on the patterned CVD graphene were performed to optimize the fabrication process and ensure minimal residue accumulation during the processing. The quality of the TiO2/Co tunnel contacts was confirmed by three-terminal DC electrical measurements. The tunnel contacts showed resistances in the range 4–5 kΩ at room temperature, with a weak increase at 4.2 K. Gate voltage sweeps were done using a Keithley 2400 source meter in the range of ±40 V, to evaluate the square resistance and carrier mobility of graphene.

Spin transport measurements

Spin transport measurements in spin valve and Hanle configurations were performed using Keithley current source and nano-voltmeter in a variable temperature cryostat in liquid He/N2 temperatures with a superconducting/electro magnets. We observed NL spin valve resistance (ΔRNL) in the range 0.004–10 Ω, depending on the channel length, temperature and gate voltage. Evidence of spin signals for CVD graphene channel lengths longer than 16 μm, although found, were masked by the noise levels in our measurements.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Kamalakar, M. V. et al. Long-distance spin communication in chemical vapour-deposited graphene. Nat. Commun. 6:6766 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7766 (2015).


  1. 1

    Geim, A. K. & Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 6, 183–191 (2007) .

  2. 2

    Zomer, P. J., Guimarães, M. H. D., Tombros, N. & van Wees, B. J. Long-distance spin transport in high-mobility graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. B 86, 161416 (2012) .

  3. 3

    Huertas-Hernando, D., Guinea, F. & Brataas, A. Spin-orbit coupling in curved graphene, fullerenes, nanotubes, and nanotube caps. Phys. Rev. B 74, 155426 (2006) .

  4. 4

    Pesin, D. & MacDonald, A. H. Spintronics and pseudospintronics in graphene and topological insulators. Nat. Mater. 11, 409–416 (2012) .

  5. 5

    Han, W., Kawakami, R. K., Gmitra, M. & Fabian, J. Graphene spintronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 324–340 (2014) .

  6. 6

    Dery, H., Dalal, P., Cywiński, Ł. & Sham, L. J. Spin-based logic in semiconductors for reconfigurable large-scale circuits. Nature 447, 573–576 (2007) .

  7. 7

    Lin, C. -C. et al. Spin transfer torque in a graphene lateral spin valve assisted by an external magnetic field. Nano Lett. 13, 5177–5181 (2013) .

  8. 8

    Žutić, I. & Das Sarma, S. Spintronics: fundamentals and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323–410 (2004) .

  9. 9

    Tombros, N., Jozsa, C., Popinciuc, M., Jonkman, H. T. & van Wees, B. J. Electronic spin transport and spin precession in single graphene layers at room temperature. Nature 448, 571–574 (2007) .

  10. 10

    Han, W. et al. Tunneling spin injection into single layer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 167202 (2010) .

  11. 11

    Han, W. & Kawakami, R. K. Spin relaxation in single-layer and bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 047207 (2011) .

  12. 12

    Avsar, A. et al. Towards wafer scale fabrication of graphene based spin valve devices. Nano Lett. 11, 2363–2368 (2011) .

  13. 13

    Shiraishi, M. et al. Robustness of spin polarization in graphene-based spin valves. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 3711–3716 (2009) .

  14. 14

    Ohishi, M. et al. Spin injection into a graphene thin film at room temperature. Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 46, L605–L607 (2007) .

  15. 15

    Neumann, I. et al. Electrical detection of spin precession in freely suspended graphene spin valves on cross-linked poly(methyl methacrylate). Small 9, 156–160 (2013) .

  16. 16

    Han, W. et al. Electron-hole asymmetry of spin injection and transport in single-layer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 137205 (2009) .

  17. 17

    Dankert, A., Kamalakar, M. V., Bergsten, J. & Dash, S. P. Spin transport and precession in graphene measured by nonlocal and three-terminal methods. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 192403 (2014) .

  18. 18

    Kamalakar, M. V., Dankert, A., Bergsten, J., Ive, T. & Dash, S. P. Enhanced tunnel spin injection into graphene using chemical vapor deposited hexagonal boron nitride. Sci. Rep. 4, 6146 (2014) .

  19. 19

    Volmer, F. et al. Role of MgO barriers for spin and charge transport in Co/MgO/graphene nonlocal spin-valve devices. Phys. Rev. B 88, 161405 (2013) .

  20. 20

    Wojtaszek, M., Vera-Marun, I. J., Maassen, T. & van Wees, B. J. Enhancement of spin relaxation time in hydrogenated graphene spin-valve devices. Phys. Rev. B 87, 081402 (2013) .

  21. 21

    Balakrishnan, J., Kok Wai Koon, G., Jaiswal, M., Castro Neto, A. H. & Özyilmaz, B. Colossal enhancement of spin–orbit coupling in weakly hydrogenated graphene. Nat. Phys. 9, 1–4 (2013) .

  22. 22

    McCreary, K. M., Swartz, A. G., Han, W., Fabian, J. & Kawakami, R. K. Magnetic moment formation in graphene detected by scattering of pure spin currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 186604 (2012) .

  23. 23

    Dlubak, B. et al. Highly efficient spin transport in epitaxial graphene on SiC. Nat. Phys. 8, 557–561 (2012) .

  24. 24

    Maassen, T. et al. Long spin relaxation times in wafer scale epitaxial graphene on SiC(0001). Nano Lett. 12, 1498–1502 (2012) .

  25. 25

    Birkner, B. et al. Annealing-induced magnetic moments detected by spin precession measurements in epitaxial graphene on SiC. Phys. Rev. B 87, 081405 (2013) .

  26. 26

    Guimarães, M. H. D. et al. Spin transport in high-quality suspended graphene devices. Nano Lett. 12, 3512–3517 (2012) .

  27. 27

    Drögeler, M. et al. Nanosecond spin lifetimes in single and few-layer graphene-hBN heterostructures at room temperature. Nano Lett. 14, 6050–6055 (2014) .

  28. 28

    Guimarães, M. H. D. et al. Controlling spin relaxation in hexagonal bn-encapsulated graphene with a transverse electric field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 086602 (2014) .

  29. 29

    Li, X. et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 324, 1312–1314 (2009) .

  30. 30

    Kim, K. S. et al. Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 457, 706–710 (2009) .

  31. 31

    Muñoz, R. & Gómez-Aleixandre, C. Review of CVD synthesis of graphene. Chem. Vap. Depos. 19, 297–322 (2013) .

  32. 32

    Zhou, H. et al. Chemical vapour deposition growth of large single crystals of monolayer and bilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 4, 2096 (2013) .

  33. 33

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 490, 192–200 (2012) .

  34. 34

    Dery, H. et al. Nanospintronics based on magnetologic gates. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 59, 259–262 (2012) .

  35. 35

    Yazyev, O. V & Louie, S. G. Electronic transport in polycrystalline graphene. Nat. Mater. 9, 806–809 (2010) .

  36. 36

    Song, H. S. et al. Origin of the relatively low transport mobility of graphene grown through chemical vapor deposition. Sci. Rep. 2, 337 (2012) .

  37. 37

    Cummings, A. W. et al. Charge transport in polycrystalline graphene: challenges and opportunities. Adv. Mater. 26, 5079–5094 (2014) .

  38. 38

    Roche, S. et al. Quantum transport in disordered graphene: a theoretical perspective. Solid State Commun. 152, 1404–1410 (2012) .

  39. 39

    Van Tuan, D. et al. Scaling properties of charge transport in polycrystalline graphene. Nano Lett. 13, 1730–1735 (2013) .

  40. 40

    Wojtaszek, M., Vera-Marun, I. J., Whiteway, E., Hilke, M. & van Wees, B. J. Absence of hyperfine effects in C-13 graphene spin-valve devices. Phys. Rev. B 89, 035417 (2014) .

  41. 41

    Fu, W., Makk, P., Maurand, R., Bräuninger, M. & Schönenberger, C. Large-scale BN tunnel barriers for graphene spintronics. J. Appl. Phys. 116, 074306 (2014) .

  42. 42

    Friedman, A. L., van ’t Erve, O. M. J., Li, C. H., Robinson, J. T. & Jonker, B. T. Homoepitaxial tunnel barriers with functionalized graphene-on-graphene for charge and spin transport. Nat. Commun. 5, 3161 (2014) .

  43. 43

    Huertas-Hernando, D., Guinea, F. & Brataas, A. Spin relaxation times in disordered graphene. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 148, 177–181 (2007) .

  44. 44

    Fratini, S., Gosálbez-Martínez, D., Merodio Cámara, P. & Fernández-Rossier, J. Anisotropic intrinsic spin relaxation in graphene due to flexural distortions. Phys. Rev. B 88, 115426 (2013) .

  45. 45

    Ogawa, Y. et al. Structure and transport properties of the interface between CVD-grown graphene domains. Nanoscale 6, 7288–7294 (2014) .

  46. 46

    Eckmann, A. et al. Probing the nature of defects in graphene by Raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 12, 3925–3930 (2012) .

  47. 47

    Jo¨nsson-A˚kerman, B. J. et al. Reliability of normal-state current–voltage characteristics as an indicator of tunnel-junction barrier quality. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1870–1872 (2000) .

  48. 48

    Fert, A. & Jaffrès, H. Conditions for efficient spin injection from a ferromagnetic metal into a semiconductor. Phys. Rev. B 64, 184420 (2001) .

  49. 49

    Rashba, E. I. Theory of electrical spin injection: tunnel contacts as a solution of the conductivity mismatch problem. Phys. Rev. B 62, R16267–R16270 (2000) .

  50. 50

    Maassen, T., Vera-Marun, I. J., Guimarães, M. H. D. & van Wees, B. J. Contact-induced spin relaxation in Hanle spin precession measurements. Phys. Rev. B 86, 235408 (2012) .

  51. 51

    Wojtaszek, M., Vera-Marun, I. J. & van Wees, B. J. Transition between one-dimensional and zero-dimensional spin transport studied by Hanle precession. Phys. Rev. B 89, 245427 (2014) .

  52. 52

    Zhang, P. & Wu, M. W. Electron spin relaxation in graphene with random Rashba field: comparison of the D’yakonov–Perel' and Elliott–Yafet-like mechanisms. New J. Phys. 14, 033015 (2012) .

  53. 53

    Takahashi, S. & Maekawa, S. Spin injection and detection in magnetic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B 67, 052409 (2003) .

  54. 54

    Van Tuan, D., Ortmann, F., Soriano, D., Valenzuela, S. O. & Roche, S. Pseudospin-driven spin relaxation mechanism in graphene. Nat. Phys. 10, 857–863 (2014) .

  55. 55

    Ertler, C., Konschuh, S., Gmitra, M. & Fabian, J. Electron spin relaxation in graphene: the role of the substrate. Phys. Rev. B 80, 041405 (2009) .

  56. 56

    Fedorov, D. et al. Impact of electron-impurity scattering on the spin relaxation time in graphene: a first-principles study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 156602 (2013) .

  57. 57

    Han, W. et al. Spin relaxation in single-layer graphene with tunable mobility. Nano Lett. 12, 3443–3447 (2012) .

  58. 58

    Ochoa, H., Castro Neto, A. H. & Guinea, F. Elliot-Yafet mechanism in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 206808 (2012) .

  59. 59

    Huertas-Hernando, D., Guinea, F. & Brataas, A. Spin-orbit-mediated spin relaxation in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 146801 (2009) .

  60. 60

    Kochan, D., Gmitra, M. & Fabian, J. Spin relaxation mechanism in graphene: resonant scattering by magnetic impurities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 116602 (2014) .

  61. 61

    Lundeberg, M., Yang, R., Renard, J. & Folk, J. Defect-mediated spin relaxation and dephasing in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 156601 (2013) .

  62. 62

    Roche, S. & Valenzuela, S. O. Graphene spintronics: puzzling controversies and challenges for spin manipulation. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 47, 094011 (2014) .

  63. 63

    Lee, J.-H. et al. Wafer-scale growth of single-crystal monolayer graphene on reusable hydrogen-terminated germanium. Science 344, 286–289 (2014) .

Download references


We acknowledge the support from colleagues of Quantum Device Physics Laboratory and Nanofabrication Laboratory at Chalmers University of Technology. We thank Jaroslav Fabian, M.H. Diniz Guimarães and I.J. Vera Marun for insightful discussions. This research is financially supported by Nano Area of Advance programme at the Chalmers University of Technology, EU FP7 Marie Curie Career Integration Grant and Swedish Research Council Young Researcher Grant.

Author information

M.V.K. fabricated and measured most of the devices. C.G., A.D. and S.P.D. fabricated and measured some devices. M.V.K. and S.P.D. conceived the idea, designed the experiments and analysed the data. S.P.D. supervised the research. M.V.K. and S.P.D. wrote the manuscript with inputs from all co-authors. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Correspondence to M. Venkata Kamalakar or Saroj P. Dash.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-3, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Notes 1-2 and Supplementary References (PDF 414 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamalakar, M., Groenveld, C., Dankert, A. et al. Long distance spin communication in chemical vapour deposited graphene. Nat Commun 6, 6766 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7766

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.